Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Patients with mild to moderate hypertension require only a simple schedule of investigations, especially if there is a history of stroke or hypertension in first degree relatives. Tests are necessary to profile other cardiovascular risk factors and to detect target organ damage with only limited screening for secondary hypertension. Careful history, physical examination, repeated blood pressure measurements over months and measurements of body mass index, random cholesterol, routine blood chemistry and urinalysis using impregnated paper strips are all that are required. More detailed investigations can be reserved for special groups such as those with peripheral vascular disease or abnormal renal function before or after treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or significant proteinuria or hypokalaemia. Patients with essential hypertension who are smokers with lipid abnormalities may go on to develop superimposed renovascular disease. Severe hypertension at any age and especially if there is a reliable negative family history also merits special consideration. Resistance to antihypertensive treatment is more often due to non-compliance or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use or alcohol abuse than to underlying secondary causes.
 ...
PMID:Hypertension: investigation, assessment and diagnosis. 820 68

The development of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in the late seventies, enabled us to measure various retinoids in the serum and tissue samples and has contributed to exciting new discoveries of retinoid field. Mainly, serum, retinoids has been measured by reversed phase HPLC with isocratic or gradient mobile eluent. In this paper, several HPLC methods for determining serum retinoids are reviewed. The discovery of plasma retinol-binding protein (RBP) in 1968 has shed new insight into retinoid metabolism. Due to the biochemical character of RBP, serum levels of this protein is a good marker for hepatic reserved function and urine levels for tubular proteinuria. Several methods for RBP determination are also reviewed.
 ...
PMID:[Determination of retinoids and retinol-binding protein]. 848 73

Approximately 150 million people worldwide have diabetes mellitus, of whom 90% are type II diabetics. It is therefore of no surprise that diabetic nephropathy has become the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Opposite to what has been known previously, kidney disease is at least as common in type II as in type I diabetes. However, because the majority of type II diabetics has hypertension for many years before diabetes mellitus becomes clinically relevant, renal lesions are often heterogeneous with frequent exclusive presence of ischemic changes. For the treatment of hypertension in diabetics without nephropathy (no microalbuminuria), drugs that exert beneficial effects or are at least neutral with respect to lipid and glucose metabolism, such as ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II-receptor antagonists, non-dihydropyridine-calcium channel blockers and the thiazide-like indapamide, are to be preferred. Although metabolically neutral, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers should be used with caution, since an increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type II diabetics treated with these compounds has most recently been described. Once that diabetic nephropathy is established, blood pressure should be lowered to 120/80 mmHg (measured in seated position). Antihypertensive treatment should primarily be based on ACE inhibitors; angiotensin II-receptor antagonists are a valuable alternative if ACE inhibitors are not tolerated. Both ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor antagonists should be used with high caution in elderly patients with severe atherosclerosis in whom acute renal failure could occur due to the presence of bilateral renal artery stenosis. Newer studies indicate that non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers such as verapamil and diltiazem may be as effective as ACE inhibitors in preserving renal function in diabetic nephropathy. A fix-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor trandolapril with verapamil is now available; it should be reserved for patients whose blood pressure and/or proteinuria can not be adequately controlled with ACE inhibitors. Finally, indapamide is the only antihypertensive diuretic with nephroprotective properties.
 ...
PMID:[Antihypertensive therapy in diabetes mellitus]. 1006 31

In September, 2000, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health called an early halt to the amlodipine arm of the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) trial after careful deliberation by an independent data and safety monitoring board. An interim analysis of the AASK at 3 years revealed a renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril as compared to the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DHP-CCB) amlodipine in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. This differential effect was independent of the blood pressure (BP) levels reached and was evident in proteinuric patients and suggestive in patients with baseline proteinuria < 300 mg/d, but was not conclusive. The AASK trial data suggest that DHP-CCBs should be used cautiously in the presence of mild to moderate renal insufficiency. Judgment should be reserved for the use of other CCBs, such as verapamil or diltiazem, since these are fundamentally different CCBs with the potential for a different impact on hypertensive nephrosclerosis. The blinded observation period for AASK will be completed at the end of September, 2001, at which time additional, clinically useful information is expected to become available. (c)2001 Le Jacq Communications, Inc.
 ...
PMID:The African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK): new findings. 1149 55

