Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0035412 (rhabdomyosarcoma)
 6,156 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The topoisomerase I inhibitor 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (topotecan) was evaluated against a panel of xenografts comprising four lines of adult colon adenocarcinoma, three colon tumors derived from adolescents, six childhood rhabdomyosarcomas from previously untreated patients as well as sublines selected in vivo for resistance to vincristine and melphalan, and three lines of childhood osteogenic sarcoma. Efficacy was determined at maximal tolerated dose levels using intermittent i.p. administration [every 4 days for 4 doses (q4dx4)] or daily p.o. or i.p. administration 5 days per week for up to 20 courses. On a q4dx4 schedule, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 12.5 mg/kg per administration, which caused marked weight loss and lethality in approximately 5% of the tumor-bearing mice. This schedule caused significant growth inhibition (but no tumor regression) in advanced adult colon adenocarcinomas. The minimal treated/control (T/C) ratios were 0.49, 0.54, and 0.3 for three of the tumor lines and were achieved at 18-21 days after the initiation of treatment. In contrast, rhabdomyosarcomas were considerably more sensitive, with T/C ratios being < 0.1 for three lines, whereas topotecan was less active against two other rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts (minimal T/C ratios, 0.17 and 0.14). As inhibitors of topoisomerase I have been demonstrated to have activity in the replication phase of the cell cycle (S-phase-specific), prolonged administration schedules were examined. Mice received topotecan 5 days per week for 3 weeks either by i.p. injection or by oral gavage (p.o.). In selected experiments, p.o. administration was continued for up to 20 weeks. Oral administration for 3 weeks (2 mg/kg per dose) resulted in complete regression of all six lines of rhabdomyosarcoma, with two lines demonstrating no regrowth during the period of observation (> or = 84 days). Similar results were obtained after i.p. administration, suggesting significant schedule dependency for these tumors. For colon tumors, the daily administration schedule (i.p. or p.o.) demonstrated some advantage over the intermittent schedule, resulting in partial regressions and significant inhibition of the growth of several colon adenocarcinoma lines. In rhabdomyosarcoma Rh12 and VRC5 colon adenocarcinoma, both of which demonstrated intermediate sensitivity to topotecan, and in osteosarcoma OS33, protracted p.o. administration for 13-20 weeks (1.0-1.5 mg/kg per dose given daily x 5 days) caused complete regression without regrowth in Rh12 and OS33 tumors and partial regression of all VRC5 tumors. No toxicity was observed using this schedule of administration. Topotecan demonstrated significant activity against all three osteosarcoma xenografts examined, with optimal schedules causing complete regression in two lines.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin against xenografts derived from adult and childhood solid tumors. 146 61

The efficacy of protracted schedules of therapy of the topoisomerase I inhibitors 9-dimethyl-aminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (topotecan) and 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (irinotecan; CPT-11) were evaluated against a panel of 21 human tumor xenografts derived from adult and pediatric malignancies. Tumors included eight colon adenocarcinomas, representing an intrinsically chemorefractory malignancy, six lines derived from childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (three embryonal, three alveolar) representing a chemoresponsive histiotype, sublines of rhabdomyosarcomas selected in vivo for resistance to vincristine and melphalan, and three pediatric brain tumors. All tumors were grown at the subcutaneous site. Topotecan was administered by oral gavage 5 days per week for 12 consecutive weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 1.5 mg/kg per dose. Irinotecan was given by i.v. administration daily for 5 days each week for 2 weeks [(d x 5)2](one cycle of therapy), repeated every 21 days. The MTD for three cycles was 10 mg/kg per dose. Treatment was started against advanced tumors. Topotecan caused a high frequency of objective regressions in one of eight colon tumor lines, whereas irinotecan caused complete regressions (CR) of all tumors in three colon lines and a high frequency of CRs in three additional lines. Both drugs demonstrated similar activity against rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts. Topotecan caused CR of all tumors in four of six lines, and irinotecan in five of six lines evaluated. Both agents retained full activity against tumors selected for primary resistance to vincristine, but only irinotecan retained activity against a tumor selected for primary resistance to melphalan. Both agents demonstrated good activity against brain tumor xenografts with irinotecan causing CR in two of three lines and topotecan inducing CR in one of three lines. Results indicate that low-dose protracted schedules of daily administration of these topoisomerase I inhibitors is either equi-effective or more efficacious than more intense shorter schedules of administration reported previously.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of topoisomerase I inhibitors, topotecan and irinotecan, administered at low dose levels in protracted schedules to mice bearing xenografts of human tumors. 763 81

