UMLS:C0033687 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A lot of evidence points to the important role of the renin-angiotensin system in the physiopathology of hypertension and the progression of chronic renal failure. In this review, the authors report the data concerning the protective effects of antagonists of angiotensin II AT1 receptors (AT1ra). The AT1 ra have been shown to have beneficial effects in most experimental models of nephropathy in which they have been tested (renal ischaemia, essential or induced hypertension, glomerulonephritis, 5/6 nephrectomy, renal transplantation, induced diabetes, toxic and radiotherapy-induced nephropathy). Clinical trials confirm these beneficial effects. In healthy subjects and hypertensive patients, the AT1 ra have identical effects to those of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on renal haemodynamics. In hypertensives, Candesartan and Irbesartan increase renal blood flow and the glomerular filtration rate and decrease the filtration fraction. Two studies have also shown that Candesartan and Irbesartan reduce proteinuria in diabetic patients. Similar results have been reported in essential hypertension with renal failure. These data suggest that AT1 ra have beneficial effects on the progression of experimental kidney disease and on proteinuria in the clinical setting. Of the pharmacological agents available for use in this class, it is essential to propose molecules whose efficacy in antagonising the effects of angiotensin II lasts throughout the 24 hour period. Clinical trials are under way to evaluate the effects of AT1 ra on renal function in man over a long period.
...
PMID:[Are the antagonists of angiotensin II AT1 receptors protectors of the kidney?]. 1044 11

The blood-pressure lowering activity, tolerability, and safety of irbesartan was evaluated in 52 hypertensive patients with chronic renal insufficiency. After a 3-week placebo period, once-daily irbesartan was administered for 12 weeks at a daily dose of 150 mg titrated to 300 mg. A second, non-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, antihypertensive drug was added after 8 weeks as needed. Twenty-four-hour creatinine clearance was determined and renal clearance studies of inulin and para-aminohippurate were done in a subset of 11 patients. Trough sitting blood pressures were reduced at the end of the first week in all groups. At weeks 4, 8, and 12 the reductions in systolic blood pressure/diastolic blood pressure averaged -11.9/-8.7, -10.8/-9.4, and -14.7/-12.1 mm Hg in patients with mild renal insufficiency and -7.7/-6.3, -13.1/-11.8, and -14.1/-10.6 mm Hg in patients with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency. Creatinine clearance, glomerular filtration rate, and effective renal plasma flow were stable. Irbesartan was withdrawn in only five patients because of adverse clinical or laboratory experience. Hyperkalemia (>6 mEq/l) requiring discontinuation of irbesartan occurred in only one patient. Once-daily irbesartan given as monotherapy at dose of 150-300 mg or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs is effective in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients with chronic renal disease. Irbesartan regimens are well tolerated in all groups. In addition, the blood pressure-lowering effect of irbesartan is accompanied by a significant reduction in proteinuria in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
...
PMID:Irbesartan effects on renal function in patients with renal impairment and hypertension: a drug-withdrawal study. 1148 53

Recent trials have helped to clarify indications for the initial pharmacological therapy of hypertension. Both the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) and World Health Organization-international Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) recommendations should be revised. The more recent trials indicate that: (1) diuretics and beta-blockers appear to be as effective in reducing overall morbidity/ mortality as other agents (Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension [STOP-2], United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study [UKPDS], Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment [INSIGHT], Nordic diltiazem [NORDIL]); (2) the use of an a-blocker results in more cardiovascular events, especially congestive heart failure, when compared with a diuretic (Antihypertensive Therapy and Lipid Lowering Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]); (3)the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor results in fewer myocardial infarctions and episodes of heart failure than calcium channel blockers in the elderly and in diabetic patients (Fosinopril vs. Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial [FACET], Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes [ABCD], STOP-2) - other data (Captopril Prevention Project [CAPPP]) suggest that the use of an ACE inhibitor is preferred in diabetic patients; (4) overall cardiovascular events are similar with calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic - however, there are fewer strokes with non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NORDIL) and a trend towards an increase in heart failure and myocardial infarctions with either a dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic (INSIGHT, NORDIL); (5) angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) will decrease proteinuria and slow progression of renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients when compared with regimens that do not include an ARB or an ACE inhibitor (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan [RENAAL], Irbesartan Type II Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT], Irbesartan Type II Diabetes with Microalbuminuria [IRMA Il]). The debate over initial therapy may be moot. High-risk hypertensive patients should probably be treated initially with combination therapy, one of which should be a diuretic. The use of diuretics and beta-blockers as well as ACE-inhibitors alone or with a diuretic should be considered as initial therapy (a change from JNCVI). Alpha-blockers should be reserved for special situations, i.e. prostatic hypertrophy (in contrast to WHO-ISH recommendations). An ACE-inhibitor or ARB, usually along with a diuretic, can be considered as preferred therapy in hypertensive diabetic patients. Some data suggest equal or greater reduction in strokes with a calcium channel blocker than other medications.
...
PMID:Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid? 1199 97

