Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Minimal change nephrotic syndrome has been proposed to be a disorder of T cell dysfunction. It is hypothesized that a circulating factor(s) from activated T cells might alter glomerular permeability to protein. Some studies have provided evidence that up-regulation of interleukin-2 may be involved, not only in the pathophysiology of minimal change nephrotic syndrome, but also in steroid resistance. Basiliximab, an anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody, is indicated for the prophylaxis of acute organ rejection in adults and children with kidney transplants. Clinical trials have shown that basiliximab is effective and well tolerated. We describe here a pediatric patient who continuously had massive proteinuria and hypoalbuminemia for 5 years, despite pulse therapy with methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide and prolonged oral treatment with cyclosporine and mizoribine. He had experienced several disease- and treatment-associated complications, such as bacterial infections, indirect inguinal hernias, and cataracts. After he had been given a single dose of basiliximab, he achieved complete remission of proteinuria and then discontinued all immunosuppressant treatment.
 ...
PMID:Remission of refractory minimal change nephrotic syndrome after basiliximab therapy. 1924 27

Basiliximab induction treatment has been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes without the secondary side effects observed with antilymphocyte polyclonal antibodies. We analyzed our experience with basiliximab induction associated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression among low-immunological risk renal transplant recipients. We retrospectively analyzed 55 renal transplantation patients of low inmunological risk who received organs from donors younger than 55 years. We compared a group of 21 patients (38.9%; group 1) treated with basiliximab (Simulect, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) with 33 patients (61.1%; group 2) without induction. The patient groups did not differ in recipient age (46.39 +/- 11.1 in group 1 vs 41.82 +/- 11.02 years in group 2; P = .25), donor age (36.71 +/- 14.72 vs 35.09 +/- 14.63 years; P = .69), or recipient and donor gender. No differences were observed in dose or tacrolimus levels during follow-up. The incidences of delayed graft function (DGF; 28.6% vs 28.1%; P = .97) and of acute rejection episodes (9.5% vs 15.6%; P = .52) were similar in both groups. Serum creatinine and proteinuria levels (P > .05) and hospital admissions due to infections (36.4 vs 35.7%; P = .97) were also similar in both groups. At 1 year graft survival rates were 92% and 96% (P = .97) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Considering our findings and the costs of basiliximab treatment, we conclude that routine administration of basiliximab cannot be justified in young, low-immunological risk transplant recipients undergoing tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.
 ...
PMID:Use of basiliximab induction in low-immunological risk renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. 1971 13