Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Although the angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARB) shares the angiotensin-II-blocking activity with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I), pharmacological mechanisms of action of these agents differ. We evaluated the temporal profiles of action of ACE-I and ARB on urinary protein excretion and nitrate/nitrate (NO(x)) excretion in hypertensive (140 and/or 90 mmHg) patients with chronic renal disease (serum creatinine < 265 (range, 44-265) micromol/l or creatinine clearance > 30 (range, 30-121) ml/min). Patients with mild (<1 g/day; range, 0.4-1.0) and moderate proteinuria (>1 g/day; range, 1.1-6.9) were randomly assigned to ACE-I- and ARB-treated groups, and were treated with ACE-I (trandolapril or perindopril) or ARB(losartan or candesartan) for 48 weeks. In all groups, treatment with ACE-I or ARB decreased blood pressure to the same level, but had no effect on creatinine clearance. In patients with mild proteinuria, neither ACE-I nor ARB altered urinary protein excretion. In patients with moderate proteinuria, ACE-I caused 44 +/- 6% reduction in proteinuria (from 2.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.5 +/- 0.4 g/day, n = 14) at 12 weeks, and this beneficial effect persisted throughout the protocol (48 weeks, 1.2 +/- 0.2 g/day). In contrast, ARB did not produce a significant decrease in proteinuria at 12 weeks (23 +/- 8%, n = 13), but a 41 +/- 6% reduction in proteinuria was observed at 48 weeks. Similarly, although early (12 weeks) increases in urinary NO(x) excretion were observed with ACE-I (from 257 +/- 70 to 1111 +/- 160 micromol/day) and ARB (from 280 +/- 82 to 723 +/- 86 micromol/day), the ARB-induced increase in NO(x) excretion was smaller than that by ACE-I (P < 0.05). In conclusion, although both ACE-I and ARB reduce blood pressure similarly, the effect of these agents on proteinuria differs in chronic renal disease with moderate proteinuria. Relatively early onset of the proteinuria-reducing effect was observed with ACE-I, which paralleled the increase in urinary NO(x) excretion. Conversely, ARB decreased proteinuria and increased urinary NO(x) excretion gradually. These time course-dependent changes in proteinuria and urinary NO(x) may reflect the pharmacological property of ACE-I and ARB, with regard to the action on bradykinin.
 ...
PMID:Distinct time courses of renal protective action of angiotensin receptor antagonists and ACE inhibitors in chronic renal disease. 1269 72

Combination therapy with angiotensin receptor antagonist(ARB) plus angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor(ACE-I) (ARB/ACE-I) was efficacious in reducing proteinuria in patients with progressive renal disease. However, this therapy may be associated with the worsening of anemia and hyperkalemia. The present study addressed whether or not triple therapy with low-dose ARB, low-dose diuretic (D) and calcium channel blocker(CCB) (ARB/D/CCB) is as effective as therapy with low-dose ARB/ACE-I in retarding the progression of overt diabetic nephropathy. In the triple therapy, the patients were initially subjected to monotherapy with CCB for 24 weeks. Low-dose ARB and low-dose D were added to the treatment for an additional 24-week period. In parallel, patients undergoing double therapy were initially treated with low-dose ACE-I alone for 24 weeks, and then low-dose ARB was added for an additional 24-week period. The results were as follows: 1) In the triple therapy, blood pressure was reduced by 9 mmHg in systole and 5 mmHg in diastole (not significant) compared to monotherapy with CCB. There was a significant decline in proteinuria (3.3 +/- 1.2 g/day in the CCB-treated period vs. 2.1 +/- 1.0 g/day in the ARB/D/CCB-treated period, n = 12, p = 0.0143). Furthermore, a significant improvement in the slope of reciprocal serum creatinine concentration(1/Cr) was found in response to triple therapy(1/Cr: -0.0118 +/- 0.0009 in the CCB-treated vs. -0.0035 +/- 0.0028(I/mg/dl/month) in the ARB/D/CCB-treated period, n = 12, p < 0.001). There was neither a worsening of anemia nor an increase in the serum potassium(K) concentration. 2) In the double therapy, blood pressure was reduced by 12 mmHg in systole(p = 0.0079, n = 11) and 6 mmHg in diastole(n = 11, p = 0.0037) compared to the monotherapy with ACE-I. A significant improvement in the slope of 1/Cr was found in the double therapy(1/Cr: -0.0095 +/- 0.0052 in the ACE-I treated period vs. -0.0029 +/- 0.0028(I/mg/dl/month) in the ARB/ACE-I, n = 11, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a substantial reduction in hematocrit and increase in serum K concentration. The present result suggests that triple therapy consisting of ARB/D/CCB is as efficacious as double therapy with ARB/ACE-I in protecting the kidney from the progression in patients with diabetic overt nephropathy. The former may be expected to have less adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:[Renoprotective effect of triple therapy with low-dose angiotensin receptor blocker, low-dose diuretic and Ca-antagonist in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy]. 1280 73

