Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Hypersensitivity to buckwheat allergen frequently causes anaphylactic type reactions including urticaria, wheezing, dyspnea and/or shock. Though the susceptible pupil would be recommended to be careful for school lunch and picnic meals, the prevalence of buckwheat allergy in school children has not yet been elucidated. In this study, data on the children allergic to buckwheat were collected by sending questionnaire to 341 nurses in elementary school in Yokohama. Among the total subjects of this investigation, 92,680 children, the incidence of buckwheat allergy was determined 0.22% (140 boys and 54 girls). This percentage was not so low level besides the prevalence of such allergic diseases as bronchial asthma, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis and food allergy was 5.6%, 4.2%, 3.1%, 1.6%, and 1.3%, respectively. Although a large majority of clinical symptoms of buckwheat allergy were urticaria (37.3%), skin itching (33.3%), and wheezing (26.5%). Four children (3.9%) experienced anaphylactic shock having a need of medical emergency treatment. The incidence of anaphylactic shock due to buckwheat was higher than those due to egg and milk allergy. Actually 7 pupil was provoked allergic reaction by buckwheat noodle served at school lunch, and 1 pupil at picnic meals. Thus, school children allergic to buckwheat is not rare, and it is important to withdraw buckwheat food from school lunch and picnic meals.
 ...
PMID:[Buckwheat allergy in 90,000 school children in Yokohama]. 952 62

Only one of several available ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is currently FDA approved for use in acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC). Sixty patients with SAC and moderate itching and bulbar conjunctival injection were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group trial comparing diclofenac sodium (DS) with ketorolac tromethamine (KT). Patients instilled 1 drop four times daily while awake for 14 days. Ocular signs and symptoms were evaluated at one and two weeks. The primary efficacy variables were itching and bulbar conjunctival injection. For both treatments, the ocular allergy sign and symptom scores were comparable at baseline. Both treatments evaluated in this study were well tolerated. Significant clinical and statistical reductions from baseline were observed in the primary efficacy variables. Treatment group differences were observed for the pain/soreness score with an advantage observed for the DS group at 30 minutes and at day 7. Our conclusion is that diclofenac sodium and ketorolac tromethamine acted similarly to reduce the ocular signs and symptoms associated with acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. There was a statistically significant advantage for the DS group to be free of symptoms at the day 7 visit as compared to the KT group (20.7% vs. 3.2%).
 ...
PMID:A multicenter comparison of the ocular efficacy and safety of diclofenac 0.1% solution with that of ketorolac 0.5% solution in patients with acute seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. 957 39

The efficacy and tolerability of azelastine (CAS 58581-89-8) eye drops at three different doses (0.025%, 0.05% and 0.1%) were investigated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 24 subjects with a history of allergic conjunctivitis/rhinoconjunctivitis, who were challenged, out of season, by airbone allergen in the "Vienna Challenge Chamber" (VCC). Subjects received a single dose of azelastine eye drops 60 min before the start of a 4 h challenge in the VCC. Additional local challenge, mimicking a gust of wind, was administered 15 min before the end of the session. Each of the 4 study days was separated by a 2 week washout period. Azelastine eye drops showed a dose-dependent inhibition of the development of itching of the eyes. The effect was most pronounced 15 min after the additional local challenge. A maximal effect was achieved at a dose of 0.05%. Similar effects were observed on lacrimation. Azelastine eye drops also dose-dependently inhibited the degree of conjunctival redness, measured by digital imaging, and tended to reduce the low incidence of chemosis observed. Ranking of the results of all symptoms for each treatment group confirmed the optimal effect at a dose of 0.05%. Azelastine eye drops had no effect on nasal and bronchial symptoms or on measurements of airways function (FEV1). No adverse effects of the treatments were reported. The data support the use of 0.05% azelastine eye drops in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis/rhinoconjunctivitis.
 ...
PMID:Dose-dependent protection by azelastine eye drops against pollen-induced allergic conjunctivitis. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 960 80

Thelazia is a nematode (Spirurida) that can parasitize the mammalian conjunctival sac. This is the first reported case of ocular. Thelazia callipaeda infestation in Taiwan. A 41-year-old woman experienced swelling, itching sensation and occasional blurred vision of the right eye 2 weeks after a small group of flies swarmed her eye while she was hiking. Her symptoms were first misdiagnosed as allergic conjunctivitis at a local medical clinic. During her first visit to our outpatient department, five white thread-like living worms were discovered on the superior and inferior fornices. The worms were cream-colored, slender and approximately 1 cm in length. Follicular and papillary conjunctivitis was noted in her right eye. After removing the worms, the symptoms resolved and no other worms were found in the following 2 months. This case is a remainder to physicians that parasitic infestation should be included in the differential diagnoses of ocular itching, conjunctivities, and blurred vision after insect contact.
 ...
PMID:Conjunctivitis caused by Thelazia callipaeda infestation in a woman. 965 Apr 73

