Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A total of 754 patients were treated intravenously with sulbactam/ampicillin, in a clinical trial to determine the efficacy and safety of the drug. The majority of patients were treated with 3 g/day by intravenous infusion for 4 to 14 days. Clinical response was evaluated in 689 of 754 patients. In the treatment of respiratory and urinary tract infections, efficacy was 82.5% and 77.1%, respectively. Overall, sulbactam/ampicillin was effective in 80.4% of all evaluable patients. Of 175 patients who failed to respond to prior antibiotic therapy, 135 patients (77.1%) were effectively treated with sulbactam/ampicillin. The overall bacteriological eradication rate was 91.8% against Gram-positive organisms, 75.9% against Gram-negative organisms, and 90% against anaerobes. In addition, 166 of 221 strains that were beta-lactamase producers were eradicated after treatment with sulbactam/ampicillin. Side effects such as rash, fever, itching, urticaria, and diarrhea occurred in only 2.65%, 20 of 754 cases. Laboratory abnormalities were similar to those reported for other beta-lactam antibiotics, including increases in levels of SGOT (4.9%), SGPT (5.7%), and eosinophilia (3.4%) counts. The study showed that sulbactam/ampicillin has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms as well as anaerobes. There was a high degree of safety. Thus, sulbactam/ampicillin is effective and safe as a treatment for medical, surgical, urological, and gynecological infections.
 ...
PMID:Clinical evaluation of sulbactam/ampicillin in Japan. 268 16

Infectious episodes in 90 patients with hematological disorders were treated with sulbactam/cefoperazone (SBT/CPZ), a new combination drug of a potent beta-lactamase inhibitor, sodium sulbactam, and a third generation cephalosporin, sodium cefoperazone. Clinical responses to the SBT/CPZ regimen were excellent in 23 cases, good in 30 cases, fair in 11 cases, and poor in 26 cases. The overall efficacy rate (percentage of cases showing excellent or good responses) was 58.9%. Efficacy rates classified according to different infections were: 80% in documented sepsis, 57.6% in suspected sepsis, 61.1% in pneumonia and 50% in other infections. One episode of side effect was encountered with redness and itching of skin. Hepatic disorders were observed in 3 cases. These adverse reactions, however, were not serious. These results indicate that SBT/CPZ has a high therapeutic efficacy to severe infections in patients with hematological disorders.
 ...
PMID:[Treatment with sulbactam/cefoperazone of severe infections in patients with hematological disorders]. 281 Jul 34

Teicoplanin is a glycopeptide antibiotic whose activity is selectively oriented against Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Clostridium difficile, Peptostreptococcus spp. and Corynebacterium jeikeium; such activity is affected by neither methicillin resistance nor beta-lactamase production. Teicoplanin is not significantly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract; consequently, it has to be administered intravenously (either by infusion or by rapid injection) or intramuscularly. Its long half-life allows regimens based upon once daily administration. The adverse effects most frequently associated with teicoplanin treatment are local and hypersensitivity reactions, such as itching and drug fever; anaphylactoid reactions (the 'red man syndrome') are seldom observed. Teicoplanin also has less potential than vancomycin to cause nephrotoxicity, especially when administered in combination with an aminoglycoside. Teicoplanin has been proven to be effective in the treatment of microbiologically documented Gram-positive infections, including 'difficult to treat infections' such as endocarditis and prosthetic infections. Furthermore, recent trials in patients with haematological malignancies or other cancers have clearly demonstrated that teicoplanin is at least as efficacious as vancomycin in the empirical initial antibiotic regimen for febrile neutropenic patients, and is associated with fewer adverse effects. Finally, owing to its good tolerability profile and the advantage of once daily administration by both intravenous and intramuscular routes, teicoplanin has proven to be very useful for the outpatient treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. In conclusion, teicoplanin is potentially an effective alternative to vancomycin both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients, with the advantage over vancomycin of single daily dose administration and lower toxicity. Further comparative studies with vancomycin are, however, required to better define the therapeutic role of teicoplanin for particular infections (i.e. infective endocarditis).
 ...
PMID:A risk-benefit assessment of teicoplanin in the treatment of infections. 878 19