Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Antihistamines are a diverse group of drugs which possess the ability to inhibit various histaminic actions. By and large, they bear a certain structural resemblance to histamine, and act principally to prevent histamine-receptor interaction through competition with histamine for histamine receptors. Consequently, they are helpful therapeutically in preventing, rather than reversing, histaminic actions. Individual antihistaminic drugs act to inhibit histaminic action at one or another histamine receptor (H1 or H2-receptor), but not at both receptors. The large number of antihistaminics which have been available for many years and employed chiefly as 'antiallergic' drugs are classified as H1-receptor inhibitors; they are most effective therapeutically in inhibiting manifestations of histamine-induced wheal and erythema formation and pruritus. H2-receptor inhibitors, agents which are able to inhibit histamine-induced gastric acid secretion, have been developed more recently. Antihistaminics in general and H1-receptor inhibitors in particular, exert a wide variety of pharmacological activities. Their use is frequently accompanied by undesirable side-effects, notably CNS depression, dryness of mucous membranes, and gastrointestinal effects. Used judiciously and in proper dosage, antihistaminic drugs are helpful in the control of allergic disorders, allergic rhinitis and urticaria in particular; newly developed H2-receptor inhibitors show therapeutic promise in the treatment of peptic ulceration.
 ...
PMID:Antihistamines: pharmacology and clinical use. 0 70

Intramuscularly administered methylprednisolone sodium phosphate (Medrol Stabisol) in single doses of 40, 80, or 160 mg (methylprednisolone equivalents) had a similar effect as the same doses of methylprednisolone sodium succinate (Solu-Medrol) with regard to eosinophil suppression, elevation of glucose, white blood count differential shifts (lympholytic effect), urinary excretion of sodium and potassium, and localized (pain) and systemic side effects. The average plasma methylprednisolone concentration was approximately 20% higher after the intramuscular administration of methylprednisolone sodium phosphate than after methylprednisolone sodium succinate. The differences in plasma methylprednisolone levels produced by the two esters suggest that either hydrolysis of the succinate ester occurs more slowly or the succinate ester distributes more extensively. This difference in plasma level, however, is not reflected in any other pharmacologic evaluation of the two esters, e.g., both eosinophil depression and hyperglycemic response were identical. No clinically significant changes in the vital signs, standard hematology, and clinical chemistry parameters evaluated were noted after 21 successive doses (q.i.d. for five days with one dose in the morning of day 6) of 80 mg methylprednisolone sodium phosphate. An increase was noted in the systolic blood pressure from a pretreatment mean of 113 mm Hg to a posttreatment mean of 123 mm Hg and an increase in the body weight from a pretreatment mean of 177 pounds to a posttreatment mean of 183 pounds. No signs of adrenal suppression were found as judged by plasma cortisol and ACTH levels. Six (6/12) subjects of the methylprednisolone sodium phosphate group, one (1/12) subject of the vehicle group, and one (1/12) subject of the placebo (sterile saline) group reported the following systemic side effects: gas in stomach, headaches, anorectal itching, and dryness of itching of the skin. No trend was observed for any side effect reported. In these double-blind, randomized studies, single (40, 80, and 160 mg) and multiple (80 mg) intramuscular doses of methylprednisolone sodium phosphate were tolerated in healthy volunteers as well as the same doses of methylprednisolone sodium succinate and similar volumes of vehicle or placebo.
 ...
PMID:The clinical pharmacology of methylprednisolone sodium phosphate. I. Intramuscular route of administration. 32 97

The term glossodynia refers to all conditions with pain and dysaesthesia of the tongue and entire oral mucosa manifesting themselves in burning, prickling, itching, stinging, and other frequently bizarre sensations as well as subjective xerostomia and bad taste. In most cases psychiatric diseases are the cause of the complex of complaints whereas local and general disorders are of only minor importance. Menopausal women with atypical depression are most often affected. Schizophrenia and abnormal personality development are far less frequent in glossodynia. After exclusion or therapy of organic disorders antidepressants are the treatment of choice in glossodynia. Thereapeutic difficulties may arise in patients suffering from marked xerostomia whose complaints may intensify during therapy because of the anticholinergic effect of most antidepressants, and in neurotic persons.
 ...
PMID:[Psychological aspects of glossodynia (author's transl)]. 67 25

