UMLS:C0033687 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Losartan is the first of a new category of drug that inhibits angiotensin II (ANG II) AT1 receptors antagonists. This drug lowers blood pressure by inhibiting the activity of ANG II and reduces proteinuria and progression of chronic renal failure (CRF). It seems therefore an extremely interesting drug. Aim of this study is to describe 3 cases of acute renal failure (ARF), occurred during therapy with losartan. None of the patients showed renal arteries stenosis or other predisposing factors for the development of ARF. In conclusion, we want pointed out that losartan could affect renal function in a similar way as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI). We suggested that use of losartan in risk situations, like old age, preexiting CRF, stenosis of renal arteries, solitary kidney and diuretic therapy, should be carefully monitored as well as that of ACE I.
...
PMID:[Acute kidney failure and losartan: a recently observed event of antagonists of angiotensin II AT1 receptors]. 1122 61

The management of diabetic hypertension requires meticulous selection of agents in the antihypertension armamentorium. There may be several associated factors to be considered while treating a hypertensive diabetic. These include hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, proteinuria, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure to name a few. Losartan is the first of a new class of agents in the list of antihypertensive drugs. By its selective angiotension II receptor (subtype AT1) blocking action it is postulated to bring about a more complete inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. Thus, it might produce all the benefits of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy with the freedom from cough so commonly seen with the use of ACE inhibitors. This review attempts to analyze the possible benefits of losartan therapy in diabetes.
...
PMID:Role of losartan therapy in the management of diabetic hypertension. 1127 47

We compared the antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker verapamil in the rat with chronic renal failure. One month after five-sixths nephrectomy, male WKY rats were treated for 2 months with either losartan or verapamil. Both resulted in a similar reduction in blood pressure: from 147.1 to 112 mm Hg in losartan-treated and from 155 to 118 mm Hg (p = NS) in verapamil-treated rats. Losartan improved the creatinine clearance (difference + 17.1% as compared with + 6.6% for verapamil, p = 0.039) and prevented the increase in proteinuria: 12.26 +/- (SE) 2.33 mg/day before and 18.48 +/- 2.19 mg/day (p = NS) after therapy in the losartan-treated and 17.27 +/- 2.73 mg/day before and 32.27 +/- 10.29 mg/day after therapy (p = 0.0484) in the verapamil-treated group. In addition, losartan resulted in minimal mesangial proliferation and significantly less glomerular sclerosis and thickening of the small arterial and arteriolar walls. The changes in interstitial fibrosis and tubular hypertrophy, however, were similar in both the verapamil- and losartan-treated groups. Treatment with losartan 1 month after five-sixths nephrectomy in male WKY rats resulted in reduced blood pressure, similar to that of the verapamil-treated group. However, despite similar antihypertensive properties, losartan improved creatinine clearance and reduced proteinuria. The losartan-treated group also had a marked reduction in mesangial proliferation and less glomerular sclerosis and less reduced vascular wall thickness in renal small arteries and arterioles. However, losartan did not totally eliminate nephrosclerosis. The tubular and interstitial changes were fewer in the losartan-treated group. Thus losartan has an additional, although only partial, renoprotective effect when compared with verapamil.
...
PMID:Renoprotective effect of angiotensin II receptor antagonists in experimental chronic renal failure. 1127 39

Hypertension is highly prevalent after renal transplantation and has been associated with lower graft survival. Optimum management of post-transplant hypertension remains to be defined. Losartan, a potent, orally active and selective non-peptide blocker of the angiotensin subtype 1 receptor, could represent a useful drug for treating post-transplant hypertension. Recently, a prospective study of 12 weeks treatment with losartan has showed a satisfactory control of arterial hypertension associated with a decrease in proteinuria in this high-risk group of renal transplant patients. A retrospective study was performed to review the role of losartan as a renoprotective agent (evaluating blood pressure and proteinuria) in renal transplant recipients in a long-term follow-up. A total of 150 transplant recipients were included in the study. None of the patients had a serum creatinine >3 mg/dl, or suspected renal artery stenosis, or other severe concomitant diseases. The indication for losartan therapy was hypertension, proteinuria and/or post-transplant erythrocytosis. The values of blood pressure, results of fasting haematology, blood chemistry and total proteinuria in 24-h urine samples were recorded at the time of initiation of losartan therapy, 6 and 3 months before the start, and at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months thereafter. A tendency analysis by linear regression comparing two slopes before and after treatment was realized. A decrease in mean blood pressure and proteinuria, from 106.7+/-0.9 to 98.2+/-2.1 mmHg and from 1253.9+/-188 to 91.2+/-33.7 mg/24 h, P<0.05, respectively, was observed after introduction of losartan. A progressive increase in creatinine clearance was observed after the third month of losartan treatment. No significant changes were seen in haematocrit or serum potassium levels. We can conclude that a progressive decrease in mean arterial pressure associated with a decrease in proteinuria was observed during long-term follow-up. Based on the capacity of losartan to improve renal function, this drug could be decisive for the treatment and prevention of chronic allograft nephropathy.
...
PMID:Angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonists in the treatment of hypertension after renal transplantation. 1136 38

