Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cyclosporin A (CsA) was introduced in recent years for the treatment of lupus nephritis in patients with steroid resistance or in those with severe corticosteroid toxicity. Our previous study on paediatric patients showed that Neoral (a new microemulsion formulation) had better bioavailability than CsA capsules. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Neoral in children with lupus nephritis compared with conventional therapy, we performed an open randomized study on 40 children, ranging from 9 to 14 yr old, with class III-V lupus nephritis and heavy proteinuria. They were randomly assigned to either Neoral (5 mg/kg/day), administered q.12.h, or prednisolone (2 mg/kg/day) plus cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day) for 1 yr. Both groups showed a significant decrease in proteinuria (Neoral: 4.62 +/- 1.93 to 0.35 +/- 0.29 g/day, P < 0.05; prednisolone plus cyclophosphamide: 4.52 +/- 1.86 to 0.62 +/- 0.21 g/day, P < 0.01). The CH50 haemolytic assay titre decreased after 1 yr of Neoral treatment (26.5 +/- 0.9 to 21.4 +/- 2.2 U/ml, P < 0.05). Serum C3 and anti-double-stranded (ds) DNA antibody levels also fell with Neoral (C3: 86.2 +/- 6.8 to 76.3 +/- 4.5 mg/dl; anti-ds DNA antibodies: 14.1 +/- 3.2 to 8.2 +/- 1.4 IU/ml, P < 0.05). The Neoral group had a significant increase in growth rate over the prednisolone plus cyclophosphamide group (8.2 +/- 1.1 cm/yr vs 2.7 +/- 0.6 cm/yr, P < 0.01) with improvement of growth status. During the study period, patients tolerated Neoral well with no significant changes in renal function, liver function or lipid profile. Our study implies that Neoral appears to be effective in suppressing proteinuria. Neoral should be regarded as being adjunctive therapy, perhaps with a steroid-sparing effect, in paediatric lupus nephritis. However, its long-term use awaits further studies.
 ...
PMID:Clinical efficacy of cyclosporin a neoral in the treatment of paediatric lupus nephritis with heavy proteinuria. 956 80

Tacrolimus has proven to be superior to cyclosporine-Sandimmune with regard to the prevention of acute rejections, but data comparing tacrolimus with Neoral are scarce. A total of 128 consecutive renal transplant recipients was studied. The patients were treated with Neoral-based (n = 74) or tacrolimus-based (n = 54) immunosuppressive regimens. Survival analyses (Cox regression analysis) were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Renal function and cardiovascular risk profile were analyzed by means of a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) up to 12 months after transplantation. Immunological features were less favorable in the tacrolimus group. Two-year patient and graft survival were comparable. Acute-rejection-free survival was 82 % in the tacrolimus group versus 40 % in the Neoral group (P < 0.0001). The severity of the rejections (1997 Banff classification) was comparable (P = 0.43). Immunological graft loss (3.7 % vs. 12.2 %, P = 0.02) and conversion because of rejection (0 % vs. 28.4 %, P < 0.001) were less in the tacrolimus group. A higher proportion (68.5 % vs. 14.9 %, P < 0.001) was successfully put on monotherapy. Creatinine clearance, proteinuria, and fractional uric acid clearance were similar. In the tacrolimus group mean blood pressure was comparable, but patients needed less anti-hypertensive drugs (P < 0.001) and, even with fewer patients on lipid-lowering drugs, total cholesterol was lower (5.2 vs. 6.0 mmol/l, P = 0.003). Treatment for post-transplant diabetes mellitus was 18.5 % versus 10.8 % (P = 0.22). In both groups, antidiabetic medication could be withdrawn for most patients. This study indicates that tacrolimus is superior to cyclosporine-Neoral in preventing acute rejection with comparable patient and graft survival rates. Because of a lower need for treatment of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, the cardiovascular risk profile is more favorable. A considerable proportion of patients can be successfully weaned off co-medication and treated with tacrolimus monotherapy.
 ...
PMID:Single-center experience with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-Neoral in renal transplant recipients. 1179 34

A microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin (Neoral) has been developed to overcome the problems of poor and variable absorption of cyclosporin. Neoral is a potent immunosuppressive agent that is highly bound in the plasma. It has been proposed that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) delivers cyclosporin (CsA) to T-lymphocytes via the LDL receptor pathway, where it produces its therapeutic effects. Herein, we report a case of minimal change nephrotic syndrome with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated by Neoral and fluvastatin. A 65-year-old male with a 10-year history of type 2 diabetes mellitus suddenly developed nephrotic syndrome. The potential causative drugs, such as NSAIDs and antibiotics, had not been administered. The laboratory findings were as follows: proteinuria 23 g/day, serum albumin 1.9 g/dl, total cholesterol 629 mg/dl, LDL-Cho 1,930 mg/dl. Renal biopsy was normal on light microscopy, and immunofluorescence demonstrated no staining. Due to the risk of deterioration of diabetes by administering prednisolone, he was given Neoral at 2.0 mg/kg/day. He was also given fluvastatin (40 mg/day) for hyperlipidemia after the renal biopsy. At four weeks after the start of Neoral and fluvastatin, his nephrosis continued, but his LDL-Cho and total cholesterol decreased. At six weeks after treatment, proteinuria gradually reduced. At eight weeks after treatment, the proteinuria had disappeared. Nephrotic syndrome is often associated with abnormal lipid metabolism, and many patients with nephrotic syndrome show high levels of LDL-Cho. It has been reported recently that LDL apheresis is effective against nephrotic syndrome. However, in the present case, it can be speculated that the improvement of hyperlipidemia by fluvastatin probably augmented the effect of Neoral, presumably through the increased cellular uptake of Neoral. This suggests that fluvastatin may be considered as the treatment of choice for the disturbed lipoprotein profile in patients with nephrotic syndrome.
 ...
PMID:[Complete remission of minimal change nephrotic syndrome with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated by microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin and fluvastatin]. 1197 50

