Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This article reviews the current state of knowledge concerning the vicious cycle of hypertension and progressive loss of renal function in renal disease, as well as the renoprotective potential of antihypertensive treatment, with a specific focus on children and adolescents. Deficient arteriolar autoregulation renders damaged kidneys particularly sensitive to systemic high blood pressure (BP). Intraglomerular hypertension promotes proteinuria, which further activates the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). Angiotensin II, apart from its vasoconstrictor effects, induces local proinflammatory and profibrotic signaling molecules resulting in renal scarring. The activity of the scarring process with the resultant loss of functional renal mass appears to be modulated, in part, by a polymorphism in the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene. Clinical studies in adults have demonstrated convincingly the high risk of progression of chronic renal failure (CRF) associated with high BP, the benefit of lowering BP to even the low normal range, and the specific benefit of drugs that inhibit the RAS on the progression of CRF. In children, even moderately elevated BP and moderate proteinuria have been shown to be significant risk factors for progression and CRF. The optimal target BP for children with CRF is currently being determined in a multinational, randomized, prospective trial.
 ...
PMID:Effect of hypertension on the progression of chronic renal failure in children. 1186 31

The introduction of new immunosuppressive regimens results in the significant improvement in the outcome of patients after kidney transplantation. However, about 5 percent of renal transplants are lost every year. Not only immunological (alloantigendependent) but also nonimmunological (alloantigen-independent) factors are involved in late graft loss. Among them, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, proteinuria, genetic predisposition, viral infection and nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressive drugs contribute to the development and to the progression of chronic post-transplant nephropathy. Hypertension can be both the cause and the consequence of chronic allograft failure. Hypertension is frequently observed before transplantation, persists after grafting and increases the risk of chronic allograft nephropathy. Hypercholesterolemia, obesity, atheromatosis, polycythemia, and excessive salt intake are factors contributing in post-transplant hypertension. However, in some cases, hypertension can be transferred with the grafted kidney, as observed in normotensive patients before renal transplantation. In 1 to 12 percent of cases, the cause of post transplant hypertension is the stenosis of the transplant artery. Sometimes the presence of hypertension in renal recipients may result from the recurrence of glomerulonephritis or from the development of glomerulonephritis de novo in the graft. Also immunosuppressive treatment with corticosteroids and cyclosporine A contributes to the increased prevalence of hypertension by 20-30 percent. The development of the graft nephroarteriolosclerosis as a consequence of hypertension accelerates the progression of the post-transplant nephropathy. Adequate control of the arterial pressure (< 140/90) should be achieved in all renal transplant recipients. Reduction in protein and salt intake is important to reduce hyper-filtration and slows the progression of transplant nephropathy. However, pharmacological treatment is usually needed. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II type I receptor antagonists exhibit beneficial hemodynamic effect leading to the reduction of glomerular hypertension and proteinuria. Calcium antagonists besides their systemic antihypertensive effect, can protect renal grafts from vascular and renal toxicity of CyA. Sometimes, combined therapy with these and other antihypertensive drugs and diuretics is necessary.
 ...
PMID:[Post-transplant nephropathy and arterial hypertension]. 1186 48

This study compared the cardiovascular and renal effects of long-term telmisartan (3 and 10 mg/kg/day)and lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day) in an animal model combining hypertension and diabetes mellitus. It was a parallel-group study of diabetic, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), treated with control or active treatment for eight months. A non-diabetic SHR control group was run in parallel. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin (45 mg/kg i.v.) in SHRs aged 9-10 weeks. Animals were treated with telmisartan (3 or 10mg/kg/day), lisinopril (10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle. Plasma glucose levels, blood pressure (BP), and urinary protein and albumin excretion were measured monthly. Telmisartan treatment significantly reduced BP of diabetic SHRs in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.05, low-dose, n= 18; p<0.01, high-dose, n=15). The BP reduction in the lisinopril group was similar to that in the telmisartan 10 mg/kg/day group. Compared with non-diabetic SHRs, untreated diabetic SHRs developed severe proteinuria and albuminuria over the experimental period (p<0.01). In diabetic SHRs, proteinuria and albuminuria were dose-dependently and significantly attenuated by treatment with telmisartan (p<0.01 with the higher dose) and lisinopril (p<0.01). Compared with the untreated diabetic SHRs, cardiac hypertrophy was significantly reduced after treatment with both doses of telmisartan and with lisinopril. Telmisartan, 10 mg/kg/day, but not lisinopril, significantly attenuated the diabetes-induced increase in glomerular volume. In conclusion, telmisartan, 10 mg/kg/day, is at least as beneficial as lisinopril, 10 mg/kg/day, in lowering BP, reducing cardiac hypertrophy and attenuating renal excretion of protein and albumin in this model.
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2001 Mar
PMID:Comparative antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of telmisartan and lisinopril after long-term treatment in hypertensive diabetic rats. 1188 Oct 63

