Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The efficacy and tolerability of azelastine (CAS 58581-89-8) eye drops at three different doses (0.025%, 0.05% and 0.1%) were investigated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 24 subjects with a history of allergic conjunctivitis/rhinoconjunctivitis, who were challenged, out of season, by airbone allergen in the "Vienna Challenge Chamber" (VCC). Subjects received a single dose of azelastine eye drops 60 min before the start of a 4 h challenge in the VCC. Additional local challenge, mimicking a gust of wind, was administered 15 min before the end of the session. Each of the 4 study days was separated by a 2 week washout period. Azelastine eye drops showed a dose-dependent inhibition of the development of itching of the eyes. The effect was most pronounced 15 min after the additional local challenge. A maximal effect was achieved at a dose of 0.05%. Similar effects were observed on lacrimation. Azelastine eye drops also dose-dependently inhibited the degree of conjunctival redness, measured by digital imaging, and tended to reduce the low incidence of chemosis observed. Ranking of the results of all symptoms for each treatment group confirmed the optimal effect at a dose of 0.05%. Azelastine eye drops had no effect on nasal and bronchial symptoms or on measurements of airways function (FEV1). No adverse effects of the treatments were reported. The data support the use of 0.05% azelastine eye drops in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis/rhinoconjunctivitis.
 ...
PMID:Dose-dependent protection by azelastine eye drops against pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 960 80

The efficacy of topical dimethindene maleate (DMM, CAS 31614-69-5, Fenistil Gel) in the treatment of sunburn was evaluated in a placebo-controlled, 1-period crossover trial in 24 healthy volunteers. An UV-erythema (sunburn) of a well-defined intensity and extent was experimentally induced on three different skin test-areas by means of UV-A/B irradiation with three times the minimal erythema dose (MED). About 24 h after irradiation, one skin test-area was subjected to a 1-h occlusive treatment with DMM gel, the second test area was subjected to treatment with a placebo gel and the third one remained untreated. As objective-quantitative indicators of tenderness, a key symptom of sunburn, sensory and pain thresholds to CO2-Laser stimulation and laser somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in Vertex-EEG were assessed about 1.5 h postdose. The reaction times (RTs) to painless and painful CO2-laser stimulation (sensory and pain threshold level, respectively) on the DMM-treated area were significantly longer than RTs to stimulation on the placebo-treated area. Thresholds in terms of laser energy showed no differences between the treatments. The SEP N1-amplitude on the DMM-area was markedly decreased in comparison to placebo. With regard to subjective sensations of pain, itching and tenderness assessed by means of visual analogue scales (VAS), no clinically relevant differences between treatments were observed after sole UV-irradiation. After additional laser stimulation tenderness was--objectively but not subjectively--decreased on the DMM-area versus placebo. Both gel preparations were well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Dimethindene maleate in the treatment of sunburn. A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. 1033 58

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a 0.1% dimetindene maleate spray (Fenistil Nasal Dosierspray) compared to placebo when applied intranasally. Dimetindene (dimetindene maleate, CAS 3614-69-5, DMM) is a very potent and well established H1-receptor antagonist. A total of 36 asymptomatic patients (17 female, 19 male), suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis from grass pollen, were randomly assigned to treatment with matching topicalnasal sprays with either dimetindene maleate 0.1% or placebo as control in a double-blind, randomised, cross-over-design, with 2 weeks wash-out periods between. The trial period was chosen in a pollen-free time from 20th October to 5th November 1998 to guarantee asymptomatic patients. The patients being allergic to grass pollen, verified by positive case history, positive skin prick test and positive nasal provocation test, were challenged under controlled conditions with purified airborne grass pollen in the Vienna Challenge Chamber. The nasal spray were applied as single doses (1 puff = 0.14 ml of the respective solution with or without 0.14 mg dimetindene maleate) in the evening before at 7.30 p.m. and in the morning at 7.30 a.m. to each nostril exactly 15 min before the onset of allergen provocation. The dosage scheme relates to a daily dose of 0.56 mg DMM in the active treatment group. Subjective nasal and ocular symptoms were measured on-line in time intervals of 30 min during the 4 h allergen provocation. The statistical analysis was a priori sequentially ordered to account for multiple testing and keep the 5% level of significance. All measured primary criteria, Total Nasal Symptom Score (p < 0.0001) calculated from the three single symptoms running of the nose (p = 0.0032) sneezing stimulus (p < 0.0001) and nasal itching (p < 0.0001), as well nasal secretion (p = 0.0031), resulted consistently in a statistically significant and clinically relevant superiority of 0.1% DMM compared to placebo. The same superior treatment effect was observed for all the other criteria, despite the nasal flow, but including the ocular variables. This can be interpreted as a positive efficacy also in secondary allergic conjunctivitis. No systemic or topical adverse events were reported. The results of the study demonstrate that 0.1% DMM as nasal spray is an efficient and safe application form for patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of intranasally applied dimetindene maleate solution versus placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. 1119 Jul 75

