Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0036341 (schizophrenia)
60,220 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The PANSS scale, first proposed by Kay et al. (1987) and translated into French is an evaluation scale of 30 disparate items scored from 1 to 7 for psychopathological symptoms observed in patients presenting psychotic syndromes, especially schizophrenic states. A semi-structured interview (translated into French by J.P. Lindenmayer) and precise definition of the different degrees of symptomatic, severity make it possible to obtain satisfactory between-assessor and test-retest fidelity. Three scores obtained with this evaluation tool are generally calculated for evaluating three dimensions of the syndrome: positive, negative and general psychopathology, as part of a categorial or dimensional perspective. The main studies validating the PANSS scale have involved several factorial analyses and comparison with data obtained using other schizophrenia scales such as Nancy Andreasen's SANS and SAPS scales. The three main factors isolated correspond to the clinical dimensions: positive, negative and "disorganization". Currently, the PANSS scale is being used increasingly more often. It allows study of the symptomatic profile in a wide population of psychotic patients and evaluation of the prognostic influence of positive and negative dimensions. It does however appear to be susceptible to change. Recent research projects are attempting to confirm initial findings and to analyse the general relevance of the reference conceptual model used by the authors.
...
PMID:[The PANSS (Positive And Negative Symptom) Scale]. 927 5

Information processing deficits were explored in a large cohort of schizophrenia patients (N = 125) and non-psychiatric subjects (N = 52). Gender, medication status and symptom factors were assessed relative to measures of performance in critical stimulus duration (CSD), visual backward masking (VBM) and auditory reaction time (RT) paradigms. Schizophrenia patients exhibited significant impairments in measures of CSD, VBM and both RT speed and RT set. Females in both groups had inflated CSDs relative to males. Female schizophrenia patients showed slower RTs and elevated RT set scores, but comparable VBM performance, when compared to males. This gender difference was not observed in the non-psychiatric subjects. To test the hypothesis that impaired performance in the VBM and RT paradigms would be related to negative symptoms and thought disorder, regression analyses were performed using factor scores derived from a factor analysis of SANS and SAPS items that generated three symptom factors: negative, disorganized, and reality distortion. Significant variance in performance on VBM and RT measures was accounted for only by the negative symptom factor. We conclude that VBM and RT assess information processing deficits in schizophrenia patients that are more related to the negative versus positive or disorganized symptoms of schizophrenia. It is possible that VBM and RT share overlapping or interacting neural substrates.
...
PMID:Information processing deficits of schizophrenia patients: relationship to clinical ratings, gender and medication status. 942 64

This study evaluated the prevalence and clinical correlates of abnormal subjective experiences across functional psychotic disorders. Patients were recruited from consecutive admissions with the following diagnoses; schizophrenia (n = 40), schizophreniform disorder (n = 40), schizoaffective disorder (n = 21), mood disorder (n = 18), brief reactive psychosis (n = 15), and atypical psychosis (n = 16). Subjective experiences were assessed using the Frankfurt Complaint Questionnaire (FCQ), and the clinical status was assessed with the Scales for the Assessment of Positive and Negative Symptoms (SAPS and SANS) and the Manual for the Assessment and Documentation of Psychopathology (AMDP). Neither the FCQ total score nor individual subjective experiences displayed significant differences across diagnoses. When the clinical predictors of subjective experiences were studied by multiple regression analyses, a different pattern resulted for individual psychotic disorders. In schizophrenic patients, subjective experiences were predicted by female gender, euphoria, lack of insight, greater illness severity, and more positive symptoms. The only predictors of subjective experiences in the schizophreniform disorder group were the negative symptoms. Within the affective disorders group, subjective experiences had no clinical predictors.
...
PMID:Subjective experiences in psychotic disorders: diagnostic value and clinical correlates. 947 50

Seventy DSM-III schizophrenic patients were assessed for positive and negative symptoms using Andreasen's scales for the assessment of positive and negative symptoms (SANS and SAPS) on admission. The correlation structure of the items in the SANS and SAPS was explored in dimension and item levels by use of correlation plots through a distinct analytical method displaying the proximity matrix. The results revealed at least three major dimensions of symptoms delineated as Negative Symptoms, Disorganized Thoughts and Delusions and Hallucinations. The latter two dimensions were derived from the SAPS, while Negative Symptoms comprised most of the items in the SANS. Items in Disorganized Thoughts were more correlated to Negative Symptoms than to the other items in the SAPS. 'Loss of ego boundary' delusions and experience of auditory hallucinations appeared as two sub-clusters in the group of Delusions and Hallucinations. The relative independence of persecutory, grandiose, religious, somatic and reference delusions gives support to the concept that paranoid schizophrenia stands as a distinct clinical subtype of schizophrenia. The graphical method introduced here well expresses the information of correlation matrix and is useful for exploring inter-item or inter-cluster associations.
...
PMID:Psychopathological dimensions in schizophrenia: a correlational approach to items of the SANS and SAPS. 954 Nov 48

