Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The efficacy and safety of a new non-sedating antihistamine, loratadine (Clarityn, CAS 79794-75-5) 10 mg q.d., was compared to the classical antihistamine, hydroxyzine 25 mg t.i.d. and placebo in a 4-week (optional 12 week) randomized, double-blind, multi-center study in 203 patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. Efficacy evaluations included weekly physician and patient assessments of pruritus, overall disease condition, and therapeutic response to treatment. Loratadine and hydroxyzine were significantly more effective than placebo and clinically comparable to each other as measured by all efficacy evaluations at each visit. Loratadine was safe and well tolerated with sedation and dry mouth similar to placebo and significantly less than hydroxyzine.
 ...
PMID:Relative efficacy and safety of loratadine, hydroxyzine, and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria. 144 78

Within the framework of a field study, Loratidine (Lisino) was administered to a total of 5,806 patients suffering from pruritic dermatological disorders, i.e. urticaria, neurodermatitis and eczema. As a guideline for the duration of the treatment, a period of three weeks was selected; however, many patients showed a response in a shorter time. The standard dose of loratidine was one 10-mg tablet a day. At the end of the treatment period, 69.6% the urticaria patients were free from pruritus, and 77.6% were free from wheals. In the case of the eczema patients, 47.6% were pruritus-free, while the remaining patients all showed some improvement. In the majority of cases pruritus decreased appreciably after only one hour, but at the latest on the first day of treatment. Treatment with loratidine was tolerated without side effects by 5,593 patients (96.3%).
 ...
PMID:[Treatment of pruritic skin diseases with loratadine. Results of an open multicenter study]. 182 71

A total of 317 patients received loratadine, 10 mg once daily, terfenadine 60 mg twice daily, or placebo in a 14-day, double-blind, randomized study in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Four nasal and four nonnasal symptoms were evaluated. At the end point evaluation, mean total scores of combined nasal and nonnasal symptoms decreased from baseline (improved) 46%, 44%, and 35%, respectively, for loratadine, terfenadine, and placebo. The difference between loratadine and placebo treatment was significant (p = 0.03). Loratadine was particularly effective compared with placebo in relieving nasal discharge, sneezing, and itching/burning eyes. Therapeutic response to treatment was good or excellent in 66 (64%) of 103 loratadine-treated patients, 58 (56%) of 104 terfenadine-treated patients, and 48 (47%) of 102 placebo-treated patients. Adverse experiences reported during the study were usually mild or moderate and were not significantly different among the three treatment groups. Sedation (somnolence) was reported by 10 loratadine-treated patients, seven terfenadine-treated patients, and eight placebo-treated patients. Loratadine, 10 mg once daily, was comparable to terfenadine, 60 mg twice daily, and significantly superior to placebo in the symptomatic relief of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and safety of loratadine (10 mg once daily), terfenadine (60 mg twice daily), and placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. 257 17

A single blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was performed during a pollen season in 41 patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis. A group of 26 patients was treated with loratadine (10 mg daily in one dose) for 3 weeks. Placebo was given in the group of 15 patients (1 tablet daily) during 8-10 days. The following parameters were assessed: clinical symptoms (rhinorhea, sneezing, blockage, nasal itching, eye symptoms), rhinoscopy, at baseline and after 8 and 21 days of the treatment. Eosinophils in nasal secretion were countered before and after the medication. Patients recorded daily nasal and ocular symptoms and possible adverse events in diary cards. It was shown a statistical significant improvement of clinical symptoms in the group treated with loratadine in comparison with the placebo group (p < 0.01). Very good and good results were observed in 84.6% of the treated with loratadine patients. The reduction of eosinophilia in nasal secretion during medication period was noted. Loratadine did not induce more side effects than placebo.
 ...
PMID:[Loratadine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis]. 780 48