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome of childhood poses a dilemma in attempting to balance toxicity of medications against long-term prognosis. This report presents our preliminary experience with the novel use of combined mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and angiotensin blockade (AB) in the treatment of nine children and young adults with focal glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). All patients were steroid resistant and had failed conventional treatment regimens. Prior to the initiation of the MMF-AB protocol, the patients were pre-treated with weekly intravenous methylprednisolone (MP) (15 mg/kg per week) for 4-8 weeks. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers were begun when intravascular volume was restored. MMF was given at a dose of 250-500 mg/m(2) per day. Proteinuria, as measured by urine protein/creatinine ratios (Up/c), decreased by 43% following MP ( P<0.05). After 6 months of MMF-AB protocol, the Up/c was 72% below baseline ( P<0.01). This level was maintained for a minimum of 24 months of observation. Similarly, hyperlipidemia, as measured by total cholesterol and triglycerides, improved significantly with treatment (536+/-163 to 265+/-70 mg/dl, 447+/-168 to 230+/-92 mg/dl, respectively, P<0.01). Our data support the use of MMF and AB for treatment of steroid-resistant FSGS when other conventional treatments have failed and/or induced toxicity.
 ...
PMID:Novel therapy of focal glomerulosclerosis with mycophenolate and angiotensin blockade. 1281 52

Hypertension is a nutritional-hygienic disease. Long-term caloric intake in excess of energy expenditures, chronic supraphysiological intake of dietary sodium, excessive alcohol consumption, and psychosocial stressors all contribute to the development of hypertension throughout the world. Elevated BP, particularly systolic BP, has been linked to multiple adverse clinical outcomes including stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency/failure, peripheral vascular disease, retinopathy, dementia, and premature mortality. These undesirable clinical outcomes are typically, although not invariably, preceded by pressure-related target-organ injury such as left ventricular hypertrophy, renal insufficiency and proteinuria. The relation of BP and CKD and, in turn, the prevention of CKD or forestalling its progression by hypertension treatment, will be the focus of this manuscript. In hypertensive persons with reduced kidney function and/or proteinuria, lowering BP with multidrug therapy that is inclusive of pharmacologic modulators of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-kinin system is an effective strategy to forestall the progressive loss of kidney function. The totality of data support low therapeutic BP targets for persons with proteinuria >1 g/d. Nevertheless, in persons with CKD, even those with proteinuria below the dipstick positive level (approximately 300 mg/d or urine protein to creatinine ratio of 0.22), aggressive BP control also may be warranted because of the high risk of nonrenal cardiovascular disease. Multiple antihypertensive drugs will be required in the vast majority of patients with diabetes and/or reduced kidney function to attain BP goal. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) modulator therapy is indicated among persons with diabetes mellitus and CKD. Available data support the use of angiotensin receptor blockers in persons with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy for preservation of kidney function. Among persons with type I diabetes with or without overt nephropathy, type 2 diabetes without overt nephropathy and in nondiabetic CKD, the available clinical data support the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as the RAS modulator of choice. Low therapeutic target BP levels <130/80 mmHg in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus also appear warranted based on available data mostly for reducing the risk of nonrenal cardiovascular disease and overall mortality.
 ...
PMID:Prevention of hypertension and its complications: theoretical basis and guidelines for treatment. 1281 10

