Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We have evaluated the efficacy of topical levocabastine in 42 patients (20 males and 22 females; mean age 37.5 yrs.) affected by perennial allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Diagnosis was performed on the basis of clinical history, Skin Prick test and RAST. The study lasted for 90 days and nasal spray levocabastine was administered at the dose of 2 puff in each nostril twice a day. Patients had to record the severity of the symptoms considered (sneezing, nasal pruritus, nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea) on a diary card according to an arbitrary score from 0 to 3. At the end of the treatment patients experienced a significant improvement of their symptoms and no side effects were recorded. On the basis of our results levocabastine can be considered a useful drug in the treatment of allergic rhinitis due to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.
...
PMID:[Efficacy of levocabastine in perennial rhinitis]. 892 38

Nasal provocation (NP) in allergic rhinitis patients can elicit a late phase inflammatory response in which interleukins (IL), leukotrienes (LT), and neutrophils have been implicated. Certain antihistamines have been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties. The objective was to determine whether astemizole at 10 mgs/day has any anti-inflammatory characteristics. We clinically evaluated 20 patients with allergic rhinitis and measured nasal IL-8 and LTB4 during NP with increasing doses of grass and ragweed antigen in a double-blind placebo-controlled fashion after a 4-week course of treatment. Clinical symptom scores for sneezing, pruritus, and rhinorrhea were evaluated. Nasal fluid was examined by ELISA and RIA for IL-8 and LTB4 levels along with neutrophil assessment before NP and at 3, 6, and 8 hours. Symptom scores for nasal sneezing, pruritus, rhinorrhea, and nasal LTB4 levels at 6 and 8 hours and IL-8 at 3, 6, and 8 hours were generally lower in astemizole-treated patients compared to those on placebo. Nasal IL-8 levels corresponded to LTB4 levels at diluent and at 6 hours in the placebo group (P = 0.01). The percentage of neutrophils correlated with LTB4 levels at baseline, coefficient = 0.76, P = 0.02 and at 6 hours, coefficient = 0.62, P = 0.035 in the placebo group. This study is the first to demonstrate an effect of astemizole during NP on IL-8 and LTB4 levels with a significant correlation of neutrophil numbers in untreated patients during the nasal late phase response.
...
PMID:Late phase response during nasal challenge: effect of astemizole on leukotriene B4 levels. 893 1

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray is an intranasal corticosteroid for the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis. This double-masked, double-dummy, parallel-group study was conducted to confirm that the efficacy of fluticasone propionate nasal spray is attributable to topical rather than systemic effects. A total of 304 patients with documented seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomly assigned to receive fluticasone propionate nasal spray 200 micrograms once daily (n = 77), oral fluticasone propionate 5 mg once daily (n = 73), oral fluticasone propionate 10 mg once daily (n = 77), or placebo (n = 77) for 14 days. Plasma fluticasone propionate concentrations were determined at baseline and after 14 days of treatment (day 15). Nasal symptoms were recorded daily by patients and assessed weekly by clinicians. On day 15, more patients in the oral fluticasone propionate 5-mg or 10-mg groups, compared with patients in the fluticasone propionate nasal spray group or the placebo group, had detectable plasma fluticasone propionate concentrations, and mean concentrations were higher in the oral fluticasone propionate groups. Both clinician- and patient-rated total and individual nasal symptom scores for obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching were significantly lower in the fluticasone propionate nasal spray group compared with either of the oral fluticasone propionate groups or the placebo group. With few exceptions, oral fluticasone propionate (5 mg or 10 mg) was not significantly different from placebo on any measures of efficacy. These findings indicate that the efficacy of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (200 micrograms once daily) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis results from direct topical effects rather than from indirect effects after systemic absorption.
...
PMID:The efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray for allergic rhinitis and its relationship to topical effects. 900 27

Ten subjects with asymptomatic seasonal allergy, outside of their allergy season, underwent allergen provocation following 1 hour of exposure to air at either 20 degrees C and 30% relative humidity (RH) or air at 37 degrees C and 90% RH. The ipsilateral changes following antigen challenge were compared under the two conditions. Conditioning of the nose to 37 degrees C, 90% RH reduced total histamine release (7.9 +/- 1.8 ng vs 4.2 +/- 1.3 ng; p < or = 0.05), sneezes (6 +/- 2 vs 3 +/- 1; p < or = 0.05), pruritus (score of 17.4 +/- 6.0 vs score of 2.0 +/- 1.8 out of a total score of 100, p < or = 0.01), nasal airway resistance (1.4 +/- 0.8 kPa/L/sec vs 0.2 +/- 0.1 kPa/L/sec; p < or = 0.05), human serum albumin levels (389.6 +/- 53.4 micrograms vs 242.2 +/- 37.9 micrograms; p < or = 0.05), and congestion (score of 23.8 +/- 4.8 vs score of 10.6 +/- 5.4 out of a total score of 100, p < or = 0.01). It had no effect on the volume of secretions (p = 0.8), lactoferrin levels (p = 0.3), or rhinorrhea (p = 1.0). Thus air at 37 degrees C and 90% RH partially reduces the early response to antigen. Its effects are greatest on histamine release, the vascular response, and neural responses, with no effect on the glandular response. The mechanisms underlying these effects are unknown.
...
PMID:Treatment with hot, humid air reduces the nasal response to allergen challenge. 900 14

