Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Sirolimus is a novel immunosuppressant with potent antiproliferative actions through its ability to inhibit the raptor-containing mammalian target of rapamycin protein kinase. Sirolimus represents a major therapeutic advance in the prevention of acute renal allograft rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy. Its role in the therapy of glomerulonephritis, autoimmunity, cystic renal diseases and renal cancer is under investigation. Because sirolimus does not share the vasomotor renal adverse effects exhibited by calcineurin inhibitors, it has been designated a 'non-nephrotoxic drug'. However, clinical reports suggest that, under some circumstances, sirolimus is associated with proteinuria and acute renal dysfunction. A common risk factor appears to be presence of pre-existing chronic renal damage. The mechanisms of sirolimus-associated proteinuria are multifactorial and may be due to an increase in glomerular capillary pressure following calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal. It has also been suggested that sirolimus directly causes increased glomerular permeability/injury, but evidence for this mechanism is currently inconclusive. The acute renal dysfunction associated with sirolimus (such as in delayed graft function) may be due to suppression of compensatory renal cell proliferation and survival/repair processes. Although these adverse effects occur in some patients, their occurrence could be minimised by knowledge of the molecular effects of sirolimus on the kidney, the use of sirolimus in appropriate patient populations, close monitoring of proteinuria and renal function, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers if proteinuria occurs and withdrawal if needed. Further long-term analysis of renal allograft studies using sirolimus as de novo immunosuppression along with clinical and laboratory studies will refine these issues in the future.
 ...
PMID:Sirolimus-associated proteinuria and renal dysfunction. 1714 61

Immunosuppressive protocols in dual kidney transplantation (DKT) are based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). We wonder whether a CNI-free immunosuppression can improve outcome in older patients receiving a DKT with marginal donor organs. Thirty-six were treated with CsA, MMF and prednisone (CsA group) and 42 with rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone (SRL group). Incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection was 44% and 11% in the CsA group, and 40% and 8% in the SRL group. CMV infection incidence was low in both protocols. Three-year patient survival was 89% in the CsA and 76% in the SRL group. One- and 3-year graft survival after censoring for dead with a functioning allograft was 94.2% and 94% in CsA and 95% and 90% in SRL, respectively. Renal function was similar in both groups whereas proteinuria was higher in the SRL group. Uninephrectomy due to graft thrombosis or urinary-related complications was numerically higher in the SRL (21%) than in the CsA group (8%) (p = 0.13) and it was associated with renal failure and proteinuria. In DKT, a new induction immunosuppressive protocol based on rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone does not offer any advantage in comparison to the old CsA, MMF and prednisone.
 ...
PMID:Immunosuppression for dual kidney transplantation with marginal organs: the old is better yet. 1721 33

This prospective study assesses over a period of 6 months, the variations in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and safety parameters within a cohort of 44 cadaveric renal-transplant (RT) patients presenting with moderate renal insufficiency. They were progressively switched from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) based- to sirolimus (SRL) based-therapies aiming SRL troughs at levels approximately 8 ng/ml (range 6-10). All the patients were receiving in addition mycophenolate mofetil. The intent-to-treat (ITT) patient and graft survivals were 100%. Thirty-four patients, i.e. 77.3% completed the study. Overall, there was a significant improvement in the calculated GFR (Nankivell formula) from day 0 to month 6, i.e. from 45.98 (+/-16.3) to 53.07 (+/-12.68) ml/mn (P=0.03). However, renal function improved in only 20 cases (group I), and deteriorated in the others (group II). Groups I and II did not significantly differ with respect to time between transplantation and drug switch, GFR, serum creatinine, and proteinuria at baseline. There was only one case of steroid-sensitive acute rejection. Overall, there was a significant increase in proteinuria from 0 (0-3.15) to 0.57 (0-4.85) g/day (P=0.002). Finally, the conversion was associated with a significant increase in lipids, and a significant decrease in hemoglobin levels.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a slow conversion from calcineurin inhibitor- to sirolimus-based therapies in maintenance renal-transplant patients presenting with moderate renal insufficiency. 1723 20

PThrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a rare serious adverse reaction of calcineurin inhibitors, tacrolimus and cyclosporin. We report a case of a young male renal transplant recipient treated with tacrolimus, who developed TMA. Treatment included discontinuation of tacrolimus, increasing the dose of mycophenolate mofetil and infusion of fresh-frozen plasma. This was followed by normalization of renal function and dis-appearance of proteinuria. The remission has been sustained after a follow-up of nine months.
 ...
PMID:Treatment of Tacrolimus-associated thrombotic microangiopathy in renal transplant recipient with fresh frozen plasma: A case report. 1729 39

Sirolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor that inhibits cell cycle progression and has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent for use in solid organ transplant recipients. The drug was initially studied as an adjunct to ciclosporin (cyclosporine) to prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Subsequent studies have shown efficacy when combined with a variety of other immunosuppressive agents. The most common adverse effects of sirolimus are hyperlipidaemia and myelosuppression. The drug has unique antiatherogenic and antineoplastic properties, and may promote immunological tolerance and reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Although sirolimus is relatively non-nephrotoxic when administered as monotherapy, it pharmacodynamically enhances the toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors. Ironically, the drug has been used to facilitate calcineurin inhibitor-free protocols designed to preserve renal function after solid organ transplantation. Whether sirolimus can be used safely over the long term with low doses of calcineurin inhibitors requires further study. The use of sirolimus as a corticosteroid-sparing agent also remains to be proven in controlled trials. Postmarketing studies have revealed a number of unforeseen adverse effects including impaired wound healing and possibly proteinuria, oedema, pneumonitis and thrombotic microangiopathy. Overall, sirolimus is a powerful agent when used judiciously with other available immunosuppressants. As is true for all immunosuppressive drugs available for treatment of solid organ transplant recipients, the efficacy of the drug must be balanced against its considerable adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:Use of sirolimus in solid organ transplantation. 1733 96

Sirolimus (SRL) is a potent immunosuppressive drug used in organ transplantation for prophylaxis of acute allograft rejection. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to SRL has become an important alternative in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy. Recently, some reports have described the appearance of proteinuria after the use of SRL. The aim of the present study was to describe the incidence of proteinuria in transplant recipients receiving SRL in our transplant center. We studied 78 patients receiving SRL either de novo or after conversion. Eighteen transplant recipients (23.1%) developed proteinuria after SRL treatment. Proteinuria was diagnosed at 11.2 +/- 2.1 months after the initiation of SRL; in eight patients (44.4%) it occurred in the first 6 months. The mean value of proteinuria was 2.6 +/- 0.6 g/24 hours. In 5 patients (27.8%), proteinuria reached nephrotic levels, and in 13 patients (72.2%) was associated with edema. Renal allograft biopsies were performed before conversion to SRL, and a new biopsy, after the appearance of proteinuria. The light microscopy of biopsies performed after the onset of proteinuria showed no specific glomerular changes, except in 2 cases wherein the diagnosis was focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Immunofluorescence was negative in all cases. In conclusion, in this study proteinuria was observed in 21.3% of patients receiving SRL therapy either as de novo protocol or after conversion to SRL. Proteinuria occurred early after the initiation of SRL therapy and in these cases, withdrawal of SRL was associated with reversion of proteinuria.
 ...
PMID:Proteinuria in transplant patients associated with sirolimus. 1736 56

Liver allograft recipients are at increased risk of death from cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease. We propose the following strategy of risk-reduction, based on currently available literature. Lifestyle: standard advice should be given (avoidance of smoking, excess alcohol and obesity, adequate exercise, reduction of excess sodium intake). Hypertension: target blood pressure should be 140/90 mmHg or lower, but for those with diabetes or renal disease, 130/80 mmHg or lower. For patients without proteinuria, antihypertensive therapy should be initiated with a calcium channel blocker and for those with proteinuria, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker. If monotherapy fails to achieve adequate response, calcium channel blockers and ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers should be combined. If hypertension remains uncontrolled, an alpha-blocker may be added. Consideration should be given to changing immunosuppression and avoiding use of calcineurin inhibitors. Diabetes: recipients should be regularly screened for diabetes. For patients with new-onset diabetes after transplant, stepwise therapy should be guided by HbA1c concentrations, as with type II diabetes mellitus. Hyperlipidemia: annual screening of lipid profile should be undertaken, with treatment thresholds and targets based on those advocated for the high risk general population. Dietary intervention is appropriate for all patients. A statin should be considered as the first line treatment to achieve specified targets. In patients receiving a calcineurin inhibitor, Pravastatin should be commenced at a dose of 10 mg/day. In patients receiving other forms of immunosuppression, pravastatin may be commenced at a dose of 20 mg/day. Liver tests should be monitored and patients warned to report myalgia. If monotherapy is inadequate, ezetimibe or a fibrate may be added. Consideration may be given to change in immunosuppression if combination lipid-lowering therapy proves inadequate.
 ...
PMID:Reducing the risks of cardiovascular disease in liver allograft recipients. 1749 26