In this randomized double-blind crossover trial we compared the antiproteinuric effects of enalapril and losartan in six children with proteinuria and underlying renal injury. The primary endpoint was reduction in proteinuria during therapy. The study had two 8-week on-drug arms, with a 4-week washout period between. Baseline proteinuria was similar, enalapril 87 mg/m(2) per hour and losartan 77 mg/m(2) per hour. The mean reduction in proteinuria with enalapril was 48% (37%-57%) with a standard error of the mean of 3%; with losartan it was 31% (14%-52%) with a standard error of the mean of 7%. Although there was a significant reduction in proteinuria with the use of both drugs, the difference in reduction of proteinuria, 48% versus 31%, was not considered clinically significant. Potassium remained below 4.5 mmol/l in all patients. No patient's creatinine rose more than the standard deviation of our assay. Blood pressure (BP) control was acceptable in four of the six patients; two patients had persistently elevated or increased BP on each drug. Side effects were minimal; none requiring withdrawal, one requiring dose reduction. Studies have shown that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors can reduce proteinuria in children with renal disorders. No studies to date have examined the reduction of proteinuria achieved by angiotensin receptor blockers. Our study, although small, suggests that angiotensin receptor blockers may reduce proteinuria as effectively, and as safely, as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:Antiproteinuric effects of enalapril and losartan: a pilot study. 1292 Jun 31

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), two drug classes that effectively block the actions of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), have unique capabilities as antihypertensive agents. Recent landmark clinical trials have demonstrated their important roles as primary therapy for the prevention of renal disease in diabetes. The optimal dosage of these RAS blockers required to slow the progression of renal disease or impair the development of cardiovascular risk is not known. However, data from many studies strongly support the use of the higher doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs to reduce proteinuria. All studies of kidney disease progression demonstrate benefit on slowing only when blood pressure is reduced when using higher doses. In order to accrue the optimum benefit from ACE inhibitors and ARBs, the dose-response relationship for diabetic renal disease will have to be determined. The best strategy, ie, supramaximal doses of ACE inhibitors or ARBs or combining them, is still a matter of debate but may be resolved soon by results of ongoing studies.
 ...
PMID:How high should an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker be dosed in patients with diabetic nephropathy? 1294 35

The purpose of this work was to determine the necessity for rhuEPO for 50 kidney transplant patients with stable graft function. We analyzed the red cell series, blood pressure, renal function, anthropometric data of the donor and recipient, proteinuria, and relationship with other factors, including immunosuppressants, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). The patients were divided into three groups depending on renal function: group A (with plasma creatinine <150 micromol/L), group B (151-250 micromol/L), and group C (>250 micromol/L). All patients were studied for 1 year. Erythropoietin use did not affect renal function, proteinuria or number of antihypertensive drugs group. The degree of renal dysfunction determined the time necessary to reach an adequate hemoglobin level (>12 g/L) and and the mean dose of weekly rhuEPO needed. The use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs increased the rhuEPO requirements in each group.
 ...
PMID:Use of recombinant human erythropoietin in kidney transplant patients with stable graft function. 1296 88

Type 2 diabetes is an ever-growing problem worldwide. Approximately 40% of the patients with type 2 diabetes will develop diabetic kidney disease. In the United States, diabetes has become the most common single cause of endstage renal disease defined by the need for dialysis or transplantation. Patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy have a dramatically increased cardiovascular risk. The Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial was designed to determine whether the use of irbesartan or a calcium channel blocker would provide protection against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes beyond that attributable to the lowering of blood pressure. In that study, 1715 hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to irbesartan 300 mg/day or amlodipine 10 mg/day, or placebo. All patients randomized in this trial had more than 900 mg of protein in their urine and serum creatinines between 1.0 mg/dl and 3.0 mg/dl. The target blood pressure was 135/85 mmHg or less in all groups. The primary outcome was time to a combined endpoint of doubling of their baseline serum creatinine concentration, the development of endstage renal disease, or death from any cause. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.6 years. Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a risk of the primary composite endpoint that was 20% lower than that in the placebo group ( P = 0.02) and 23% lower than that in the amlodipine group ( P = 0.006). The risk of doubling of the serum creatinine concentration was 33% lower in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group ( P = 0.003) and 37% lower in the irbesartan group than in the amlodipine group ( P < 0.001). Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a relative risk of endstage renal disease that was 23% lower than that in both other groups. These differences were not accounted for by differences in the blood pressures that were achieved. Proteinuria was reduced on average by 33% in the irbesartan group as compared with 6% in the amlodipine group and 10% in the placebo group. The angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan was shown to be effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. In a study done in patients with type 2 diabetes and early nephropathy as manifested by microalbuminuria, 590 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria were randomized to receive either irbesartan 150 mg/day or irbesartan 300 mg/day and followed for 2 years. The primary outcome in that trial was the time to the onset of diabetic nephropathy, defined by persistent albuminuria in overnight specimens, with a urinary albumin excretion rate that was more than 200 mg/min or at least 30% higher than the baseline level. The irbesartan 150 mg/day group demonstrated a 39% relative risk reduction versus the control group in the development of overt proteinuria. The irbesartan 300 mg/day group demonstrated a highly significant 70% risk reduction versus the control group ( P < 0.001). The albumin excretion rate was reduced in the two irbesartan groups throughout the study (-11% and -38% at 24 months compared with baseline in the irbesartan 150-mg and 300-mg groups, respectively). The albumin excretion rate remained unchanged in the control group. Irbesartan was demonstrated in the above study to be renoprotective, independent of its blood pressure-lowering effect, in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Thus, irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, was demonstrated to be significantly renoprotective in patients with type 2 diabetes with either early nephropathy (microalbuminuria) or late nephropathy (proteinuria). The renoprotective effects of irbesartan were above and beyond the effects irbesartan had on systemic blood pressure. Patients with type 2 diabetes and either early or late diabetic nephropathy should be treated with the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of diabetic nephropathy with angiotensin II receptor antagonist. 1458 37

