Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 178 patients with symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) were treated with either triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) Aqueous nasal spray (220 micrograms once daily) or placebo for 4 weeks. Symptoms of PAR (nasal stuffiness, nasal discharge, sneezing, nasal index, and nasal itching) were evaluated throughout the treatment period through the use of patient diaries. In addition, both patients and physicians completed independent global evaluations of treatment efficacy at the conclusion of the study. TAA Aqueous provided clinically and statistically (P < or = 0.05) greater improvements in nasal stuffiness, sneezing, nasal index, and nasal itching over the 4-week study period than did placebo. Significant improvements in sneezing (P = 0.022) were observed as early as the first day (within 12 to 16 hours based on treatment in the morning and assessment of symptoms at bedtime), and in the nasal index (P = 0.009) by the third day after treatment with TAA Aqueous. Patients' and physicians' global evaluations of overall efficacy were concordant: 65% of patients rated their nasal symptoms greatly or somewhat improved with TAA Aqueous compared with 48% in the placebo group; physicians rated 66% of patients as having greatly or somewhat improved symptoms with the study drug compared with 48% of patients who received placebo. Adverse events were mild and the incidences were comparable for both groups; no significant changes in vital signs or clinical laboratory parameters were observed. This study demonstrated that TAA Aqueous administered once daily was well tolerated and provided relief of PAR symptoms in adults and adolescents.
 ...
PMID:Triamcinolone acetonide aqueous nasal spray for the treatment of patients with perennial allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 758 54

The present study compared the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of cetirizine (2.5, 5, and 10 mg) once a day with placebo over 14 days in 6-12-year-old children with perennial allergic rhinitis. The design was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study. Five symptoms (sneezing, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, nasal pruritus, and ocular pruritus) were rated according to severity by investigators at the visits and daily by patients. Eighty-three patients were randomized to placebo, 84 to 2.5 mg cetirizine, 85 to 5 mg cetirizine, and 76 to 10 mg cetirizine. Groups were comparable at inclusion. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of days with no or only mild symptoms: at all doses, cetirizine appeared to be more effective than placebo, but a significant difference was reached only in the 10-mg group (difference in medians of 22%; P = 0.016). The test of linearity was significant (P = 0.026) for the percentage of asymptomatic days. The investigators' assessments at each visit scored the symptoms in the placebo group higher, i.e., more severe, than in the active groups, the 10-mg dose causing the greatest reduction in symptoms. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild or moderate in severity. It was concluded that cetirizine at a 10-mg, once daily dose could be used to treat effectively 6-12-year-old children with perennial allergic rhinitis.
 ...
PMID:Assessment of the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of cetirizine given once daily in children with perennial allergic rhinitis. 765 36

The efficacy and safety of an extended-release combination of loratadine plus pseudoephedrine sulfate (SCH 434) was compared with that of a tablet containing chlorpheniramine maleate plus pseudoephedrine sulfate (CTM-D) in 131 patients with symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SCH 434 (loratadine 5 mg and pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) or CTM-D (chlorpheniramine maleate 12 mg and pseudoephedrine sulfate 120 mg) twice daily for 2 weeks. Evaluations were made after 3, 7, and 14 days of treatment. Demographics (age, race, sex, and duration of seasonal allergic rhinitis) and baseline total symptom scores were comparable between groups. Both combination products were effective in relieving the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Improvement in total symptom scores was 54% on day 3 and 65% on day 14 in the SCH 434 group versus 57% on day 3 and 64% on day 14 in the CTM-D group. Individual symptom scores (nasal discharge, stuffiness, nasal itching, sneezing, and ocular symptoms) responded similarly. A smaller proportion of patients in the SCH 434 group reported side effects, especially dry mouth (7% vs 19%, P = 0.07), fatigue (6% vs 25%, P < 0.01), and sedation (7% vs 22%, P < 0.03). In conclusion, the combination of loratadine plus pseudoephedrine sulfate was equally as effective as a classic antihistamine (chlorpheniramine maleate) plus pseudoephedrine sulfate but had a lower incidence of side effects.
 ...
PMID:Comparative study of SCH 434 and CTM-D in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. 791 2

