Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Diabetic nephropathy is a major cause of chronic renal failure. The evidence available indicates that renal hemodynamics are altered in clinical and experimental diabetes mellitus. In these circumstances, an increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is associated with albuminuria and eventually with glomerulosclerosis. We studied the renal and hemodynamic effects of long-term treatment (5 months) using an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (trandolapril, 0.7 mg/g b.w. per day) and a calcium antagonist (verapamil, 20 mg/g b.w. per day), and the combination of the two (veratran) at the same dose, on streptozotocin-diabetic uninephrectomized rats. A moderate degree of hyperglycemia (2-4 g/l) was maintained with daily insulin. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured monthly using the tail-cuff method. Determinations were made of urinary protein excretion, creatinine clearance, urinary electrolyte excretion and, at the end of treatment, renal and cardiac hypertrophy. MAP was similar in control and untreated diabetic rats. Trandolapril and veratran reduced MAP whereas verapamil alone had no effect on these animals. All groups showed a slight proteinuria that increased with verapamil treatment. The GFR of diabetic animals was higher than in the control group (mainly the first 2 months), except for veratran group, in which it was similar to the control value. Urinary electrolyte excretion increased in all diabetic groups with no significant differences among them. Veratran induced a protective effect against cardiac hypertrophy. None of the treatments affected renal hypertrophy. It is concluded that in a murine model of diabetes without hypertension or proteinuria, a combination of verapamil and trandolapril prevents hyperfiltration whereas verapamil alone increases proteinuria.
 ...
PMID:Renal effects of antihypertensive therapy in uninephrectomized diabetic rats. 944 Jan 38

The effects of the addition of a calcium channel blocker, verapamil (20 mg/kg/day) to an ACE inhibitor, trandolapril (0.7 mg/kg/day) in a 6-month treatment on renal insufficiency development in rats with 5/6th nephrectomy, were studied. Every month we measured heart rate and arterial pressure by the tail-cuff method. Renal function studies were performed in metabolic cages. At the end of the study, renal tissue was prepared for light microscope analysis. Renal lesions were assessed by semiquantitative scores in a blind fashion. Corpuscular section area, intraglomerular and tubulointerstitial fibrosis were determined by digital image analysis with a specific software (Fibrosis HR) on syrium red-stained renal sections. Trandolapril markedly increased the survival ratio that after 6 months reached 87% in comparison with 61% in untreated rats. No mortality was observed in rats treated with the combination of verapamil and trandolapril. Trandolapril treatment prevented the development of hypertension. The combination verapamil-trandolapril did not induce further reduction on blood pressure. The untreated group showed a marked proteinuria, that in the trandolapril group showed an important reduction. The verapamil + trandolapril group showed a proteinuria significantly smaller than that of all the other groups. Light microscopy semiquantitative studies of the renal injury showed that the trandolapril and verapamil + trandolapril groups had a marked reduction in glomerular and tubulointerstitial alterations, compared with untreated animals. Quantitative determinations of glomerular and interstitial fibrosis performed on syrium red-stained renal sections demonstrated that fibrosis was reduced when rats when treated with trandolapril and even more with verapamil + trandolapril when they were compared to untreated animals' values. In conclusion, long-term treatment with verapamil given in addition to trandolapril produces additional protection against progressive renal injury associated to subtotal nephrectomy.
 ...
PMID:Beneficial effect of the long-term treatment with the combination of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker on renal injury in rats with 5/6 nephrectomy. 952 72