In a randomised, multicentre study, the effect of azelastine eye drops (n = 51 patients) was compared in a double-blind manner with placebo eye drops (n = 30 patients) and in an open manner with levocabastine eye drops (n = 32 patients) during a 14-day treatment period involving 113 children (aged 4 to 12 years) suffering from seasonal allergic conjunctivitis/rhinoconjunctivitis. The primary variable was the response rate defined as the number of patients showing an improvement after three days of treatment of at least three score points, from a minimum baseline score of six, in the main ocular symptoms of itching, conjunctival redness and lacrimation (each assessed on a four-point scale). Patients discontinuing due to inefficacy were regarded as non-responders. The mean response rate in the azelastine eye drops group (74%) was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that in the placebo group (39%) and comparable with that in the levocabastine group. The response rates assessed by the patients in their diaries were very similar. Significant differences (p < 0.01) for azelastine compared with placebo were observed on days 3 and 14 in the mean sum scores for the three main symptoms and for a total of eight eye symptoms. The overall assessment of efficacy confirmed the superiority of both active treatments compared with placebo. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 23% of placebo-, 35% of azelastine- and 38% of levocabastine-treated patients. These were mainly local irritant effects. Overall tolerability was assessed as very good or good in 80%, 84% and 91% of placebo-, azelastine- and levocabastine-treated patients, respectively. Azelastine eye drops are effective and well-tolerated in children with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
 ...
PMID:Azelastine eye drops in the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis in young children. 978 82

This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of 0.025% and 0.05% azelastine eye-drops in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis of > or = 1 year's duration. A total of 151 patients received 0.025% or 0.05% azelastine eye-drops or placebo b.i.d. for 14 days according to a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-dosing design; 129 patients completed the study as planned. The three target symptoms, scored on 4-point scales, were itching, lacrimation, and redness of the eyes; responders were patients whose symptom sum score decreased by > or = 3 from a baseline score of > or = 6 by day 3. Mean scores of these and five other symptoms were recorded also on days 7 and 14, and patients kept daily diaries of the three main symptoms and swollen eyelids. Responder rates were 73% for 0.025% (P=0.115 vs placebo) and 82% for 0.05% azelastine eye-drops (P=0.011 vs placebo) and 56% for placebo. The time courses of the mean (investigators' and patients') scores for the three main symptoms reflected the dose-dependent effect of azelastine eye-drops. One patient each from the two azelastine groups and three from the placebo group withdrew because of inefficacy. Adverse drug reactions were reported by 14 and 24 patients receiving 0.025% and 0.05% azelastine eye-drops, respectively, and by eight placebo patients. These reactions were mainly slight application site reactions and taste perversion (bitter or unpleasant taste). Azelastine eye-drops are effective and well tolerated at a dose of 0.05% for the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
 ...
PMID:Azelastine eye-drops in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. 978 86

We have evaluated the efficacy of nedocromil sodium 2% eye drops in 35 patients (18 males and 17 females, mean age 32.8 yrs) suffering from perennial allergic conjunctivitis due to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus diagnosed on the basis of anamnesis, Skin Prick Test and RAST. Patients were treated for 8 weeks with nedocromil sodium one drop each eye, four times daily and had to report the severity of the symptoms considered (photophobia, lacrimation, hyperaemia and itching) on a daily card. During the study no other medication was allowed. After 4 weeks symptoms were statistically improved and this beneficial effect increased at the end of the treatment. No side effects were reported. Nedocromil sodium eye drops is therefore a useful treatment in perennial allergic conjunctivitis due to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.
 ...
PMID:[Efficacy of nedocromil sodium in perennial allergic conjunctivitis]. 984 52