The experimental models and the studies in man employed to assess the skin and general safety of a newly developed glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, CAS 55-63-0) transdermal patch, hereinafter coded EPI, are described. EPI was found well tolerated by the skin after single or 28-day repeated epicutaneous application on the rabbit, devoid of phototoxicity in the mouse, devoid of skin sensitizing potential in the guinea pig and devoid of photosensitizing effects in the guinea pig. Tested were also, with negative results, the cytotoxic, hemolytic and genotoxic potential, the presence of bacterial endotoxins, the systemic and intracutaneous toxicity, and the possible conjunctival irritant effects. The application of EPI for 14 consecutive days on the thoracic skin of 28 healthy volunteers did not provoke subjective discomfort such as itching, burning or pain, or objective skin lesions. On the application site a light and transient erythema was often found demonstrating the transcutaneous absorption of the vasodilating GTN from the patch. The 14-day application was followed after two weeks by the application of a challenge EPI patch to detect a possible skin sensitization by EPI. No skin reaction was elicited, showing that also in man EPI is devoid of skin sensitizing potential. During the 14-day application of EPI several GTN commonly induced systemic adverse reactions were observed, particularly headache, confirming the systemic bioavailability of GTN from the patch. Headache rapidly disappeared after removal of the patch, in parallel with the decrease of the blood concentrations of GTN and of its active metabolites, consistently with the previous pharmacokinetic findings. This is an advantage of the administration of GTN with the transdermal patch because, in the case of unbearable headache, the patient is relieved by the simple removal of the patch.
 ...
PMID:Assessment of skin safety of a new glyceryl trinitrate transdermal patch. Animal and human studies. 1121 23

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of intranasally applied dimetindene (CAS 3614-69-5) 0.1% spray in children suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis. A total of 100 children under 14 years with acute seasonal allergic rhinitis participated in this randomised, single-blind, reference-controlled, multi-center, parallel group study with two treatment groups. The study took place between 2nd April and 16th September 1996 during the pollen season. Patients were examined at enrollment (day 1), day 8 and day 15. Patients kept diary throughout the 2-week treatment phase. Patients were randomised to receive either dimetindene 0.1% (Fenistil Nasal Spray) or a levocabastine (CAS 79516-68-0) 0.05% solution as reference medication. Both medications were supplied in similar outer packages. A single-blind approach was chosen, because the reference medication levocabastine requires two spray puffs per nostril as a single dose, whereas for dimetindene maleate solution a single spray puff per nostril is sufficient. Dimetindene 0.1% was applied with 1 spray puff (= 0.14 mg dimetindene) in each nostril and levocabastine with 2 spray puff (= 0.10 mg levocabastine) in each nostril every day in the morning before leaving the house and in the evening before going to bed. Additional administration of the spray was allowed up to 4 times a day if needed. Efficacy was assessed as change in severity of characteristic symptoms associated with pollen rhinitis: nasal rhinorrhea, nasal itching, nasal sneezing and nasal congestion. In addition, changes in ocular symptoms, lacrimation, ocular itching and red eyes, global physician's assessment of efficacy at the end of treatment were assessed. The primary criterion change of total nasal symptom severity score between day 1 and day 3 resulted in a statistically equivalent and therapeutically relevant symptom reduction for the two treatments. All secondary criteria showed a similar reduction in symptoms, thus underlining the consistency of the findings. Both nasal sprays were well tolerated. It is concluded from these results that dimetindene 0.1% nasal spray solution is a safe and efficient treatment option for children under 14 years suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of intranasally applied dimetindene maleate solution. Multicenter study in children under 14 years suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis. 1130 39