Topotecan (Hycamtin) is a promising new topoisomerase I-targeting anticancer agent that first entered clinical trials in 1989 under National Cancer Institute sponsorship in collaboration with SmithKline Beecham. In 1996, it was approved for use by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for previously treated patients with advanced ovarian cancer. For these patients, topotecan provides another therapeutic option upon disease progression after initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Topotecan also has activity in other tumor types, including small-cell lung cancer, hematologic malignancies and pediatric neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. Topotecan combination regimens with paclitaxel (Taxol), etoposide (VePesid), cisplatin (Platinol), and cytarabine and with other treatment modalities, such as radiation therapy, are in development. Studies evaluating topotecan combinations as initial treatment in such diseases as ovarian and small-cell lung carcinoma are also underway. It is hoped that earlier use of topotecan, with its novel mechanism of action, will prolong survival and increase cure rates in patients with these chemoresponsive tumors. Whether or not such hopes are realized, these important studies will help define the role of topotecan in cancer chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Clinical status and optimal use of topotecan. 939 64

The antitumor activity of topotecan administered as a 72-h continuous i.v. infusion was evaluated in children with refractory neuroblastoma and sarcomas of soft tissue and bone. We also attempted to increase the dose intensity of topotecan by including an intrapatient dose escalation in the trial design. Ninety-three children (85 eligible and evaluable for response) with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, or other soft-tissue sarcomas received topotecan administered as a 72-h i.v. infusion every 21 days. The initial dose was 1.0 mg/m2/day, with subsequent intrapatient dose escalation to 1.3 mg/m2/day for those patients who did not experience dose-limiting toxicity after their first cycle of topotecan. There was one complete response in a patient with neuroblastoma (n = 26) and one partial response in a patient with Ewing's sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (n = 25). No complete or partial responses were observed in 17 patients with osteosarcoma, 15 patients with rhabdomyosarcoma, or 2 patients with other soft-tissue sarcomas; however, 8 patients had prolonged (15-48 weeks) stable disease while receiving topotecan. Topotecan was well tolerated. The most commonly observed toxicities were myelosuppression (dose-limiting) and nausea and vomiting. Intrapatient dose escalations were performed in 68% of the patients who received more than one cycle of topotecan, and 1.3 mg/m2/day was tolerated by 79% of the patients who received the higher dose and were evaluable for hematological toxicity. In conclusion, topotecan administered as a 72-h continuous infusion every 21 days is inactive (objective response rate, < 20%) in children with refractory or recurrent neuroblastoma and sarcomas of soft tissue or bone.
 ...
PMID:Phase II trial of topotecan administered as 72-hour continuous infusion in children with refractory solid tumors: a collaborative Pediatric Branch, National Cancer Institute, and Children's Cancer Group Study. 951 23

Although the prognosis of childhood cancers has dramatically improved over the last three decades, new active drugs are needed. Camptothecins represent a very attractive new class of anticancer drugs to develop in paediatric oncology. The preclinical and clinical development of two of these DNA-topoisomerase I inhibitors, i.e. topotecan and irinotecan, is ongoing in paediatric malignancies. Here we review the currently available results of this evaluation. Topotecan proved to be active against several paediatric tumour xenografts. In paediatric phase I studies exploring several administration schedules, myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The preliminary results of topotecan evaluation in phase II study showed antitumour activity in neuroblastoma (response rate: 15% at relapse and 37% in newly diagnosed patients with disseminated disease) and in metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (40% in untreated patients). Topotecan-containing drug combinations are currently investigated. Irinotecan displayed a broad spectrum of activity in paediatric solid tumour xenografts, including rhabdo-myosarcoma, neuroblastoma, peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, malignant glioma and juvenile colon cancer. For several of these histology types, tumour-free survivors have been observed among animals bearing an advanced-stage tumour at time of treatment. The clinical evaluation of irinotecan in children is ongoing. Irinotecan undergoes a complex in vivo biotransformation involving several enzyme systems, such as carboxylesterase, UDPGT and cytochrome P450, in children as well as in adults. Preclinical studies of both drugs have shown that their activity was schedule-dependent. The optimal schedule of administration is an issue that needs to be addressed in children. In conclusion, the preliminary results of the paediatric evaluation of camptothecin derivatives show very encouraging results in childhood malignancies. The potential place of camptothecins in the treatment of paediatric malignant tumours is discussed.
 ...
PMID:Preclinical development of camptothecin derivatives and clinical trials in pediatric oncology. 961 66

