Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We compared the analgesia, side effects, and plasma concentrations of buprenorphine and fentanyl in a double-blind study of 78 parturients receiving one of these drugs by patient-controlled epidural infusion after elective cesarean section with epidural anesthesia. Patients were randomized to three epidural infusion groups: group 1 (n = 26), 3 micrograms/mL buprenorphine with 0.015% bupivacaine and 1 microgram/mL epinephrine; group 2 (n = 26), 3 micrograms/mL fentanyl with 0.015% bupivacaine and 1 microgram/mL epinephrine; and group 3 (n = 26), 3 micrograms/mL fentanyl with 0.015% bupivacaine. Plasma for determination of opioid concentrations was obtained in some subjects in each group at intervals up to 48 h during the infusion and in some subjects from each group at intervals after the infusion was stopped. Pain relief was similar and satisfactory in all three groups. The median overall satisfaction scores were high for all three groups. Pruritus was more common in the fentanyl groups (P less than 0.05). However, vomiting was more disturbing to the patients and seen only with buprenorphine. No patient had a respiratory rate less than 12 breaths/min. Epinephrine use was associated with a slower infusion rate (P less than 0.05, group 2 vs 3). All patients were able to ambulate without difficulty. Mean opioid plasma concentrations did not exceed 1.5 ng/mL. Thus, epidural patient-controlled analgesia in all three groups provided excellent analgesia, permitted ambulation, and was without serious side effects. Epidural buprenorphine offered no advantages over epidural fentanyl.
 ...
PMID:Epidural patient-controlled analgesia after cesarean section: buprenorphine-0.015% bupivacaine with epinephrine versus fentanyl-0.015% bupivacaine with and without epinephrine. 850 57

The most frequently used postoperative analgesia techniques are intramuscular injection (IM) and patient controlled analgesia (PCA). Recently, the use of epidural catheter injection (EPI) has been done with success. This study was done to prospectively compare these three techniques for postoperative analgesia after extensive operations upon the colon and rectum. Patients were randomized to one of three analgesia groups--IM, intramuscular morphine sulfate; PCA, patient controlled morphine sulfate, and EPI, epidural morphine sulfate. Data collected included age, time to first bowel movement, amount of narcotic, number achieving 75 per cent of preoperative forced vital capacity, postoperative pruritus, headache, nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, atelectasis or pneumonitis. A visual analog pain scale was used to evaluate postoperative pain severity (0, no; 1, partial; 2, marked, and 3, total relief). Sixty-eight patients were eligible for study (IM, 19; PCA, 22; EPI, 23, and excluded, four). The EPI group required significantly less daily narcotic compared with either the IM or PCA groups (17.0 +/- 6.12 milligrams; 67.8 +/- 26.8 milligrams; 40.5 +/- 20.6 milligrams, respectively, less than 0.05 ANOVA) and total narcotic (81.3 +/- 31.3 milligrams; 355.4 +/- 147.7 milligrams; 215.3 +/- 105.4 milligrams, respectively, p less than 0.05 ANOVA). EPI achieves excellent pain control in more patients with a significantly lower dose of narcotics and significantly fewer pulmonary complications. Therefore, epidural analgesia is the optimal method of postoperative analgesia after extensive abdominal operations.
 ...
PMID:Epidural analgesia. 173 72

This retrospective study explores a number of variables encountered with the use of either epidural or non-epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Postoperative mobility, amount of narcotic used, incidence of blood transfusion, length of stay, and presence of urinary retention, pruritus, nausea and vomiting, or respiratory depression were compared in a group of 101 consecutive patients scheduled for total hip or knee arthroplasty. Fifty-two patients received epidural anesthesia and analgesia; the remaining 49 received non-epidural anesthesia, followed by standard IM/IV postoperative analgesia. Epidural patients required significantly less narcotic than the non-epidural group. There were significantly fewer blood transfusions in the epidural group; however, epidural patients had significantly increased incidence of urinary retention and pruritus. The use of epidural anesthesia and analgesia for total hip and knee arthroplasty patients has definite merit, but is most safely administered in a monitored, skilled nursing unit.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of epidural and non-epidural anesthesia and analgesia in total hip or knee arthroplasty patients. 173 19