Irbesartan (SR 47436; BMS-186295) is a selective non-peptide antagonist of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1). Irbesartan inhibits the action of angiotensin II, which acts through the binding to the AT1 receptor. Many experimental and clinical data show that activation of AT1 receptors plays the crucial role in the development of hypertension, hypertrophy of left ventricle, progression of lipid disorders and impairment of renal function. Therefore, the pharmacological intervention with angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists could be used as a new therapeutic option in treatment of hypertension and its complications. The advantage of irbesartan is its long lasting blood pressure lowering action and the possibility of taking it once a day. The principle of its action is not only limited to blocking the AT1 receptor, but it also participates in many other reactions of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. According to the reports published, irbesartan and other antagonists of angiotensin II type 1 receptor seem to be a promising complement in the treatment of idiopathic hypertension, especially in patients with heart failure, diabetes and impaired renal function. Several studies showed that in addition to its long blood pressure lowering action (study of Pool, Fogari, Stumlple, Minran)--(possibility of taking the drug once a day), the AT1 antagonists reduced proteinuria (Sica et al.) without decreasing the creatinine clearance, improved the function of endothelium and inhibited the mitogen and proliferative action of angiotensin II on cardio-vascular system (Kahan et al., Tonkon et al., SILVER and ELITE trail).
...
PMID:[Irbesartan--antihypertensive treatment in patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus]. 1218 30

Type 2 diabetes is an ever-growing problem worldwide. Approximately 40% of the patients with type 2 diabetes will develop diabetic kidney disease. In the United States, diabetes has become the most common single cause of endstage renal disease defined by the need for dialysis or transplantation. Patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy have a dramatically increased cardiovascular risk. The Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial was designed to determine whether the use of irbesartan or a calcium channel blocker would provide protection against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes beyond that attributable to the lowering of blood pressure. In that study, 1715 hypertensive patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to irbesartan 300 mg/day or amlodipine 10 mg/day, or placebo. All patients randomized in this trial had more than 900 mg of protein in their urine and serum creatinines between 1.0 mg/dl and 3.0 mg/dl. The target blood pressure was 135/85 mmHg or less in all groups. The primary outcome was time to a combined endpoint of doubling of their baseline serum creatinine concentration, the development of endstage renal disease, or death from any cause. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.6 years. Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a risk of the primary composite endpoint that was 20% lower than that in the placebo group ( P = 0.02) and 23% lower than that in the amlodipine group ( P = 0.006). The risk of doubling of the serum creatinine concentration was 33% lower in the irbesartan group than in the placebo group ( P = 0.003) and 37% lower in the irbesartan group than in the amlodipine group ( P < 0.001). Treatment with irbesartan was associated with a relative risk of endstage renal disease that was 23% lower than that in both other groups. These differences were not accounted for by differences in the blood pressures that were achieved. Proteinuria was reduced on average by 33% in the irbesartan group as compared with 6% in the amlodipine group and 10% in the placebo group. The angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan was shown to be effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. In a study done in patients with type 2 diabetes and early nephropathy as manifested by microalbuminuria, 590 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria were randomized to receive either irbesartan 150 mg/day or irbesartan 300 mg/day and followed for 2 years. The primary outcome in that trial was the time to the onset of diabetic nephropathy, defined by persistent albuminuria in overnight specimens, with a urinary albumin excretion rate that was more than 200 mg/min or at least 30% higher than the baseline level. The irbesartan 150 mg/day group demonstrated a 39% relative risk reduction versus the control group in the development of overt proteinuria. The irbesartan 300 mg/day group demonstrated a highly significant 70% risk reduction versus the control group ( P < 0.001). The albumin excretion rate was reduced in the two irbesartan groups throughout the study (-11% and -38% at 24 months compared with baseline in the irbesartan 150-mg and 300-mg groups, respectively). The albumin excretion rate remained unchanged in the control group. Irbesartan was demonstrated in the above study to be renoprotective, independent of its blood pressure-lowering effect, in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Thus, irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, was demonstrated to be significantly renoprotective in patients with type 2 diabetes with either early nephropathy (microalbuminuria) or late nephropathy (proteinuria). The renoprotective effects of irbesartan were above and beyond the effects irbesartan had on systemic blood pressure. Patients with type 2 diabetes and either early or late diabetic nephropathy should be treated with the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan.
...
PMID:Treatment of diabetic nephropathy with angiotensin II receptor antagonist. 1458 37