Trandolapril is a newly developed angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) whose characteristic is that it undergoes hepatic excretion. ACEI appears to have a specific reno-protective and antiproteinuric role in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis(CGN). Although renally excreted ACEI tend to accumulate and cause side-effects in patients with renal dysfunction, the pharmacokinetics of trandolapril were not affected by renal dysfunction. We compared the effect of other renally excreted ACEI with those of trandolapril on serum creatinine (s-Cr), creatinine clearance(Ccr), proteinuria and total protein(TP) in CGN patients who switched from another ACEI to trandolapril. Twelve hypertensive patients with chronic renal failure(nine males and three females, ranging from 30 to 72 years of age) who were treated by other renally excreted ACEIs for long periods(2 to 8 years) with some effects on proteinuria and renal function, were enrolled in the present study. After ACEI therapy, s-Cr had decreased(2.09 to 1.80 mg/dl, p < 0.01) as well as proteinuria(1.65 to 0.71 g/day, p < 0.01). A single daily oral dose of 1 mg of trandolapril was administered to these patients regardless of their blood pressure status and renal functions. After change to trandolapril therapy, s-Cr(2.25 to 2.06 mg/dl, p < 0.01) and urinary protein(1.82 to 1.34 g/day, p < 0.05) significantly decreased. On the contrary, both Ccr and TP significantly increased at the level of 39.4 to 44.4 ml/min(p < 0.05) and 6.80 to 7.02 g/dl (p < 0.01), respectively. No apparent side effects, such as hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, anemia or worsening of the existing renal dysfunction except for coughing, were observed in these patients. Furthermore, none of the 12 patients treated with trandolapril required discontinuation of the compound. In conclusion, it was shown from this study that trandolapril is effective for the treatment of hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency irrespective of the original diseases. Thus, it can be envisaged that trandolapril is one of the most appropriate agents compared to other renally excreted ACEI for these patients with renal insufficiency. We recommend the change from other ACEIs to trandolapril, when renal dysfunction might be due to ACEI accumulation.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical effects of trandolapril in chronic glomerulonephritis patients with renal insufficiency]. 1089 92

Fixed verapamil SR/trandolapril combinations 180/1 mg and 180/2 mg (Tarka, Knoll AG) have a significantly superior antihypertensive effect compared to equal dosages of either agent alone. Verapamil SR/trandolapril 180/2 mg combination produces the best dose-response ratio of different dose combinations of these two drugs. Combination therapy has the most pronounced effect on blunting the early morning rise in blood pressure. Thus, verapamil SR/trandolapril combination therapy may be an appropriate treatment option in patients with moderate essential hypertension, particularly in those who have a tendency toward the early morning rise in blood pressure. The adverse effect profile of the fixed combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril includes the typical side effects of its monocompounds. The fixed combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril is also effective and safe in the treatment of hypertension in the elderly. The fixed low-dose combination therapy with verapamil SR/trandolapril 180/2 mg is a suitable treatment option for patients with moderate essential hypertension and Type 2 diabetes mellitus, because it improves parameters of carbohydrate metabolism and uricaemia and does not alter the lipid profile. The insulin-sensitising effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor monotherapy with its theoretical risk of hypoglycaemia is completely neutralised in the combination with verapamil SR. Comparative studies have shown that the low-dose combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril may be a suitable alternative to combinations containing a thiazide diuretic or a beta-blocking agent for the long-term management of hypertensive patients for whom combination therapy is indicated. The combination of an ACE inhibitor with a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker reduces proteinuria to a greater extent than either agent alone. A combination of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker may provide additional benefit in inducing the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Combination therapy leads to a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction, improvement of wall motion index and increases exercise duration time in patients with coronary heart disease and left heart failure. It also improves the ratio of exercise to rest rate-pressure product and decreases the number of angina attacks. These findings support the hypothesis that the combination of verapamil and trandolapril might be useful in patients with attenuated left ventricular function and angina pectoris. Thus, Tarka is an effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive agent with a good safety profile and positive metabolic effects.
 ...
PMID:The fixed combination of verapamil SR/trandolapril. 1124 35

The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of the ACE-1, Trandolapril, alone or with Verapamil on blood pressure, albuminuria and metabolic profile in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension and albuminuria. It was an open multicenter, consecutive and prospective study conducted in 281 patients. There was a four-week wash-out period of antihypertensive drugs, after which we carried out a measurement over a 24-h period of the urinary excretion of albumina (UEA). Blood pressure was recorded after at least 5 minutes of rest in the sitting position at 1 to 3 minute intervals with a mercury sphygmomanometer in good condition. Average BP was obtained from three consecutive readings. Within treatment changes were analysed using descriptive statistics and t-tests on the change from baseline. Analysis of variance, chi-square and Mc Nemar tests were also used. If after 8 weeks of treatment with Trandolapril 2 mg o.q.d. the patients were non-responders (mean blood pressure reduction of 5 mmHg or less) or their blood pressure remained uncontrolled (blood pressure > or = 140/90 mmHg), Verapamil 180 mg o.q.d. was added. Two hundred and thirty patients completed the 12 weeks study. Population included 157 (55.9%) males with an average of 61.7 +/- 9.2 years. Baseline measurements were systolic 165.4 +/- 14.6 and diastolic 94.8 +/- 8.5 mmHg blood pressures, fasting glucose 162.7 +/- 43.9 mg/dL, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) 6.8 +/- 1.2%, and albuminuria 520.9 +/- 602 mg/day. UEA fell significantly (p < 0.001) after treatment to 177.9 +/- 24.3 mg/day (CI 95%, 129.9 to 225.8). The percent reduction reached 29.6%. Albuminuria was lower than 30 mg/day in 47 patients. Blood pressure was completely controlled in 125 (54%) patients. Glucemia fell significantly (p < 0.001) to 153.2 +/- 42.7 mg/dL, and the HbAlc to 6.5 +/- 1.3% (p = 0.012). In summary, in those diabetic type 2 patients with arterial hypertension and proteinuria, Trandolapril alone or associated with Verapamil significant lowered albuminuria and blood pressure facilitated the control or their metabolic profile.
 ...
PMID:[The effect of trandolapril, in monotherapy and associated with verapamil, on arterial pressure, albuminuria, and metabolic control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria]. 1179 14

