Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Patient (ASA PS I-III, mean age 68 +/- 14 yr) who had undergone lower extremity surgery under spinal anesthesia were studied to determine the effect of intrathecal administration of morphine 0.1 mg on intra- and postoperative pain relief and its side effects. They were randomly divided into control (C) and intrathecal morphine (M) groups (n = 25, respectively) and received 10 mg tetracaine in 4 ml of a quarter saline with 7.5 micrograms epinephrine. Incidence of intraoperative tourniquet pain was significantly lower in M group (36.8%) than in C group (64.3%). Postoperative pain was examined in terms of the duration until the first supplemental analgesic within 24 hr. The mean duration was 7.0 +/- 4.3 hr in the control group, but 11 patients in the M group needed it within 24 hr (18.1 +/- 6.8 hr, excluding 6 patients who did not receive analgesic). Although incidences of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and itching were higher in M group than in C group, none required antiemetic or naloxone. Both groups showed no difference in postoperative respiratory depression measured by apnea monitor (Eden Trace II, Mallinkrodt Japan, Tokyo). The results suggest that a low dose of intrathecal morphine is effective on postoperative 24 hr pain relief in elderly patients and that its side effects are negligible.
 ...
PMID:[Low dose intrathecal morphine and postoperative pain relief in elderly patients]. 1171 41

BACKGROUND: Moderate doses of prostaglandin inhibitors may reduce the cutaneous reactions from niacin administration. We undertook this study to determine if low doses of either ibuprofen or aspirin reduces cutaneous reactions from niacin in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-two subjects were randomized to received crystalline niacine 500 mg preceded by either placebo, aspirin 165 mg, aspirin 325 mg, or ibuprofen 200 mg. The study was crossover and double blinded, and treatment arms were separated by 2 days. Subjects were asked to rate the severity of flushing, itching, and tingling after niacin on a visual analog scale (0---no symptoms; 10---severe symptoms). Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures of analysis of variance. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 22 subjects completed the protocol. Overall, aspirin 325 mg statistically reduced flushing after niacin administration. No statistical difference was observed for the other treatment arms for either flushing, itching, or tingling. When subjects experiencing the worse symptoms were analyzed separately, all treatment arms statistically reduced the flushing, itching, or tingling from niacin. Aspirin 325 mg was the most efficacious, followed by aspirin 165 mg and ibuprofen 200 mg. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that pretreatment with low doses of aspirin or ibuprofen are effective in reducing cutaneous reactions from niacin administration.
 ...
PMID:Low-Dose Aspirin and Ibuprofen Reduce the Cutaneous Reactions Following Niacin Administration. 1185 Jun 94

Topically applied aspirin has recently been reported to decrease histamine-induced itch in human volunteers. Our aim is to confirm this and to study the antipruritic ability of topical aspirin in inflamed skin. In 24 non-atopic volunteers, an inflammatory skin reaction was induced in forearm skin at 5 different sites by sodium lauryl sulphate contained in Finn Chambers. Aspirin 10%, aspirin 1%, mepyramine 5% and vehicle were applied to the inflamed and corresponding non-inflamed areas 20 min before itch induction with intradermal histamine injection. Itch and pain were scored on a visual analogue scale at regular intervals. Wheal and flare areas were measured. No difference in itch intensities was found after application of aspirin, mepyramine and vehicle, but more itch was induced in aspirin and mepyramine pretreated sites in inflamed skin compared to normal skin (p<0.05). In normal skin, flare areas were smaller after pretreatment with aspirin 10% (p<0.05) and mepyramine (p<0.001), as were wheal areas after mepyramine (p<0.01), compared to vehicle pretreatments. In inflamed skin, flare areas were smaller after pretreatment with aspirin 10% (p<0.01) and mepyramine (p<0.001), as were wheal areas after aspirin 10% (p<0.01), aspirin 1% (p<0.05) and mepyramine (p<0.001). We conclude that despite a significant skin penetration as measured by the influence on wheal and flare reactions, topically applied aspirin did not decrease histamine-induced itch in the model used.
 ...
PMID:Topically applied aspirin decreases histamine-induced wheal and flare reactions in normal and SLS-inflamed skin, but does not decrease itch. A randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled human study. 1201 95

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTF) was compared with midazolam as a premedicant in a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Eighty children (ASA grade 1 or 2, aged 3-9 years) who presented for tonsillectomy were randomly allocated to receive either 2.5 ml OTF (15-20 microg.kg(-1)) in a lollipop format and 0.5 ml.kg(-1) placebo syrup, or midazolam syrup (0.5 mg.kg(-1)) and a placebo lollipop (2.5 ml). The acceptability of sedation, anxiety and compliance with anaesthetic induction were assessed. The children were given an 'emergence' score for their recovery. Analgesia requirements, the incidence of vomiting, itching and any behavioural changes were assessed for 6 h postoperatively. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate was as effective as midazolam in aiding compliance with anaesthesia, but is significantly better in its appeal to children (p < 0.001) and emergence (p < 0.001) characteristics. In conclusion, OTF may be particularly useful as a premedicant in paediatric practice.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of oral transmucosal fentanyl and oral midazolam for premedication in children. 1213 94