During the past decade, the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has risen dramatically, primarily due to an increase in the incidence of diabetes. In patients with diabetes, both hyperglycemia and hypertension are independent risk factors for renal disease. Hypertension is also a risk factor in nondiabetic renal disease and contributes to renal dysfunction by increasing glomerular pressure, glomerular capillary damage, and proteinuria. The resultant nephron damage increases glomerular pressure and damage within remnant functional nephrons, further contributing to deterioration of renal function. In addition to its role in systemic hypertension, angiotensin II has direct effects on the kidney through elevation of glomerular capillary pressure and upregulation of components of the renal injury response. These direct effects of angiotensin II on the kidney support the inclusion of agents that target the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) into treatment regimens for patients at risk for renal disease. Several clinical trials have established the benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with diabetes. The ACE inhibitors have been shown to delay renal decline in patients with type 1 diabetes, whereas the renoprotective effect of these agents in patients with type 2 diabetes is less clear. The ARBs have been shown to provide significant benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, both at early (microalbuminuria) and late (proteinuria) stages of renal decline. In the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study, ARB therapy significantly reduced the progression of overt nephropathy (composite of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, and death), a benefit that has not been shown for ACE inhibitors. Moreover, in RENAAL, losartan significantly reduced the incidence of the individual end point of ESRD. The benefits of ARB therapy in IDNT and RENAAL were associated with significant reductions in proteinuria and were independent of blood pressure reductions. In RENAAL, proteinuria was a strong predictor of both renal and cardiovascular events. These findings underscore the importance of RAS blockade as a strategy for improving clinical outcomes in patients with renal disease.
...
PMID:Recommendations for the management of special populations: renal disease in diabetes. 1462 61

The activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is elevated both in the circulation and in the renal tissue of diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies. The increased RAAS activity plays an important role in the hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic pathogenetic mechanisms involved in kidney disease. Previous studies have demonstrated that albuminuria is not only a marker of glomerular lesions, but also a progression promoter, and finally a powerful predictor of the long-term beneficial effect of blood pressure-lowering therapy. Randomized crossover and parallel blind studies in patients with diabetic nephropathy have demonstrated that angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) induce favorable changes in systemic blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and proteinuria similar to those induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. Studies have revealed the optimal renoprotective dose for some ARBs; however, additional dose titration studies are urgently needed to obtain the maximum benefit of this valuable new class of compounds. The combination of ARB and ACE inhibition is well tolerated and even more effective than monotherapy in reducing systemic blood pressure and albuminuria in diabetic nephropathy. In addition, dual RAAS blockade is safe and well tolerated. Impaired autoregulation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR); demonstrated with some blood pressure-lowering agents implies disturbances in the downstream transmission of the systemic blood pressure into the glomerulus, leading to capillary hypertension or hypotension depending of the level of blood pressure. ARB does not interfere with GFR autoregulation in hypertensive diabetic patients. In contrast to previous observational studies with ACE inhibition, long-term treatment with ARB has similar beneficial renoprotective effect on progression of diabetic kidney disease in hypertensive diabetic patients with ACE II and DD genotypes. ARB can prevent/delay development of diabetic nephropathy independently of its beneficial blood pressure-lowering effect in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Recently, two landmark studies led to the following conclusion: "Losartan and Irbesartan conferred significant renal benefit in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. This protection is independent of the reduction in blood pressure it causes. The ARB is generally safe and well tolerated." A recent metaanalysis indicates that ARBs reduce cardiovascular events mainly because of reduction in first hospitalization for congestive heart failure in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria. The studies mentioned here suggest that ARB represents a beneficial treatment of hypertension and proteinuria in incipient and overt diabetic nephropathy.
...
PMID:Angiotensin receptor blockers in diabetic nephropathy: renal and cardiovascular end points. 1501 27

