Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033774 (pruritus)
 14,546 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An open, noncomparative study at 8 rheumatology centers in Brazil assessed the efficacy and safety of auranofin (AF) when given for up to 24 months. The study enrolled 80 patients with classic or definite rheumatoid arthritis (RA); disease was severe in 20 (25%), moderate in 55 (69%), and mild in 5 (6%). Patients received auranofin, 3 mg twice daily, and varying doses of anti-inflammatory drugs (aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and corticosteroids). Sixty patients (75%) completed the full 24 months of therapy. No patients were withdrawn from therapy because of insufficient therapeutic effect. There was statistically significant improvement (p less than 0.001) in 9 clinical parameters of disease activity, evident as early as 3 months after beginning AF therapy, increasing steadily over 12 months, and remaining at improved levels for another 12 months. Improvements in some parameters were particularly striking. By 24 months, assessment of well-being had increased by 150%, intensity of pain had decreased by 66%, and duration of morning stiffness had decreased by 78%. The average daily dose of anti-inflammatory drugs also decreased over time. The safety profile of AF was similar to that found in comparable trials. Ten patients (12.5%) were withdrawn because of adverse events: 6 for diarrhea (7.5%), 2 for proteinuria (2.5%), and 1 each for pruritus and anemia (1.25%). Adverse events occurred in 24 of 80 patients; some reported more than one adverse event. The most common adverse events were loose stools (20 patients) or diarrhea (11 patients).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of auranofin as demonstrated by improvement in clinical parameters and decrease in anti-inflammatory usage: a long-term, multicenter study. 329 82

Data about adverse events can be particularly useful when assessing newly marketed drugs. However, spontaneous reporting of adverse events does not generally provide sufficient or highly accurate data on incidence and prevalence. In order to provide the most complete and accurate data, a postmarketing surveillance program (PMSP) for auranofin (AF) oral gold therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) from December 1982 through December 1985. The objectives of the program were to observe a large population treated with AF for more than a year; to compare the safety profile of AF with experience from clinical trials; and to register rare or previously unknown adverse events. The program included 2,777 patients with RA from 928 test centers. Disease duration was less than 2 years in 29%. 2-5 in 23.2%, 5-10 in 32.5%, and more than 10 in 13.3% (no data for 2%); disease was mild or moderate in 67.4% and severe in 29.9% (no data for 2.7%). Auranofin was given 6 mg/day as either two 3-mg tablets at breakfast or 1 tablet at breakfast and 1 at the evening meal. Laboratory studies and efficacy, as indicated by increase in grip strength and decrease in number of tender and swollen joints, were monitored regularly. A total of 1,595 patients completed 1 year of treatment with AF. Withdrawals included 12.9% for adverse events, 4.2% for insufficient therapeutic effect, and 33.1% for a variety of administrative or technical reasons. The most common adverse event was alteration in stool pattern, which occurred in 22.5% of patients, compared with 46.6% in worldwide AF clinical trials. Other gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 17.4%, compared with 22.4% worldwide. The occurrence of most adverse events in the PMSP was much less than in worldwide studies, for example: skin rash 7.3% vs. 24.2% worldwide, pruritus 4.2% vs. 16.6%, proteinuria 1.0% vs. 5.0%, and leukopenia 0.7% vs. 1.9%. These discrepancies may be explained by the method of monitoring employed in the postmarketing study, which favored the reporting of only clinically relevant adverse events. The pattern of occurrence of adverse events was similar to that seen during other AF trials, indicating that any intolerance to AF occurs primarily within the first 6 months of treatment. However, hematologic or nephrologic adverse events appear to be independent of time on therapy, with a constant monthly prevalence of about 0.1-0.2%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Postmarketing experience with auranofin in the Federal Republic of Germany. 329 83

Twenty-three patients with rheumatoid arthritis were given choline magnesium trisalicylate (CMT) (Trilisate; Adcock-Ingram) in a dose of 1.5 g (3 tablets) twice daily and were followed up for 6 weeks. Nineteen patients completed the study and the data obtianed were subjected to statistical analysis. There was a statistically significant improvement in the indices of inflammation. Seven patients developed tinnitus, which resolved on reduction of the dose to 1 g (2 tablets) twice daily. Four patients developed pruritus and minor gastro-intestinal side-effects were present in 3 patients, but all these side-effects were transient and no change in therapy was necessary.
 ...
PMID:Clinical evaluation of choline magnesium trisalicylate in rheumatoid arthritis. 634 67

A partially purified extract of an ant venom from the South American tree ant Pseudomyrmex sp. was tested in a double-blind, controlled study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Venom treated patients demonstrated an improvement in global efficacy and a decrease in the number of tender/painful joints and swollen joints. Swollen joint index improved in 60% of venom treated patients. Other parameters did not demonstrate significant change. Reduction of joint swelling was followed by symptomatic improvement that was sometimes delayed by weeks. Reactions were limited to erythema at the injection site (all patients), local pruritus (two-thirds of the patients), and fever with malaise (one-third of the patients). Further study of this venom in rheumatoid arthritis appears warranted in view of its apparent favorable efficacy-to-toxicity ratio.
 ...
PMID:The effects of a partially purified fraction of an ant venom in rheumatoid arthritis. 636 51

The chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical use and efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage of auranofin, an oral chrysotherapeutic agent used in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, are reviewed. Auranofin is lipid-soluble and is monomeric in solution. It has a modulatory effect on both the humoral and cellular immune systems. Auranofin may be a condition-dependent immunoregulating agent rather than an immunosuppressive agent. It inhibits (1) monocyte-mediated antibody-dependent cellular toxicity, (2) release of enzymes from polymorphonuclear leukocytes that may contribute to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, and (3) neutrophil activity. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 15-33% of an oral dose of auranofin 6 mg is absorbed. Peak plasma gold concentrations are achieved in one to two hours. Gold is highly protein bound. Elimination occurs through the feces and urine; 73-100% of auranofin gold is excreted. Plasma half-life is three weeks. Patients receiving auranofin 3 mg twice daily for rheumatoid arthritis reported improvement after five weeks of therapy; improvement has also been reported with lower doses. Diarrhea, rashes, and pruritus were the most common adverse effects. Auranofin is safe and effective for short- and long-term treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Its relative safety and potency compared with injectable gold salts and other drugs need further study.
 ...
PMID:Review of auranofin, an oral chrysotherapeutic agent. 642 43

Auranofin is the first orally active gold compound for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Like other chrysotherapeutic agents, its exact mechanism of action is unknown, but it probably acts via immunological mechanisms and alteration of lysosomal enzyme activity. Although long term clinical experience with auranofin is limited, its efficacy appears to approach that of sodium aurothiomalate. Further comparative studies with aurothioglucose, hydroxychloroquine and D-penicillamine are required before definitive statements can be made regarding the relative efficacy of auranofin and these agents. While patients have demonstrated clinical remission of rheumatoid arthritis in response to auranofin therapy, radiological studies have been inconclusive regarding its effect on the occurrence or progression of erosive lesions. Auranofin is relatively well tolerated in most patients, but diarrhoea, skin rash, and pruritus are sometimes troublesome, and thrombocytopenia and proteinuria are potentially serious side effects which may occur during therapy. Whereas mucocutaneous side effects are more frequent with injectable gold compounds, gastrointestinal reactions are the most common adverse effect seen with auranofin. The frequency of side effects has been similar with auranofin and sodium aurothiomalate, but they are generally less severe with auranofin. While some of the side effects are controlled by a reduction in dosage, temporary or permanent withdrawal of auranofin may be necessary. Auranofin is clearly a useful addition to the limited list of agents with disease-modifying potential presently available for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. It will doubtless generate much interest as its final place in therapy becomes better defined through additional well-designed studies and wider clinical experience.
 ...
PMID:Auranofin. A preliminary review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in rheumatoid arthritis. 642 23

Auranofin (Ridaura SK and F 39 162) was tested in an open multicenter study with regard to its anti-inflammatory effect in 166 patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. The time for treatment lasted for one or two years. The therapeutic effect of the drug was judged by its influence on pain, joint swelling, morning stiffness, grip strength, blood-sedimentation rate and rheumatoid factor etc. The serum gold concentration was measured regularly. With Auranofin the majority of the patients achieved a lasting improvement of the condition. The therapeutical effect was observed gradually. Side-effects were frequent but removal from the therapy was rare. Most of the side-effects were diarrhea, rash, pruritus and conjunctivitis. Regular laboratory controls revealed in some cases toxic organic reactions.
 ...
PMID:[Auranofin in the treatment of chronic polyarthritis. Results of an open multicenter study]. 644 53

Auranofin (AF), a new gold compound, has been suggested as an alternative to parenteral gold in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This hypothesis has been tested within a double-blind comparative study and to date 103 patients have been enrolled. Forty-one RA patients have been treated for longer than 6 months. The patients were randomly allocated to treatment with either AF or sodium aurothiomalate (GSTM) and serial comparison of changes within the articular index, grip strength, pain, morning stiffness, and global assessment during treatment were measured. Improvement was noted within both treatment groups. Diarrhea as a side effect was most commonly seen during treatment with AF while rash often combined with pruritus was most commonly reported with GSTM; withdrawal from treatment as the result of this was nevertheless uncommon.
 ...
PMID:Auranofin and sodium aurothiomalate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A double-blind, comparative multicenter study. 681 83

We present seven cases of capillaritis arising in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and suggest that it is primarily related to disease activity and not drugs. In the majority, the rash resolved spontaneously with the use of a topical steroid to treat the symptom of itch.
 ...
PMID:Capillaritis: a manifestation of rheumatoid disease. 846 13

We report a case of drug eruption caused by the crude drug Boi. A 41-year-old female patient had been diagnosed with chronic rheumatoid arthritis in the department of internal medicine. After ingestion of a decoction of the crude drug Boi for the alleviation of arthralgia, a slight fever developed, which was followed by systemic edematous erythema with itching. HPLC showed that the main components of the crude drug Boi are sinomenine and magnoflorine. The results of patch tests were negative for all oral drugs that the patient had been taking. Oral ingestion tests showed that the patient showed positive reactions to the as-is Boi boiling-water decoction and 1/10-volume sinomenine. Based on this, the drug eruption was judged to be caused by sinomenine. It is considered the first time that the causative component of a drug eruption was confirmed by oral ingestion tests with components of a crude drug of Kampo medicine (Sino-Japanese traditional medicine).
 ...
PMID:A case of drug eruption caused by the crude drug Boi (Sinomenium stem/Sinomeni caulis et Rhizoma). 858 64


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>