Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0034065 (pulmonary embolism)
 14,979 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The defibrinating agent ancrod has had limited clinical trial, but appears to give no advantages over heparin. Intravenous infusion of dextran, a glucose polymer, has been shown to have an antithrombotic effect in many experimental models of thrombosis. However, the evidence that dextran is a clinically valuable antithrombotic drug is conflicting. A number of controlled randomized studies have shown that dextran can prevent postoperative venous thromboembolism when a large volume of dextran 40 or 70 was infused rapidly during and after surgery. However, blood volume expansion during dextran treatment prohibits its use in patients with reduced cardiac reserve, and infrequent though sometimes severe, allergic reactions have been reported. Evidence that dextran is of value for the treatment of venous or arterial thromboembolism comes from uncontrolled studies and is not convincing. Many compounds have been shown to inhibit platelet function in vitro but only five of these drugs have been extensively evaluated as prophylactic or therapeutic antithrombotic agents in man. These are aspirin, sulphinpyrazone, dipyridamole, hydroxychloroquine and clofibrate. They have been evaluated mainly in patients with cerebral vascular disorders, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery ischaemia, venous thromboembolism, prosthetic heart valves, and in patients with arteriovenous shunts. The evaluation of the clinical effect of the platelet function suppressing drugs is in its early stages, but they appear to differ from each other in the spectrum of their clinical effectiveness, and they may be more effective in arterial than in venous thromboembolic disorders. Their role in the management of cerebral vascular disease and coronary artery disease is still uncertain, and should be clarified by the results of a number of multi-centre, prospective, randomized studies which are currently in progress. Three types of thrombolytic drugs have been evaluated clinically; the plasminogen activators streptokinase and urokinase, proteolytic enzymes such as plasmin, and agents which increase the level of endogenous plasminogen activator (e.g. anabolic steroids). Of these, the plasminogen activators now have a definite place in clinical practice. The plasminogen activators accelerate the lysis of recent venous thrombi and pulmonary emboli, and of arterial thrombi or emboli. Thrombolytic therapy with these agents should be considered particularly in patients with recent major pulmonary embolism, as lysis of recent emboli is rapid and substantial. It should also be considered in patients with recent extensive venous thrombosis, because total lysis of venous thrombi has been reported to result in long-term preservation of valve function, and is likely to prevent postphlebitic syndrome, though this has not been proven. However, plasminogen activator therapy carries a higher risk of bleeding than heparin treatment...
 ...
PMID:Antithrombotic drugs: part II. 78 6

Effort thrombosis of the axillary and subclavian veins is an uncommon cause of upper extremity swelling. Prompt recognition and treatment of this disorder is important in order to minimize the complications of pulmonary embolism and postphlebitic syndrome that can occur with this condition. This can be very challenging while underway or in the field. A sailor who developed effort vein thrombosis while underway on board the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln is presented to review the presentation and management of this disorder, particularly as it applies to active duty military personnel.
 ...
PMID:Effort thrombosis: recognition and management while underway. 174 4

All surgical patients are at risk for the development of deep venous thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolism or postphlebitic syndrome. The evolution of ultrasonographic imaging has increased the awareness of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Duplex imaging and Doppler color flow imaging have made the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis relatively simple, painless, inexpensive, and definitive. These procedures have gained acceptance by both patients and physicians. Several risk factors have been identified that increase the chance of the development of deep venous thrombosis. These factors include a history of deep venous thrombosis, presence of a malignant process, increasing age, cigarette smoking, obesity, prolonged bed rest, and general anesthesia. The greater the number of risk factors, the more aggressive prophylaxis should be. Means of prophylaxis have improved, and surgeons now generally agree that some form of prophylaxis is required. Heparin and intermittent compression devices appear to be equally effective in preventing deep venous thrombosis. The addition of venous monitoring in high-risk patients permits immediate identification of the presence of deep venous thrombosis. During the last decade, the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis has changed little. Heparin followed by warfarin remains the treatment of choice. A small group of patients receive fibrinolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis. Although the incidence of postoperative deep venous thrombosis has decreased during the last decade, it remains a significant complication.
 ...
PMID:Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. 194 69

