Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We compared the analgesia, side effects, and plasma concentrations of buprenorphine and fentanyl in a double-blind study of 78 parturients receiving one of these drugs by patient-controlled epidural infusion after elective cesarean section with epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomized to three epidural infusion groups: group 1 (n = 26), 3 micrograms/mL buprenorphine with 0.015% bupivacaine and 1 microgram/mL epinephrine; group 2 (n = 26), 3 micrograms/mL fentanyl with 0.015% bupivacaine and 1 microgram/mL epinephrine; and group 3 (n = 26), 3 micrograms/mL fentanyl with 0.015% bupivacaine. Plasma for determination of opioid concentrations was obtained in some subjects in each group at intervals up to 48 h during the infusion and in some subjects from each group at intervals after the infusion was stopped. Pain relief was similar and satisfactory in all three groups. The median overall satisfaction scores were high for all three groups. Pruritus was more common in the fentanyl groups (P less than 0.05). However, vomiting was more disturbing to the patients and seen only with buprenorphine. No patient had a respiratory rate less than 12 breaths/min. Epinephrine use was associated with a slower infusion rate (P less than 0.05, group 2 vs 3). All patients were able to ambulate without difficulty. Mean opioid plasma concentrations did not exceed 1.5 ng/mL. Thus, epidural patient-controlled analgesia in all three groups provided excellent analgesia, permitted ambulation, and was without serious side effects. Epidural buprenorphine offered no advantages over epidural fentanyl.
 ...
PMID:Epidural patient-controlled analgesia after cesarean section: buprenorphine-0.015% bupivacaine with epinephrine versus fentanyl-0.015% bupivacaine with and without epinephrine. 850 57

Epidural sufentanil was administered to 57 women after Caesarean section, under epidural anaesthesia, to provide postoperative analgesia. Each patient received a 30 micrograms dose at the first complaint of pain and this dose was repeated when pain recurred. Epinephrine (1:200,000) was added to the local anaesthetic, sufentanil, both, or neither. The time of onset of analgesia, efficacy, duration of analgesia and the incidence of side-effects were recorded. This dose of epidural sufentanil provided satisfactory postoperative analgesia and no serious side-effects were observed. The onset of analgesia was rapid (4-6 min), but the duration of action was brief (4-5 hr). The addition of 1:200,000 epinephrine had no statistically significant influence on any of the measured variables. Pruritus occurred commonly but never required treatment. Drowsiness was experienced frequently and was felt by some patients to inhibit their interaction with their neonates. Respiratory depression, as defined by a respiratory rate less than 10 bpm, was not observed. A number of patients noted a transient period of euphoria 5-8 min after administration of the epidural sufentanil. The authors feel that epidural sufentanil provides satisfactory analgesia after Caesarean section, but the brief duration of action and the high incidence of drowsiness limit its acceptability for routine use in obstetric patients.
 ...
PMID:Epidural sufentanil for post-caesarean section analgesia: lack of benefit of epinephrine. 197 Nov 98

Ten patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma were treated over 4 months with the betablocker Metoprolol tartrate as 3% eye drops twice daily. Intraocular pressures were significantly lowered by the drug in all patients throughout the study. The mean initial IOP response was 36% relative decrease, the maintenance IOP decrease ranged between 23 and 30%. There was partial loss of the initial response within the first weeks of treatment. Topical Metoprolol treatment possibly affects systolic blood pressure and heart rate. There had been no objective side effects of Metoprolol treatment. The most common subjective side effects were burning, itching and tearing. The therapeutic significance of the results is discussed.
 ...
PMID:The long-term ocular and systemic effects of topically applied metoprolol tartrate in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. 701 Aug 91

Two studies were conducted using the conjunctival provocation test (CPT) model of ocular allergy. The objective of the first study was to evaluate the sensitivity of the CPT model to a topical corticosteroid. Selected was loteprednol etabonate 0.5%, previously found effective in the treatment of ocular allergy and inflammation. The study was a randomized double-masked, placebo-controlled, paired-comparison of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% (LE), b.i.d. or q.i.d. Sixty subjects who had a minimum pre-determined allergic response received LE in one eye and placebo in the fellow eye for 28 days from Day 7 to Day 35. Antigen challenges were carried out on Days 0, 7 (baseline), 21 and 35. The primary endpoints were interocular differences in itching and mean redness (the average of ciliary, conjunctival and episcleral vessel beds). LE (either b.i.d. or q.i.d.) was significantly more effective than placebo for reducing mean redness and itching. No clinical or statistically significant changes in intraocular pressure were observed. Based upon the results of Study 1, we used the CPT model to aid in the selection of a concentration of loteprednol etabonate for subsequent studies in environmental seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. This was a randomized double-masked, placebo-controlled, paired-comparison of loteprednol etabonate 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3%, q.i.d. in 88 subjects. The dosing and testing regimen was similar to the first portion of the study. Loteprednol etabonate, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3%, was numerically superior to the placebo in reducing mean redness and itching. At the 20-minute post allergen challenge, the 0.1% concentration was significantly superior (p < 0.05) to the placebo on Visit 4 (2 and 4 hour challenge) in reducing the mean redness; however, LE was only numerically superior in relieving itching. The 0.2% concentration was significantly superior (p < 0.05) to the placebo in the reduction of mean redness and itching on Visit 3 (Day 21) and in reduction of mean redness on Visit 4 (4 hour challenge). The 0.3% concentration was significantly superior (p < 0.05) to the placebo in the reduction of mean redness on all visits, and statistically significant in the reduction of itching on Visit 4 (4 hour challenge). While there were some elevations of IOP with LE 0.2%, they were not clinically significant. In conclusion, the CPT model of ocular allergy is useful in the evaluation of corticosteroids. Furthermore, based upon a dose-response study in this model, 0.2% loteprednol etabonate was selected for further evaluation in environmental seasonal allergic conjunctivitis studies.
 ...
PMID:The conjunctival provocation test model of ocular allergy: utility for assessment of an ocular corticosteroid, loteprednol etabonate. 986 36

Histamine is present in the epidermis in intracellular and extracellular area and is released from mast cells and keratinocytes in the early stage of inflammation of the skin. Such release may contribute to common itching or intensify the inflammatory responses. Histamine binds to its receptors and participate in regulation of the inflammatory responses by acting on endothelial cells, nerve endings, lymphocytes, monocytes, and leukocytes. Histamine has direct effects on keratinocytes as well. Histamine modulates the proliferation of keratinocytes. The binding of histamine to the receptor on keratinocyte membrane induces activation of adenylate cyclase and phospholipase C through GTP binding protein. We previously reported that histamine induces transient increase in intracellular Ca2+ in cultured normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) and normal epidermis. H1 and H2 histamine receptors are widely distributed in many tissues and cells. In this study, we investigated which types of histamine receptors are related to the increase in intracellular Ca2+ by histamine stimulation in cultured human epidermal keratinocytes. NHEK were cultured in serum-free KGM medium. With H1 antihistamines, mepyramine and diphenhydramine, histamine responses were moderately but not statistically significantly inhibited. With H2 antihistamine, cimetidine, histamine response was significantly inhibited. Epinephrine response was not affected by these antihistamines. Thus, it is considered that H2 antihistamines specifically block histamine-mediated increase in intracellular Ca2+ of cultured normal human keratinocytes.
 ...
PMID:H2 histamine receptor-mediated increase in intracellular Ca2+ in cultured human keratinocytes. 1051 81

The tissues affected by histamine and anaphylactic reactions are identical. Epinephrine antagonizes the action of histamine by acting on effector cells in a direction opposite to that of histamine. The so-called antihistaminic drugs block rather than antagonize the action of histamine. The injection into the human body of epinephrine or certain antihistaminic substances provokes the release of histamine and thereby produces a rise in the histamine blood level. There is a remarkable conformity of potency of antihistaminics as determined by Dale experiments and by histamine intoxication experiments in the intact guinea pig. Neoantergan, Pyribenzamine and Histadyl are usually superior to other compounds when potency is assayed by these methods. All antihistaminics provide similar protection again animal anaphylaxis. Larger doses are necessary to protect against anaphylaxis than against histamine intoxication. The differences in potency as determined by Dale experiments and histamine experiments in animals are not found in clinical use. One compound is not generally superior to all others in the treatment of any one or several allergic disorders. The antihistaminic drugs are beneficial in the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis, acute urticaria and angioneurotic edema, and mild non-infective bronchial asthma. Their effectiveness in the management of moderately severe and severe non-infective bronchial bronchial asthma; infective bronchial asthma; migraine; atopic dermatitis (disseminated neurodermatitis), and pruritus of skin disorders other than acute urticaria and angioneurotic edema, is not worthy of particular commendation. The size of the dose of any antihistaminic substance influences the incidence of but not the type of side-effect that may accompany its usage. The quality of side effects varies according to the drug, although there is an individuality of response for each patient which must be reckoned with. In selecting an antihistaminic compound it is necessary to consider the percentage of cases in which side effects occur, as well as the percentage of good results. Optimal results are obtained by employing combinations of compounds and changing from one to the other as the case demands.
 ...
PMID:Histamine and the antihistaminic drugs. 1541 37

Real allergy to local anesthetic (LA) is very rare. This study was performed to report a case of anaphylaxis to multiple "caine." A 25-years-old atopic nurse developed a very severe anaphylactic reaction on her third infiltration for low back pain with bupivacaine, lidocaine, and methylprednisolone: she developed a vagal reaction, followed during the next 30 minutes by a pruriginous skin rash, followed by a tongue edema and a severe bronchospasm. Adrenalin was injected with a poor response. She was intubated and transferred to the intensive care unit for a few days and, finally, she recuperated completely. Skin-prick tests were done on two occasions. In the first session, no reactions were observed with triamcinolone and methylprednisolone at 1 mg/cc, but a rapid extending maculopapular erythema developed with a final diameter of 50 mm with lidocaine 0.1% (group 2) and 25 mm with procaine 2% (group 1): control 0 mm, histamine, 3 mm. She also complained of itchiness in the neck and shoulder, which resolved in the next 90 minutes. In the second session, a test with bupivacaine 0.0005% (group 2) gave a papule with a diameter of >5 mm, and a test with mepivacaine 0.001% (group 2) was negative: control, histamine, 3 mm; no subsequent tests with mepivacaine were done because she developed a cough and throat pruritus, voice modification, and a sensation of throat narrowing, that resolved with treatment. We reported a case of anaphylaxis to multiple LA (groups 1 and 2), possibly via an IgE-mediated mechanism.
 ...
PMID:Allergy to multiple local anesthetics. 1803 81

The aim was to investigate the effectiveness of the fixed drug combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% as monotherapy, substitutive and as adjunctive therapy in patients with primary open angle glaucoma. 130 patients were divided in three different study groups and treated by the combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% as monotherapy, substitutive therapy and additional therapy. After three months using fixed combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5%, the mean IOP decreased by 5.6 mmHg. After prescribing substitutive therapy with fixed drug combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% for 3 months, the intraocular preassure increased by 0.13 mmHg. Three months after the treatment with fixed combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% as an additional antiglaucomatous drug, we have noticed a decrease of the mean IOP of 3.28 mmHg. Itching and soarness were reported by 43% patients. In conclusion, glaucoma drug therapy with fixed drug combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% achieves effective lowering of intraocular preassure levels as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy. As a substitutive therapy, the combination had the same IOP lowering effect. Simple drug administration and good drug tolerance indicate the effectiveness of the same drug.
 ...
PMID:[The efficacy of the fixed drug combination dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open angle glaucoma]. 2293 Sep 33

IgE-mediated food allergy is an important health concern with increasing prevalence worldwide. Manifestations of IgE-mediated food allergy include urticaria, angioedema, pruritus, difficulty in breathing, laryngeal oedema, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or hypotension within minutes to two hours of the offending food's ingestion. Diagnosis requires both a careful history and supportive testing with laboratory studies and possibly oral food challenges. Current treatment of food allergy focuses on avoidance of the allergen and prompt emergency management of reactions. Epinephrine autoinjectors are provided to patients for the treatment of severe reactions. More research is needed to determine the optimal timing with which to introduce common allergens into a child's diet to possibly prevent the development of food allergy. Novel therapies are under investigation given the difficulty of allergen avoidance and the potentially fatal nature of reactions. Both allergen specific therapies such as oral, sublingual and epicutaneous immunotherapy and allergen non-specific therapies such the Chinese herbal formula FAHF-2 and omalizumab show promise though more data on efficacy and long-term safety are needed before these therapies become mainstream.
...
PMID:Food allergy: diagnosis, management & emerging therapies. 2510 14

Although beneficial in acute and chronic pain management, the use of local anaesthetics is limited by its duration of action and the dose dependent adverse effects on the cardiac and central nervous system. Adjuvants or additives are often used with local anaesthetics for its synergistic effect by prolonging the duration of sensory-motor block and limiting the cumulative dose requirement of local anaesthetics. The armamentarium of local anesthetic adjuvants have evolved over time from classical opioids to a wide array of drugs spanning several groups and varying mechanisms of action. A large array of opioids ranging from morphine, fentanyl and sufentanyl to hydromorphone, buprenorphine and tramadol has been used with varying success. However, their use has been limited by their adverse effect like respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting and pruritus, especially with its neuraxial use. Epinephrine potentiates the local anesthetics by its antinociceptive properties mediated by alpha-2 adrenoreceptor activation along with its vasoconstrictive properties limiting the systemic absorption of local anesthetics. Alpha 2 adrenoreceptor antagonists like clonidine and dexmedetomidine are one of the most widely used class of local anesthetic adjuvants. Other drugs like steroids (dexamethasone), anti-inflammatory agents (parecoxib and lornoxicam), midazolam, ketamine, magnesium sulfate and neostigmine have also been used with mixed success. The concern regarding the safety profile of these adjuvants is due to its potential neurotoxicity and neurological complications which necessitate further research in this direction. Current research is directed towards a search for agents and techniques which would prolong local anaesthetic action without its deleterious effects. This includes novel approaches like use of charged molecules to produce local anaesthetic action (tonicaine and n butyl tetracaine), new age delivery mechanisms for prolonged bioavailability (liposomal, microspheres and cyclodextrin systems) and further studies with other drugs (adenosine, neuromuscular blockers, dextrans).
 ...
PMID:Adjuvants to local anesthetics: Current understanding and future trends. 2886 3


1