Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (
proteinuria
)
24,015
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
A 59-year-old male patient developed a necrotizing ulceration on the right shin. Both clinical and histopathologic examinations suggested pyoderma gangrenosum. After temporary improvement of skin symptoms under peroral glucocorticoid treatment, a hemorrhagic-purulent discharge started from the nose, he began to have fever, malaise,
cough
, and a chest X-ray revealed inflammation in the lung. Cerebral CT and MRI disclosed midline bone loss within the nasal septum and granulomatosus tissue masses protruding into the right orbit. The c-ANCA test was positive, serum IgA was elevated, and he had microhaematuria and
proteinuria
. In this severe case of Wegener's granulomatosis prolonged methylprednisone and cyclophosphamide treatment was initiated. Both the skin symptoms and the granulomatosus infiltrations resolved.
...
PMID:Wegener's granulomatosis presenting as pyoderma gangrenosum. 1463 9
The development of drugs which block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been proven a major advance in cardiovascular medicine. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which block the formation of angiotensin II from the inactive angiotensin I, are widely used as first line treatment in hypertension, heart failure and diabetic nephropathy. More recently, selective antagonists of the angiotensin type-1 receptor (AT1R) have become available for clinical use. Accumulating evidence suggests that AT1R antagonists have similar effects to ACE inhibitors in hypertension, heart failure and diabetic nephropathy. Although ACE inhibitors and AT1R antagonists block the same system, experimental evidence suggest that their mechanisms of action differ in several respects, such as increased bradykinin and angiotensin 1-7 levels with ACE inhibitors and AT2R activation with AT1R antagonists. Nevertheless, the clinical significance of these differences remains largely unknown and, in practice, the only clear advantage of AT1R antagonists over ACE inhibitors is the absence of
cough
as a side effect. Recent clinical data suggest that combined ACE inhibition and AT1R antagonism offer additive effects in reducing blood pressure in hypertension, in reducing
proteinuria
in nephropathy and in improving prognosis in heart failure. Further evidence suggests that some hypertensive patients may have a good antihypertensive response with ACE inhibition but not with AT1R antagonism, or the reverse. These data suggest that these two drug classes have important similarities, because they act on the same system, but they also appear to have important differences, which are not only of theoretical but also of clinical importance.
...
PMID:Renin-angiotensin system blockade at the level of the angiotensin converting enzyme or the angiotensin type-1 receptor: similarities and differences. 1496 13
A 41-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of fever and polyarthralgia. A diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was made based on the findings of polyarthritis, leukocytopenia, lymphocytopenia,
proteinuria
, and positive reactions for antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-double strand (ds)DNA antibody. She had also been suffering from a pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection with such symptoms as
cough
and sputum for the past 3 years. Antimicrobial drugs for MAC infection were administered first, and later she was given cyclophosphamide pulse therapy, consisting of methylprednisolone (8 mg/day) and mizoribine (100 mg/day). Owing to these therapeutic regimens, SLE was successfully treated without an exacerbation of the MAC infection. The risk factors for MAC infection and SLE are also discussed.
...
PMID:A patient with a Mycobacterium avium complex infection complicated by systemic lupus erythematosus. 1499 19
The primary aim of this study was evaluation of the efficacy of telmisartan (angiotensin II receptor blocker- AT(1) blocker) on blood pressure in 10 patients with renal impairment in moderate or advanced stages of renal insufficiency and not dependent on haemodialysis. Its effect on
proteinuria
, renal function (represented by serum urea, creatinine, glomerular filtration), evaluation of overall therapy compliance in comparison with a previously prescribed angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) were secondary aims. Considering the presence of left ventricle hypertrophy in all patients as a marker of hypertensive cardiopathy, the effect of telmisartan therapy on non-invasive cardiovascular parameters (ECG, echocardiography, and assessment of heart rate variability-HRV) was also evaluated. The study group involved 10 hypertensive patients (6 women, 4 men) with diabetic and non-diabetic renal impairment,
proteinuria
above 1 g/24 hours, hypertensive cardiopathy and intolerance of ACEI (
cough
). Telmisartan was added to their long-term antihypertensive combination therapy in a dose of 40 mg for the first 14 days, after which the dose increased to the maximal of 80 mg. The average initial daytime systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 149 +/- 19.7 mm Hg, average night-time SBP 145 +/- 23.0 mm Hg, average initial daytime diastolic BP (DBP) 90.6 +/- 2.5 mm Hg, night-time DBP 88.9 +/- 13.5 mm Hg. Average initial serum creatinine was 207.2 +/- 48.5 micromol/l, urea 15.1 +/- 4.4 mmol/l, GF 0.5 +/- 0.1 ml/s. Echocardiography revealed left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy with well preserved systolic and moderately impaired diastolic LV function. Also the HRV assessment revealed impaired neurovegetative (e.g. sympathovagal) balance. After 1 year of combination therapy with telmisartan, there was a clearly significant reduction in both SBP and DBP in both day and night-time (SBP daytime 149.6 vs.116.6 mm Hg, night-time 145.8 vs. 129.5 mm Hg; DBP daytime 90.6 vs. 83.5 mm Hg, night-time 88.9 vs. 79.3 mm Hg) and
proteinuria
(2.37 vs. 1.27 g/24 hour, p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in serum creatinine, urea values, and LV functions. On the other hand, further progression of the sympathovagal balance impairment was noted (continuing reduction of HRV in 9 from 10 patients), which can be described as the priority finding. The total compliance of telmisartan therapy was very good and without adverse clinical side effects. In conclusion - telmisartan reduces blood pressure and
proteinuria
safely and effectively in patients with various types of nephropathy in moderate or advanced stages of renal insufficiency.