There is increasing evidence to suggest endothelial dysfunction as a critical factor in vascular diseases. Genetically predisposed spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) treated with inhibitors of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, develop a severe hypertensive nephrosclerosis without the necessity for surgical reduction in renal mass, nephrectomy, renal infarction or nephrotoxic drugs. In these animals, endothelial dysfunction is considered a valid model for assessment of the efficacy of cardiovascular therapy. SHR were treated with either the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril or the angiotensin II (Ang II) AT(1)-receptor antagonist (AIIA) valsartan at sub-hypotensive doses and the effects on survival rates, cardiac and renal changes were monitored. Rats treated with valsartan, alone or in combination with enalapril, showed markedly higher survival rates (67-85%, respectively) than untreated animals (37%) or those treated with enalapril alone (55%). Valsartan at a dose which attenuated blood pressure increase led to even greater survival rates (95%). Despite these improved survival rates, at non-hypotensive doses the drugs had no effect on histological appearance, nor was kidney function improved. Plasma creatinine levels were reduced by valsartan, alone or in combination with enalapril, but proteinuria persisted with all treatments over the 12 weeks of the study. Aldosterone levels were significantly reduced by all treatments. The results suggest a beneficial role for endothelium in hypertension. Reduced renal perfusion pressure probably underlies the beneficial renal effects of high-dose valsartan.
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2000 Jun
PMID:Combination of non-hypotensive doses of valsartan and enalapril improves survival of spontaneously hypertensive rats with endothelial dysfunction. 1196 7

The RENAAL Study is a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the renal protective effects of losartan in Type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. The study has enrolled 1513 patients and is expected to continue for 3.5 years after the last patient has been entered. Eligible patients must have a urinary albumin:creatinine ratio of at least 300 mg/g and serum creatinine between 1.3 to 3.0 mg/dL. Eligible hypertensive or normotensive patients are randomised to receive either losartan or placebo, in addition to their existing antihypertensive therapy. Medications that block angiotensin production or action, are excluded. The primary endpoint is a composite of the time to first event of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease, or death; secondary endpoints include cardiovascular events, progression of renal disease, and changes in proteinuria; tertiary endpoints include quality of life, healthcare resource utilisation, and amputations. Patients include Caucasians (48.6%), Blacks (15.2%), Asians (16.7%), and Hispanics (18.2%). Baseline urinary albumin:creatinine ratio and serum creatinine levels average 1867 mg/g and 1.9 mg/dL, respectively. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures are 153 and 82 mmHg, respectively. RENAAL will document whether blockade of the AII receptor with losartan produces clinical benefits in patients with Type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2000 Dec
PMID:The losartan renal protection study--rationale, study design and baseline characteristics of RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan). 1196 19