The camptothecin derivative topotecan has been postulated to mediate its antitumor effect through a drug-induced increase in covalent topoisomerase I-DNA complexes. If this hypothesis is correct, then schedules of exposure to topotecan that maximize the number of topoisomerase I-DNA complexes should produce the greatest cytotoxicity. We identified schedules of exposure to topotecan that maximize levels of complexes in vitro and used these schedules to postulate effective schedules of exposure in vivo in a mouse xenograft model. Unexpectedly, K+-SDS precipitation assays quantitating covalent topoisomerase I-DNA complexes showed that Daoy medulloblastoma and Rh30 rhabdomyosarcoma cells became refractory to drug-induced increases in complexes after an 8-h exposure to 2.5 microM topotecan. In contrast, assays using 10-50 nM topotecan showed that the cells did not become refractory, and more importantly, intermittent exposure to drug increased the level of complexes approximately 2-fold above the maximum level observed after a single drug exposure. The data indicate that continuous exposure to topotecan does not maximize topoisomerase I-DNA complexes and suggest that effective intermittent schedules of exposure to topotecan might be identified. Growth inhibition assays confirmed this hypothesis and showed that growth inhibition by topotecan was extremely schedule dependent in Rh30 cells but not in Daoy cells. Xenograft studies showed that schedules modeled after the in vitro experiments produced complete tumor regressions in mice. Topotecan given daily (0.6-2.2 mg/kg) or every other day (1-3.3 mg/kg) for 2 weeks, repeated every 21 days for three cycles, produced complete regressions of Daoy xenografts; however, daily exposure was required to achieve complete regressions of Rh30 xenografts. We conclude that effective intermittent schedules of exposure to topotecan, based on biochemical parameters, can be identified. The clinical utility of each schedule will depend on the relative antitumor effect compared to the toxic effect on the bone marrow, which usually limits administration of topotecan to patients.
 ...
PMID:Effective schedules of exposure of medulloblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts to topotecan correlate with in vitro assays. 971 30

Topotecan and vincristine were evaluated alone or in combination against 13 independent xenografts and 1 vincristine-resistant derivative, representing childhood neuroblastoma (n = 6), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 5), or brain tumors (n = 3). Topotecan was given by i.v. bolus on a schedule found previously to be optimal. Drug was administered daily for 5 days on 2 consecutive weeks with cycles repeated every 21 days over a period of 8 weeks. Doses of topotecan ranged from 0.16 to 1.5 mg/kg to simulate clinically achievable topotecan lactone plasma systemic exposures. Vincristine was administered i.v. every 7 days at a fixed dose of 1 mg/kg. Given as a single agent, vincristine induced complete responses (CRs) in all mice bearing two rhabdomyosarcomas (Rh28 and Rh30) and some CRs in Rh12-bearing mice (57%) but relatively few CRs (<29%) in other tumors. As a single agent, topotecan induced CR in a low proportion of tumor lines. A dose-response model with a logit link function was used to investigate whether the combination of topotecan and vincristine resulted in greater than expected responses compared with the activity of the agents when administered alone. Only CR was used to evaluate tumor responses. The combination resulted in significantly greater than expected CRs than individual agents in nine tumor lines (four neuroblastoma, three brain tumors, and two rhabdomyosarcomas). Similar event-free (failure) distributions were shown in SJ-GBM2 glioblastoma xenografts, whether vincristine was administered on day 1 or day 5 of each topotecan course. To determine whether the increased antitumor activity with the combination was attributable to a change in drug disposition, extensive pharmacokinetic studies were performed. However, little or no interaction between these two agents was determined. Toxicity of the combination was marked by prolonged thrombocytopenia and decreased hemoglobin. However, approximately 75 and 80% of the maximum tolerated dose of each single agent, topotecan (1.5 mg/kg) or vincristine (1 mg/kg), could be given in combination, resulting in a combination toxicity index of approximately 1.5. These results show that the therapeutic effect of combining topotecan with vincristine was greater than additive in most tumor models of childhood solid tumors, and toxicity data suggest that this can be administered to mice with only moderate reduction in the dose levels for each agent.
 ...
PMID:Synergy of topotecan in combination with vincristine for treatment of pediatric solid tumor xenografts. 1058 79

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma and related soft tissue sarcomas continue in the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG) and European cooperative groups. The use of molecular biology techniques in soft tissue sarcomas are redefining the classic pathology of these small blue cell tumors. Improvements in imaging, radiotherapy, and surgery, in part, deserve credit for the better survival seen in all cooperative trials. These advances confound the interpretation of consecutively run chemotherapy trials using historical comparisons. The IRSG has reported improvement in the prognosis of both nonmetastatic and metastatic embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma as attributable to three, three-drug regimens that use cyclophosphamide at 2.2 g/m2 in either maintenance or induction and maintenance therapy. Patients of any age with metastatic, nonembryonal, and those over 10 years of age with metastatic embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma continue to have a poor prognosis, which even megatherapy has failed to change. The doublet of ifosfamide and etoposide in combination with vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide at 2.2 g/m2 achieved a remarkable 3-year survival of 58% in patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma and undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma. The topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, has recently been found by the IRSG to have a 57% overall response rate in patients with metastatic alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Topotecan has completed testing with cyclophosphamide in a phase II window study in newly diagnosed patients with metastatic disease and has been incorporated into a randomized trial in intermediate risk patients in IRSG-V. Molecular studies in IRSG-V will be applied in the detection of occult bone marrow metastases and the evaluation of resection margins at initial and second-look surgery. Long-term follow-up will be required in patients with gross residual sarcoma randomized to conventional and hyperfractionated radiotherapy in IRSG-IV to assess late effects. Although older patients with unfavorable histology and metastatic disease continue to have a poor prognosis, the overall 5-year survival of children and adolescents with nonmetastatic and metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma is approaching 80%. As molecular discoveries advance the diagnosis and detection of rhabdomyosarcoma, it is hoped that the futuristic molecular based treatment strategies in development and early testing will further improve survival in high-risk patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.
 ...
PMID:Progress in the diagnosis and treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma and related soft tissue sarcomas. 1075 91