Arterial hypertension develops in up to 80% of renal transplant recipients. Uncontrolled hypertension induces left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure and death, but also promotes deterioration of allograft function. Cadaveric transplantation, delayed graft function, renal artery stenosis, presence of native kidneys, increased body weight and therapy with calcineurin inhibitors and steroids have been associated with an increased incidence of hypertension after kidney transplantation. Cyclosporine increases both systemic and renal vascular resistance, enhances sympathetic activation, endothelin production and, possibly, decreases vascular relaxation by decreasing the generation of nitric oxide. Tacrolimus has less pronounced prohypertensive role after renal transplantation. Corticosteroids contribute to the development of hypertension, since their withdrawal results in a significant decrease of blood pressure in the majority of patients. Renal artery stenosis occurs in almost 12% of hypertensive renal transplant recipients. It is a correctable cause of hypertension, and for this reason should be investigated in all suspected patients. Doppler ultrasonography is used as the screening method that is highly sensitive and specific in the hands of a well-experienced investigator. However, dependence of the method on the experience of the investigator is its major drawback. Magnetic resonance angiography and spinal computed tomography angiography are useful noninvasive methods, but arteriography remains a method for establishing the definitive diagnosis. Percutaneous balloon angioplasty, with or without placement of the stent, is successful in the majority of patients, but with a high incidence of restenoses (20%). Surgery is indicated for stenoses that cannot be treated with angioplasty or that recur. Auto-transplantation of the kidney with complex stenoses of graft arteries is useful in selected cases. Posttransplant hypertension should be aggressively treated to prevent the development of end-organ damage. Every effort should be invested in reducing immunosuppression when appropriate, together with salt restriction and weight reduction. Calcium channel blockers have good antihypertensive properties accompanied with minimization of cyclosporine-induced renal vasoconstriction. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) should be used in patients with proteinuria. Renal function should be carefully monitored after their introduction since they may cause transitory deterioration of glomerular filtration and/or hyperkaliemia. ACEi can induce anemia in renal transplant recipients, side effect that is often used in the treatment of posttransplant erythrocytosis. All other antihypertensive drugs could be used, with minoxidil being the most potent one. Patients with resistant hypertension should be investigated for the presence of renal artery stenosis. After exclusion of rejection, renal artery stenosis and recurrent disease, in cases of severe hypertension, native kidneys laparoscopic nephrectomy should be considered.
 ...
PMID:[Arterial hypertension in renal transplant recipients]. 1836 9

Sirolimus has been associated with high-range proteinuria when used in replacement of calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplant recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Primary FSGS was demonstrated previously in some such patients, but the coexistence of CAN lesions made the interpretation uneasy. However, nephrotic syndrome and FSGS were observed recently in three patients who received sirolimus de novo, without medical history of primary FSGS or CAN. Markers of podocyte differentiation were studied in kidney biopsies of the three patients who received sirolimus de novo and of five patients who switched to sirolimus. All patients developed FSGS lesions of classic type (not otherwise specified), but only switched patients exhibited advanced sclerotic lesions. Immunohistochemistry showed that some podocytes in FSGS lesions had absent or diminished expression of the podocyte-specific epitopes synaptopodin and p57, reflecting dedifferentiation, and had acquired expression of cytokeratin and PAX2, reflecting a immature fetal phenotype. Such a pattern of epitope expression provides evidence for podocyte dysregulation. Moreover, a decrease in vascular endothelial growth factor expression was observed in some glomeruli. In conclusion, sirolimus induces FSGS that is responsible for proteinuria in some transplant patients.
 ...
PMID:High sirolimus levels may induce focal segmental glomerulosclerosis de novo. 1769 6

Proteinuria has been reported in several papers after conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to Sirolimus (SRL), but this complication has not been analyzed in randomized clinical trials using de novo SRL. It is not known whether de novo use of SRL is a risk factor for proteinuria. We analyzed a series of patients included in a big multicenter randomized trial (RMR trial) corresponding to all patients in Spain and Portugal with respect to this issue. We retrospectively evaluated 24-hour proteinuria in all the patients during the study period (5 years postransplant) for comparison between treatment arms group A, continuous cyclosporine (CyA) + SRL and group B SRL with CyA elimination at 3 months postransplant. The elimination of CyA after the third month was not followed by significant changes in proteinuria. Nevertheless, during the last year of follow-up (between 48 and 60 months postransplant) an impressive increase in proteinuria was observed in group A. This surprising finding seemed to be a consequence of a protocol amendment that recommended CyA elimination in patients of group A, due to poorer results in the intermediate analysis of the trial. This fact suggests that the hemodynamic changes induced by elimination of the vasoconstrictor CyA might be responsible for the proteinuria but only in the long term probably when significant pathological lesions are already present. This finding argues for earlier conversion.
 ...
PMID:Early sirolimus use with cyclosporine elimination does not induce progressive proteinuria. 1788 21


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>