Thrombolytic therapy has been used fairly extensively in the management of acute proximal deep-vein thrombophlebitis of the extremities, acute pulmonary embolism, and acute peripheral arterial thrombosis and embolism in addition to acute thrombotic coronary events. In the presence of acceptable indications and a favorable benefit to risk ratio, this form of therapy, when successful, has served as a useful adjunct in the management of these disorders. In deep-vein thrombophlebitis, lysis of the thrombus before permanent pathological changes (eg, organization, scarring) have occurred can prevent venous valvular dysfunction and postural venous hypertension and its complications, especially the postphlebitic syndrome. In the more severe forms of acute pulmonary embolism, thrombolytic therapy, when applied early after symptom onset, decreases morbidity and is likely to prevent a chronic increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and persistent pulmonary hypertension. In peripheral arterial thrombo-occlusive events, early restoration of flow through thrombolysis has been shown to limit ischemic damage and serve as a useful supplement to angioplasty or surgery. Thrombolytic therapy has been used less extensively in acute strokes. Here the danger of reperfusion causing bleeding into a softened area of brain undergoing infarction has slowed its evaluation for this disorder; its application to stroke remains experimental.
 ...
PMID:Thrombolytic therapy for noncoronary diseases. 200 69

Acute and subacute deep venous thrombosis can be followed by two serious complications: pulmonary embolism feared in the early stadium and the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) as a late complication. After a lapse of months and years there might appear a complete or incomplete recanalization, but the valves of the veins will be destroyed. Therefore it is understandable to strive first an active therapy as thrombectomy or thrombolysis to remove thrombosis. There will be released a physiological tissue plasminogen activator from the endothelium of the vein increasing a local fibrinolytic activity. But it is not strong enough to reopen the occlusion within a few days. This is only possible adding exogenous activators as streptokinase, urokinase and recently rt-PA. Heparin is well known at low-dose subcutaneously for thrombosis prophylaxis. The high doses of heparin infusion intravenously with 30-40,000 units daily are used "therapeutically" inhibiting growth-promotion of the thrombus and reducing the incidence of pulmonary embolism markedly. In respect of a postthrombotic syndrome (oedema, leg ulcers) it needs the evaluation of the early and follow up late results and the analysis of efficiency and risk of the two models of treatment. It was necessary comparing the success rate of reopening of the occluded veins after some days and follow up 5 or 6 years in clinical studies. The reopening rate in thrombolysis was about 3 times higher than in heparin therapy. But in contrast bleeding was 3 times lower in heparin therapy. For the long term follow up, physical examination, doppler-sonography phlebodynamometry and vein occlusion plethysmography were assessed. The acute intervention, regarding treatment, turned out to be the crucial prognostic parameter. Syndromes and clinical findings did indeed correlate quite well with the outcome of fibrinolytic treatment. Postthrombotic syndrome was rare in cases with complete patency. In cases where patency was only partially or not at all achieved, postthrombotic syndrome was present to a higher degree the more central and the more extensive the remaining thrombus was. In deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity thrombolytic therapy is recommended mostly to younger patients with acute, the popliteal and the femoral vein including thrombosis, except of contraindications. More over in each of an individual case it has to be decided whether the aggressive or conservative therapy is to prefer.
 ...
PMID:[The treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Thrombolysis vs heparin]. 209 22

Balancing the benefits, risks, and cost of thrombolytic treatment is a complex issue which depends considerably upon the variable threat of the thrombus to organ physiology and patient survival. For example, after deep vein thrombosis (DVT), the major risk is long-term disability due to the postphlebitic syndrome, while in pulmonary embolism (PE) patients, the risks concern short-term mortality and impaired pulmonary physiology. Thus, for treating DVT or PE, the question is whether thrombolytic therapy would be valuable in addition to other antithrombotic approaches. Clearly, the best indication for thrombolytic therapy is in acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients, because this therapy has the potential for reducing coronary artery thrombus mortality. In acute MI the major issues concern the choice of thrombolytic agent and the relative merits of nonpharmacologic interventions such as angioplasty and bypass surgery. An optimal window of treatment opportunity exists for all of the indications. The window is shortest for MI, intermediate for PE, and longest for DVT patients.
 ...
PMID:Thrombolytic agents: balancing cost, efficacy, and side effects. 211 90

The effectiveness of a therapeutic protocol, using 15,000 to 22,500 IU/day of heparin by subcutaneous injection, to treat the distal postoperative vein thrombosis on the lower limb, was evaluated. The study was made on 427 patients, which were analyzed by the Fibrinogen I125 marked accumulation test, to give an early diagnostic and follow-up of their thrombosis (thrombus lysis, stabilization or expansion). Treatment made, showed its efficacy preventing from proximal expansion, as well as avoiding pulmonary embolism and postphlebitic syndrome. Its cost is lower than other therapeutic option's costs, and it doesn't extend the hospital stay.
 ...
PMID:[Treatment of distal venous thrombosis of the lower extremity with "moderated" doses of heparin]. 239 58