Recent trials have helped to clarify indications for the initial pharmacological therapy of hypertension. Both the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) and World Health Organization-international Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) recommendations should be revised. The more recent trials indicate that: (1) diuretics and beta-blockers appear to be as effective in reducing overall morbidity/ mortality as other agents (Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension [STOP-2], United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study [UKPDS], Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment [INSIGHT], Nordic diltiazem [NORDIL]); (2) the use of an a-blocker results in more cardiovascular events, especially congestive heart failure, when compared with a diuretic (Antihypertensive Therapy and Lipid Lowering Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]); (3)the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor results in fewer myocardial infarctions and episodes of heart failure than calcium channel blockers in the elderly and in diabetic patients (Fosinopril vs. Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial [FACET], Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes [ABCD], STOP-2) - other data (Captopril Prevention Project [CAPPP]) suggest that the use of an ACE inhibitor is preferred in diabetic patients; (4) overall cardiovascular events are similar with calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic - however, there are fewer strokes with non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NORDIL) and a trend towards an increase in heart failure and myocardial infarctions with either a dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic (INSIGHT, NORDIL); (5) angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) will decrease proteinuria and slow progression of renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients when compared with regimens that do not include an ARB or an ACE inhibitor (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan [RENAAL], Irbesartan Type II Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT], Irbesartan Type II Diabetes with Microalbuminuria [IRMA Il]). The debate over initial therapy may be moot. High-risk hypertensive patients should probably be treated initially with combination therapy, one of which should be a diuretic. The use of diuretics and beta-blockers as well as ACE-inhibitors alone or with a diuretic should be considered as initial therapy (a change from JNCVI). Alpha-blockers should be reserved for special situations, i.e. prostatic hypertrophy (in contrast to WHO-ISH recommendations). An ACE-inhibitor or ARB, usually along with a diuretic, can be considered as preferred therapy in hypertensive diabetic patients. Some data suggest equal or greater reduction in strokes with a calcium channel blocker than other medications.
 ...
PMID:Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid? 1199 97

Ramipril is safe and effective in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure, but this is not reviewed here. Ramipril is a lipophilic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor suitable for once-daily administration. In addition to decreasing angiotensin II and increasing bradykinin levels, ramipril increases the levels of vasodilatory renal medullary neutral lipids and inhibits platelet-derived growth factor-induced proliferation of glomerulus cells. Ramipril also decreases transforming growth factor-beta in the kidney. Changes in kidney structure and proteinuria are characteristics of the streptozotocin (STZ) rat model of diabetes, and these are prevented by ramipril. In STZ diabetes, doses of ramipril that have no effect on blood pressure reverse vascular hypertrophy. In animal models of kidney failure (subtotal nephrectomy, stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats), ramipril is renoprotective and some of this renoprotective effect is independent of blood pressure lowering. In humans, clinical doses of ramipril probably do not modify glucose metabolism but do reduce the levels of LDL- and HDL-cholesterol. In clinical trials of renal effects, ramipril has been shown to increase cortical nephron flow in hypertension and to reduce proteinuria in patients with and without diabetes and/or hypertension. Some of the smaller clinical trials showed beneficial effects on kidney function with low doses of ramipril that do not lower blood pressure. A large clinical trial in nondiabetic proteinuria, the Ramipril Efficacy in Nephropathy (REIN) trial, has shown that ramipril 1.25 mg/day, which does not lower blood pressure, arrested the decline in glomerular filtration rate and prolonged the time to end-stage renal failure. In diabetic patients who have had a previous cardiovascular event or having one other cardiovascular risk factor, the MICRO-HOPE clinical trial showed that ramipril lowers the combined risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death by 25%. In conclusion, ramipril has proven beneficial effects in kidney disease alone or in association with diabetes and in diabetes without kidney disease, and is the pril for diabetes and kidney disease. (c) 2001 Prous Science. All rights reserved.
 ...
PMID:Is Ramipril the pril for diabetes and kidney disease? 1276 20

