Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Because evidence from uncontrolled, unblinded studies suggested fewer side effects from epidural hydromorphone than from epidural morphine, we employed a randomized, blinded study design to compare the side effects of lumbar epidural morphine and hydromorphone in 55 adult, non-obstetric patients undergoing major surgical procedures. A bolus dose of epidural study drug was given at least 1 h prior to the conclusion of surgery, followed by a continuous infusion of the same drug for two postoperative days. Infusions were titrated to patient comfort. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, VAS sedation scores, and subjective ratings of nausea and pruritus were assessed twice daily. The two treatments provided equivalent analgesia. Sedation scores and prevalence of nausea did not differ significantly between groups. Prevalence of pruritus, however, differed significantly on postoperative day 1, with moderate to severe pruritus reported by 44.4% of patients in the morphine group versus 11.5% in the hydromorphone group (P < .01). On post-operative day 2, reports of pruritus by patients receiving morphine remained higher than those among the hydromorphone-treated subjects, although this difference was no longer statistically significant (32% vs. 16.7%, P = .18). We conclude that lumbar epidural morphine and hydromorphone afford comparable analgesia, but the occurrence of moderate to severe pruritus on the first postoperative day is reduced by the use of hydromorphone.
 ...
PMID:Morphine and hydromorphone epidural analgesia. A prospective, randomized comparison. 128 25

Combined spinal anesthesia with the use of hyperbaric solution of lignocaine at an average dose of (69.4 +/- 1.4) mg and morphine hydrochloride at a dose of 0.3 mg was used in 50 patients with II-IV degree anesthesiologic risk during one-stage appendectomy. Effective intraoperative anesthesia was achieved in (96.2 +/- 2.5) % of cases. Duration of postoperative analgesia was (26.8 +/- 1.1) h. Suppression of breathing, hyperalgesia on termination of the effect of a local anesthetic were not noted. In (50.1 +/- 1.7) % of the patients, intraoperative hypotension was revealed. After the operation, nausea was noted in (20 +/- 11.5) % of these patients, vomiting--in (6.0 +/- 2.3) %, itch at the site of puncture--in (22.0 +/- 10.4) %, shiver--in (2.0 +/- 1.4) %.
 ...
PMID:[Effectiveness of combined spinal anesthesia]. 129 45

The safety and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia used for postoperative pain relief were evaluated. Cumulative 24-hour requirements were analyzed for possible correlation with patient characteristics. All patients who used a patient-controlled analgesia device for postoperative pain relief were reviewed from June to October 1991. The device Baxter's basal/bolus infusor with patient control module, was used to deliver fentanyl in 379 patients. The fentanyl requirement, verbal analog pain score, first passage of flatus, side effects, sedative score, and degree of satisfaction were examined. The fentanyl requirement during the first 24 hours after operation was analyzed with regard to age, body weight, and sex. The daily fentanyl consumption in the first three postoperative days was 928 +/- 352 micrograms (n = 338), 553 +/- 259 micrograms (n = 220), and 490 +/- 222 micrograms (n = 71), respectively. The requirement for fentanyl during the first 24 hours after surgery was significantly higher than for the next two days (p-value < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption correlated well with body weight, and inversely with age. No difference was found between fentanyl consumption and sex (p-value = 0.4687). The mean time to the first passage of flatus in patients with abdominal surgery was 54.6 +/- 26.4 hours. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness was similar, about 20% of patients. Itching was noted in 7% of patients. Oversedation (class 4) was found in three patients during the first operative day, the sedative score for other patients were around class 1-3. No patient exhibited signs of respiratory depression or withdrawal syndrome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[The efficacy of intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief]. 134 40