To study the morbidity and mortality rates after placement of an inferior vena cava filter and to define the appropriate indications for interruption of the inferior vena cava, the records of all patients who underwent insertion of a Greenfield filter during the decade January 1978 to December 1987 were reviewed. Patients were designated as having either a traditional or extended indication for placement of an inferior vena cava filter. Two hundred sixty inferior vena cava filters were placed in 264 attempts, with no deaths related to insertion of the filter. An extended indication was the primary reason for placement of the Greenfield filter in 66 (25%) of the patients. In patients with extended indications there were no cases of air embolism or filter misplacement and only three wound complications (4.5%). Pulmonary embolism after insertion of the inferior vena cava filter occurred in three patients (4.5%), with one fatality (1.5%). Inferior vena cava occlusion was documented in three cases (4.5%), and manifestations of the postphlebitic syndrome in early follow-up were present in two patients (3.0%). As the procedures to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism have become safer, more efficacious, and less morbid, the number of patients in whom the potential benefits of insertion of an inferior vena cava filter outweigh the risks has become larger. Our results support the liberalized use of Greenfield filters in those patients who do not necessarily have one of the traditional indications for placement of an inferior vena cava filter but are at a high risk of having a fatal pulmonary embolus.
 ...
PMID:Extended indications for placement of an inferior vena cava filter. 237 47

Thrombolytic therapy offers the promise of major therapeutic intervention in many areas as well as in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction who present to the emergency department. Infusion of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) during field transport has been proven safe, but optimal methods for reliably diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in the prehospital setting have yet to be delineated. A major advance would be achieved if thrombolysis were proven effective in preventing the progression of unstable angina to actual infarction. However, early studies have yielded contradictory results. The use of tPA in dissolving peripheral arterial clots appears very promising, but long-term limb survival has yet to be demonstrated. Unlike heparin, thrombolytic agents can also lyse clot in peripheral deep veins and possibly lessen the tendency toward postphlebitic syndrome. The proper dosage regimen to minimize hemorrhage has not been determined. Pulmonary emboli can be lysed by tPA. IV infusion is as effective as intrapulmonary. Significant complications can be minimized, particularly if major vessel catheterization can be avoided for diagnosis. Even after catheterization for pulmonary angiography, however, thrombolytic therapy appears quite promising. The use of thrombolytic agents for embolic-thrombotic stroke is less promising: therefore, the risk of hemorrhagic complication may not outweigh the potential benefit. Thrombolytic therapy thus offers the potential for significant impact on the practice of emergency medicine.
 ...
PMID:Future role of thrombolytic therapy in emergency medicine. 251 90

Clinical experience with thrombolytics in non-coronary disorders is limited to the plasminogen activators streptokinase, urokinase and alteplase; therapeutic trials with anistreplase (APSAC) are almost, and with saruplase completely, limited to acute myocardial infarction. In terms of thrombus clearance, thrombolytic drugs are superior to heparin in patients with recent deep vein thrombosis in the pelvis or lower limbs. In aggregate, thrombi younger than 8 days are lysed in approximately 60% of patients treated with streptokinase, urokinase or alteplase. The results of studies assessing the subsequent development of the postphlebitic syndrome are conflicting, but most suggest that thrombolytic therapy can reduce symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency. Currently, the combination of systemic thrombolytic drugs followed by heparin is recommended for patients with acute major pulmonary embolism who are haemodynamically unstable. Streptokinase, urokinase and alteplase have all been shown to accelerate the lysis of pulmonary emboli and to decrease pulmonary vascular obstruction and pulmonary hypertension. Systemic venous or intrapulmonary infusions of alteplase offers the same benefit in terms of angiographic and haemodynamic improvement. A short infusion of 100 mg alteplase over 2 hours seems to be superior to a 24-hour infusion of urokinase. None of the thrombolytic trials in pulmonary embolism have been large enough to demonstrate a reduction in mortality. It is now generally accepted that, unless contraindicated, thrombolytic therapy is the front-line treatment for patients with massive pulmonary embolism and major haemodynamic disturbance. The local treatment of acute arterial occlusion in limb arteries results in rapid clearing of the artery in 67% of patients treated with streptokinase; the corresponding success rates for urokinase and alteplase are 81% and 88 to 94%, respectively. The main question appears to be the identification of patients in whom local thrombolysis is the treatment of choice, as opposed to established therapeutic modalities. Thrombolytic treatment following a major ischaemic stroke is hazardous, although clinical improvement has been noted in a minority of patients with recanalised cerebral arteries. The safety and efficacy of thrombolytic treatment remains unproven for this indication, and its use must be restricted to experimental protocols. Thrombolytic treatment in retinal artery or vein occlusion has, in practice, been abandoned.
 ...
PMID:Use of thrombolytic drugs in non-coronary disorders. 268 38


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>