Two studies were conducted using the conjunctival provocation test (CPT) model of ocular allergy. The objective of the first study was to evaluate the sensitivity of the CPT model to a topical corticosteroid. Selected was loteprednol etabonate 0.5%, previously found effective in the treatment of ocular allergy and inflammation. The study was a randomized double-masked, placebo-controlled, paired-comparison of loteprednol etabonate 0.5% (LE), b.i.d. or q.i.d. Sixty subjects who had a minimum pre-determined allergic response received LE in one eye and placebo in the fellow eye for 28 days from Day 7 to Day 35. Antigen challenges were carried out on Days 0, 7 (baseline), 21 and 35. The primary endpoints were interocular differences in itching and mean redness (the average of ciliary, conjunctival and episcleral vessel beds). LE (either b.i.d. or q.i.d.) was significantly more effective than placebo for reducing mean redness and itching. No clinical or statistically significant changes in intraocular pressure were observed. Based upon the results of Study 1, we used the CPT model to aid in the selection of a concentration of loteprednol etabonate for subsequent studies in environmental seasonal allergic conjunctivitis. This was a randomized double-masked, placebo-controlled, paired-comparison of loteprednol etabonate 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3%, q.i.d. in 88 subjects. The dosing and testing regimen was similar to the first portion of the study. Loteprednol etabonate, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3%, was numerically superior to the placebo in reducing mean redness and itching. At the 20-minute post allergen challenge, the 0.1% concentration was significantly superior (p < 0.05) to the placebo on Visit 4 (2 and 4 hour challenge) in reducing the mean redness; however, LE was only numerically superior in relieving itching. The 0.2% concentration was significantly superior (p < 0.05) to the placebo in the reduction of mean redness and itching on Visit 3 (Day 21) and in reduction of mean redness on Visit 4 (4 hour challenge). The 0.3% concentration was significantly superior (p < 0.05) to the placebo in the reduction of mean redness on all visits, and statistically significant in the reduction of itching on Visit 4 (4 hour challenge). While there were some elevations of IOP with LE 0.2%, they were not clinically significant. In conclusion, the CPT model of ocular allergy is useful in the evaluation of corticosteroids. Furthermore, based upon a dose-response study in this model, 0.2% loteprednol etabonate was selected for further evaluation in environmental seasonal allergic conjunctivitis studies.
 ...
PMID:The conjunctival provocation test model of ocular allergy: utility for assessment of an ocular corticosteroid, loteprednol etabonate. 986 36

Allergic eye conditions, particularly seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC), are common. Itching, oedema and hyperaemia are relieved with topical H1-antagonists or sodium cromoglycate. The newer mast-cell stabilizing agent nedocromil sodium has a similar safety profile to sodium cromoglycate, but is more potent and has a more convenient twice-daily dosing regimen. When several placebo-controlled studies of its use in the treatment of SAC were analysed, it was found that 80% of patients reported symptom relief. In a further study, nedocromil sodium eyedrops (twice-daily dosing) had similar overall efficacy to sodium cromoglycate eyedrops (four-times-daily dosing) in subjects with SAC during the birch season, but during the period of highest pollen challenge, only the former agent was significantly more effective than placebo. Another study found that nedocromil sodium had efficacy equivalent to levocabastine over 7 days, but tended to have a more rapid onset of action. In patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC) unresponsive to sodium cromoglycate, both clinicians and patients reported significantly better control of symptoms with nedocromil sodium eyedrops than with placebo. Recently, in a long-term study of treatment for vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), it was found that nedocromil sodium 2% eyedrops produced a more rapid and marked improvement in symptoms than sodium cromoglycate 2% eyedrops and enabled lower use of steroid rescue medication. Both drugs were well tolerated and without serious side-effects.
 ...
PMID:Treating severe eye allergy. 998 35

Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis is rarely associated with permanent vision impairment; however, it is a relatively common condition that may compromise the quality of life. It may, in extreme cases, impair daily activities, including work. Numerous treatment options have become available for the relief of acute symptoms. Avoidance should always be the first line in therapy but, in most cases, is not practical, especially with pollen allergies. The use of saline eyedrops is simple and nontoxic, and it is effective in up to 30% to 35% of cases. It can and should be added to all other remedies to reduce adverse effects and cost by decreasing the need for other therapeutic options. Antihistamines and decongestants are useful treatment choices for the majority of cases. Ketorolac tromethamine may be helpful in relieving pruritus, but it offers little advantage over topical antihistamines. Corticosteroids may be used for severe cases for a limited time. If topical corticosteroids are being considered, an ophthalmologist should be consulted. Cromolyn sodium and lodoxamide ophthalmic solution may be helpful in the prophylaxis of symptoms during the allergy season, but these agents require frequent dosing. Olopatadine hydrochloride is a mast cell stabilizer and antihistamine that can be dosed twice a day. Immunotherapy is effective and should be offered to those who are intolerant or have allergic conjunctivitis refractory to medications.
 ...
PMID:Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: overview and treatment update. 1047 15


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>