Ewing's sarcoma is the second most frequent primary bone cancer, with approximately 225 new cases diagnosed each year in patients less than 20 years of age in North America. It is one of the pediatric small round blue cell tumors, characterized by strong membrane expression of CD99 in a chain-mail pattern and negativity for lymphoid (CD45), rhabdomyosarcoma (myogenin, desmin, actin) and neuroblastoma (neurofilament protein) markers. Pathognomonic translocations involving the ews gene on chromosome 22 and an ets-type gene, most commonly the fli1 gene on chromosome 11, are implicated in the great majority of cases. Clinical presentation is usually dominated by local bone pain and a mass. Imaging reveals a technetium pyrophosphate avid lesion that, on plain radiograph, is destructive, diaphyseal and classically causes layered periosteal calcification. Magnetic resonance best defines the extent of the lesion. Biopsy should be undertaken by an experienced orthopedic oncologist. Approximately three quarters of patients have initially localized disease. About two thirds survive disease-free. Management, preferably at a specialist center with a multi-disciplinary team, includes both local control-either surgery, radiation or a combination-and systemic chemotherapy. Chemotherapy includes cyclic combinations, incorporating vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, ifosfamide and occasionally actinomycin D. Topotecan in combination with cyclophosphamide has shown preliminary activity. Patients with initially metastatic disease fare less well, with about one quarter surviving. Studies incorporating intensive therapy followed by stem cell infusion show no clear benefit. New approaches include anti-angiogenic therapy, particularly since vascular endothelial growth factor is an apparent downstream target of the ews-fli1 oncogene.
 ...
PMID:Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors: current management. 1672 Aug 51

The prognosis of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in advanced stages is still sobering. Therapy is limited due to local tumor recurrence, development of metastases and multidrug resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the development of multidrug resistance in cell lines and in xenografts of alveolar and embryonal RMS treated according to the German Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study (CWS). Alveolar and embryonal RMS cell lines were treated with Vincristine, Topotecan, Carboplatin, Actinomycin D, or Ifosfamide. Expression levels of resistance-associated genes were assessed using Real time-PCR. Nude mice (NMRI nu/nu, n = 10 per group) underwent xenotransplantation of human embryonal or alveolar RMS. Animals were treated with standard chemotherapeutic drugs Vincristine, Topotecan, Carboplatin, Actinomycin D, or Ifosfamide according to treatment schedules of the CWS-study. Tumor sizes were measured and relative tumor volumes were calculated. Animals were sacrificed after 20 days and standard histology, Real-time-PCR for MDR1-, MRP-, LRP- and MDM2-gene as well as immunohistochemistry for MDR1-, LRP-, and MRP-protein were performed. In the cell lines, an up-regulation of MDR-1 gene was found in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. In embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, an up-regulation of LRP and MRP was found. Standard chemotherapy of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma resulted in a significant reduction of tumor growth (P < 0.05) in all groups. In embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma strongest effects were found after treatment with Ifosfamide, Vincristine and Carboplatin (P < 0.05). RT-PCR revealed a MDR1-dependent mechanism in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. In embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, MDR1 occurred to a lower degree. Immunohistochemistry revealed correlating expression levels of multidrug resistance-associated proteins. The use of established chemotherapy on human RMS in vivo had strong effects on xenografts compared to their controls. In all cases, there was only a reduction of tumor growth, but not a complete eradication of the tumors. Chemotherapy seemed to upregulate the expression of resistance-associated genes in vitro and in vivo. The mechanism of multidrug resistance depends on the tumor subtype. Therefore, further investigations will be required to evaluate multidrug resistance in patients and to investigate new modalities for a reversal of multidrug resistance.
 ...
PMID:Effects of standard chemotherapy on tumor growth and regulation of multidrug resistance genes and proteins in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma. 1721 91


1