One hundred and twenty five children (median age 8.71 years) suffering from perennial allergic rhinitis were treated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study comparing azelastine nasal spray 0.14 mg/nostril twice daily (0.56 mg/day) and placebo nasal spray. Medication was given for a period of 6 weeks which followed a 2 week placebo washout period in all patients. Subjects were aged between 5 and 12 and were skin prick positive to either house dust mites and/or cat or dog dander. Concomitant anti allergic treatment was not permitted during the study. Severity of rhinitis symptoms was scored daily by the child or his/her parents on a diary card using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for each evaluated symptom: 0, absent-100, could not be worse. Mean weekly scores were calculated. Symptoms evaluated were: sneezing, nasal blockage, nasal itch and rhinorrhea. In addition, at each clinic visit the investigator evaluated symptoms using a verbal score of 0, no symptom-3, severe. Compared to the baseline, for each of the six study weeks, the reduction in the VAS scores for all four symptoms was statistically greater for the azelastine group compared to the placebo group. The investigator's assessment at clinic visits bore out these results. Both azelastine nasal spray and placebo were well tolerated, no serious adverse events were reported. During the treatment phase of the study a total of 36 adverse events were reported by 25 patients (azelastine 10, placebo 15). The most frequently occurring events were pharyngitis (azelastine 5, placebo 3), cough (azelastine 3, placebo 1) and bronchitis (azelastine 1, placebo 3). In conclusion, azelastine has been shown to be effective in the treatment of perennial rhinitis in children aged 5-12 years and to be superior to placebo in the relief of all symptoms assessed, namely sneezing, nasal blockage, nasal itch and rhinorrhea.
...
PMID:A randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of azelastine nasal spray in children with perennial rhinitis. 905 34

Quantitative determinations of the inflammatory mediators in nasal secretions were performed and correlated with the objective nasal symptoms within 1 h after nasal allergen challenge (NAC). Twenty-six patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were enrolled outside the pollen season. All measurements were performed before (as a baseline control) and at 1, 5, 10, 30, and 60 min after NAC. This study aimed to clarify the pathogenic mechanism of the early-phase reaction (EPR) by monitoring the evolution of early-phase mediators in nasal secretions and the presence of nasal symptoms during this period. The results showed that, after NAC, the maximal mediator concentration was already reached after 1 min for histamine (124 ng/g), 5 min for tryptase (56 microU/g), and 5-10 min for leukotriene C4 (40 ng/g). Itching and sneezing started as early as 20-30 s, and they were predominant symptoms within 5 min. Rhinorrhea and nasal obstruction started a few minutes after NAC and lasted until more than 1 h after NAC. There was no significant correlation between any single mediator and nasal symptoms during the sampling period. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that during the EPR the presence of nasal symptoms involves a complex mechanism, reflecting the interaction between the mediators released by inflammatory cells, and the receptors on different target organs. When evaluating symptoms during the EPR, one must consider not only the severity of these symptoms but also the time period within which these symptoms occur. For the symptoms of nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea, the early-phase reaction often lasted more than 1 h.
...
PMID:An approach to the understanding of the nasal early-phase reaction induced by nasal allergen challenge. 910 20

Perennial and seasonal allergic rhinitis affect many million Americans and account for close to $2 billion annually in medical costs and lost productivity. The symptoms of allergic rhinitis, including sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and pruritus are, at best, very annoying and may be quite debilitating in some patients, causing irritability, insomnia, and fatigue. Moreover, allergic rhinitis is often not self-limiting and can contribute to serious medical complications such as sinusitis and otitis. Aggressive medical management of allergic rhinitis is important in the therapy for chronic sinusitis and otitis media and may prevent progression to more serious disease. Accurate diagnosis and initiation of environmental control measures to reduce exposure to causative factors should accompany initiation of pharmacotherapy. Antihistamines form the cornerstone of pharmacologic therapy, and use of the newer nonsedating antihistamines such as loratadine, terfenadine, and astemizole is not associated with the sedation produced by the classic antihistamines. Both loratadine and terfenadine are available in combination with a decongestant. Topical intranasal corticosteroids are another important component of pharmacologic management of allergic rhinitis. Allergen immunotherapy (hyposensitization) is used in those patients not adequately managed with pharmacotherapy. The relative safety and convenient dosing schedule of the newer medications should be accompanied by enhanced patient compliance and, hence, better control of allergic symptoms, halting progression of allergic rhinitis to serious medical complications.
...
PMID:Treatment strategies designed to minimize medical complications of allergic rhinitis. 912 50

