Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

At the beginning, the way intrathecal morphine was used for postoperative pain relief was quite unfortunate, because the doses derived from experience with morphine-tolerant cancer patients were considerably too high and respiratory depression occurred frequently. Subsequent dose-finding studies showed that the doses of morphine used initially could be reduced by a factor of ten without loss of the analgesic effect and with a marked reduction in side-effects. No respiratory depression has been reported when doses below 0.1 mg morphine are used. METHOD. In this prospective study the effect of 0.06 to 0.08 mg intrathecal morphine, mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anesthesia, was investigated in surgical patients aged 21 to 81 years, ASA grade I or II, scheduled for orthopaedic operations or herniorraphies. Thirty unpremedicated patients were enrolled in the study and were, after informed consent, randomly allocated to a control group without morphine or to a morphine group. The analgesic effect was assessed by the time interval between the administration of the spinal anaesthesia and the first demand for an analgesic medication. The mood state was evaluated with the adjective checklist of Janke and Debus 6 h after the spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In the control group half of the patients asked for an analgesic medication within 275 min (median) after the spinal anaesthesia, and all patients within 420 min, whereas in the morphine group half of the patients asked for an analgesic within 1170 min (median). Seven patients had not required an analgesic at the termination of the observation period 20 h after the spinal anaesthesia. The mood status showed no difference between the two groups, in particular, no dizziness or drowsiness after morphine. There was no difference in the incidence of side-effects such as nausea or urinary retention between the two groups. Pruritus was not reported spontaneously but was found upon questioning in five patients. It was in no case disturbing. CONCLUSIONS. Morphine (0.06 to 0.08 mg) mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia provided for an analgesia of more than 20 h duration in half of the patients. This technique is safe, simple, reliable and virtually free of side-effects. No particular supervision due to the administration of intrathecal morphine is necessary in this dose range if systemic opiates are avoided. If the analgesia is unsatisfactory, a non-opioid analgesic is recommended.
...
PMID:[Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain]. 146 57

A randomized, double-blind study was designed to determine the effects on maternal intraoperative analgesia of adding one of the following opioids to the local anesthetic at the onset of epidural block, before surgery and neonatal delivery: morphine (3 mg), fentanyl (75 micrograms), sufentanil (50 micrograms), buprenorphine (0.3 mg) and oxymorphone (1 mg). The duration of postoperative analgesia, the presence of side effects and the neonatal outcome were also studied. Ninety healthy multiparas, at term, undergoing elective cesarean delivery using lumbar epidural anesthesia with 2% lidocaine were randomized in six equal groups to receive one of the opioids or saline. The predelivery administration of morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil significantly improved the intraoperative analgesia. Patients who received fentanyl, sufentanil, buprenorphine or oxymorphone had more somnolence than the others (p less than 0.01), but this did not interfere with the first mother-infant relationship during surgery. Patients in the buprenorphine group had more vomiting during surgery when compared with the others (p less than 0.01). Morphine provided the longest pain-free interval, followed by oxymorphone, buprenorphine, sufentanil and fentanyl. Postoperatively, the number of patients having pruritus and vomiting was significantly higher in the morphine and buprenorphine groups, respectively (p less than 0.01 versus others). No adverse neonatal effects were noted in any group.
...
PMID:Epidural analgesia during and after cesarean delivery. Comparison of five opioids. 167 19

The process of nociception, the anatomy of the epidural space, and the placement of the epidural catheter are reviewed, and the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, analgesic efficacy, and potential adverse effects of epidurally administered narcotics and local anesthetics are discussed, as well as patient monitoring standards and solution preparation guidelines for these agents. The epidural space is located between the dura mater (the outer-most membrane surrounding the spinal cord) and the vertebral canal. The site of catheter placement is determined by the dermatomes corresponding to the site of desired analgesia. The primary factors that differentiate epidural narcotics are related to their pharmacokinetic profiles. Morphine, which is hydrophilic, has a slower onset of action and a longer duration of analgesia than lipophilic compounds such as fentanyl; morphine also results in less segmentalization (the degree to which analgesia is limited to discrete dermatomal segments corresponding to the level of the epidural narcotic injection) than is seen with lipophilic compounds. Studies have shown that epidural narcotics provide superior pain relief compared with systemic narcotics. Common adverse effects associated with therapeutic doses of intraspinal narcotics include itching, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, and sedation; respiratory depression is uncommon after epidural administration of narcotics. The most bothersome adverse effect encountered with analgesic doses of local anesthetics is paresthesia. Solutions for epidural administration must be sterile and preservative free. Epidural administration of narcotics and local anesthetics seems to provide better pain relief than conventional methods but may be associated with more bothersome adverse effects.
...
PMID:Epidural analgesia. 174 84