Aspirin and all nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a chemically heterogeneous group of compounds that share the ability to inhibit the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX). This inhibitory effect, especially of COX-1, is suggested as the mechanism underlying NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions. In this study, we evaluated the safety and convenience of a single full-dose challenge with nabumetone, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, in patients with hypersensitivity to nonselective NSAIDs (ns-NSAIDs). Twenty-four subjects with a history of hypersensitivity reactions to at least two different ns-NSAIDs on two different occasions were enrolled in the study. The patients were otherwise healthy and did not suffer from NSAID- or aspirin-induced asthma or urticaria. All subjects were orally challenged by a single full dose (1000 mg) of nabumetone, monitored closely in the hospital for the next 4 hours and contacted by telephone the next morning and 3-12 months afterward. Twenty-two patients tolerated nabumetone without any reaction during and after the challenge. One patient had a single urticarial lesion and one patient reported mild pruritus without objective signs, both of which resolved spontaneously. Thirteen patients, including the patient who responded with pruritus to the challenge, used nabumetone on several occasions during the follow-up period without any adverse reaction. Our study shows that in patients with a history of aspirin- and ns-NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reaction, a rapid one-step challenge with nabumetone was well tolerated. These initial data support the possibility that a single full dose of nabumetone can be tried as a safe alternative in most patients with a hypersensitivity reaction to ns-NSAIDs.
 ...
PMID:Safe full-dose one-step nabumetone challenge in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity. 1297 96

Postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is severe, and achieving adequate analgesia remains a clinical challenge. We tested the hypothesis that, in patients having unilateral TKA under intrathecal (IT) anesthesia, the addition of a femoral nerve block would provide superior analgesia when compared with IT morphine and demonstrate fewer adverse side effects. In a single-blinded and controlled trial, 41 ASA I-III patients undergoing unilateral TKA were randomized into 2 groups. Both groups received 15 mg of IT hyperbaric bupivacaine for the surgical anesthetic. Group ITM received 250 microg of IT morphine and group FNB received an ultrasound-assisted femoral nerve block with 40 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine, 5 microg/mL of epinephrine, and 75 microg of clonidine. At 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, we measured visual analog scales for pain, cumulative IV morphine consumption, hemodynamics, and side effects. There were no statistically significant differences in morphine consumption, pain at rest, or pain with movement. However, group FNB had fewer perioperative side effects including nausea, vomiting, and pruritus (P < 0.05 for each event). This corresponded to a decrease in patient satisfaction in group ITM, in which 20% of the patients rated their experience as "unsatisfactory" (P < 0.05). We conclude that, in comparison with IT morphine, a single injection femoral nerve block provides equivalent analgesia but with a significant reduction in side effects for patients having TKA under bupivacaine intrathecal anesthesia.
 ...
PMID:A single injection ultrasound-assisted femoral nerve block provides side effect-sparing analgesia when compared with intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. 1550 61

Single-shot "kiddie caudal" with bupivacaine alone is losing popularity because of its duration of 4-8 h. In a prospective randomized double-blind clinical study, we assessed and compared the efficacy of ketamine, midazolam, and neostigmine coadministered with bupivacaine in a caudal epidural to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief. Eighty children (ASA status I) aged 5-10 yr undergoing unilateral inguinal herniotomy were allocated randomly in equal numbers (n = 20) into 4 groups to receive a caudal injection of 0.25% bupivacaine (1 mL/kg) with or without ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), midazolam (50 microg/kg), and neostig-mine (2 microg/kg), after the induction of standardized general anesthesia without premedication. Monitoring for pain, sedation, postoperative nausea/vomiting, dizziness, and pruritus was performed by anesthesiologists blinded to the study allocation. The time to first analgesic administration (paracetamol syrup) was longer (P < 0.05) in the bupivacaine-neostigmine group and the bupivacaine-midazolam group than in the other groups. Undesirable effects, such as emesis, pruritus, and dizziness, were comparable in all groups. However, the incidence of hallucination was more frequent in the bupivacaine-ketamine group compared with the other groups. This study shows that single-shot caudal coadministration of bupivacaine-neostigmine and bupivacaine-midazolam was associated with an extended duration of postoperative pain relief.
 ...
PMID:Caudal additives in pediatrics: a comparison among midazolam, ketamine, and neostigmine coadministered with bupivacaine. 1652

Analgesic efficacy and possible side effects of bupivacaine-fentanyl (BF) and bupivacaine-morphine (BM) combinations for patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) have been compared. Sixty ASA I-II patients who had PCEA following lower abdominal surgery were admitted to the study. Epidural catheter was inserted at the level of L3-4 or L4-5 following induction of general anesthesia. In Group BF epidural drug solution was prepared as bupivacaine 0.1 % and fentanyl 2 microg/ml. In Group BM, solution was prepared as bupivacaine 0.1 % and morphine 0.2 microg/ml. In both groups PCEA was set as; bolus dose: 4 ml, lock - out period: 20 minutes, 4 hour limit: 30 ml. VAS was measured at postoperative 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24th hours. In both groups adequate postoperative analgesia was provided. VAS score was higher in Group BF than Group BM at postoperative 12th hour (p<0.05). One patient in Group BF had unilateral motor block, one patient in Group BM had respiratory depression responding to i.v. naloxon administration. The incidence of pruritus was higher in Group BM than Group BF (p<0.05). Both treatment modalities provided adequate postoperative analgesia, but the risk of respiratory depression with opioid use should be considered.
 ...
PMID:[Comparison of bupivacaine-fentanyl versus bupivacaine-morphine for patient controlled epidural analgesia]. 1597 94

