Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

N-(3,5-Dichlorophenyl)succinimide (NDPS), an experimental agricultural fungicide, has been shown to produce selective nephrotoxicity in rats. Previous studies have shown that a metabolite(s) of extrarenal origin contributes to acute NDPS-induced nephrotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to determine if the organic acid transport inhibitor probenecid could modify the renal toxicity produced by NDPS administration. Male Fischer 344 rats were administered a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of probenecid (60, 90 and 120 mg/kg) or 0.9% saline (1.0 ml/kg) followed 30 min later by NDPS (0.4 or 1.0 mmol/kg, i.p.) or sesame oil (2.5 ml/kg, i.p.) Renal function was monitored at 24 h and 48 h. Probenecid (60 mg/kg) did not markedly alter NDPS-induced renal effects on either post-treatment day. However, pretreatment with probenecid (90 or 120 mg/kg) blocked or attenuated the diuresis, increased proteinuria, decreased tetraethylammonium (TEA), uptake, elevation in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration and increased kidney weight produced by NDPS (0.4 mmol/kg) administration. Only increased kidney weight and BUN concentration, and decreased lactate-stimulated p-aminohippurate (PAH) uptake were altered by probenecid (120 mg/kg) pretreatment when NDPS (1.0 mmol/kg) was given. NDPS-induced changes in renal morphology were not prevented by pretreatment with any probenecid dose. These results suggest that at least one nephrotoxic metabolite of NDPS is an organic acid. However, this acidic metabolite might not be the major nephrotoxic metabolite or a precursor to the major nephrotoxic metabolite(s). The identity of these metabolites remains to be determined.
...
PMID:The effect of probenecid on acute N-(3,5-dichlorophenyl)succinimide-induced nephrotoxicity in the Fischer 344 rat. 356 52

Herpes infections continue to be prevalent, especially in immunocompromised patients. Some of these patients will develop resistant HSV infections. Therefore, it is important to explore new treatment options. Animal studies have shown cidofovir to be effective in the treatment and prevention of HSV infections. Human data are limited, with only one randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed to date. The results from this study look promising; however, due to the small sample size, a larger clinical trial is warranted. The human data available as case reports are suboptimal in the quality of reporting time frames for resolution of lesions/symptoms and outcomes of therapy. Another problem with the case report data is that the TK status of the herpes simplex isolates was not reported. This would have helped substantiate the acyclovir resistance seen in these patients. It was evident in these case reports that acyclovir resistance can be overcome, as acyclovir-resistant strains became sensitive following cidofovir therapy. This may be because TK(+) viruses have been shown to establish latency more readily than do TK(-) viruses. This pattern suggests that alternating between acyclovir and cidofovir therapies may provide a strategy to manage the emergence of alternatively acyclovir-sensitive and -resistant infections. At present, only the intravenous formulation of cidofovir is commercially available. Advantages of the intravenous formulation include weekly dosing and efficacy. Disadvantages are the complexity of administration and the adverse effect profile. The most common adverse effects with this formulation include nephrotoxicity manifested as proteinuria (12%), and increased creatinine (5%) and neutropenia (15%). Administration of probenecid and NaCl 0.9% hydration are used to reduce the incidence and severity of nephrotoxicity in patients who are receiving cidofovir. Probenecid also has toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, headache, fever, and flushing. The topical formulation of cidofovir looks promising for mucocutaneous HSV infection because it is usually undetectable in the blood following topical administration. Therefore, systemic adverse effects should be minimized. A cidofovir gel product (Forvade, Gilead Sciences) is currently being reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of refractory HSV. Ultimately, more controlled clinical studies are necessary to determine whether routine cidofovir use can be justified in patients with acyclovir-resistant HSV infection.
...
PMID:Cidofovir use in acyclovir-resistant herpes infection. 941 91

The case of an AIDS patient with cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis who was treated with cidofovir for 17 consecutive months, without any adverse effect, is presented. In the context of antiretroviral therapy, cidofovir therapeutic regimen was 5 mg/kg of body weight for 2 weeks and 5 mg/kg thereafter every other week. Probenecid, hydration and monitoring for proteinuria were also used to prevent nephrotoxicity. The patient stopped maintenance therapy for CMV retinitis after the permanent rise of CD4+ cells above 100 c/mm3. For more than 10 months after drug withdrawal the patient remains free of retinitis.
...
PMID:Lack of reactivation of cytomegalovirus retinitis in an AIDS patient, during and after stopping long-term cidofovir treatment: case report. 1087 23