The effectiveness and safety of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (200 micrograms once daily for 4 weeks) were compared with those of loratadine (10 mg once daily for 4 weeks) in 114 adults and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis in this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group study. Patients recorded their nasal symptoms (nighttime and daytime obstruction, sneezing, itching, rhinorrhea, and overall discomfort) using a 4-point scale (0 = no symptoms, 3 = very frequent symptoms) in daily diaries. Clinicians assessed patients' nasal symptoms (nighttime and daytime obstruction, sneezing, itching, and rhinorrhea) using a 4-point scale at every scheduled visit. Clinicians and patients assessed the overall effectiveness of treatment at the end of the study. Fluticasone propionate improved clinician-rated total nasal symptom scores (defined as the sum of five nasal symptoms) more than loratadine at the 2-week and 4-week assessments (P < or = 0.008). Clinicians give fluticasone propionate better global ratings than loratadine (P = 0.04). After 4 weeks of treatment, between-group differences in clinician-rated individual nasal symptoms favored fluticasone propionate (P < 0.05), with the exception of nasal itching (P = 0.11). These findings were confirmed by between-group differences in the percentages of symptom-free days calculated from patient-recorded daily diary-card data. Both treatments were well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events between groups was similar. Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms administered once daily in the morning was more effective than loratadine 10 mg administered once daily for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
...
PMID:Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray compared with oral loratadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. 918 29

We have evaluated the efficacy of azelastine, a new long acting antihistamine, in the topic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis to Parietaria officinalis. Forty five patients have been considered, 20 males and 25 females, mean age 28.5 years, suffering from seasonal rhinitis to Parietaria officinalis for at least 4 years. Azelastine was administered twice a day for 4 weeks in the pollen season. On a daily diary-card, patients had to record the severity of the symptoms considered: runny nose, sneeze, itching nose, nasal obstruction, following an arbitrary score from 0 to 3. At the end of the study, patients obtained a significant improvement of the symptoms considered without the addition of any other topical or systemic therapy. No side effects have been reported. Therefore azelastine is an effective drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis to Parietaria officinalis.
...
PMID:[Efficacy of topical azelastine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis caused by Parietaria officinalis]. 961 9

To determine the relative efficacy, compare the incidence of adverse events, and ascertain the systemic glucocorticoid effect of the nasal application of several doses of budesonide, 406 patients with seasonal ragweed-induced allergic rhinitis were randomized in a double-blind, parallel group design to receive intranasal budesonide aqueous pump spray (Rhinocort Aqua) 32 micrograms, 64 micrograms, 128 micrograms, 256 micrograms, or placebo once daily for 4 weeks. A total of 231 adults and 175 children participated in the study conducted at 14 centers in two geographic regions, the Midwest and the Northeast United States, during the 1994 ragweed season. Pollen counts were collected at each site by the Rotorod method. The primary efficacy parameter was the change from baseline nasal index score (NIS) for the overall study population--defined as the sum of scores for nasal congestion, runny nose, and sneezing. The study was powered only to evaluate the overall study population for statistical significance. Significant differences in NIS were observed in each active treatment group compared with placebo (p < or = 0.003). Compared with placebo, budesonide aqueous spray significantly reduced individual symptoms of runny nose and sneezing at all doses (p < or = 0.008), and nasal congestion and nasal itching at all doses except 64 micrograms (p < or = 0.022). In the Midwest pollen belt where the 1994 ragweed season was representative of a typical pollen season, it was possible to establish a dose-response relationship for comparison of budesonide aqueous spray 256 micrograms versus 32 micrograms (p = 0.017). The incidence of adverse events was similar between budesonide aqueous-treated and placebo-treated patients. Importantly, there was no effect of budesonide aqueous spray on basal or ACTH-stimulated plasma cortisol levels in either adults or children at the end of 4 weeks of treatment. Intranasal budesonide aqueous pump spray, administered once daily, was efficacious and was generally well tolerated in both adults and children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
...
PMID:Intranasal budesonide aqueous pump spray (Rhinocort Aqua) for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Rhinocort Aqua Study Group. 980 42


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>