Recent trials have helped to clarify indications for the initial pharmacological therapy of hypertension. Both the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) and World Health Organization-international Society of Hypertension (WHO-ISH) recommendations should be revised. The more recent trials indicate that: (1) diuretics and beta-blockers appear to be as effective in reducing overall morbidity/ mortality as other agents (Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension [STOP-2], United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study [UKPDS], Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment [INSIGHT], Nordic diltiazem [NORDIL]); (2) the use of an a-blocker results in more cardiovascular events, especially congestive heart failure, when compared with a diuretic (Antihypertensive Therapy and Lipid Lowering Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT]); (3)the use of an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor results in fewer myocardial infarctions and episodes of heart failure than calcium channel blockers in the elderly and in diabetic patients (Fosinopril vs. Amlodipine Cardiovascular Events Randomized Trial [FACET], Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes [ABCD], STOP-2) - other data (Captopril Prevention Project [CAPPP]) suggest that the use of an ACE inhibitor is preferred in diabetic patients; (4) overall cardiovascular events are similar with calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic - however, there are fewer strokes with non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (NORDIL) and a trend towards an increase in heart failure and myocardial infarctions with either a dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers compared with a diuretic (INSIGHT, NORDIL); (5) angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) will decrease proteinuria and slow progression of renal disease in type 2 diabetic patients when compared with regimens that do not include an ARB or an ACE inhibitor (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan [RENAAL], Irbesartan Type II Diabetic Nephropathy Trial [IDNT], Irbesartan Type II Diabetes with Microalbuminuria [IRMA Il]). The debate over initial therapy may be moot. High-risk hypertensive patients should probably be treated initially with combination therapy, one of which should be a diuretic. The use of diuretics and beta-blockers as well as ACE-inhibitors alone or with a diuretic should be considered as initial therapy (a change from JNCVI). Alpha-blockers should be reserved for special situations, i.e. prostatic hypertrophy (in contrast to WHO-ISH recommendations). An ACE-inhibitor or ARB, usually along with a diuretic, can be considered as preferred therapy in hypertensive diabetic patients. Some data suggest equal or greater reduction in strokes with a calcium channel blocker than other medications.
 ...
PMID:Current recommendations for the treatment of hypertension: are they still valid? 1199 97

Diabetic nephropathy is one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease and is often associated with other macrovascular complications such as ischemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disease. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (AIIR) have both been shown to have a protective effect on the progression of diabetic nephropathy and have thus become the first choice for treatment of hypertension and/or renal involvement in patients with diabetes. However, most of these patients, especially those with type 2 diabetes, require two of more medications in order to reduce their blood pressure to the levels, which have been proposed in recently published consensus papers. These target blood pressure levels are 130/80 mm Hg in diabetic subjects with proteinuria of up to 1 g/day and 125/75 mm Hg in those with proteinuria in excess of 1 g/day. Combinations of different medications may have a synergistic effect. Some of the early studies using a combination of either a nondihydropyridine or a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker with ACE-I demonstrated a synergistic effect on proteinuria in patients with diabetic nephropathy. However, these studies have not been substantiated, but calcium channel blockers, with their proven ability to reduce blood pressure, play an important role in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension. The combination of ACE-I with AIIR may have several theoretical advantages. Many studies using this combination have been performed in animal models of diabetes and in patients with diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease. Some of these studies have demonstrated a synergistic effect of the combination on proteinuria or hypertension, but the results have not been consistent in all studies. It may be concluded that, until additional studies provide more convincing evidence, this combination could be used in patients whose proteinuria or hypertension has not responded to either one of the agents as monotherapy or to a combination of other medications.
 ...
PMID:Combination antihypertensive therapy in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. 1216 70

Secondary amyloidosis (AA amyloidosis) is a well known cause of nephrotic syndrome and renal failure. Several studies in patients with nephrotic syndrome have suggested a beneficial effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI). Angiotensin II (ATII) receptor antagonists effect on the long term is not known. In this study, we intended to study the effect of losartan, as an ATII receptor antagonist, on proteinuria and renal functions in patients with normotensive secondary amyloidosis. In total 44 patients with biopsy proven AA amyloidosis associated with nephrotic proteinuria were included. The first group of patients (n=22) was treated with losartan 50 mg/day. The second group of patients (n=22) did not receive any specific antiproteinuric treatment. Urinary protein loss was effectively lowered by losartan from 4.38 +/- 1.0 to 2.8 +/- 0.61 g/day (p<0.0001), whereas the control group showed a slight fall in proteinuria as 4.21 +/- 1.06 to 4.12 +/- 1.07 g/day (p = 0.176). Hypoalbuminemia improved significantly from 2.52 +/- 0.69 to 2.78 +/- 0.46 g/dl (p = 0.004), in the losartan group, whereas serum albumin had fallen in the control group from 2.44 +/- 0.57 to 2.27 +/- 0.41 (p = 0.041). Serum creatinine increased in the control group from 1.52 +/- 0.42 to 2.39 +/- 0.51 mg/dl (p<0.0001), and in the losartan group from 1.59 +/- 0.50 to 1.84 +/- 0.6 mg/dl (p<0.001), after 24 months of treatment. The ATII receptor blocker losartan is effective in protecting against the progression of nephropathy due to AA amyloidosis. Symptomatic treatment of proteinuria with losartan is therefore to be considered, especially with severe proteinuria even in normotensive patients.
 ...
PMID:Effect of losartan treatment on the proteinuria in normotensive patients having proteinuria due to secondary amyloidosis. 1216 10