The success of major surgery depends partly on providing effective post-operative pain relief, which can be commonly achieved by morphine administration via patient- controlled analgesic (PCA) system. Alternatively, tramadol which is a weak opioid analgesic, can be used for post operative pain relief. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous PCA tramadol in comparison with PCA morphine in term of analgesic properties, sedation and side effects. A randomized, double-blinded study was conducted on 160 ASA I and II patients who underwent major operations. Eighty of them received a loading dose of intravenous morphine 0.1 mg/kg followed by PCA morphine bolus of 1 mg (1 mg/ml) as required, while the other 80 patients received a loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg of intravenous tramadol followed by PCA infusion of 10 mg (10 mg/ml) as required. Patients were monitored for pain, sedation and side effects as well as respiratory rate, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, blood pressure and pulse rate. Patients were evaluated 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours post operation. There were no differences in the demographic data between the two groups (p > 0.05). The overall mean pain score in tramadol group was 0.70 +/- 0.60 as compared to 0.75 +/- 0.67 for morphine group. The mean pain score for tramadol and morphine groups at 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours post operation were 1.32 +/- 0.79, 104 +/- 0.79, 0.35 +/- 0.48, 0.09 +/- 0.33 and 1.35 +/- 0.99, 1.14 +/- 0.81, 0.40 +/- 0.54, 0.10 +/- 0.34 respectively. The overall mean sedation score in tramadol and morphine group was 0.39 +/- 0.44 as compared to 0.35 +/- 0.43 for morphine group. The mean sedation score for tramadol and morphine group at 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours post operation were 0.90 +/- 0.74, 0.56 +/- 0.59, 0.075 +/- 0.27, 0.025 +/- 0.16 and 0.84 +/- 0.70, 0.46 +/- 0.64, 0.08 +/- 0.27, 0.01 +/- 0.11 respectively. There was no significant difference in the overall mean pain and sedation score between the two groups as well as for each duration assessed (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the blood pressure and heart rate. The incidence of nausea, vomiting and pruritus were the same in the two groups. This study indicates that PCA tramadol is as equally effective as PCA morphine control following major surgery. The incidences of sedation, nausea or pruritus were the same in the two groups.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine and tramadol in patients undergoing major operation. 1762 58

Extended spinal anaesthesia using a spinal micro-catheter was used as a primary method of anaesthesia for elective colorectal cancer surgery in 68 high risk patients over a 14-year period in our institution. The technique was also useful in eight elective and 13 emergency abdominal surgeries. All patients suffered from severe chronic obstructive airway disease requiring multiple inhalers and drugs (ASA III). Thirty nine of these patients also suffered from angina, myocardial infarction, diabetes and other systemic diseases (ASA IV). Surgery included right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, total colectomy, sigmoid colectomy, Hartman's resection, anterior resection of rectum, abdominoperineal resection, cholecystectomy (open and laparoscopic) and obstructed inguinal hernia requiring laparotomy. Spinal anaesthesia was performed under strict aseptic conditions with a 22 gauge spinal needle with a mixture consisting of 2.75ml of 0.5% heavy bupivacaine and 0.25ml of fentanyl (25microg). This was followed by placement of a spinal micro-catheter and the duration of anaesthesia was extended by intermittent injection of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine. Brief hypotension occurred in 12.4% of patients during the establishment of anaesthetic block height to T6-7 and was duly treated with intravenous administration of fluid and ephedrine hydrochloride. Good anaesthesia resulted in all patients except for brief discomfort in some patients during hemicolectomy surgery possibly due to the dissection and traction on the peritoneum causing irritation to the diaphragm. The use of sedation was avoided. General anaesthesia was administered in one patient and this patient required postoperative ventilation and cardiovascular support in the Intensive Care Unit. The spinal micro-catheter was removed at the end of surgery. Postoperative pain relief was obtained by administering intravenous morphine through a patient controlled analgesia machine in the critical care ward area (High Dependency Unit). There was a low incidence of minor postoperative side effects such as nausea (14.6%), vomiting (7.9%), minor post dural puncture headache (5.6%) and pruritus (5.6%). We conclude that spinal anaesthesia with a micro-catheter may be used as a primary method of anaesthesia for colorectal cancer surgery and other major abdominal surgery in high-risk patients for whom general anaesthesia would be associated with higher morbidity and mortality.
 ...
PMID:Spinal anaesthesia with a micro-catheter in high-risk patients undergoing colorectal cancer and other major abdominal surgery. 1803 40


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>