Two hundred and fifty-one patients, aged 16 years and over, with perennial rhinitis were recruited to this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study. One hundred and fifty-nine patients received fluticasone propionate (200 micrograms) aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) twice daily, and 83 patients received beclomethasone dipropionate (200 micrograms) aqueous nasal spray (BDPANS) twice daily; treatment randomization being 2:1, respectively, in order to increase the number of patients in the FPANS group as FPANS was the drug under study. After 1 year of treatment, nasal blockage (p = 0.002), nasal discharge (p = 0.002) and eye watering/irritation (p = 0.048) were significantly improved in patients treated with FPANS twice daily, compared to patients treated with BDPANS twice daily. The symptom grades for nasal itching (p = 0.052) were improved in the FPANS group, but just failed to attain statistical significance at the 5% level. The symptom grades for sneezing tended to be better for the FPANS group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Assessment of changes in the findings during nasal examination (rhinoscopy) and in haematological, biochemical and urinary parameters, and measurements of plasma cortisol levels during the one year of treatment with the study drugs, showed that there were no clinically significant differences between the two treatment groups and that the study drugs were equally well tolerated. This study indicates that long-term use of FPANS provides better relief than BDPANS for most of the symptoms of perennial rhinitis.
 ...
PMID:A multicentre study to assess long-term use of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in comparison with beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of perennial rhinitis. 814 Mar 83

Rhinitis is a common complaint, especially during the allergy season. Physicians can often identify the probable allergen or irritant with history taking, and skin tests may be helpful in confirming the clinical impression. Often, environmental control measures can provide significant relief. Successful drug treatment hinges on selection of the proper class of medication for a given patient's type and severity of symptoms. Antihistamines remain a mainstay for reducing sneezing, itching, and nasal discharge. New oral agents are nonsedating, and an eyedrop form is available for bothersome eye symptoms. Decongestants reduce nasal blockage and are often especially beneficial when used in combination with antihistamines, In moderate to severe rhinitis, intranasal corticosteroids are the most effective treatment.
 ...
PMID:Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis. Directing medical therapy at specific symptoms. 870 Aug 25

Twelve children with allergic rhinitis due to monosensitivity to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) took part in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study to evaluate the effect of cetirizine, a second-generation, nonsedating H1-blocker-type antihistamine, on sulfidoleukotriene releasability by blood leukocytes and to determine its correlation with clinical findings and nasal challenge scores. Sulfidoleukotriene release by blood leukocytes was determined by the cellular allergen stimulation test (CAST), which measures leukotriene (LT)C4, LTD4, and LTE4, all in one assay. Compared to placebo, cetirizine significantly (P < 0.05) decreased daily symptom scores of nasal discharge, nasal itching, and sneezing, as well as the number of sneezings after nasal challenge with the antigen, without alleviating nasal obstruction (P > 0.05). It also suppressed both early (P < 0.05) and late skin reactions to intradermal tests. Although cetirizine did not influence in vitro sulfidoleukotriene production by blood leukocytes with buffer or anti-IgE (P > 0.05), it substantially reduced the release of these mediators upon challenge with Dp antigen. Furthermore, there was a high correlation between the number of sneezes after challenge and the amount of sulfidoleukotriene released in nine patients (r = 0.78; P < 0.01). It is concluded that the amount of sulfidoleukotrienes produced by blood leukocytes in vitro may reflect the nasal hyperreactivity of the patient, and that cetirizine, which is highly effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, owes part of its effect to inhibition of sulfidoleukotriene releasability by blood leukocytes in children.
 ...
PMID:The effect of cetirizine on sulfidoleukotriene production by blood leukocytes in children with allergic rhinitis. 883 25

875 adolescents of both sexes, aged between 12 and 15 years, who had presented with a perennial allergic rhinitis, were included in an open study that was conducted by pediatricians and allergologists on the efficacy of ZYRTEC (CETIRIZINE). There were four evaluations in the study, at Day-10, D 0, D15 and D30 and it was conducted according to the following plan: A first period (D-10 to D 0) to establish the eligibility of the subjects to be tested, and to establish the clinical allergic history, before definitive inclusion at D 0. A second period, of therapy, of 30 days, during which the subjects took a 10 mg tablet of ZYRTEC as a daily dose. Efficacy was evaluated at each visit by scores of intensity of major symptoms (sneezing, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, nasal pruritus) and secondary symptoms (ocular score ... ) of rhinitis, as well as anterior rhinoscopy. The patients made an auto-evaluation of symptoms at different times. Analysis of the different parameters showed a real efficacy of ZYRTEC, for 30 days of treatment, in young patients. Furthermore, the tolerance of the product is excellent. This study has shown an overall improvement in the symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis in patients who were treated with ZYRTEC in conditions similar to those of usual medical practice by pediatricians and allergologists.
 ...
PMID:[Multicenter study on the efficacy of Zyrtec (Cetirizine) in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis in 875 adolescents]. 888 7