This observational study was undertaken in maintenance renal transplant recipients to assess the relationship between cyclosporine C(2) and the long-term risk of chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD). Pharmacokinetic profiling was undertaken twice yearly in 79 patients with stable graft function receiving cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids. Mean time since transplantation at study entry was 56 +/- 49 months posttransplant. At the end of the observational period (mean 43 +/- 14 months) 24 patients (30%) had developed CRAD, defined as proteinuria > 500 mg/24 hours associated with a rising serum creatinine and confirmed by graft biopsy. There were no significant differences at baseline between patients who did vs did not develop CRAD, except for reduced incidence of acute rejection in CRAD-free patients. The cyclosporine AUC was significantly higher among patients without CRAD (5707 ng. h/mL vs 3994 ng. h/mL, P =.0007). Mean C(2) was also significantly higher: 1001 ng/mL in the CRAD-free group versus 640 ng/mL in the CRAD group (P =.002). There was no significant difference in C(0). Regression analysis showed that the best predictors for the occurrence of CRAD were a low AUC (relative risk [RR] 1.54, P <.0001), a low C(2) (RR 1.30, P <.0001) and proteinuria (RR 4.95, P <.0001). Probability of freedom from CRAD was 90% for C(2) > 900 ng/mL. C(2) appears to be a superior strategy to C(0) monitoring of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients with regard to the risk of CRAD. C(2) values above 900 ng/mL are appropriate to minimize the risk of CRAD among patients receiving cyclosporine microemulsion and steroids.
 ...
PMID:Long-term predictive value of cyclosporine microemulsion C2 level for chronic renal allograft dysfunction. 1469 31

The Mycophenolate Steroids Sparing (MYSS) study found that in renal transplant recipients who were on immunosuppressive therapy with the cyclosporine microemulsion Neoral, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was not better than azathioprine in preventing acute rejection at 21 mo after transplantation and was 15 times more expensive. The MYSS Follow-up Study, an extension of MYSS, was aimed at comparing long-term outcome of 248 MYSS patients according to their original randomization to MMF (1 g twice daily) or azathioprine (75 to 100 mg/d). Primary outcome was estimated GFR at 5 yr after transplantation. Mean 5-yr GFR difference between azathioprine and mycophenolate was 4.67 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.43 to 9.77 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.07). GFR from month 6 (mean +/- SEM: 54.3 +/- 1.6 versus 53.9 +/- 1.5 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.83) to month 72 after transplantation (49.5 +/- 2.2 versus 47.3 +/- 2.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.50); GFR slopes (mean +/- SEM: -1.10 +/- 0.56 versus -1.23 +/- 0.31 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year; P = 0.83); and 72-mo patient mortality (4.0 versus 4.0% [P = 0.95]; HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.28 to 3.31; P = 0.95), graft loss (6.8 versus 6.1% [P = 0.82]; HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.32 to 2.46; P = 0.83), incidence of persistent proteinuria (25.0 versus 27.4%; P = 0.72), late (>6 mo after transplantation) rejections (25.3 versus 21.2%; P = 0.53), and adverse events were similar on azathioprine (n = 124) and MMF (n = 124), respectively. Outcomes in the two groups were comparable also among patients with or without steroid therapy, considered separately. In kidney transplantation, the long-term risk/benefit profile of MMF and azathioprine therapy in combination with cyclosporine Neoral is similar. In view of the cost, standard immunosuppression regimens for kidney transplantation should perhaps include azathioprine rather than MMF.
 ...
PMID:Mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of chronic allograft dysfunction in renal transplantation: the MYSS follow-up randomized, controlled clinical trial. 1772 86

Because corticosteroids have adverse metabolic effects, inducing bone-mineral imbalance and contributing to infections among renal transplant recipients, many withdrawal trials have been attempted to reduce adverse events and improve quality of life. We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of late steroid withdrawal, after the first posttransplant year, among a selected group of kidney allograft recipients. In 42 low immunological risk allograft recipients, among 382 patients transplanted during a decade, corticosteroids were progressively reduced and completely withdrawn. The evolution of clinical and biochemical parameters after the withdrawal were analyzed. Corticosteroid withdrawal was performed as a mean of 52.16 +/- 28.41 months posttransplant, with subsequent follow-up without steroid treatment of 18.13 +/- 16.11 months. Comparing the most recent evaluation with the data previous to steroid withdrawal, patients showed a significant decreases in diastolic pressure (P = .039), total cholesterol (P = .000), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (P = .039), but not in triglyceride levels (P = .33). Body weight did not change (P = .77), but increased fasting glucose levels were noted (P = .03), in absence of new diagnosed diabetes mellitus. A significant reduction in cyclosporine Neoral (P = .01) or tacrolimus doses were detected (P = .01). At the last visit, serum creatinine in the whole group remained stable (P = .06). Only five patients showed an increase in serum creatinine more than 20% (from 1.44 +/- 0.41 to 1.94 +/- 0.45 mg/dL P = .04) and proteinuria did not increase (P = .94). No patient was diagnosed with a rejection episodes or required corticosteroid resumption. Graft and patient survivals were 100% at the end of follow-up. In conclusion, our data showed that late corticosteroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients of low immunological risk is safe and is followed by an improvement in their metabolic profile and in blood pressure.
 ...
PMID:Benefits derivated from late steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients. 1788 28