The safety and efficacy of loratadine (Sch 29851, CAS 79794-75-5) syrup (5 or 10 mg QD) was compared to terfenadine (CAS 50679-08-8) suspension (30 mg b.i.d.) in a randomized, third party blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Two hundred thirty-six children ages 6-12 years, with chronic allergic skin disorders were treated for 14 days. The predominant skin condition was atrophic dermatitis (88% of the efficacy population). Evaluation of efficacy was based on investigator and patient assessment of symptoms, overall condition of the disease, and therapeutic response to treatment. After 7 and 14 days of treatment, and in the endpoint analysis (last valid study visit for all patients) the decreases from baseline in mean total sign/symptom scores, and all individual symptoms, did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between treatments. Itching improved 54% in the loratadine group and 58% in the terfenadine group in the endpoint analysis. Forty-five percent of patients treated with loratadine and 46% of terfenadine-treated patients treated had complete or marked relief of their symptoms at endpoint. The efficacy of loratadine increased during the study, suggesting that patients did not develop tolerance to the medication over the 14-day course of therapy. Mild to moderate treatment-related adverse experiences were reported in 7/113 patients (6%) treated with loratadine and 11/119 patients (9%) treated with terfenadine. Single daily doses of 5 mg or 10 mg loratadine syrup were comparable to terfenadine suspension 30 mg twice daily for improving the symptoms of chronic allergic skin disorders in children. Loratadine was safe and well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup and terfenadine suspension in the treatment of chronic allergic skin diseases in a pediatric population. 829 64

The aim of the study was to assess efficacy and safety of 5 mg loratadine/120 mg pseudoephedrine combination drug in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. 30 patients allergic to grass pollen were treated with the new drug (Clarinase) twice a day in 15-day study during grass pollen seasonal. Nasal an non-nasal symptoms were evaluated for efficacy. Loratadine/pseudoephedrine combination effected a significant decrease in total symptoms score as well as individual evaluated symptoms score: nasal stuffiness, itching and discharge, sneezing, eye itching, tearing and redness of the eyes. The treatments was well tolerated. No serious side effects were noticed. The incidence of mild sedation, dry mouth, insomnia and nervousness was only 3 to 7 percent. 5 mg loratadine plus 120 mg pseudoephedrine was safe and effective in relieving the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.
 ...
PMID:[Evaluation of the efficiency and safety of the loratadine with pseudoephedrine combination drug in treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis]. 963 91

Atopic dermatitis is a common skin disease in Thai children. The treatment of atopic dermatitis requires topical corticosteroids, emollients, systemic antihistamine as well as avoidance of the precipitating factors. A double blind multicenter placebo controlled study was conducted to assess the therapeutic efficacy of topical mometasone furoate 0.1 per cent cream in combination with loratadine syrup. Forty-eight patients, 23 boys and 25 girls, mean age 73.67 months, with atopic dermatitis were included in the study. The severity of the disease was measured by using the SCORAD index including the degree of erythema, dryness, edema/papulation, oozing/crusting, lichenification, and excoriation. Total area involved was measured and a target area of dermatitis was selected for specific evaluation. The degree of clinical signs and pruritic symptom was graded. The sensation of pruritus, disturbance of sleep due to pruritus, and feeling of sleepiness in the morning were recorded. Mometasone furoate 0.1 per cent cream was applied to all patients once daily. One group received loratadine syrup and another group received placebo syrup. They were followed-up on day 5, 8 and 15. The severity of atopic dermatitis and pruritus significantly decreased after 14 days of treatment in both groups (p < 0.001). There was no difference in therapeutic response between the loratadine and placebo groups (p = 0.99). All signs examined had decreased by the end of the study. The result demonstrated that 0.1 per cent mometasone therapy is very effective for treating childhood atopic dermatitis. Loratadine did not show beneficial effect when combined with good topical corticosteroid but it was safe and had no serious side effect on the children.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic efficacy and safety of loratadine syrup in childhood atopic dermatitis treated with mometasone furoate 0.1 per cent cream. 1211 96

Loratidine is a piperidine derivative resemble to azatadine long acting non sedating commonly used for the treatment of allergic condition like watery or itchy eyes, runny nose, chronic urticaria or throat itching. In the present study different brands of loratidine were evaluated for the weight variation, hardness, friability, disintegration time and dissolution. Dissolution release study performed by using paddle method (USP 2) in 900 ml of 0.1N HCl at 50 rpm. The physicochemical of loratidine did not give any variation. By this study we conclude that all parameter for physicochemical properties like weight variation, hardness of tablets, friability, their disintegration time and the dissolution release study for all the brands of loratidine that are available in Karachi meet the British pharmacopoeia (BP) and United State pharmacopoeia (USP) specification for quality control analysis.Weight variation, hardness and friability value requirement was complied by all brands .Disintegration time for all brands was less than 15 minutes complying the BP/USP recommendation. All brands showed more than 80% drug release within 45 minutes. The present findings suggest that almost all the brands of loratidine meet the BP/USP specification for QC analysis.
 ...
PMID:Report: A comparative study of loratidine physiochemical properties from different brands. 3047 33