The authors have studied the effect of azelastine nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The trial was a double-blind, placebo controlled study, with 33 allergic subjects (17 female, 16 male), 15-40 years old. The patients were randomized into two parallel groups, to receive daily 0.56 mg of azelastine intranasally or placebo during two weeks. Before and after treatment severity of nasal symptoms such as: sneezing, itching, nasal blockage, nasal discharge and general feeling were evaluated by patients according to VAS (visual analogue scale). At the same time the physician's evaluation of nasal oedema, nasal discharge and general patient's condition were performed (VAS). Additionally during the treatment patients noted possible adverse events. Patient's and physician's evaluations showed clinical efficacy in the azelastine group and no evident efficacy in the placebo group--between those two groups statistical significances were noted for all evaluated parameters (p < 0.001). The bitter taste in the mouth was the only serious side effect in some patients in azelastine group, although this was quite well accepted. Generally the treatment was well-tolerated. Azelastine nasal spray is an effective and well-tolerated drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical assessment of azelastine nasal spray in seasonal allergic rhinitis]. 1010 26

A forty-four-year-old Japanese female, who had persistant rhinorrhea, was administered Benza block tablets orally along with two other medicines. Immediately after ingestion, the patient displayed itching of the right upper eyelid, followed by coughing, sneezing, nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, nausea, vomiting, swelling of the face, and dyspnea. She had edema, a wheal extending from the face to the neck, and swelling of the eyelids and lips. Her symptoms subsided after treatment. Her reaction to ibuprofen, which was contained in the Benza Block tablets, was confirmed by a positive reaction to prick testing. From the results of these examinations, our patient was diagnosed as having anaphylaxis due to the ibuprofen in the Benza Block tablets. A review of the literature revealed no previous reports of anaphylaxis due to ibuprofen, although a few cases of ibuprofen urticaria have been reported.
 ...
PMID:A case of anaphylaxis due to ibuprofen. 1087 2

The clinical effect and tolerance of momethasone furoate (MF) glucocorticoid nasal spray (MFNS) were studied in 14-70 year-old patients suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis. The patients administered daily one (morning) dose, 100 micrograms each, of MF into both nostrils, for a period of 14 days. They did not use other medicines affecting nasal symptoms. Nasal symptoms (nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, nasal itching, sneezing) and non-nasal symptoms (lacrimation, eye itching/burning sensation, palatal itching, ear itching, general itching), scored 0 to 3, and serving as a basis for evaluating the effect, were registered before treatment (day 1) and at visits on 3, 7 and 14th day. Of the 196 patients involved in the open multicentric study, 188 completed the study. The total average nasal symptom scores decreased, already after 3 days of treatment, from 8.7 to 4.1 and to 1.6 by the 14th day. Decrease of non-nasal symptoms was also conspicuous, however, lacrimation persisted in 57 of 188 cases, while eye itching--mainly in moderate and mild form--in 90 cases. The general condition of rhinitis before the treatment was evaluated by the examiners as severe or very severe in 155 cases (82%), as symptom-free (99 cases) on day 14 in, and mild (71 cases), in 170 cases (90%). The therapeutic effect was considered by both, patients and physician, as excellent, in 106 (56%) and 115 (61%) cases, resp. and as good in 63 (34%) and 56 cases (30%). Side-effects were mostly mild and transitory. Treatment was not discontinued due to side-effect in any of the cases. Based on the results, MFNS, administered in a single daily dose of 200 micrograms, has proved to be an effective and safe glucocorticoid preparation, also easy to use locally, in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
 ...
PMID:[Effectiveness and tolerability of the glucocorticoid mometasone furoate given as nasal spray in seasonal allergic rhinitis]. 1093 85


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>