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains a significant cause of late renal allograft loss. Although many factors may be involved in pathogenesis, the hemodynamic and fibrogenic consequences of long-term therapy with cyclosporine (CsA) have been implicated as important potentially reversible causes. CsA's effect on CAN is mediated in part through increased renal expression of TGF-beta, which can be modified by administration of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). A pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ARB valsartan on renal function and proteinuira in patients with CAN. Ten patients on CsA-based therapy with evidence of CAN received valsartan in an initial dose of 80 mg/d, force titrated to 160 mg/d after 4 weeks, for a total of 52 weeks. Renal function was evaluated by serum creatinine, 24-hour creatinine clearance (CrCl), and isotope, GFR and urinary protein by 24-hour protein excretion. The 10 patients were aged 20 to 71 years and had been transplanted for 88.2 +/- 64.8 months at the time of study. After 52 weeks of valsartan therapy mean blood pressure (BP) fell from 152/88 mm Hg to 138/77 mm Hg (P =.06); serum creatinine rose from 206 +/- 55 micromol/L to 238 +/- 81 micromol/L (P =.22.); GFR fell from 39.8 +/- 17.6 to 31.9 +/- 19 mL/min (P =.23); and urine protein fell from 2.16 +/- 2.7 to 1.12 +/-.095 g/24 hours (P =.13). Side effects of valsartan therapy were few and included transient hyperkalemia in 2/10 patients. The small rise in serum creatinine and fall in GFR observed were not statistically significant. Urine protein fell by more than 50%, though the small patient numbers in this pilot study prevent this from achieving statistical significance. It is concluded that valasartan reduces BP and proteinuria in CAN patients without inducing a serious worsening in renal function. Valsartan may have a role to play in the management of patients with CAN.
 ...
PMID:Effect of valsartan on urinary protein excretion and renal function in patients with chronic renal allograft nephropathy. 1461 73

During the past decade, the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has risen dramatically, primarily due to an increase in the incidence of diabetes. In patients with diabetes, both hyperglycemia and hypertension are independent risk factors for renal disease. Hypertension is also a risk factor in nondiabetic renal disease and contributes to renal dysfunction by increasing glomerular pressure, glomerular capillary damage, and proteinuria. The resultant nephron damage increases glomerular pressure and damage within remnant functional nephrons, further contributing to deterioration of renal function. In addition to its role in systemic hypertension, angiotensin II has direct effects on the kidney through elevation of glomerular capillary pressure and upregulation of components of the renal injury response. These direct effects of angiotensin II on the kidney support the inclusion of agents that target the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) into treatment regimens for patients at risk for renal disease. Several clinical trials have established the benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with diabetes. The ACE inhibitors have been shown to delay renal decline in patients with type 1 diabetes, whereas the renoprotective effect of these agents in patients with type 2 diabetes is less clear. The ARBs have been shown to provide significant benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, both at early (microalbuminuria) and late (proteinuria) stages of renal decline. In the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study, ARB therapy significantly reduced the progression of overt nephropathy (composite of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, and death), a benefit that has not been shown for ACE inhibitors. Moreover, in RENAAL, losartan significantly reduced the incidence of the individual end point of ESRD. The benefits of ARB therapy in IDNT and RENAAL were associated with significant reductions in proteinuria and were independent of blood pressure reductions. In RENAAL, proteinuria was a strong predictor of both renal and cardiovascular events. These findings underscore the importance of RAS blockade as a strategy for improving clinical outcomes in patients with renal disease.
 ...
PMID:Recommendations for the management of special populations: renal disease in diabetes. 1462 61


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>