Oxatomide (CAS 60607-34-3, KW-4354) is an effective antiallergic agent for allergic rhinitis, urticaria, pruritus cutaneous, and eczema/dermatitis, etc. Terfenadine (CAS 50679-08-8) and astemizole (CAS 68844-77-9), antiallergic agents, have been reported to induce QT prolongation leading to serious ventricular arrhythmia (torsades de pointes) as cardiovascular adverse effects. The present study was carried out to determine whether oxatomide and terfenadine have effects on QT interval as a single drug or in combination with itraconazole (CAS 84625-61-6), an antifungal agent with a CYP3A4 inhibitory effect, in conscious dogs. Terfenadine alone induced QT prolongation at the dose of 30 mg/kg p.o. When itraconazole was administered at the dose of 100 mg/kg p.o. 1 h before terfenadine administration, terfenadine induced QT prolongation at the dose of 10 mg/kg p.o. On the other hand, oxatomide did not induce QT prolongation either as a single agent at the dose of 30 mg/kg p.o. or in combination with itraconazole at the dose of 10 mg/kg p.o. The results present no evidence that oxatomide has the potential to provoke ventricular arrhythmia.
 ...
PMID:Effect of oxatomide, an antiallergic agent, on QT interval in dogs. 1179 44

The objective of this paper was to assess the available clinical data on the efficacy and safety of ointments containing either a bacterial culture suspension (BCS) from Escherichia coli or a combination of BCS with hydrocortisone (CAS 50-23-7) (BCS: Posterisan, and BCS + HC: Posterisan forte). The BCS is assumed to act by immunomodulation in hemorrhoidal disease and perianal eczema. Six randomized, double-blind trials are reported: three of them using BCS ointment and one using BCS + HC, against ointment base, and two trials using BCS + HC against hydrocortisone ointment alone. Patients with hemorrhoids and/or perianal eczema were included and treated over 2 weeks with weekly assessments. Efficacy parameters included score changes for burning, itching, redness and soiling as well as the investigators' overall efficacy rating. Safety was assessed from adverse drug reactions and an overall safety rating. Out of 1,070 patients (mean age 50 years), 273 received BCS and 229 BCS + HC; 568 patients were given the various controls. In the overall efficacy rating, BCS ointment was significantly superior to the ointment base in all three studies (p = 0.028, p = 0.016, and p = 0.045). Moreover, BCS + HC was superior to the ointment base (p < 0.001) and to hydrocortisone alone (p = 0.156 and p = 0.021), confirming the distinct effect of the E. coli suspension. Satisfactory results were achieved in 83% of patients after the BCS + HC combination, 77% after BCS-containing ointment, 75% after hydrocortisone ointment and 52% after ointment base. Symptom scores decreased consistently more after administration of BCS than after the ointment base (p = 0.095, p = 0.006, and p = 0.029), and likewise, the combination of BCS + HC was significantly superior to the ointment base (p < 0.001) and to hydrocortisone alone (p = 0.036 and p = 0.019). Adverse events were less frequent for BCS and BCS + HC than for the ointment base. It can therefore be concluded that ointments containing either only E. coli BCS or a combination of BCS and hydrocortisone provide significant relief in perianal eczema as well as in early stages of hemorrhoidal disease.
 ...
PMID:Local treatment of hemorrhoidal disease and perianal eczema. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of an Escherichia coli culture suspension alone or in combination with hydrocortisone. 1218 74

This randomised, double-blind, multicentric clinical study compared the efficacy and tolerability of the two vaginal antiseptics, 10 mg dequalinium chloride (CAS 522-51-0, Fluomycin N) and 200 mg povidone iodine (CAS 25655-41-8), in a parallel-group design. A total of 180 patients with vaginal infections of varying etiology participated in this study (bacterial vaginosis, fluor vaginalis, vulvo-vaginal candidiasis, trichomoniasis). Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups and were treated once per day for 6 days. Control examinations took place 5 to 7 days after the end of treatment, and 3 to 4 weeks after the first control examination. The total symptoms score, a summary score for the clinical symptoms, discharge, burning, pruritus, redness of vulva/vagina, was defined as primary efficacy parameter. The treatments at the first control examination were compared in the full analysis set using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-test, 2-sided, thereby proving equivalence of both treatments at the 5% level. Both treatments strongly improved the symptoms of vaginal infections both on short-term and long-term follow-up. Descriptive analysis of the secondary parameters, vaginal pH, degree of purity of the vaginal flora, and number of lactobacilli in the wet mounts, supported the comparable efficacy of both therapies to restore the vaginal milieu. Analysis of the diagnostic subgroups indicated that irrespective of the diagnosis, both treatments improved the efficacy criteria as observed for the entire population. The global assessment of the therapeutic efficacy by investigators and patients supported the results of the efficacy analysis with good to very good ratings in 70-90% of the cases. A good tolerability of both preparations was observed in this study with a low number of adverse events in the test group (5.8%).
 ...
PMID:Local treatment of vaginal infections of varying etiology with dequalinium chloride or povidone iodine. A randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentric clinical study. 1240 87