Beside the syndromic dichotomy (negative-positive), other symptomatic dimensions have been described in schizophrenia. A question of interest is, therefore, to know which symptom structures can be individualized to characterize schizophrenia. Using confirmatory factor analysis in 135 patients, a two-factor model (negative-positive), a three-factor model (negative-positive-disorganization) and a four-factor model (negative-positive-disorganization-relational) were primarily identified with SANS (Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms) and SAPS (Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms). In contrast, no models could be identified with PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale). The results confirm the relevance of other syndrome dimensions, beside the negative and positive ones and suggest that SANS-SAPS was more useful than PANSS in identifying an adequate dimensional factor structure of schizophrenic symptoms.
...
PMID:Symptom structure in schizophrenia: two-, three- or four-factor models? 963 41

The benzamide amisulpride (ASP) is a selective D2-like dopamine antagonist, while flupentixol (FPX), a thioxanthene, blocks D2-like, D1-like and 5-HT2 receptors. To evaluate efficacy and safety of ASP and to investigate the importance of an additional D1-like antagonism for antipsychotic effects and extrapyramidal tolerability, a randomized double-blind multi- center study versus FPX as reference drug was performed for 6 weeks in 132 patients suffering from acute schizophrenia (DSM-III-R) with predominant positive symptomatology. Doses were initially fixed (ASP: 1000 mg/day; FPX: 25 mg/day) but could be reduced by 40% in case of side effects (mean daily doses: ASP: 956 mg; FPX: 22.6 mg). Intention-to-treat evaluation demonstrated significant improvement under both medications. The difference between the mean BPRS decreases of both treatment groups was 5.6 points (95% CI: 0.55; 10.65) in favour of ASP. According to CGI, 62% of patients in either drug group were treatment responders. ANCOVA analysis showed that reductions of BPRS (ASP: -42%; FPX: -32%) and SAPS (ASP: -78%; FPX: -65%) were more pronounced under ASP. Due to adverse events, significantly fewer ASP patients (6%) were withdrawn from the study (FPX: 18%). Extrapyramidal tolerability was better in the ASP group, as demonstrated by smaller increases in the Simpson-Angus Scale, the AIMS, and the Barnes Akathisia Scale in ANCOVA analyses with dosage as covariate. ASP appears to be as effective as FPX with regard to antipsychotic effects on positive schizophrenic symptomatology, while extrapyramidal tolerability is better. These conclusions have to be drawn cautiously, as dosage effects on outcome parameters cannot be entirely ruled out. The present results question the notion that additional blockade of D1-like receptors may be necessary to achieve sufficient antipsychotic effects or to improve extrapyramidal tolerability.
...
PMID:Amisulpride versus flupentixol in schizophrenia with predominantly positive symptomatology -- a double-blind controlled study comparing a selective D2-like antagonist to a mixed D1-/D2-like antagonist. The Amisulpride Study Group. 968 99

Diagnostic and symptomatological profiles of schizophrenic syndromes diagnosed according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV were compared. For this reason a group of patients fulfilling at least one of these sets of criteria was created and then diagnostic and symptomatological profile was compared between those who fulfilled the ICD-10 and those who fulfilled DSM-IV criteria. 105 inpatients hospitalized in acute phase of their first or one of consecutive episodes were included--102 of them had fulfilled ICD-10, and 90 DSM-IV criteria of schizophrenia. Diagnostic concordance between the two systems of criteria was high (83%). Differentiation of diagnostic profile (i.e. difference between frequency of fulfilling the specific requirements of ICD-10 or DSM-IV criteria) of the symptoms in these two groups was not significant, expert of 6-month criterion of duration of illness, which was significantly less frequently valid in ICD-10 syndromes group. A comparison of symptomatological profiles (i.e. frequency and intensity of symptoms) of schizophrenic syndromes diagnosed by ICD-10 or DSM-IV criteria and described by several rating scales (PANSS, SAPS/SANS, KOSS-S) did not show any significant differences. Results suggested that despite of different ways of defining the schizophrenic syndromes in both diagnostic systems, disorders manifested in the groups of patients created by means of them are very similar in psychopathological picture. This seems to be a significant change in comparison to more prominent differences contrasting the previous versions of the diagnostic systems (i.e. ICD-9 and DSM-III-R).
...
PMID:[Psychopathological profile of acute schizophrenic syndromes diagnosed according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria]. 973 78