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 is important in fibrogenesis and has been involved in the pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The angiotensinogen (AGT) gene encodes the only glycoprotein known to be a precursor of the vasopressor angiotensin II. Angiotensin II is also a growth factor and a profibrogenic cytokine. It mediates the induction of TGF-beta1. We studied the relationship among the intragraft expression of AGT, TGF-beta1, and CAN in stable renal transplant patients (RTP). We used a competitive quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-ELISA assay to identify intragraft amounts of AGT expression in RTP and correlated it with TGF-beta1 mRNA expression. We studied and performed kidney biopsies on 12 RTP with long-functioning grafts and 6 RTP in the immediate posttransplantation period (7 days) who had acute tubular necrosis as control. Histology was based on Banff working classification criteria. Total RNA was isolated from biopsy specimens. For RT-PCR-ELISA, we created heterologous RNA competitors that coamplified with the same primers as AGT and TGF-beta1. Six of 12 long RTP had proteinuria >1000 mg/24 hr and 6 had proteinuria <1000 mg/24 hr. The differences between Banff grades (P =0.03), AGT, and TGF-beta1 levels by RT-PCR-ELISA were statistically significant between both groups (106.2+/-60.7 vs. 34.1+/-11.9 pg/microg total RNA [P =0.01] and 5954+/-5612 vs. 436+/-517 transcripts/microg total RNA [P =0.01], respectively). The control group showed AGT levels of 25+/-12.2 pg/microg total RNA and TGF-beta1 levels of 228+/-111 transcripts/microg total RNA, significant only for the higher proteinuria group (P=0.01 and P=0.04, respectively). There was a correlation between AGT and TGF-beta1 in both groups (r=0.96, P=0.001). We showed a relationship between mRNA expression of AGT and TGF-beta1 in kidney transplant patients with different grades of CAN and proteinuria.
 ...
PMID:Intragraft messenger RNA expression of angiotensinogen: relationship with transforming growth factor beta-1 and chronic allograft nephropathy in kidney transplant patients. 1235 92

Type 2 diabetes is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in most industrialized countries in Europe. The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) Study evaluated the renal protective effects of losartan versus placebo on a background of non-ACE-I/non-AIIA conventional antihypertensive therapy in 1513 patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Losartan reduced the incidence of doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or death by 16% (P=0.022) and reduced the risk of progression to ESRD, defined as the initiation of dialysis or transplantation, by 29% (P=0.002). We set out to estimate the potential effect of losartan on the burden and costs associated with ESRD over 3.5 years in the European Union (EU). The risk reduction in new cases of ESRD was calculated by combining type 2 diabetes population estimates for the EU with the percent absolute risk reduction of ESRD in patients treated with losartan as observed in RENAAL. The number of days each patient experienced ESRD was defined as the length of time from onset of ESRD until the minimum of death or 3.5 years. ESRD-free person-years avoided with losartan treatment were calculated by combining the population estimate with the ESRD days avoided divided by number of days in a year. ESRD costs from Germany were used to approximate the potential cost savings from reduced time with ESRD and fewer ESRD cases on a EU wide basis. There are approximately 700,000 diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients with proteinuria (urine albumin/creatinine >or=300 mg/g) in the EU. The addition of losartan to the treatment regimen of these patients is expected to lead to a reduction of 44,100 cases of ESRD, 64,400 fewer person-years with ESRD, and reduce ESRD-related costs by euro 2.6 billion over 3.5 years based on RENAAL data. Treatment with losartan not only reduced the incidence of ESRD, but also can result in substantial cost savings in the European Union.
 ...
PMID:Losartan reduces the burden and cost of ESRD: public health implications from the RENAAL study for the European Union. 1241 Aug 59


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>