Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The effect of nalbuphine on the respiratory depression, pruritus and analgesia induced by epidural morphine was determined in a randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Twenty ASA physical status I women received 0.1 mg.kg-1 epidural morphine at induction of general anaesthesia for elective total abdominal hysterectomy. Group 1 (n = 14) received 0.3 mg.kg-1 nalbuphine intravenously six hours after the epidural morphine administration. Group 2 (n = 6) received saline. Prior to agent administration, six patients from the nalbuphine group and four patients from the saline group had respiratory depression indicated by a PaCO2 greater than 45 mmHg. After nalbuphine administration the PaCO2 (mean +/- SE) decreased from 49.5 +/- 1.2 mmHg to 42.5 +/- 0.7 mmHg (p less than 0.005) while there was no significant change after saline administration. Nine of the 14 patients receiving nalbuphine appeared to become more sedated, despite an improvement in ventilation. Pruritus was antagonized by 0.1 mg.kg-1 nalbuphine (p less than 0.006). There was no reversal of analgesia after administration of 0.3 mg.kg-1 nalbuphine.
 ...
PMID:Reversal of epidural morphine-induced respiratory depression and pruritus with nalbuphine. 314 43

The anesthetic effect of 2 ml of 5% lidocaine in 7.5% glucose (LG) or 5% meperidine in water were evaluated and compared in 40 ASA class 1 or 2 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups (20 patients in each) according to the anesthetic agent, which was injected into the lumbar subarachnoid space in the sitting position. The patients remained sitting for 5 min before being placed in the supine position. Times of onset of sensory and complete motor blockade were significantly more rapid with LG. The extent of maximum cephalad spread of analgesia and the time to maximum height of analgesia in the two groups were not different. Duration of analgesia at the T-7 (48.96 +/- 6.64 min with LG, 44.74 +/- 6.14 min with meperidine; means +/- SEM) and L-1 (94.37 +/- 7.42 min with LG, 76.19 +/- 5.64 min with meperidine) dermatomes was not different in the two groups but was statistically longer at the T-10 dermatome with LG (66.83 +/- 6.72 min) than with meperidine (46.66 +/- 6.26 min). The duration of complete motor blockade was also significantly longer with LG (66.44 +/- 7.05 min) than with meperidine (42.67 +/- 4.47 min). Complications in both groups included decrease in blood pressure and nausea and vomiting intraoperatively, and urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, and mild headache postoperatively. Complications that occurred only in the meperidine group were intraoperative drowsiness, respiratory depression, bronchospasm, and itching. The frequency of complications was greater wit meperidine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Meperidine as a spinal anesthetic agent: a comparison with lidocaine-glucose. 354 85

Twenty male patients of ASA physical status I or II undergoing surgery of the perineal or inguinal areas received intrathecal meperidine in a dose of 1 mg X kg-1 as the sole anaesthetic agent. There was sensory and motor block within ten minutes of intrathecal injection of meperidine and surgery was performed with complete analgesia. The duration of surgery was 39.7 +/- 14 (mean +/- SD) minutes. Prolonged postoperative analgesia was obtained and some patients did not require additional narcotic analgesic during the postoperative period, lasting up to seven days. Side effects included nausea and vomiting (six patients), hypotension (five patients), pruritus (five patients) and urinary retention (two patients). There was no early or late respiratory depression. It is concluded that intrathecal meperidine in a dose of 1 mg X kg-1 is effective as the sole agent for spinal anaesthesia and produces prolonged postoperative analgesia. It offers an advantage for such painful operations as haemorrhoidectomy and anal fissurectomy where its prolonged analgesic effect is desirable. It could also serve as an alternative agent for spinal anaesthesia when a local anaesthetic is not available.
 ...
PMID:Spinal anaesthesia with meperidine as the sole agent. 404 54

Lumbar epidural analgesia was administered to 60 ASA class 1 & 2 patients with 3 ml test dose of 1.5% lidocaine and bolus of 20 ml of 0.5% lidocaine containing 0.5 microgram/kg sufentanil. Bilateral decreased lumbar cold perception was accepted as evidence of analgesia despite persisting pinprick sensation in thoracic dermatomes. Oxygen saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate, cardiovascular parameters and leg muscle strength were monitored throughout and until 1 hour afterwards. Midazolam provided light sedation and atropine bradycardia control. Verbal communication was maintained. ESWL could start within 6-10 minutes of bolus, with analgesia adequate in 86% of patients, the rest being "rescued" with 5-10 ml 0.5% lidocaine or analgesic doses (20-30 mg IV) of ketamine. Leg weakness developed in 14%, with 1 patient fully paralyzed. All resolved within 1 hour. Topical urethral analgesia was used in males where cystoscopy preceded ESWL. Phenylephrine was required once for nild systolic hypotension, otherwise blood pressures were stable. Two of 4 patients experiencing pruritus needed naloxone relief. Itching appeared in skin recovering from sensory block while visceral analgesia persists. Excessive respiratory depression was not seen.
 ...
PMID:Low dose epidural lidocaine/sufentanil is effective for outpatient lithotripsy. 756 23