Recent trials have helped to clarify indications for the initial pharmacological therapy of hypertension. Both the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) and World Health Organization-international Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) recommendations should be revised. The more recent trials indicate that: (1) diuretics and beta-blockers appear to be as effective in reducing overall morbidity/ mortality as other agents (Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension [STOP-2], United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study [UKPDS], Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment [INSIGHT], Nordic diltiazem [NORDIL]); (2) the use of an a-blocker results in more cardiovascular events, especially congestive heart failure, when compared with a diuretic (Antihypertensive Therapy and Lipid Lowering Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]); (3)the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor results in fewer myocardial infarctions and episodes of heart failure than calcium channel blockers in the elderly and in diabetic patients (Fosinopril vs. Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial [FACET], Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes [ABCD], STOP-2) - other data (Captopril Prevention Project [CAPPP]) suggest that the use of an ACE inhibitor is preferred in diabetic patients; (4) overall cardiovascular events are similar with calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic - however, there are fewer strokes with non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NORDIL) and a trend towards an increase in heart failure and myocardial infarctions with either a dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic (INSIGHT, NORDIL); (5) angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) will decrease proteinuria and slow progression of renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients when compared with regimens that do not include an ARB or an ACE inhibitor (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan [RENAAL], Irbesartan Type II Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT], Irbesartan Type II Diabetes with Microalbuminuria [IRMA Il]). The debate over initial therapy may be moot. High-risk hypertensive patients should probably be treated initially with combination therapy, one of which should be a diuretic. The use of diuretics and beta-blockers as well as ACE-inhibitors alone or with a diuretic should be considered as initial therapy (a change from JNCVI). Alpha-blockers should be reserved for special situations, i.e. prostatic hypertrophy (in contrast to WHO-ISH recommendations). An ACE-inhibitor or ARB, usually along with a diuretic, can be considered as preferred therapy in hypertensive diabetic patients. Some data suggest equal or greater reduction in strokes with a calcium channel blocker than other medications.
...
PMID:Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid? 1199 97

Type 2 diabetes is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States, and type 2 diabetes has been shown to be a myocardial infarction equivalent in regard to risk of death from a cardiovascular event. Proteinuria is a surrogate marker for renal disease progression, and although data favor both the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in reducing proteinuria, data for renal outcomes, such as time to dialysis, only exist for the ARBs, which clearly increase the duration to dialysis. Conversely, ACE inhibitors have overwhelming data that show substantial risk reduction from cardiovascular events and death in people with type 2 diabetes. Similar data on cardiovascular risk reduction are not yet available with ARBs, although two trials of renal disease progression did have cardiovascular endpoints as secondary outcomes. There were no significant differences between the ARB and control group except for first hospitalization with heart failure, where losartan reduced the risk by 32%, but there was a trend, albeit not significant, toward reduction of myocardial infarction. The first information regarding ARB effects on cardiovascular events as primary outcomes will come from the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension study. Therefore, as of this writing, all patients with type 2 diabetes and no evidence of nephropathy, ie, proteinuria and an elevated creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, should be placed on an ACE inhibitor for cardiovascular risk reduction. If nephropathy is present, the evidence would support an ARB for therapy in concert with a b-blocker for cardiovascular risk reduction and renoprotection.
...
PMID:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in nephropathy from type 2 diabetes. 1200 99

To study whether prevention of renal injury using the anti-inflammatory drugs pentosan polysulphate (PPS) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is associated with improvement of glomerular haemodynamics, PPS and MMF were compared with losartan. The awake systolic blood pressure (SBP), proteinuria (Uprot) and micropuncture studies were performed 30 days after five-sixths nephrectomy in untreated rats and in rats treated with PPS (100 mg/kg per day), MMF (30 mg/kg per day) or losartan (30 mg/kg per day). In the rats receiving no treatment, there was a rise in SBP (to 180-200 mmHg) and in Uprot, which were prevented by losartan. In the PPS and MMF groups, the SBP was elevated but the Uprot did not increase. In the untreated rats the total glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased (-80%) and the single-nephron GFR (37-42%), plasma flow (67-127%) and glomerular pressure (10-15 mmHg) increased. These changes were prevented by PPS and MMF to the same extent as by losartan: the rise in single-nephron GFR and plasma flow were reduced by 50% and the glomerular pressure was normal. In rats receiving losartan, this was due to the fall in arterial pressure, whereas in PPS- and MMF-treated rats it was due to a rise in afferent resistance, indicating autoregulatory capacity. Total GFR was similar, despite the lower single-nephron GFR in treated groups, suggesting a larger proportion of functioning nephrons. Losartan, PPS and MMF significantly reduced glomerular sclerosis and tubular dilation and atrophy in association with a reduction in the lymphocyte and macrophage infiltrate. These results suggest an interaction between the haemodynamic and inflammatory changes that perpetuate each other during progression of renal injury. Renal protection provided by anti-inflammatory drugs is partially mediated by the prevention of glomerular haemodynamic alterations.
...
PMID:Restoration of glomerular haemodynamics and renal injury independent of arterial hypertension in rats with subtotal renal ablation. 1218 53

Drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) are of proven benefit in the treatment of hypertension, congestive heart failure, or acute myocardial infarction. In the last decade, several clinical trials have shown that RAS inhibitors also offer significant renoprotection in both diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathy. However, patients with advanced renal insufficiency did not take part in these trials because of the risk of acute renal failure (ARF) and hyperkalemia, and, for the same reason, most physicians do not offer these drugs to patients with impaired renal function. Recently, a post-hoc analysis of the Ramipril Efficacy In Nephropathy (REIN) study which included patients with severe renal insufficiency, showed that RAS inhibition slows glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline over time and progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in a safe way in patients quite close to ESRD (basal GFR, 10 to 30 ml/min/1.73m2). These beneficial effects have also been shown in the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the All Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) study, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, clinical proteinuria, and renal insufficiency, where RAS inhibition therapy significantly reduced the risk of ESRD once doubling of baseline serum creatinine levels had been achieved as compared to non-RAS anti-hypertensive treatment. Thus, these data suggest that RAS inhibition therapy should be given to all patients with proteinuric chronic nephropathy, independently of the level of renal function.
...
PMID:Inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system reduce the rate of GFR decline and end-stage renal disease in patients with severe renal insufficiency. 1224 75

Type 2 diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in most industrialized countries in Europe. The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) Study evaluated the renal protective effects of losartan versus placebo on a background of non-ACE-I/non-AIIA conventional antihypertensive therapy in 1513 patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Losartan reduced the incidence of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or death by 16% (P=0.022) and reduced the risk of progression to ESRD, defined as the initiation of dialysis or transplantation, by 29% (P=0.002). We set out to estimate the potential effect of losartan on the burden and costs associated with ESRD over 3.5 years in the European Union (EU). The risk reduction in new cases of ESRD was calculated by combining type 2 diabetes population estimates for the EU with the percent absolute risk reduction of ESRD in patients treated with losartan as observed in RENAAL. The number of days each patient experienced ESRD was defined as the length of time from onset of ESRD until the minimum of death or 3.5 years. ESRD-free person-years avoided with losartan treatment were calculated by combining the population estimate with the ESRD days avoided divided by number of days in a year. ESRD costs from Germany were used to approximate the potential cost savings from reduced time with ESRD and fewer ESRD cases on a EU wide basis. There are approximately 700,000 diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with proteinuria (urine albumin/creatinine >or=300 mg/g) in the EU. The addition of losartan to the treatment regimen of these patients is expected to lead to a reduction of 44,100 cases of ESRD, 64,400 fewer person-years with ESRD, and reduce ESRD-related costs by euro 2.6 billion over 3.5 years based on RENAAL data. Treatment with losartan not only reduced the incidence of ESRD, but also can result in substantial cost savings in the European Union.
...
PMID:Losartan reduces the burden and cost of ESRD: public health implications from the RENAAL study for the European Union. 1241 Aug 59

Losartan is an orally active, selective, nonpeptide, angiotensin II AT(1) receptor antagonist. Losartan 50 or 100 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the incidence of a doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death (43.5% vs 47.1%, p = 0.02) in a pivotal, well designed trial (Reduction of Endpoints in Non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan [RENAAL] study) in 1513 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and proteinuria. Losartan also significantly reduced the incidence of doubling of serum creatinine level (p = 0.006), ESRD (p = 0.002), ESRD or death (p = 0.01) and doubling of serum creatinine and ESRD (p = 0.01) compared with placebo in the RENAAL trial. There were similar incidences of overall mortality and morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular causes between treatment groups. In addition, data from several nonblind and double-blind studies indicates that losartan effectively reduces the mean albumin excretion rate. Two double-blind studies show that losartan has similar effects to enalapril on kidney function. Data from 4058 patients (3300 with essential hypertension) who have received losartan (10-150 mg/day) in clinical trials indicate it is well tolerated. In the RENAAL study 17.2% and 21.7% of losartan and placebo recipients discontinued treatment because of adverse events, but causality was not determined.
...
PMID:Losartan in diabetic nephropathy. 1255 62

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next >>