Epidural administration of an opioid analgesic by means of a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system was compared with conventional intravenous PCA for pain relief after cesarean delivery. One hundred seventeen healthy women were randomly assigned to receive hydromorphone either intravenously (IV-PCA) or epidurally (EPI-PCA) after cesarean delivery with epidural bupivacaine for operative anesthesia. The hydromorphone requirements were 3.4 and 4.2 times more in the IV-PCA group on the first (P less than 0.01) and second (P less than 0.01) postoperative days, respectively. The mean number (+/- SD) of PCA demands during the first 24 h after the operation was 105 (+/- 88) for the IV-PCA group and 33 (+/- 48) for the EPI-PCA group (P less than 0.01). This difference was also significant 24-48 h after surgery. Although the EPI-PCA group utilized significantly less opioid medication, pain and sedation scores were similar in the two treatment groups; however, a significantly larger percentage of patients in the IV-PCA group (46% vs 22%) stated that they felt drowsy during the first postoperative day. Pruritus was reported more frequently in the EPI-PCA (67%) than in the IV-PCA (33%) group. Nausea was experienced by only 10% of patients in the IV-PCA and 6% in the EPI-PCA group. There was no evidence of postoperative respiratory depression, with minimal oxygen saturation values of 93% (+/- 3%) and 94% (+/- 1%) in the IV-PCA and EPI-PCA groups, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Epidural patient-controlled analgesia: an alternative to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain relief after cesarean delivery. 137 7

Forty-six patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were given postoperative epidural analgesia for four days with bupivacaine-sufentanil or bupivacaine-morphine. Both groups received a bolus of 8 ml bupivacaine 0.5% followed after 30 minutes by an infusion of 20 ml/h bupivacaine 0.1%. The sufentanil group (group A: 21 patients) received a loading dose of 50 micrograms sufentanil and a continuous infusion of 5 micrograms/h sufentanil. The morphine group (group B: 25 patients) received no loading dose of morphine but only a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/h morphine. Both regimens provided excellent analgesia, but the frequency of respiratory depression was much greater in group A (33% versus 4% in group B). This respiratory depression occurred in the first hours postoperatively, when the patients were still in the post-anesthesia care unit. There was also a high incidence of hypotension after the loading dose of bupivacaine 0.5%. Although we noticed a large incidence of pruritus, no patient needed naloxone reversal. In view of these side effects we recommend a lower loading dose of both bupivacaine and sufentanil.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative analgesia for major abdominal surgery with continuous thoracic epidural infusion of bupivacaine with sufentanil, versus bupivacaine with morphine. A randomized double blind study. 138 19

We have studied postoperative analgesia and unwanted side effects of a single dose of a mixture of morphine and sufentanil administered extradurally with the effects produced by extradural injection of each opioid alone in 64 patients after Caesarean delivery. The patients were allocated randomly to receive morphine 4 mg (n = 21), sufentanil 50 micrograms (n = 22) or morphine 2 mg with sufentanil 25 micrograms (n = 21) via an extradural catheter in a double-blind design. Intensity of pain was measured using a linear visual analogue scale. Compared with the effect produced by morphine alone, the morphine-sufentanil combination produced more rapid onset of pain relief (19 (SD 5) min vs 79 (23) min for a 75% reduction of pain; P less than 0.01), whereas the duration and quality of analgesia assessed during 12 h was similar for these two groups. In contrast, patients receiving sufentanil alone required significantly more supplementary analgesia 4 h after administration than with morphine alone or morphine combined with sufentanil. There were no significant changes in cardiorespiratory variables in any group. Side effects consisted mainly of pruritus and nausea and did not differ between groups, with the exception of early and transient dizziness which was observed only in patients given sufentanil either alone or in combination with morphine. We conclude that a single extradural injection of morphine and sufentanil combines the short onset time produced by sufentanil and the long duration of analgesia attributable to morphine, thus providing excellent and prolonged analgesia after Caesarean delivery.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of extradural administration of sufentanil, morphine and sufentanil-morphine combination after caesarean section. 138 24

This study compared the analgesic efficacy of intermittent injections of intrathecal fentanyl (10 micrograms), meperidine (10 mg), or sufentanil (5 micrograms) administered to 65 parturients during the first stage of labor. The groups did not differ in onset or duration of effective analgesia. The meperidine group, however, had significantly lower pain scores once cervical dilation progressed beyond 6 cm. Side effects included mild pruritus and nausea. After intrathecal drug injection, variable decelerations of the fetal heart rate increased in the fentanyl and meperidine groups. All neonates had a 5-min Apgar score of 7 or more. We conclude that intermittent intrathecal injections of fentanyl, meperidine, or sufentanil can provide adequate first-stage labor analgesia. Meperidine appears to provide more reliable analgesia as the first stage of labor progresses.
 ...
PMID:Comparison among intrathecal fentanyl, meperidine, and sufentanil for labor analgesia. 141 27