This series of articles on the management of glomerulonephritis (GN) has been prepared by a team of experts in the evidence-based format consistent with peer review of published data. Each author was asked to review the literature for his assigned histological type, with emphasis on therapy and limited to adult studies. The age limit was not considered for minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, because of the high prevalence of these glomerulopathies in children. The particular treatment recommendations for each type of glomerular disease were graded by each author according to the amount of evidence provided in these reviewed studies. The first two articles concentrate on indications and techniques for kidney biopsy. Each subsequent article focuses on and describes the highest level of evidence supporting the recommendation for therapy in IgA nephropathy (Ig-GN), minimal change nephropathy (MCN) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN), lupus nephritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, HCV-associated cryoglobulinaemia and renal involvement in paraproteinemic disorders. The article on IgA nephropathy emphasises the importance of carefully evaluating both clinical and histologic findings before settling on the treatment. The recent, renewed interest in steroids and many immunosuppressive agents is discussed in detail. Recommendations related to the patient's age are also provided. MCN and FSGS are treated together because these forms share similar evidence-based recommendations. For both of these diseases, in fact, the initial treatment approach in children should be prednisone or prednisolone for four to six weeks. The therapeutic response in adults is slower than in children, but adults experience fewer relapses and a more prolonged remission. There is also a discussion on treatment of relapse, frequent relapsing disease and true steroid-resistant disease as well as the role of new immunosuppressive agents. Membranous nephropathy is a frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults and, in one third of these patients, leads to end-stage renal disease. However, the treatment of this form is as yet a matter of discussion. Based on extensive critical review of the literature, the following recommendations are put forward: (a) no treatment in the absence of nephrotic syndrome; (b) patients with heavy proteinuria should receive a 6-month treatment with i.v. methylprednisolone (MP) pulse therapy for three consecutive days followed by oral MP (0.4 mg/kg/day) (months 1, 3, 5) and chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide (months 2, 4, 6); (c) the dosage of chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide should be lowered in older patients; (d) cyclosporine is a second-choice treatment. The treatment of lupus nephritis depends on the histologic class. No specific treatment is usually necessary for class I and IIA. Oral steroids are indicated in patients with class IIb, proteinuria and active systemic disease. Steroids and azathioprine are the treatment of choice for patients with class III and IV, but cyclosporine can be an effective alternative therapy. Cyclophosphamide is more effective than azathioprine when severe acute renal involvement is present. The treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis depends mainly on clinical presentation, oral prednisone + oral or i.v. cyclophosphamide are generally effective. In the most severe cases, the association of MP pulse therapy with cyclophosphamide is probably more effective. Plasma exchange is probably justified in unresponsive patients. Azathioprine should replace cyclophosphamide during the maintenance therapy. In HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia the treatment also depends on the severity of renal involvement. The treatment for chronic HCV infection involves alpha interferon alone or preferably in combination with ribavirin. Aggressive therapy, including i.v. MP, plasmapheresis and cyclophosphamide is primarily reserved for patients with acute severe disease, as manifested by progressive renal failure, distal necroses requiring amputation, or advanced neuropathy. Uncontrolled studies suggest that this regimen can improve renal function. Renal involvement is a common problem in paraproteinemic disorders that include multiple myeloma, Waldentrom's macroglobulinaemia and monoclonal gammopathy. The most common renal diseases in this setting are cast nephropathy, primary amyloidosis cast nephropathy, primary amyloidosis, and light chain deposition disease that are related to the overproduction of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains. The approach to therapy varies with the cause of the renal dysfunction. Patients with amyloidosis or light-chain deposition disease are generally treated with chemotherapy, but the most effective therapy for myeloma kidney is prevention by minimising the risk factors that promote light chain filtration and subsequent obstruction by cast formation within the tubules. Chemotherapy or stem cell or bone marrow transplantation to decrease filtered light chain load, prevent volume depletion and maintain high fluid intake to reduce light chain concentration within the tubular lumen are indicated in almost all the patients.
 ...
PMID:[Instructions and implementations for percutaneous renal biopsy. Guidelines for the therapy of glomerular nephropaties]. 1466 2