In well designed studies in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, combinations of the sustained-release (SR) formulation of the nondihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist verapamil 120 to 240 mg/day and the ACE inhibitor trandolapril 0.5 to 8 mg/day were significantly more effective in reducing sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline than placebo. In most randomised studies, combinations of verapamil SR 120 to 240 mg/day and trandolapril 0.5 to 8 mg/day were significantly more effective in lowering sitting DBP and SBP than the corresponding monotherapies administered at the same dosage. Trandolapril/verapamil SR 2/180 mg/day provided significantly more effective 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) control than of the corresponding monotherapies. Moreover, trandolapril/verapamil SR reduced BP in patients inadequately controlled with either of the corresponding monotherapies. The antihypertensive efficacy of trandolapril/verapamil SR 2/180 mg/day was generally similar to that of other combinations of antihypertensive agents (metoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol/chlorthalidone, lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide, enalapril/hydrochlorothiazide) in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trandolapril/verapamil SR reduced BP in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes or primary renal disease, Black patients and elderly patients. Trandolapril/verapamil SR was more effective than the individual components administered as monotherapy in reducing proteinuria in patients with type 2 diabetes or primary renal disease. Trandolapril/verapamil SR had a neutral or beneficial effect on metabolic parameters (glucose, insulin, lipids) in patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes. Trandolapril/verapamil SR preserved left ventricular function in patients with heart failure. Fewer cardiac events occurred after therapy with trandolapril/verapamil SR than after trandolapril alone in post-myocardial infarction patients with congestive heart failure. The incidence of adverse events in recipients of trandolapril/verapamil SR was similar to that of the individual components, and that of other combination therapies. In placebo-controlled trials conducted in the US, headache, upper respiratory tract infections, cough, constipation, atrioventricular block (first degree) and dizziness were the most commonly reported adverse events in recipients of combinations of verapamil SR (120 to 240 mg/day) and trandolapril (0.5 to 8 mg/day). In conclusion, the fixed-dose combination of trandolapril/verapamil SR is an effective treatment for patients with hypertension, including those with type 2 diabetes. Trandolapril/verapamil SR tended to be more effective than monotherapy with either verapamil SR or trandolapril, and generally showed antihypertensive efficacy similar to that of other combination antihypertensive therapies. Current data support the use of trandolapril/verapamil SR as an alternative treatment when monotherapy with either agent is not effective. Data from large clinical trials currently being conducted will assist in fully defining the role of trandolapril/verapamil SR as a cardio- and renoprotective agent.
 ...
PMID:Fixed combination trandolapril/verapamil sustained-release: a review of its use in essential hypertension. 1242 Nov 12

Trandolapril is a well known angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with many cardiovascular (CV) indications. The objectives of this article are to review the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties of trandolapril and to focus on its clinical relevance in cardiovascular medicine. Various populations have been studied in large clinical trials including patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), diabetics, patients with hypertension (HTN), stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and prevention of proteinuria. Long-term treatment with trandolapril in patients with reduced left ventricular function soon after AMI significantly reduced the risk of overall mortality, mortality from CV causes, sudden death, and the development of severe CHF. Treatment with trandolapril after AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction appears to be of considerable importance in patients with diabetes mellitus by saving lives and substantially reducing the risk of progression to severe CHF as well. Moreover, trandolapril reduces progression to proteinuria in high-risk patients. Some of the advantages of trandolapril over other ACE inhibitors are the wide spectrum of patient populations studied, the well established dosage and its proven trough-to-peak effect ratios permitting a safe once-a-day administration.
 ...
PMID:Update on the use of trandolapril in the management of cardiovascular disorders. 1933 28