The anatomy and physiology of the epidural space and the mechanism of action, sites of action, and pharmacokinetics of analgesics administered by continuous epidural infusion are reviewed, and the efficacy, adverse effects, and postoperative indications for use of analgesics administered by this route are discussed. Narcotics selectively block pain conduction by occupying specific opiate receptors in the spinal cord. Local anesthetics provide analgesia by axonal membrane blockade; they also can produce nonselective sympathetic and somatic (sensory and motor) blockade in addition to analgesia. A narcotic-local anesthetic mixture should provide an additive analgesic effect, without an increase in the incidence of adverse effects. Comparative efficacy studies have shown that continuous epidural infusions of narcotics, local anesthetics, and narcotic-local anesthetic combinations, when used appropriately, may produce better analgesia than conventional bolus methods of pain relief. Continuous epidural infusions also offer a safety advantage over intermittent epidural injections because peak and trough levels of the analgesic agent are avoided. Adverse effects of epidurally administered narcotics include respiratory depression, pruritus, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, and sedation. Adverse effects of epidurally administered local anesthetics include urinary retention, hypotension, numbness, motor weakness, tachyphylaxis, and, rarely, systemic toxicity. The cost of epidurally administered drugs is substantially higher than that for i.m. or i.v. narcotic analgesia, but this cost may be offset by other benefits such as a shorter hospital stay. Current studies suggest superior analgesia for the majority of surgical procedures with continuous epidural analgesia infusions compared with more traditional methods of providing analgesia.
 ...
PMID:Management of postoperative pain by continuous epidural infusion of analgesics. 174 61

The process of nociception, the anatomy of the epidural space, and the placement of the epidural catheter are reviewed, and the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics, analgesic efficacy, and potential adverse effects of epidurally administered narcotics and local anesthetics are discussed, as well as patient monitoring standards and solution preparation guidelines for these agents. The epidural space is located between the dura mater (the outer-most membrane surrounding the spinal cord) and the vertebral canal. The site of catheter placement is determined by the dermatomes corresponding to the site of desired analgesia. The primary factors that differentiate epidural narcotics are related to their pharmacokinetic profiles. Morphine, which is hydrophilic, has a slower onset of action and a longer duration of analgesia than lipophilic compounds such as fentanyl; morphine also results in less segmentalization (the degree to which analgesia is limited to discrete dermatomal segments corresponding to the level of the epidural narcotic injection) than is seen with lipophilic compounds. Studies have shown that epidural narcotics provide superior pain relief compared with systemic narcotics. Common adverse effects associated with therapeutic doses of intraspinal narcotics include itching, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, and sedation; respiratory depression is uncommon after epidural administration of narcotics. The most bothersome adverse effect encountered with analgesic doses of local anesthetics is paresthesia. Solutions for epidural administration must be sterile and preservative free. Epidural administration of narcotics and local anesthetics seems to provide better pain relief than conventional methods but may be associated with more bothersome adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:Epidural analgesia. 174 84

Sixty-four patients undergoing oesophageal surgery were randomly allocated to receive either a continuous lumbar epidural infusion of morphine or fentanyl, or, intramuscular morphine for postoperative analgesia. There was no statistical difference in analgesic requirements between the patients who underwent a thoracotomy for their procedure (n = 50) and those who did not (n = 14), as assessed by the total dose of opioid administered, visual analogue scale (VAS) and pain score (PS) comparison. However, by these criteria, epidural morphine infusion provided the most satisfactory analgesia (P less than 0.05). Despite the variable quality of analgesia achieved with the three regimens, the postoperative lung function tests were similar for all groups, and we conclude that routine lung function tests are not an appropriate method of comparing analgesic efficacy. Prophylactic administration of loratadine to 15% of our patients was not shown to be effective in diminishing the incidence of pruritus.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative analgesia for oesophageal surgery: a comparison of three analgesic regimens. 176 98

Dose-response relationship of mini-dose intrathecal morphine (0.025-0.125 mg) for analgesia after Cesarean section was studied. Sixty-three patients were randomly divided into six groups by the following intrathecal morphine injection: group 1 (0 mg), group 2 (0.025 mg), group 3 (0.05 mg), group 4 (0.075 mg), group 5 (0.1 mg), and group 6 (0.125 mg). The selected dose of morphine mixed with 2 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (10 mg) was administered intrathecally to induce spinal anesthesia. The mean analgesia duration in each group was 3.6 +/- 2.0, 10.6 +/- 7.1, 17.3 +/- 13.8, 25.6 +/- 7.5, 33.9 +/- 10.1, and 39.5 +/- 11.9 h respectively (mean +/- SD). In morphine groups, duration of analgesia was significantly longer (p less than 0.05) than control group (0 mg), and the first 24 h pain scores were also lower (p less than 0.01). Furthermore, a significant linear dose-response relationship between analgesic duration and the dose of intrathecal morphine was revealed (y = 3.28 + 295.5x, r2 = 0.64, p less than 0.05). Among morphine groups, analgesic quality was significantly better in patients in groups 4-6 than those in group 2 and 3 (p less than 0.05), so as in the proportion of effective analgesia in the first 24 h (p less than 0.01). Neonatal condition was not adversely affected by such mini-dose of intrathecal morphine. The most common maternal adverse effect observed was pruritus, and its incidence was significantly greater in groups 3-6 than in the control group (p less than 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed among all morphine groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Mini-dose intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean section analgesia. 180 Aug 72

