Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The new H1-receptor antagonist, cetirizine, is eliminated primarily unchanged by renal excretion and is thus potentially useful for relief of pruritus in patients with hepatic dysfunction, in whom many H1-receptor antagonists are contraindicated. The authors studied the elimination of cetirizine in six patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. In contrast to data obtained in healthy adults with normal hepatic function reported in the medical literature, they found that the mean serum elimination half-life value of cetirizine, 13.8 +/- 1.8 hours, was longer, and the mean clearance rate, 0.44 +/- 0.10 mL/min/kg, was lower (P < .05). The mean peak serum cetirizine concentration, 498 +/- 118 ng/mL, was higher, the mean area under the curve, 6438 +/- 1621 ng/mL/hr, was larger, and the mean fraction of the dose excreted as unchanged cetirizine in the urine, .32 +/- .14, was lower (P < .05). The duration of action of cetirizine was prolonged, as evidenced by significant suppression of the histamine-induced wheal and flare for 48 and 72 hours, respectively, after a single dose. Cetirizine elimination was impaired in patients with hepatic dysfunction.
 ...
PMID:Cetirizine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in primary biliary cirrhosis. 769 67

Eighteen adult subjects sensitive to mosquito bites participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 10 mg cetirizine. The drug was given prophylactically and the subjects were then exposed to bites of Aedes communis mosquitoes in the field. Bite lesions were measured and pruritus was scored with a visual analogue scale at 15 min, 60 min, 12 hr and 24 hr. Cetirizine significantly decreased immediate wealing and pruritus and, interestingly, also had a clear effect on the delayed 12 hr and 24 hr bite papules and pruritus. The diameter of a 15 min mosquito-bite weal was 10.1 +/- 10.4 mm (mean +/- s.d.) with the placebo and 5.9 +/- 5.9 mm with cetirizine treatment (P < 0.05). The 15 min pruritus scores were 36.0 +/- 25.2 and 11.2 +/- 13.2 (P < 0.001), respectively. The diameter of the 24 hr mosquito-bite lesion was 12.6 +/- 21.9 mm with the placebo and 7.4 +/- 16.1 mm with cetirizine treatment (P < 0.01). The 24 hr pruritus scores were 18.9 +/- 25.5 and 6.6 +/- 14.8 (P < 0.01), respectively. These results indicate that, in mosquito-sensitive subjects, prophylactically administered cetirizine is an effective drug against both immediate and delayed mosquito-bite symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of mosquito bites with cetirizine. 809 95

A total of 107 children of both sexes between 2 and 6 years of age with pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) were entered in a multicentre study of double-blind parallel group design in which the effects of 5 mg cetirizine, given as drops from a solution containing 10 mg/ml once daily each evening for two weeks, were compared with those of identical placebo. Sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction and nasal and ocular pruritus were the symptoms evaluated by means of symptom scores by investigators and, on daily record cards, by parents. Investigators also made a global evaluation at the end of treatment. Cetirizine was more active than placebo for each symptom evaluated both by parents and investigators. There were significant by more (p = 0.002) days during which symptoms were absent or mild, in the cetirizine than in the placebo group. When the maximum symptom scores rated by investigators at each visit were compared, the difference in favour of cetirizine at the end of treatment was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Global evaluation by investigators of changes in symptoms at the end of the study showed an improvement in both groups which was significantly greater with cetirizine, providing excellent or good improvement in 34/54 patients compared with 25/53 patients on placebo (p = 0.039). Tolerance was good. Three patients on cetirizine and none on placebo experienced mild somnolence.
 ...
PMID:Cetirizine for seasonal allergic rhinitis in children aged 2-6 years. A double-blind comparison with placebo. 822 Aug 4

The effect of cetirizine, 10 mg at night, on dermographic urticaria, was studied in 19 patients. The study design was a randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison with placebo, each treatment being given for 7 days. Patients kept a daily diary of itch and weal severity (100-mm linear analogue scale), and recorded sleep disturbance. The dermographic weal response was measured objectively with a spring-loaded stylus, and the weal threshold calculated from the force/response curve. There was a small, insignificant subjective response to placebo, but no objective response. On cetirizine, the subjective assessment of wealing was reduced from 34.3 +/- 6.7 (mean +/- SEM, 0-100 scale) to 16.8 +/- 4.1 (P = 0.02), itch was reduced from 43.2 +/- 6.6 to 19.4 +/- 4.1 (P = 0.001), and nights disturbed from 46.2 to 8.8% (P = 0.03). There was a shift to the right in the position of the force/response curve, and the wealing threshold increased from 24.6 +/- 3.2 to 54.7 +/- 4.4 g/mm2 (P = 0.00001), but there was no correlation between change in itch scores and wealing threshold. Cetirizine 10 mg daily is an effective treatment in dermographic urticaria, and its usefulness will depend on the prevalence of unwanted effects.
 ...
PMID:The effect of cetirizine on symptoms and wealing in dermographic urticaria. 825 55

