Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0034069 (
pulmonary fibrosis
)
7,050
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
To exploit possible dose-response and combination drug synergism, 20 previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received one or two courses of high-dose induction chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg), etoposide (1,200 mg/m2), and cisplatin (120 mg/m2) (HDCEP). HDCEP was followed by four cycles of standard-dose cyclophosphamide (1,000 mg/m2), doxorubicin (40 mg/m2), and vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) (CAV). Response was determined after HDCEP and following CAV. Reevaluation included repeat bronchoscopy and chest computerized tomography (CT), as well as repetition of all initially abnormal studies. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Overall response to HDCEP was 90%, with a complete response (CR) rate of 65% (95% confidence limits, 44% to 86%) and a partial response (PR) rate of 25% (95% confidence limits, 6% to 44%). All patients either maintained or improved their initial response while receiving CAV. Median duration of response was 6 months (range, 2 to 12 months) and median survival was 9.5 + months (range, 2 to 21 + months). All 37 courses of HDCEP were associated with leukopenia (less than 1,000/microL), 92% with thrombocytopenia (less than 20,000/microL), and 84% with fever of greater than 38.5 degrees C. Additional toxicities included
bacteremia
(24%), nausea and emesis (59%), mucositis (57%), diarrhea (38%), and hemorrhagic cystitis (5%). There were two treatment-related deaths due to infection. A third patient died 4 months after completing HDCEP with
pulmonary fibrosis
. Although response duration and median survival were not improved, HDCEP produced a high CR rate in ambulatory patients with extensive-stage SCLC.
...
PMID:High-dose induction chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. 303 61
Lung transplantation has become an excellent treatment option for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and bronchiectasis with very advanced lung disease. Despite the challenges that the CF patients present, survival is more favorable than that seen in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and
pulmonary fibrosis
. Although those CF and bronchiectasis patients with severe respiratory disease are often infected with organisms that display in vitro resistance to the commonly used antibiotics, they usually have successful outcomes with transplantation, which are reported to be the same as in those patients with less resistant bacteria. Preoperative synergy testing has been demonstrated to reduce the presence of postoperative
bacteremia
and empyema in patients with CF. Newer challenges include the increasing presence of nontuberculous mycobacteria and in particular the rapid grower Mycobacterium abscessus, for which patient-to-patient spread has been recently recognized. The increased recognition of gastroesophageal reflux offers challenges regarding when and to whom one should offer fundoplication. Most potential CF recipients have metabolic bone disease warranting treatment, especially with the significant loss of bone density seen in the first year after transplantation. Diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, and hypertension and their consequences remain common and are of increasing importance as median survival increases in excess of 10 years. With increased experience, more programs are now transplanting patients who require membrane oxygenator support in addition to noninvasive ventilation pretransplantation and the use of a membrane device in the awake patient principally to remove excessive CO2 and reduce acidemia is worthy of note (Novalung; Novalung GmbH, Heilbronn, Federal Republic of Germany). Many centers now take the view that an awake and ambulant patient receiving such support represents a more favorable option than an intubated patient. The limiting factor in lung transplantation remains the number of organs available. Efforts to increase the donor pool, such as low tidal volume ventilation, are effective in allowing a greater percentage of offered organs to be accepted. Perhaps the most encouraging development, however, is that of ex vivo lung perfusion. This permits not only the ability to measure the function of the lungs, something of great value for lungs from donors with circulatory death (donation after cardiac death), but also the potential to introduce lung repair and convert a nonusable lung to one that can be safely used for transplantation.
...
PMID:Lung transplantation for cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis. 2382 5