While the P50 component (50-60-ms latency) of the auditory evoked potential has been reported as abnormal in schizophrenia, few studies have examined the relationship between this abnormality and clinical or neuropsychological measures. To examine these possible relationships, mid-latency auditory evoked potentials were recorded at the CZ recording site of 47 patients with schizophrenia in response to binaural clicks presented at three stimulus rates: 1, 5 and 10/sec. A sub-sample of patients were then divided into high- (n = 15) and low-P50 abnormality (n = 16) groups based on a median split of the P50 amplitude at a rate of 10/sec (a greater amplitude at this rate suggests a greater abnormality in recovery) of the entire sample. Only those patients with complete neuropsychological and clinical data and who were reasonably matched on demographic dimensions were included. A multivariate analysis of variance of 11 neuropsychological function profile scores showed a significant group x global score interaction (Hotelling t = 3.97, p < 0.005). The high-abnormality group had relatively greater deficits for attention profile scores than for the remaining neuropsychological measures. An analysis of global subscores for SAPS and SANS clinical measures revealed a significant difference only for the SANS attention subscale (p < 0.05). The high-abnormality group was rated as more severe on the attention measure. These convergent findings across both phenomenological and neuropsychological measures suggest that abnormalities in P50 recovery may be linked to deficits in attention processes in schizophrenia.
...
PMID:P50 abnormalities in schizophrenia: relationship to clinical and neuropsychological indices of attention. 978 8

Among the reasons for the relatively limited number of investigations of self-knowledge phenomena should be included, in addition to theoretical motives, the difficulties regarding the use of instruments available for this kind of approach and their content validity. This study investigates the relationship between subjective and objective deficits in schizophrenia, taking into account subjective experiences of cognitive impairment, clinical symptoms, and cognitive evoked potentials (P300 component). A group of 36 young schizophrenic patients (29 on neuroleptic treatment and seven drug-naive) were considered, together with a comparison group of 36 healthy subjects. Auditory event-correlated potentials (ERPs) were obtained using a simple "oddball" paradigm. Clinical symptoms were rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Scales for the Assessment of Positive and Negative Symptoms (SAPS and SANS), and while subjective disturbances were assessed by the Frankfurter Beschwerde Fragebogen (FBF, also called the Complaint Questionnaire). Correlation analysis showed that P300 amplitude was inversely correlated with subjective experiences of cognitive deficit, especially in the area of automatic skills and overstimulation. No relationship emerged between BPRS, SANS, and SAPS scores and P300 alterations. The results suggest that subjective cognitive disturbances, more than objective symptoms, are related to P300 alterations in schizophrenia, and that the FBF questionnaire appropriately covers the domain of schizophrenic cognitive disorders.
...
PMID:Basic symptoms and P300 abnormalities in young schizophrenic patients. 1050 19

Recently, there has been a great deal of interest in understanding the latent organisation of the phenomenology of schizophrenia through examination of the fit of dimensional models to observed symptoms date. A group of 66 DSM-IV paranoid schizophrenic in-patients were assessed three times using the SAPS, SANS, BPRS and PAS. The interrelations between individual symptoms of each scale were examined by means of principal component analysis. The results of factor analysis of the findings from SANS and SAPS confirm the three-factor model, composed of a negative, disorganisation and psychotic factor. Extending the range of symptomatology using BPRS resulted in a five-factor model, composed of the following factors: paranoid, negative, affective, cognitive and disorganised behaviour. In view of the findings based on Strauss' work (1974) the PAS has been added to the SANS, SAPS and BPRS, whose results were examined by factor analysis. The findings indicate that it is possible to consider a six-factor model, composed of the following dimensions: paranoid, negative, affective, cognitive, disorganised behaviour and premorbid social adjustment deficits. The number of factors that best reflect the structure of the symptomatology of paranoid schizophrenia depends on the range of the symptoms under study, i.e., on the type of scales. It follows from our study that six-factor model appears to be the most suitable and clear model in rendering the multidimensionality of paranoid schizophrenia phenomenology.
...
PMID:Dimensions of psychopathology in paranoid schizophrenia. 1059 90


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>