Oxatomide (CAS 60607-34-3) is an antiallergic agent effective against allergic rhinitis, urticaria, pruritus dermatitis, eczema dermatitis and bronchial asthma. The aim of this study was to establish the method for simultaneously determining oxatomide and its major metabolite M-11 in human serum, human plasma and rat plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The method was applied to study the influences of alimentation on pharmacokinetics of oxatomide in rats. After extracting oxatomide and its metabolite M-11 from human serum, human plasma or rat plasma with diethyl ether under alkaline condition, sulfuric acid was added to the organic layer and oxatomide and M-11 were back-extracted. The aqueous layers were analysed by HPLC equipped with a fluorimetric detector. The method was highly sensitive and precise for quantitation of oxatomide and M-11 in human serum, human plasma and rat plasma in the concentration range of 1 to 125 ng/ml. Plasma concentration of oxatomide decreased biphasically with an elimination half-life (T1/2) of 1.59 h after intravenous administration of oxatomide (1 mg/kg) to non-fasting male rats. After oral administration of oxatomide (30 mg/kg) to fasting male rats, plasma concentration of oxatomide increased rapidly, and reached the maximum concentration of 188 ng/ml (Cmax) at 1.0 h. Plasma concentration of oxatomide decreased monophasically. The T1/2 was 2.58 h. The bioavailability was 6.74%. Plasma concentration of M-11 increased rapidly, and reached Cmax of 64.3 ng/ml at 0.7 h, and decreased monophasically with T1/2 of 3.79 h. After oral administration of oxatomide to non-fasting male rats, plasma concentration of oxatomide reached Cmax of 378 ng/ml at 3.3 h. The T1/2 was 3.27 h and the bioavailability was 17.5%. The Cmax and AUC0-infinity of M-11 were larger than those after oral administration of oxatomide to fasting male rats. These results demonstrated the usefulness of this method for monitoring and basic examination of biological samples and the influence of alimentation on absorption of oxatomide. Determination of plasma oxatomide concentrations would provide a useful indication of therapeutic efficacy.
 ...
PMID:High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of oxatomide and its metabolite and its application to pharmacokinetic study in rat plasma. 1244 38

Azelastine (CAS 58581-89-8) is a selective H1-receptor antagonist that inhibits histamine release and interferes with activation of other mediators of allergic inflammation. The present double-blind study aimed to evaluate azelastine eye drops (Allergodil) in patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis compared to placebo. A total of 116 patients with an ocular symptoms score for itching and conjunctival redness > or = 3 (0-6 scale) were randomized to twice-daily 0.05% azelastine eye drops treatment (n = 58) or placebo. Patients maintained daily logs and were clinically evaluated after 7, 21 and 42 days of treatment. Azelastine significantly improved itching and conjunctival redness versus placebo (p < 0.001). Tolerability was rated good or better by 97% of patients with only bitter taste and application site reaction notable adverse experiences. On Day 7, ocular symptoms score improved by 1.5 +/- 0.9 (versus 0.5 +/- 0.8 placebo) with score improvement > or = 2 in 55% with azelastine (versus 14% placebo). Itching and redness further improved at Day 42 (score improvement > or = 2 in 95% with azelastine versus 33% placebo) and completely resolved for 47% azelastine patients (versus 10% placebo). Daily patient logs confirmed the clinically assessed scores. Topical azelastine progressively improved itching and conjunctival redness in patients with moderate to severe perennial allergic conjunctivitis. Continued improvement with prolonged use is consistent with mechanisms other than H1-receptor blockade, such as possible down regulation of adhesion molecule receptors.
 ...
PMID:Azelastine eye drops in the treatment of perennial allergic conjunctivitis. 1270 71


<< Previous 1 2 3 Next >>