Meperidine 1 mg kg-1 and pentazocine 0.3 mg kg-1 were administered epidurally to investigate their effect on vesical function in twenty American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I (ASA-1) adult males. Cystometry was performed before and 45 minutes following epidural administration of meperidine and pentazocine. There was no significant change in maximum cystometric capacity, detrusor pressure at which detrusor reflex occurred and in vesical compliance following epidural administration of meperidine in ten patients and also in ten patients who received epidural pentazocine. The mean onset of analgesia after epidural administration of meperidine was 8 minutes which lasted for more than 360 minutes whereas mean onset of analgesia after epidural administration of pentazocine was 4 minutes which lasted for more than 360 minutes. There was no significant change in heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate after epidural administration of either meperidine or pentazocine. None of the subjects in either of the groups experienced any difficulty in passing urine, frequency or urgency of micturition. Side-effects like nausea, vomiting, pruritus and respiratory depression were not observed. It is concluded that epidural administration of meperidine 1 mg kg-1 or pentazocine 0.3 mg kg-1 produces significant analgesia of faster onset without altering vesical function as documented, both subjectively by voiding symptoms and objectively by cystometry.
 ...
PMID:Analgesic and urodynamic effects of epidural meperidine and pentazocine--a comparative study. 771 90

The efficacy and safety of postoperative analgesia with continuous epidural infusion of either morphine or fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine were evaluated in 85 patients, ASA physical status I or II, undergoing thoracic and/or upper abdominal surgery. Patients were treated with one of the combinations for 48 h after surgery. The morphine/bupivacaine group (MB; n = 45) received morphine at the rate of 0.2 mg.h-1, and bupivacaine at the rate of 10 mg.h-1 for the first 24 h or 5 mg.h-1 for the second 24 h; the fentanyl/bupivacaine group (FB; n = 40) received fentanyl at the rate of 20 micrograms.h-1, and bupivacaine at the rate of 10 mg.h-1 for the first 24 h or 5 mg.h-1 for the second 24 h. The degree of pain relief assessed by the visual pain scale and the modified Prince Henry pain scale was satisfactory in most patients in both groups. In group MB 74% and in group FB 76% of patients did not need any supplementary analgesics. No significant differences were observed between the groups in assessment of pain. The incidence of hypotension (P < 0.05) and pruritus (P < 0.05) was higher in group MB than in group FB. None of the patients developed respiratory depression in either group.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of continuous epidural infusion of morphine/bupivacaine with fentanyl/bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. 806 30

Of a total of 131 patients suffering from chronic urticaria, 15 were cautiously re-exposed to ASA after an initial provocative exposure during an urticaria test programme 2-11 years before. Only 1 of these patients, who had undergone the initial provocative test 7 years earlier, reacted at the same intensity; 1 other patient reacted with much less intense symptoms 4 years after the original test. Among 3 other patients, who merely reacted to ASA intake with urticarial eruptions and did not suffer from chronic urticaria, only 1 presented 4 years after the initial exposure with oedema of the skin and itching. The tolerance threshold was markedly higher. These results suggest that the sensitivity to intolerance-inducing agents is reduced relatively quickly and may subside completely in most cases.
 ...
PMID:[Catamnestic studies of patients with chronic urticaria and aspirin intolerance ]. 815 Jun 10

The influence of the addition of epinephrine to epidural morphine on postoperative analgesia were investigated in 60 ASA physical status I or II patients aged average 45 yr. The treatments were given following lower extremity operation under epidural anesthesia with 2% Xylocaine solution in 20 mL. The subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A (n = 30) received 2 mg epidural morphine in 10 mL normal saline without epinephrine. Group B (n = 30) received 2 mg epidural morphine in 10 mL normal saline with epinephrine 0.1 mg (1:100,000, 10 micrograms/mL). Patients were assessed for quality and duration of postoperative analgesia, as well as the incidence and severity of side effects after epidural morphine administration. The addition of epinephrine to epidural morphine had significantly increased the quality and duration of analgesia. The side effects of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention were more intense after epinephrine-morphine administration. However, respiratory depression was not observed in both groups.
 ...
PMID:Influence of epinephrine as an adjuvant to epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia. 830 50

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of intrathecal meperidine in patients undergoing Caesarean section, and also to compare meperidine with heavy lidocaine. Fifty full-term pregnant women, ASA physical status I or II, presenting for elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups with 25 in each, to receive either intrathecal meperidine or lidocaine. All patients received premedication with oral ranitidine, 150 mg, the night before surgery, and again two hours before surgery. Patients in the meperidine group were also given metoclopramide iv 10 mg one hour before surgery. After iv 20 ml.kg-1 Ringer's lactate, patients were given either 5% meperidine 1 mg.kg-1 or 5% heavy lidocaine 1.2 to 1.4 ml intrathecally. The sensory and motor blockades in all except two patients in each group who required sedation at the time of skin incision were adequate for surgery. None of the mothers suffered from any major side effects. The incidence of hypotension was higher in the lidocaine group than in meperidine group (P < 0.05). Pruritus and drowsiness were more common in meperidine group than in lidocaine group (P < 0.01). All the newborns in both groups cried immediately after birth and had an Apgar score > 7. The mean duration of postoperative analgesia was six hours in the meperidine group and one hour in the lidocaine group (P < 0.01). Postoperative analgesia requirement was less in the meperidine than in the lidocaine group (P < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Intrathecal meperidine for elective caesarean section: a comparison with lidocaine. 840 55

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of epidural fentanyl, 25 micrograms vs 50 micrograms, when used to supplement epidural anaesthesia for elective Caesarean section. Fifty ASA I and II patients were randomized into two groups: Group I (n = 24) received 25 micrograms and Group II (n = 26) received 50 micrograms of epidural fentanyl after the epidural test dose. No differences between the two groups were found on any measures of intraoperative pain, nausea, drowsiness, respiratory depression, hypotension, pruritus and neonatal outcome. The low levels of pain experienced by patients indicates that doses higher than 50 micrograms of epidural fentanyl are usually unnecessary for optimal analgesia.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of two doses of epidural fentanyl during caesarean section. 840 56


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >>