Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study was undertaken in 40 patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis during the 1990 hay fever season. The patients were randomized and treated for seven days with either 120 mg terfenadine or 10 mg loratadine, each drug taken once daily in the morning. The severity of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasopharyngeal itching, and itchy, watery, red eyes was evaluated before and at the end of treatment. The global severity of symptoms was ranked daily by the patient on a diary card. Both treatment groups experienced a significant improvement of symptoms after treatment (p < 0.01), without any significant difference between the two study drugs. Terfenadine and loratadine significantly improved symptom severity by 69 and 55% compared with the baseline values, respectively. Headache and fatigue were reported in three loratadine-treated patients, and sedation in one patient. No side effects were observed in patients receiving terfenadine. This study confirmed that terfenadine 120 mg once daily is a safe and effective treatment for hay fever.
 ...
PMID:Comparative effects of terfenadine and loratadine in the treatment of hay fever. 166 95

40 patients suffering from chronic urticaria were randomly treated with either Terfenadine or Astemizole. The treatment period was 8 days after a 4 day wash out phase with placebo. The intensity of the symptoms was quantified and daily recorded by the patients. Both antihistamines influenced significantly the intensity of the pruritus and the flares. With the used study design and dosage slight superiority of Astemizole over Terfenadine could be observed. Neither Astemizole nor Terfenadine showed sedation side effects. The average amount of the sedation symptom scores was during the therapy phase on the same level as during the placebo phase.
 ...
PMID:[Comparison of astemizole and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic urticaria. A randomized double-blind study of 40 patients]. 285 14

A double-blind study was carried out in 65 patients with seasonal rhinitis to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of terfenadine and dexchlorpheniramine. Patients were allocated at random to receive treatment for 1 week with either 60 mg terfenadine twice daily or 2 mg dexchlorpheniramine maleate 3-times daily. Before and after treatment, patients underwent RAST and skin prick tests for reactivity to pollen and those who were positive also had rhinomanometric measurements made of nasal resistance. Diary cards were used by patients to record the severity of nasal obstruction, rhinorrhoea, sneezing, watery, irritated and red eyes, itching of the nose, throat and eyes, and cough. Details were also kept of the frequency and severity of any side-effects. Pollen counts were taken daily during the treatment period. The results showed that both terfenadine and dexchlorpheniramine produced good or excellent relief of the main symptoms in 78% and 73% of the patients, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the pollen count and reduced symptom severity. Both drugs produced a reduction in total nasal resistance but this was not significantly different from initial values, neither was there a significant difference between treatment. Terfenadine was well tolerated and side-effects incidence was significantly lower (p less than 0.01) than in patients treated with dexchlorpheniramine, particularly so with reference to drowsiness.
 ...
PMID:Antihistaminic treatment of allergic rhinitis: a double-blind study with terfenadine versus dexchlorpheniramine. 288 17

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of terfenadine were studied in 13 children with allergic rhinitis, mean age 7.45 +/- 0.54 SEM years. Serum concentrations of the active carboxylic acid metabolite of terfenadine (terfenadine metabolite I) were measured before and hourly for 8 hours after administration of a single dose of terfenadine suspension. The mean maximum serum concentration of terfenadine metabolite I, 242 +/- 28 ng/ml, occurred at 2.3 +/- 0.2 hours; the mean serum half-life value was 2.0 +/- 0.1 hours. Wheals and flares after epicutaneous tests with histamine phosphate, 1.0 mg/ml and 0.2 mg/ml, were significantly suppressed from 1 to 8 hours after the terfenadine dose compared to predose values. Maximum wheal suppression occurred at from 3 to 6 hours. Itching was completely suppressed for 8 hours. No serious adverse effects occurred. Terfenadine in children appears to be well absorbed, and its carboxylic acid metabolite has a short serum elimination half-life. The duration of its suppressive effect on the histamine-induced wheal and flare greatly exceeds that expected from consideration of serum terfenadine metabolite I concentrations.
 ...
PMID:The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of terfenadine in children. 289 38

The efficacy of terfenadine, a nonsedating H1 antihistamine, in the management of chronic idiopathic urticaria was compared with chlorpheniramine and placebo in a parallel multicenter trial. Subjects with symptoms of hives for 3 days per week for at least 6 weeks were initially screened and admitted if no identifiable cause for symptoms could be determined. Patients entered a single-blind placebo period, and if hives of moderate severity were present for at least 3 days during the week, they were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to take terfenadine, 60 mg twice daily, chlorpheniramine, 4 mg three times a day, or placebo for 6 weeks. Data were analyzed for 122 patients. Those patients receiving both active treatments noted significant improvement in symptoms: pruritus, redness, number of hives, and waking hours during which hives were present, at the end of the first day of therapy. Symptom control by terfenadine was statistically superior to placebo during all 6 weeks, as rated by both patients and investigators. However, statistical significance was not achieved for chlorpheniramine at all observation points. Diphenhydramine was permitted as a relief medication for refractory symptoms and was taken by 52% of subjects receiving placebo, 26% taking chlorpheniramine, and only 9% of patients who were receiving terfenadine. In addition to providing superior symptom control, terfenadine caused less drowsiness and fatigue than chlorpheniramine. Terfenadine is a useful therapeutic agent for primary management of chronic idiopathic urticaria.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind comparison of terfenadine, chlorpheniramine, and placebo in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. 312 20