Aggressive treatment of hypertension is effective in reducing both microvascular and macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes, with target BP < 130/80 mmHg being recommended. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were found to be more effective than the other traditional agents in reducing the onset of clinical proteinuria in individuals with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes and incipient nephropathy. However, small trials on patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy failed to demonstrate a specific renoprotective role for this class of drugs. The aim of the Program for Irbesartan Mortality and Morbidity Evaluation was to ascertain whether angiotensin II receptor blockers are effective in both preventing the development of clinical proteinuria and delaying the progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes. The Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria (IRMA) Study showed that, as compared with conventional therapy, irbesartan is better at preventing the development of clinical proteinuria and at restoring normoalbuminuria for comparable BP control in patients with incipient nephropathy. The Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial showed that irbesartan is more effective than traditional antihypertensive therapies in reducing the progression toward ESRD in patients with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy regardless of changes in BP. Moreover, secondary analysis of the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial showed that the achieved systolic pressure as well as baseline and current proteinuria significantly predict renal outcomes. In conclusion, the results of the Program for Irbesartan Mortality and Morbidity Evaluation demonstrate that irbesartan significantly prevents the development of clinical proteinuria in individuals with microalbuminuria and delays the progression of nephropathy in individuals with proteinuria. Moreover, the renoprotective effects of irbesartan go beyond its effect on BP.
...
PMID:Prevention and treatment of diabetic nephropathy: the program for irbesartan mortality and morbidity evaluation. 1593 34

Proteinuria is a graded marker for kidney damage, as well as the risk for future cardiovascular events. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce urinary protein excretion and slow progression of renal impairment, independent of blood pressure lowering. Both the Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and the Reduction in Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study were large, randomized, prospective studies in type 2 diabetic patients with proteinuria. There was no reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction or stroke with the ARBs compared to placebo in either trial. A broader overview of clinical trials comparing ACEIs and ARBs with other antihypertensive drugs fails to show any substantive blood pressure-independent effects on stroke or myocardial infarction with these classes of drugs. Therefore, for cardiovascular end points (as opposed to renal end points), it may be more important that the blood pressure is reduced, rather than how the process is started.
...
PMID:Antihypertensive, antiproteinuric therapy and myocardial infarction and stroke prevention. 1615 81

Total serum homocysteine (tHcy) has been shown to predict de novo and recurrent cardiovascular events in many studies. However, results in diabetic populations with minimal nephropathy are mixed. The independent relationship between tHcy and arteriosclerotic outcomes and congestive heart failure (CHF) events in a population with high cardiovascular risk and diabetic nephropathy was examined. A total of 1575 individuals were enrolled in the international Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) and followed for 2.6 yr. All participants had baseline diabetic nephropathy, overt proteinuria, and hypertension and were recruited between 1996 and 1999. A total of 492 total arteriosclerotic outcomes (primary outcome) and 317 CHF events (secondary outcome) were tallied. Established cardiovascular risk factors were highly prevalent, as were high tHcy levels (quintiles [microM]: first 4.5 to 11; second >11 to 13; third >13 to 15; fourth >15 to 19; fifth >19). No association between tHcy and arteriosclerotic outcomes was observed in a univariate model or after adjustment for study randomization and established cardiovascular risk factors. The strongest outcome predictor was the presence of baseline cardiovascular disease, followed by an inverse relationship to diastolic BP. The significant univariate association between tHcy and CHF events disappeared when serum creatinine alone was added to the model. These findings question the utility of tHcy in predicting de novo or recurrent cardiovascular events in individuals with diabetic nephropathy. Further studies are needed to confirm whether these negative results apply to other populations with heavy cardiovascular risk burdens. Previous positive findings can potentially be explained through tHcy's role as a sensitive surrogate marker for kidney disease, itself a recognized cardiovascular risk factor.
...
PMID:Total plasma homocysteine and arteriosclerotic outcomes in type 2 diabetes with nephropathy. 1616 14

1 2 Next >>