This study compared naloxone and nalbuphine when administered for treatment of side effects after epidural morphine, 5 mg, given for postcesarean analgesia. Patients requesting treatment for pruritus or nausea randomly received, in a double-blind fashion, up to three intravenous doses of either naloxone 0.2 mg (group 1; n = 20) or nalbuphine 5 mg (group 2; n = 20). The incidence of vomiting, the severity of nausea and pruritus, and the degree of sedation and pain were assessed before and 30 min after each dose. The first dose of nalbuphine decreased the incidence of vomiting (P < 0.005) and the severity of nausea and pruritus (P < 0.01), whereas naloxone caused no significant changes. Sedation scores increased after nalbuphine (P < 0.05) and remained unchanged after naloxone, whereas pain scores increased after naloxone (P < 0.01) and were unchanged after nalbuphine. Eighteen patients in group 1 and 12 in group 2 received a second dose, and 8 and 4 patients, respectively, a third dose. Other than decreased pruritus after the second dose with both drugs, no further changes occurred. We conclude that nalbuphine is superior to naloxone for the treatment of side effects after epidural morphine. However, persistent symptoms may require supplemental therapy, as repeated doses proved less effective than the initial dose.
 ...
PMID:Nalbuphine is better than naloxone for treatment of side effects after epidural morphine. 141 28

To develop a regimen that would provide good analgesia after cesarean section with minimal side effects in the setting of prolonged (> 24 h) epidural infusion, buprenorphine or fentanyl was combined with 0.03% bupivacaine in a double-blind study of 23 parturients. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group I (n = 12), patient-controlled analgesia by epidural infusion of buprenorphine (3 micrograms/mL) with 0.03% bupivacaine; group II (n = 11), patient-controlled analgesia by epidural infusion of fentanyl (2 micrograms/mL) with 0.03% bupivacaine. Plasma for determination of opioid concentrations was obtained at intermittent intervals. Pain relief was similar and satisfactory in both groups. The median overall satisfaction score was higher (10.0 vs 7.5; P < 0.03) for group II. Pruritus was mild in most patients. Nausea and vomiting, which were most disturbing to the patients, were seen only with buprenorphine. No patient had a respiratory rate of < 12 breaths/min. Mean plasma opioid concentrations did not exceed 1 ng/mL during the study. However, four patients (33%) in group I and six patients (55%) in group II experienced sensory loss in the lower extremities, which made ambulation difficult. One patient in each group developed extensive pressure blisters on both heels. These complications led us to terminate the study. We conclude that 0.03% bupivacaine used in combination with an opioid in prolonged epidural infusions produces a high incidence of sensory loss in the lower extremities and is unsuitable for situations in which early ambulation is desired.
 ...
PMID:Adverse effects of epidural 0.03% bupivacaine during analgesia after cesarean section. 141 29

Although epidural opioids frequently are used to provide postoperative analgesia, several articles have suggested that the analgesia after epidural fentanyl is similar to that after an equal dose of fentanyl given intravenously. To address this issue further, 29 postthoracotomy patients were studied in a randomized, double-blinded trial comparing a lumbar epidural fentanyl infusion with an intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia, plasma fentanyl pharmacokinetics, and respiratory effects for 20 h postoperatively. In all patients in both groups, good analgesia was achieved (pain score less than 3, maximum 10) over a similar time course, although the patients receiving epidural infusion required a significantly larger fentanyl infusion dose than did the patients receiving intravenous infusion (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.95 +/- 0.45 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.56 +/- 0.36 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.0002). The time course for the plasma fentanyl concentrations was similar in the two groups, and plasma fentanyl concentrations were not significantly different at any sampling period (T7-T20; group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.8 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.6 +/- 0.6 ng/ml; P = 0.06). Similarly, calculated clearance values for the two groups were not significantly different (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 0.95 +/- 0.26 l.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 0.87 +/- 0.25 l.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.3). Both groups demonstrated a similar degree of mild to moderate respiratory depression postoperatively, which was assessed with continuous respiratory inductance plethysmography and sequential arterial blood gas analysis. Side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were mild and did not differ between groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for postthoracotomy pain relief. Analgesic, pharmacokinetic, and respiratory effects. 848 73


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>