One hundred seventy-eight adults with atopic dermatitis were included in this double-blind, parallel, randomized study where the effects of placebo, and cetirizine, 10, 20, and 40 mg administered daily during 4 weeks were measured. Local rescue therapy, which consisted of emollients and 1% hydrocortisone, was permitted and patients in all four groups used it in the same regular way. Severity of atopic dermatitis was measured via the following parameters: pruritus (visual analog scales used by both the investigator and patients), four point scale (absent, slight, moderate and serious) symptom scores for erythema, vesicles, excoriation, and lichenification in 14 body areas and a final visit assessment of the patient's general condition. The patient's quality of sleep was also measured along with standard blood chemistry tests. Adverse events during the study were recorded as well. In total 127 patients were assessed for efficacy. A statistically significant (P < or = .05) improvement was observed in all therapeutic groups for the following parameters: erythema, excoriation, lichenification, total symptom score, area involved, and pruritus. Cetirizine showed a dose-related improvement in the following parameters measured: erythema, lichenification, total symptom score, area involved, final assessment, and pruritus (measured by the patient at each visit). At 40 mg, cetirizine was significantly (P < or = .05) more effective than placebo for these parameters. At 20 mg, this was true only for pruritus (measured by the patient at each visit).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Dose ranging study: cetirizine in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults. 843 Sep 20

Mosquito bites usually cause wealing and delayed bite papules. Cetirizine decreases wealing, bite papules and pruritus but the effect of other antihistamines on mosquito bites is unknown. We studied the effect of ebastine in 30 mosquito bite-sensitive adult subjects. Ebastine 10 mg or 20 mg and placebo were given for 4 days in a cross-over fashion. Aedes aegypti bites were given on forearms. The size of the bite lesions and pruritus (visual analogue score) were measured at 15 min, 2, 6, and 24 h after the bites. Twenty-five subjects were evaluable in the study. At 15 min ebastine decreased significantly the size of the bite lesion (p = 0.0017) and pruritus (p<0.0001). The effects of 10 mg and 20 mg of ebastine were similar. No significant effect was found at 2, 6 or 24 h, but when the measurements at all four time points were compiled the size of the bite lesion and pruritus score decreased significantly. Sedation occurred during ebastine treatment in 6 (21%) and during placebo treatment in 2 (7%) subjects. The present results show that prophylactically given ebastine is effective against immediate mosquito bite symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Effect of ebastine on mosquito bites. 922 28

Among the most frequently used drugs in the treatment of allergic rhinitis we have to mention topical nasal corticosteroids and H1 antihistamines used both systemically and topically. The present study focused the effectiveness and tolerability of cetirizine and fluticasone propionate in seasonal allergic rhinitis. 54 patients, divided into three homogeneous groups, underwent the following different treatments: Group 1: Placebo of fluticasone (2 puff per nostril once daily by aerosol) + cetirizine (10 mg/die per os) for 60 days. Group 2: Fluticasone (100 mg per nostril once daily by aerosol) + placebo of cetirizine (per os) for 60 days. Group 3: Cetirizine (10 mg/die per os) for 60 days + fluticasone (100 mg per nostril once daily by aerosol) for 20 days. The patients reported nasal symptoms (sneezing, obstruction, itching, rhinorrea) on a clinical diary. ECP levels in nasal secretions were investigated in all patients to determine the anti-inflammatory activity of both treatments. Cetirizine resulted very effective in the treatment of sneezing, itching and acqueous rhinorrea whereas not much effective on nasal obstruction. On the contrary, fluticasone, which acted effectively on nasal obstruction, resulted inefficacious on the other symptoms. The third group of patients achieved the best results on all four symptoms, including obstruction, which continued even after interrupting the treatment with fluticasone. The ECP levels were significantly reduced by both treatments. The side effects in all 3 groups were rare and not serious. From these results we can assert that the synergic action of the two drugs, achieves the best effectiveness, that the fluticasone treatment can be limited to 20 days cycles and finally that both molecules are well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Comparative study between fluticasone propionate and cetirizine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. 993 6