In a series of 84 various evaluable disseminated cancer patients treated with hydrazine sulfate as a result of a pharmaceutical-sponsored investigational new drug (IND) study, it was found that 59/84 or 70% of the cases improved subjectively and 14/84 or 17% improved objectively. Subjective responses included increased appetite with either weight gain or cessation of weight loss, increase in strength and improved performance status and decrease in pain. Objective responses included measurable tumor regression, disappearance of or decrease in neoplastic-associated disorders and long-term (over 1 year) 'stabilized condition'. Of the overall 59 subjective improvements 25 (42%) had no concurrent or prior (within 3 months) anticancer therapy of any type. Of the 14 objective improvements 7 (50%) had no concurrent or prior anticancer therapy. Of the remaining cases in which there was either concurrent or prior anticancer therapy, improvements occurred only after the addition of hydrazine sulfate to the treatment regimen. Duration of improvement was variable, from temporary to long-term and continuing. Side effects were mild, comprising for the most part low incidences of extremity paresthesias, nausea, pruritus and drowsiness; there was no indication of bone marrow depression.
 ...
PMID:Use of hydrazine sulfate in terminal and preterminal cancer patients: results of investigational new drug (IND) study in 84 evaluable patients. 120 24

The safety and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia used for postoperative pain relief were evaluated. Cumulative 24-hour requirements were analyzed for possible correlation with patient characteristics. All patients who used a patient-controlled analgesia device for postoperative pain relief were reviewed from June to October 1991. The device Baxter's basal/bolus infusor with patient control module, was used to deliver fentanyl in 379 patients. The fentanyl requirement, verbal analog pain score, first passage of flatus, side effects, sedative score, and degree of satisfaction were examined. The fentanyl requirement during the first 24 hours after operation was analyzed with regard to age, body weight, and sex. The daily fentanyl consumption in the first three postoperative days was 928 +/- 352 micrograms (n = 338), 553 +/- 259 micrograms (n = 220), and 490 +/- 222 micrograms (n = 71), respectively. The requirement for fentanyl during the first 24 hours after surgery was significantly higher than for the next two days (p-value < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption correlated well with body weight, and inversely with age. No difference was found between fentanyl consumption and sex (p-value = 0.4687). The mean time to the first passage of flatus in patients with abdominal surgery was 54.6 +/- 26.4 hours. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness was similar, about 20% of patients. Itching was noted in 7% of patients. Oversedation (class 4) was found in three patients during the first operative day, the sedative score for other patients were around class 1-3. No patient exhibited signs of respiratory depression or withdrawal syndrome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[The efficacy of intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief]. 134 40

Pruritus is usually caused by a primary disorder of the skin, but can also be caused by a systemic disease (Table 1). Some dermatologic conditions that cause pruritus can be inconspicuous or nonspecific (Table 2), while others are usually apparent on physical examination (Table 3). Classification of pruritus as localized (Fig. 1) vs. generalized (Fig. 3) can be helpful in arriving at a correct diagnosis. The history and physical examination are the most important diagnostic tools, though laboratory testing for systemic disease may be necessary. In refractory cases, one should consider occult systemic disease (such as malignancy), psychiatric disease (especially depression), and HIV infection. Subsequent referral to a dermatologist may be indicted. When treatment of the underlying cause of pruritus is not possible, antihistamines and topical agents (menthol, phenol, and/or pramoxine) can be helpful.
 ...
PMID:Pruritus: a practical approach. 135 41

Epidural administration of an opioid analgesic by means of a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system was compared with conventional intravenous PCA for pain relief after cesarean delivery. One hundred seventeen healthy women were randomly assigned to receive hydromorphone either intravenously (IV-PCA) or epidurally (EPI-PCA) after cesarean delivery with epidural bupivacaine for operative anesthesia. The hydromorphone requirements were 3.4 and 4.2 times more in the IV-PCA group on the first (P less than 0.01) and second (P less than 0.01) postoperative days, respectively. The mean number (+/- SD) of PCA demands during the first 24 h after the operation was 105 (+/- 88) for the IV-PCA group and 33 (+/- 48) for the EPI-PCA group (P less than 0.01). This difference was also significant 24-48 h after surgery. Although the EPI-PCA group utilized significantly less opioid medication, pain and sedation scores were similar in the two treatment groups; however, a significantly larger percentage of patients in the IV-PCA group (46% vs 22%) stated that they felt drowsy during the first postoperative day. Pruritus was reported more frequently in the EPI-PCA (67%) than in the IV-PCA (33%) group. Nausea was experienced by only 10% of patients in the IV-PCA and 6% in the EPI-PCA group. There was no evidence of postoperative respiratory depression, with minimal oxygen saturation values of 93% (+/- 3%) and 94% (+/- 1%) in the IV-PCA and EPI-PCA groups, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Epidural patient-controlled analgesia: an alternative to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain relief after cesarean delivery. 137 7