Terfenadine, a potent and non-sedative antihistamine, was shown to be effective in chronic idiopathic urticaria in a double-blind crossover placebo controlled trial. An oral twice daily 60 mg dose of terfenadine was given and itch and wheal parameters were assessed daily. Despite the overall effectiveness of terfenadine, a variable response was noted which was similar to that shown in previous studies with other antihistamines.
 ...
PMID:Terfenadine and placebo compared in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a randomised double-blind study. 393 49

The effectiveness of 60 mg b.i.d. of a novel antihistamine, terfenadine, was compared with an active control, 4 mg t.i.d. of chlorpheniramine, and placebo in 560 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. In contrast to the gradual decrease in seasonal symptoms observed over a 7 day period of study in placebo-treated patients, both antihistamines produced a prompt significant decrease in sneezing and rhinorrhea, and a gradual decrease in nasopharyngeal pruritus. Terfenadine-related sedation did not differ from that produced by the placebo and was less than the sedation produced by the active control.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of allergic rhinitis with a new selective H1 antihistamine: terfenadine. 393 72

Ninety patients participated in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled comparison of terfenadine with astemizole in the treatment of hay fever. They entered the trial as a cohort before the grass pollen season and recorded daily their symptoms of itching eyes, sneezing, running nose, and blocked nose on visual analogue scales in diary cards. Over the eight weeks of the trial astemizole was significantly better than either terfenadine or placebo in alleviating itching eyes, sneezing, and running nose (p less than 0.0001) but no better than placebo for the treatment of blocked nose. The placebo was significantly better than terfenadine for the treatment of running nose and blocked nose (p less than 0.002). Neither of these H1 antihistamine drugs was associated with sedative adverse effects despite significantly inhibiting histamine induced skin weal responses. These results suggest that astemizole is a satisfactory non-sedative H1 antihistamine for maintenance treatment of hay fever. Terfenadine is ineffective by comparison.
 ...
PMID:Comparative trial of two non-sedative H1 antihistamines, terfenadine and astemizole, for hay fever. 614 5

A comparative double-blind multicenter trial was carried out in six German dermatology clinics involving patients with long-term continuous urticaria. After a five-day washout and initial assessment of the urticaria symptomatology oral antihistamine treatment was started with 2 X 1 mg Azatadine or 2 X 60 mg Terfenadine daily. After seven to ten days' treatment the target symptoms wheals, erythema and itching recovered in all but 4% of the azatadine patients and 21% of the terfenadine patients. Azatadine showed significantly stronger antiallergic efficacy for all symptoms. Both substances caused a certain degree of sedation, but in varying intensity. In all patients developing sedation this undesired side effect disappeared after three days in spite of continuous therapy.
 ...
PMID:[Antihistaminic therapy of chronic urticaria. Results of a multicenter study with azatadine and terfenadine]. 620 94

The study investigated the effect of the oral H1-blocker terfenadine on allergen challenge in subjects with nasal allergy in comparison with the topical steroid, budesonide. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study with 3 experimental days was performed outside the pollen season. Seventeen nonsmokers with hay fever (symptoms, positive skin prick test, and RAST against timothy) were treated for 14 days before each experimental day, where the response to nasal challenge with four different concentrations of timothy was measured every 15 min for 6 h. The nasal cavity dimensions were measured by acoustic rhinometry and the olfactory function as the threshold for the sense of smell of butanol. Nasal symptoms were determined by questionnaires. Both terfenadine and budesonide dry powder had an effect on the hay fever symptoms during nasal pollen challenge. Terfenadine was more efficient than budesonide against histamine-mediated symptoms such as sneezing and itching. Budesonide increased nasal airway dimensions better than terfenadine (P < 0.01). A marked effect of budesonide was seen 1-2 h after challenge, suggesting an effect on "early late phase" reaction in the nose. In 7/17 subjects, a significant (P < 0.05) improvement of olfactory function after budesonide treatment was seen. In conclusion, topical steroid (budesonide) is superior to antihistamine (terfenadine) in treatment of nasal congestion in hay fever, especially for the postchallenge reaction, and may, in some cases, relieve the decreased sense of smell during pollen challenge.
 ...
PMID:Effect of terfenadine and budesonide on nasal symptoms, olfaction, and nasal airway patency following allergen challenge. 750 5


1 2 Next >>