In a randomized double-blind study of 51 primigravida, we have examined the relative efficacies of bupivacaine, diamorphine or diamorphine with adrenaline given by the extradural route for relief of pain during labour. Group 1 (n = 18) received diamorphine 5 mg in 0.9% sodium chloride 8 ml; group 2 (n = 19) received diamorphine 5 mg in 0.9% sodium chloride 8 ml with 1:200,000 adrenaline; group 3 (n = 14) received 0.375% bupivacaine 8 ml. All patients received 0.375% bupivacaine 8 ml as a supplement after the initial analgesia had subsided. Patients in all groups had satisfactory and comparable analgesia 20 min after the initial injection. However, after 60 min and up to 8 h, analgesia was superior in group 2 as assessed by linear analogue pain scores, with statistical significance at 4, 6 and 8 h. Groups 1 and 2 required bupivacaine supplements less frequently than group 3 (P less than 0.001). There were no serious adverse effects in any group, but pruritus was a feature in the diamorphine groups. Diamorphine 5 mg may be used as an alternative to bupivacaine 0.375% 8 ml in the first stage of labour and provides a longer duration of action. The addition of adrenaline 1:200,000 appears to augment both the quality and duration of analgesia.
 ...
PMID:Extradural diamorphine with adrenaline in labour: comparison with diamorphine and bupivacaine. 181 29

Postoperative analgesia provided by epidurally administered sufentanil and/or morphine was evaluated in 45 patients recovering from major gynecologic surgery. At the first complaint of pain in the Postanesthesia Care Unit, patients received a single epidural bolus of 30 micrograms sufentanil (group A), 5 mg morphine (group B), or 30 micrograms sufentanil plus 3 mg morphine (group C) in a randomized blinded fashion. Analgesic efficacy was assessed throughout the 24-h study period with 10-cm visual analog scales. The need for additional postoperative analgesia (patient-controlled analgesia, 1 mg of morphine every 6 min as necessary) and the incidence of adverse effects were also assessed. Patients receiving sufentanil (groups A and C) had significantly faster onset of analgesia than did patients given morphine alone (group B, P less than 0.05). Group B subjects experienced the longest duration of analgesia (B vs A and C, P less than 0.05) and required significantly less patient-controlled analgesia (morphine) than patients in group A (P less than 0.05). No patient developed clinically significant respiratory depression or excessive sedation, and there were no intergroup differences in incidence of pruritus or nausea (P value not significant). The data indicate that a mixture of sufentanil and morphine provides either a more rapid onset of epidural analgesia or reduced patient-controlled analgesia narcotic requirement than respective doses of each agent administered alone.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of epidurally administered sufentanil, morphine, and sufentanil-morphine combination for postoperative analgesia. 182 73

In a double-blinded, randomized, prospective multi-center study of 695 women, we investigated whether epidural injection of sufentanil added to 0.125% bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:800,000) reduces the total amount of local anesthetic required, resulting in less motor blockade and reduced incidence of instrumental deliveries, and improves the quality of analgesia provided by this low concentration of local anesthetic without jeopardizing the safety of the baby. In addition, other potential benefits of sufentanil (such as decrease in the incidence of shivering) and side effects were examined. It was found that adding incremental doses of 10 micrograms sufentanil up to a maximum of 30 micrograms reduced the incidence of instrumental deliveries from 36 to 24% (P less than 0.01) and significantly improved quality and duration of analgesia without depressing the neurobehavioral status of the baby. No other benefits from adding sufentanil were found. The only side effect that occurred more frequently after sufentanil was pruritus. We conclude that epidural injection of 10-30 micrograms sufentanil added to 0.125% bupivacaine with epinephrine (1:800,000) improved the quality of analgesia during labor and reduced the incidence of instrumental deliveries without jeopardizing the safety of the baby.
 ...
PMID:The effects of the addition of sufentanil to 0.125% bupivacaine on the quality of analgesia during labor and on the incidence of instrumental deliveries. 202 Nov 97


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>