Epidural morphine injection was done in nineteen patients who had been admitted from March to August 1990 to the Intensive Care Unit, Severance Hospital, Yonsei Medical Center for respiratory care including ventilator care. Morphine suplphate, 2.67 +/- 0.27 mg was injected one to three times to four patients after chest trauma, and to fifteen patients after thoracotomy. Tidal volume and vital capacity were increased from 4.45 +/- 0.48 and 8.31 +/- 0.50 to 6.91 +/- 0.41 and 12.81 +/- 0.73 mg/kg. However, respiratory rates decreased from 26.07 +/- 1.41 to 20.07 +/- 1.16/min. Inspiratory force increased from -13.40 +/- 1.31 to -26.53 +/- 1.82 cmH2O. Pain score decreased from 9.22 +/- 0.57 to 3.56 +/- 0.83 during this period. PaCO2 did not differ significantly (39.33 +/- 1.13 and 39.48 +/- 1.42 mmHg). Side effects such as pruritus and urinary retention were treated with naloxone 7 approximately 10 ng/kg/min. Mean arterial pressure and pulse rates stayed stable during the study periods. Ventilator hours and ICU stays differed from the control group. However, the duration was not statistically significant. The control group consisted of patients who were admitted during the six months from September 1989 to February 1990 to the ICU for respiratory care, without epidural morphine injection.
...
PMID:Epidural morphine on ventilatory function in chest trauma and thoracotomy patients. 178 Nov 84

Forty-five patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were randomly divided into three groups. An epidural tube was inserted into one of the following three sites, Th11-12, L2-3, and caudal region. General anesthesia was then maintained with nitrous oxide-oxygen-enflurane, and pancuronium bromide. Morphine hydrochloride 2 mg in 8 ml of normal saline was administered into one of the designated epidural spaces one to two hours before the assumed end of surgery. Postoperative pain was assessed every four hours after the end of the operation until the next morning. Morphine exerted a relatively profound and prolonged analgesic effect in 40% of the Th11-12 group of patients, as well as in 6.7% of the L2-3 and caudal groups. But, supplementary analgesics were necessary in the other patients. No significant differences were found in the degree and extension of postoperative pain, as well as the doses of supplementary analgesics among the three groups. Adverse effects, such as nausea, vomiting and itching, occurred in 30 to 40% of each of the morphine administered groups. Though morphine was applied into different spinal levels, this clinical study did not show any difference in extension of analgesia. The epidurally applied morphine may be distributed widely in the spinal arachnoid space after some time, and may exert an effect on the brain as well as on the spinal nerves. When morphine is administered epidurally one to two hours before the end of a surgical operation, selection of an injection site according to the dermatome level of the skin incision may be unnecessary.
...
PMID:[Degree and extension of analgesic effect of morphine applied at three different spinal levels of epidural space]. 227 45

A nationwide follow-up survey was undertaken to study the use of extradural and intrathecal opioids in the management of pain, to estimate the incidence of delayed ventilatory depression and to study post-injection surveillance routines. A questionnaire was sent to all 93 anaesthetic departments in Sweden; 96% responded. The major indication for using extradural opioids was the treatment of postoperative, traumatic and cancer pain. During 1984 over 14,000 patients received extradural, and over 1100 patients intrathecal, opioids. Morphine was the predominant opioid for extradural administration and was used in 96% of patients. Extradural opioid analgesia constitutes about 25% of all extradural blocks performed in Sweden. Pruritus and urinary retention were considered as minor problems; however, the risk was considerably higher after intrathecal morphine. The incidence of delayed ventilatory depression was about 1:1100 (0.09%) following extradural morphine and 1:275 (0.36%) following intrathecal morphine. Risk factors for delayed ventilatory depression are discussed. Administration of extradural morphine for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing major surgery is considered a high benefit-low risk technique by most Swedish anaesthetists. The results of the present nationwide survey suggests that, following extradural morphine, surveillance of patients for more than 12 h appears unnecessary.
...
PMID:Present state of extradural and intrathecal opioid analgesia in Sweden. A nationwide follow-up survey. 288 44

We performed a double-blind study of the dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine (0, 0.3, 1, and 2.5 mg) for postoperative pain relief in 33 subjects who underwent total knee or hip replacement surgery. Assessments commenced 1 hour after the opioid injection, which was given at the end of surgery, and continued for 24 hours. Pain measurements, supplementary analgesia requirements, and adverse effects were recorded. Intrathecal morphine provided effective, long-lasting pain relief. All doses delayed the initial perception of discomfort (T-Pain) and also postponed the onset of severe pain requiring analgetic supplementation (T-Morphine) (1.25 hours control with placebo injections; greater than 20 hours with intrathecal morphine 0.3, 1, and 2.5 mg: P less than 0.05). Although 0.3 mg usually provided good analgesia it was unsatisfactory in three of 10 patients (30%), whereas 1 and 2.5 mg were absolutely reliable. Respiratory depression (increased PaCO2), common after the administration of 1 or 2.5 mg intrathecal morphine, was slow in onset and prolonged. The respiratory depression after 2.5 mg was more profound than after 1 mg, and produced apnea necessitating large-dose naloxone therapy. Pruritus was unique to intrathecal morphine administration, but nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention were common in all the groups. We conclude that no ideal dose of intrathecal morphine exists because, even with small quantities, minor adverse effects are evident. Doses between 0.3 and 1 mg, however, should provide good analgesia free from the major complication, respiratory depression.
...
PMID:A dose-response study of intrathecal morphine: efficacy, duration, optimal dose, and side effects. 318 98