It is no a secret that we are confronted by an alarmingly increasing number of patients with progressive renal disease. There is ample evidence for the notion that angiotensin II (Ang II) is a major culprit in progression. The vasopeptide Ang II turned out to have also multiple nonhemodynamic pathophysiologic actions on the kidney, including proinflammatory and profibrogenic effects. Diverse complex Ang II generating systems have been identified, including specifically local tissue-specific renin-angiotensin systems (RAS). For example, proximal tubular cells have all components required for a functional RAS capable of synthesizing Ang II. On the other hand, Ang II is not the only effector of the RAS and other peptides generated by the RAS influence renal function and structure as well. Moreover, the discoveries that Ang II can be generated by enzymes other than angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and that Ang II and other RAS derived peptides bind to various receptors with different functional consequences have further added to the complexity of this system. Several major clinical trials have clearly shown that ACE inhibitor treatment slows the progression of renal diseases, including in diabetic nephropathy. Well-controlled studies demonstrated that this effect is in part independent of blood pressure control. More recently, with Ang II type 1 receptor (AT(1)) receptor antagonists a similarly protective effect on renal function was seen in patients with type 2 diabetes. Neither ACE inhibitor treatment nor AT(1) receptor blockade completely abrogate progression of renal disease. A recently introduced novel therapeutic approach is combination treatment comprising both ACE inhibitor and AT(1) receptor antagonists. The rationale for this approach is based on several considerations. Small-scale clinical studies, mainly of crossover design, documented that combination therapy is more potent in reducing proteinuria in patients with different chronic renal diseases. Blood pressure as an important confounder was, however, significantly lower in the majority of this studies in the combination treatment arms compared to the respective monotherapies. In a recent prospective study Japanese authors avoided this confounder and demonstrated that combination therapy reduced hard end-points (end stage renal failure or doubling of serum creatinine concentration) by 50% compared to the respective monotherapies. This effect could not be explained by a more pronounced reduction of blood pressure in the combination therapy group. Although these results are encouraging, administration of combination therapy should be reserved currently to special high risk groups. Further studies are necessary to confirm these promising results. It is possible that combination therapy may increase the risk of hyperkalemia, particularly when with coadministered with medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or spironolactone. In our opinion patients with proteinuria >1 g/day despite optimal blood pressure control under RAS-blocking monotherapy are a high-risk group which will presumably benefit from combination therapy.
 ...
PMID:Combination therapy with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers to halt progression of chronic renal disease: pathophysiology and indications. 1616 72

Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is a common cause of secondary hypertension, with the activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system being the pathophysiologic hallmark of the disease. Renovascular hypertension, ischemic nephropathy, proteinuria, and flash pulmonary edema are the main clinical syndromes associated with RAS. The prevalence of RAS is on the rise, owing to an increasing prevalence of diabetes and atherosclerotic disease among our aging population. This rise in RAS prevalence poses major challenges for clinicians making diagnostic and treatment decisions. Although renal angioplasty is of proven benefit in fibromuscular dysplasia, randomized trials in atherosclerotic RAS have not shown any advantage for revascularization over medical therapy in terms of blood pressure control or renal function preservation. Angioplasty and surgical interventions should be reserved for patients with preserved kidney size and hemodynamically significant stenosis.
 ...
PMID:Challenges in the diagnosis and management of renal artery stenosis. 1591 98

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common childhood bacterial infections, after upper respiratory tract and middle ear infections. The current goal of management is to prevent detrimental effects of UTI by early detection and treatment. Recommendations for the imaging of children depend upon age at presentation and sex. All children aged <5 years who have had a febrile UTI require a radiologic evaluation to identify any underlying genitourinary pathology. Older children can undergo a more tailored work-up depending on whether there is a febrile UTI or cystitis-type symptoms. Dysfunctional voiding and urge syndrome significantly increase the risk of developing UTIs in children. Vesicoureteral reflux can increase the risk of pyelonephritis and renal scarring in children with UTIs. For the most part, pyelonephritis can be diagnosed on clinical grounds in the majority of patients and a subsequent (99m)Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid scan can be reserved to identify post-nephritic renal scarring. When renal scarring is identified, the child and parents need to be educated regarding the possibility of hypertension, proteinuria, progressive nephropathy, and the risk of complications in future pregnancies. Treatment of UTI is started in the unwell child before the culture results are available and subsequently changed to culture-specific antimicrobial therapy. A short course of treatment is required for acute uncomplicated UTIs. A child with acute pyelonephritis requires 10-14 days of antibacterial treatment. The oral route in young children often causes vomiting, which implies therapeutic delay, a well known risk factor for scarring.
 ...
PMID:Controversies in the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections in children. 1635 21


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next >>