Itching reflects a distinct quality of cutaneous nociception elicited by chemical or other stimuli to neuronal receptors at the superficial layers of the skin and muco-cutaneous orifices. Although recent experimental studies of the conduction and perception of itch have yielded deeper insight into the physiology of this sensory quality, little is known about the neuromechanisms involved in pruritus accompanying many inflammatory skin diseases, in particular, in atopic eczema. Previous case-control studies of our research group with patients suffering from atopic eczema (AE) revealed significantly diminished itch perception after iontophoretic application of different doses of histamine as well as substance P (i.c. injected). Further experiments using acetylcholine (ACh, i.c.) clearly demonstrated that ACh elicits pruritus instead of pain in patients with AE. The first part of the present review deals with the results of our most recent case-control studies on histamine-induced itch perception in atopics devoid of eczema as well as in patients with urticaria or psoriasis compared to atopics with or without manifest eczema. We demonstrated that both focal itch and perifocal alloknesis (i.e., itch elicited by a slight mechanical, otherwise non-itching stimulus) were significantly reduced in eczema-free atopics yet were normal in non-atopics suffering from urticaria or psoriasis. In further studies using ACh i.c. injected into the uninvolved skin of patients with AE, lichen ruber, psoriasis, type IV contact eczema, or non-specific nummular eczema (n = 10/each group), all the atopics and 6/10 psoriatics felt itch instead of burning pain, but none of the others did. Different doses of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) i.c. applied to the controls and the atopics with or without eczema did not markedly increase the intensity of nociceptive sensations. However, ACh induced pain in the controls, pure pruritus in the atopics with acute eczema, and a 'mixture' of pain and itch in the atopics just free from eczema. Obviously, the quality of sensations evoked by ACh and VIP depends on the inflammatory or non-inflammatory state of the atopic skin. In a placebo-controlled, double blind study on histamine-induced focal itch and alloknesis with healthy subjects (n = 15) using naltrexone (opioid receptor antagonist) and cetirizine (H1-blocking agent), naltrexone was found to significantly reduce both itching and alloknesis. Cetirizine reduced focal itch but failed to influence the alloknesis phenomenon. The wheal and flare reaction was suppressed only by cetirizine. These different effects point to a mainly CNS-based activity of naltrexone but a peripheral level effect of cetirizine. Due to long-lasting experience with group sport as a supporting adjuvant for inpatients with AE, we evaluated, by clinical, psychometric, and physiological studies, the therapeutic efficacy of controlled physical exercise in addition to otherwise equal anti-eczematous therapy for both voluntary participants and non-participants in sports by performing several case-control studies, one followed-up to 6 months after the patients' discharge from the hospital. Regular moderate exercises neither deteriorated nor impeded the recovery from AE, ameliorated the participants' scratch controlling ability and significantly their depressed emotional mood. The non-participants failed to achieve these aims. Sweating-induced itch was inhibited in almost all participants if simple skin care (clearing by warm shower, ointment) and short-term rest were used by informed patients. In conclusion, there are several indications that itching is elicited in individuals inclined to cutaneous atopy, regardless of their eczematous or just eczema-free state, by a different physiological pathway from that in non-atopic individuals. Therefore, antipruritic agents influencing the centrally altered nociception of atopics are needed and may be expected in near future. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
 ...
PMID:Recent studies of cutaneous nociception in atopic and non-atopic subjects. 1009 77

Antihistamines are the pharmacologic cornerstone of treatment for allergic rhinitis. The comparative effects of the newer, more specific H (1) -antagonists cetirizine and loratadine among younger patients are not well characterized. The efficacy and safety of cetirizine and loratadine were compared in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, longitudinal, parallel-group study of 80 children, 2 to 6 years of age, with perennial allergic rhinitis caused by house dust mites or plant pollens (verified by a radioallergosorbent or skin test). Patients received cetirizine or loratadine at 0.2 mg/kg once daily in the morning for 28 days. Histamine skin tests and eosinophil counts from nasal smears were performed at baseline and at the end of treatment. Individual rhinitis symptoms were assessed by the investigator at baseline and on day 28 and by parents at baseline and daily in symptom diaries. Global assessments were made by using a visual analog scale at baseline and at the end of treatment. Cetirizine produced significantly greater inhibition of the wheal response compared with loratadine (P <.0001). Eosinophil counts were improved to a comparable degree with both agents. Cetirizine and loratadine produced comparable improvements in symptoms and according to a global evaluation as assessed by the investigator at the end of treatment. Both agents produced substantial symptomatic relief according to patients' daily diary assessments; however, cetirizine was more effective than loratadine in relieving the symptoms of rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal obstruction, and nasal pruritus (P <. 0001). Both treatments were well tolerated; two patients receiving cetirizine were dropped from the study because of adverse events. Cetirizine and loratadine provided effective, well-tolerated relief of the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis in small children. Cetirizine was more effective than loratadine in inhibiting the wheal response to histamine challenge and afforded greater reductions in most individual symptoms assessed daily by the parent.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of cetirizine and loratadine in children ages 2 to 6 years with perennial allergic rhinitis. 1042 57

Cetirizine, a human metabolite of hydroxyzine, is a selective H1-receptor antagonist currently approved for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, perennial allergic rhinitis, and chronic urticaria. In U.S. clinical trials, transient reversible hepatic transaminase elevations were observed in <2% of patients during cetirizine therapy. We report a case of cetirizine-induced cholestasis in a 28-year-old man with no previous hepatobiliary disease after a 2-year period of taking cetirizine on a daily basis. The treatment of this patient included the use of ursodeoxycholic acid, as well as hydroxyzine, for symptomatic relief of pruritus. In light of the patient's clinical and biochemical improvement while using hydroxyzine, it appears that the hepatic metabolism of hydroxyzine to metabolites, including cetirizine, is not involved in the pathogenesis of this particular case of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Cetirizine should be considered as a potential cause of drug-induced cholestasis.
 ...
PMID:Cetirizine-induce cholestasis. 1103 10


<< Previous 1 2 3 Next >>