Since its introduction to North America in 1942, the use of epidural catheter analgesia has increased dramatically. Improved equipment, methods and medications have broadened its application to include among others, surgical anesthesia, chronic pain relief and the management of postoperative pain. Numerous techniques for epidural puncture and insertion of the catheter have been described. Although complications have been associated with placement of an epidural catheter, these are rare when performed by an experienced anesthesiologist. Epidural analgesia was first accomplished by blockade with local anesthetics. Bupivacaine has been called the local anesthetic of choice for epidural infusion. Bolus administration of epidural local anesthetics gives effective analgesia; however, its use is limited by brief duration and occasionally severe hypotension. Epidural local anesthetics have been administered by continuous infusion in an attempt to minimize side effects. Nevertheless, hypotension, as well as motor block, numbness, nausea and urinary retention have occurred. Epidural analgesia with local anesthetics is effective in relieving postoperative pain, but its safety and feasibility have been questioned because of the frequent, potentially serious side effects. These problems led to trials of epidural narcotics for postoperative pain management. The exact site of action of epidural narcotic analgesics is debatable; however, the bulk of evidence supports a direct spinal action. Epidural narcotics appear to specifically inhibit nociceptive stimuli. The prolonged and profound analgesia that occurs with epidural narcotics relative to parenteral administration is due to a higher concentration of drug reaching the CSF through the epidural route. Since nervous transmission is not completely blocked this technique cannot provide anesthesia during operation. Morphine has been the most frequently used narcotic for epidural analgesia. Results of several recent, randomized double-blind studies have shown that epidural narcotics give adequate analgesia comparable with that observed with epidural bupivacaine. Epidural morphine provides a greater duration of analgesia and may cause fewer side effects. Improved analgesia has been reported when epidural narcotics are used in combination with local anesthetics. Continuous administration of low dosage epidural narcotics has been shown to have less frequent side effects than bolus administration. Nevertheless, pruritus, urinary retention, hypotension and severe respiratory depression have been reported with both methods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:Epidural catheter analgesia for the management of postoperative pain. 351 98

A prospective study of the effect and side-effects of epidural morphine for pain relief in 1085 patients after thoracic, abdominal, urologic, or orthopaedic surgery was performed. Morphine chloride was diluted in saline or bupivacaine and administered through an epidural catheter placed at a segmental level appropriate for the type of surgery. The initial dose was 4 or 6 mg morphine and supplementary doses were given when needed to obtain complete freedom from pain during deep breathing or nursing care. The total dose of epidural morphine from end of surgery until the next morning varied from 4 to 18 mg. 97% of hip arthroplasty patients, 91% of prostatectomy patients and thoracotomy patients, 90% of patients after major lower extremity surgery and 88% of patients after laparotomy were completely satisfied with the postoperative course. For hip arthroplasty and major extremity surgery, an initial dose of 4 mg of epidural morphine was as effective as 6 mg. After prostatectomy, laparotomy, and thoracotomy, an initial dose of 6 mg gave significantly better effect than 4 mg. Pruritus occurred in 11%, nausea or vomiting in 34%, and respiratory depression in 0.9% of the total patient population. Urinary retention occurred in 42% of patients not having urinary catheters in place. Postoperative nausea or vomiting was more frequent in women than in men (P less than 0.001). There was a higher incidence of nausea or vomiting in men experiencing pain than in men who were completely pain-free after abdominal surgery (P less than 0.001). Respiratory depression was rare and occurred as a gradually decreasing respiratory rate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Epidural morphine for postoperative pain: experience with 1085 patients. 397 21

To determine the efficacy of epidural morphine during labor and delivery, 40 healthy parturients who requested epidural analgesia were randomly given either a single injection of morphine sulfate (2 mg, n = 9; 5 mg, n = 10; or 7.5 mg, n = 11) or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 10). Bupivacaine provided excellent analgesia in all patients. Morphine (2 or 5 mg) did not produce adequate analgesia and needed to be supplemented by local anesthesia. Morphine (7.5 mg) gave satisfactory analgesia in 7 of 11 patients until the end of the first stage of labor, and, in an additional patient, for almost 13 hr, at which time cephalopelvic disproportion was diagnosed. In all patients given epidural morphine, local anesthesia was needed for the second stage of labor if instrumentation or episiotomy was required. The only side effect was pruritus, which occurred in three patients. Epidural morphine did not produce neonatal depression, as evidenced by Apgar scores and neurologic and adaptive capacity scores. We conclude that 7.5 mg of epidural morphine can give satisfactory pain relief during labor but not delivery, and that 2 or 5 mg of morphine is ineffective. Although 0.5% bupivacaine provided better anesthesia, epidural morphine might prove useful for selected patients.
...
PMID:Maternal and neonatal effects of epidural morphine for labor and delivery. 670 48


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>