Forty-six patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were given postoperative epidural analgesia for four days with bupivacaine-sufentanil or bupivacaine-morphine. Both groups received a bolus of 8 ml bupivacaine 0.5% followed after 30 minutes by an infusion of 20 ml/h bupivacaine 0.1%. The sufentanil group (group A: 21 patients) received a loading dose of 50 micrograms sufentanil and a continuous infusion of 5 micrograms/h sufentanil. The morphine group (group B: 25 patients) received no loading dose of morphine but only a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/h morphine. Both regimens provided excellent analgesia, but the frequency of respiratory depression was much greater in group A (33% versus 4% in group B). This respiratory depression occurred in the first hours postoperatively, when the patients were still in the post-anesthesia care unit. There was also a high incidence of hypotension after the loading dose of bupivacaine 0.5%. Although we noticed a large incidence of pruritus, no patient needed naloxone reversal. In view of these side effects we recommend a lower loading dose of both bupivacaine and sufentanil.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative analgesia for major abdominal surgery with continuous thoracic epidural infusion of bupivacaine with sufentanil, versus bupivacaine with morphine. A randomized double blind study. 138 19

Although epidural opioids frequently are used to provide postoperative analgesia, several articles have suggested that the analgesia after epidural fentanyl is similar to that after an equal dose of fentanyl given intravenously. To address this issue further, 29 postthoracotomy patients were studied in a randomized, double-blinded trial comparing a lumbar epidural fentanyl infusion with an intravenous fentanyl infusion for analgesia, plasma fentanyl pharmacokinetics, and respiratory effects for 20 h postoperatively. In all patients in both groups, good analgesia was achieved (pain score less than 3, maximum 10) over a similar time course, although the patients receiving epidural infusion required a significantly larger fentanyl infusion dose than did the patients receiving intravenous infusion (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.95 +/- 0.45 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.56 +/- 0.36 micrograms.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.0002). The time course for the plasma fentanyl concentrations was similar in the two groups, and plasma fentanyl concentrations were not significantly different at any sampling period (T7-T20; group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 1.8 +/- 0.5 ng/ml; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 1.6 +/- 0.6 ng/ml; P = 0.06). Similarly, calculated clearance values for the two groups were not significantly different (group receiving epidural fentanyl infusion: 0.95 +/- 0.26 l.kg-1.h-1; group receiving intravenous fentanyl infusion: 0.87 +/- 0.25 l.kg-1.h-1; P = 0.3). Both groups demonstrated a similar degree of mild to moderate respiratory depression postoperatively, which was assessed with continuous respiratory inductance plethysmography and sequential arterial blood gas analysis. Side effects (nausea, vomiting, pruritus) were mild and did not differ between groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A randomized, double-blind comparison of lumbar epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions for postthoracotomy pain relief. Analgesic, pharmacokinetic, and respiratory effects. 848 73

At the beginning, the way intrathecal morphine was used for postoperative pain relief was quite unfortunate, because the doses derived from experience with morphine-tolerant cancer patients were considerably too high and respiratory depression occurred frequently. Subsequent dose-finding studies showed that the doses of morphine used initially could be reduced by a factor of ten without loss of the analgesic effect and with a marked reduction in side-effects. No respiratory depression has been reported when doses below 0.1 mg morphine are used. METHOD. In this prospective study the effect of 0.06 to 0.08 mg intrathecal morphine, mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anesthesia, was investigated in surgical patients aged 21 to 81 years, ASA grade I or II, scheduled for orthopaedic operations or herniorraphies. Thirty unpremedicated patients were enrolled in the study and were, after informed consent, randomly allocated to a control group without morphine or to a morphine group. The analgesic effect was assessed by the time interval between the administration of the spinal anaesthesia and the first demand for an analgesic medication. The mood state was evaluated with the adjective checklist of Janke and Debus 6 h after the spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In the control group half of the patients asked for an analgesic medication within 275 min (median) after the spinal anaesthesia, and all patients within 420 min, whereas in the morphine group half of the patients asked for an analgesic within 1170 min (median). Seven patients had not required an analgesic at the termination of the observation period 20 h after the spinal anaesthesia. The mood status showed no difference between the two groups, in particular, no dizziness or drowsiness after morphine. There was no difference in the incidence of side-effects such as nausea or urinary retention between the two groups. Pruritus was not reported spontaneously but was found upon questioning in five patients. It was in no case disturbing. CONCLUSIONS. Morphine (0.06 to 0.08 mg) mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia provided for an analgesia of more than 20 h duration in half of the patients. This technique is safe, simple, reliable and virtually free of side-effects. No particular supervision due to the administration of intrathecal morphine is necessary in this dose range if systemic opiates are avoided. If the analgesia is unsatisfactory, a non-opioid analgesic is recommended.
 ...
PMID:[Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain]. 146 57


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>