...
PMID:Telmisartan in the treatment of hypertension in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. 1552 50
This article presents clinical data which suggest that the current dosage of losartan 50 to 100 mg/day may not be the optimum in many cases, especially if used as monotherapy in the treatment of
proteinuria
and we may have to increase to 200 mg/day. However, about 30% of patients cannot take angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) because of the side effect of
cough
. To potentiate the anti-proteinuric effect of losartan, especially for patients who do not adhere to a low salt diet, a 12.5-mg dose of hydro-chlorothiazide may further decrease
proteinuria
. The main message of this article is that we would have to, in many instances, increase the dose of losartan to a minimum of 100 mg/day or 100 mg twice a day for some patients for optimal therapy. The second message is to monitor the creatinine clearance test (CCT) and to start therapy when CCT is reduced and not wait for serum creatinine to rise to abnormal levels (renal impairment) before starting therapy. The first group involves half a dozen patients with hypertension but no
proteinuria
. Therapy with losartan is shown to improve the renal function. This data suggest that losartan, apart from its use in reduction of
proteinuria
, can be used in patients with mild renal impairment without
proteinuria
to reverse the mild renal impairment and preserve renal function. The second group deals with 3 patients with low creatinine clearance. After a followup period of an average of 3 years, they all developed renal impairment. In another 6 patients, the data suggest that we should perhaps treat patients with low CCT as soon as possible and with dose ranging from 100 to 200 mg/day if necessary, to derive maximum beneficial effect. The third group highlights 5 patients with high CCT due to glomerular hyperfiltration. With time, the high CCT decreases and renal impairment sets in. The data suggest that patients with high CCT should be treated early to prevent renal impairment. The fourth group illustrates 6 patients where their
proteinuria
was markedly reduced with the increase of losartan from 100 mg/day to 200 mg/day, suggesting that losartan 200 mg/day is probably the optimum dose. In conclusion, apart from its traditional usage in reduction of
proteinuria
to retard progression to renal failure, the data suggest that losartan is also indicated in patients with renal impairment in the absence of
proteinuria
; patients with low CCT, patients with high CCT and patients who do not respond to a dosage of 100 mg/day should have the dosage increased to 100 mg twice daily to increase efficacy of losartan. It is hoped that with these new and earlier indications as well as increased dosage of losartan starting with 100 mg, whenever possible, and increasing to 200 mg/day, if there is no response, we can prevent more patients from developing renal failure. Based on these observations, further randomised controlled trials should be designed to address these issues.
...
PMID:ATRA therapy restores normal renal function and renal reserve and prevents renal failure. 1572 20
Agents that interfere with the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reduce
proteinuria
and afford renal protection. The combination of different measures that serve maximization of RAS blockade is thought to improve the antiproteinuric efficacy. The feasibility and the efficacy of such a combination strategy were studied in nondiabetic patients with residual
proteinuria
during previous RAS blockade by individual antiproteinuric titration. Previous medication was replaced by irbesartan 300 mg combined with a diuretic. Lisinopril was added in increasing doses until a maximal dose of 40 mg/d. Titration stopped when target
proteinuria
(< 1 g/d) was reached or further dose titration was not tolerated because of side effects. Residual proteinuria (median, 3.2 g/d; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 5.2 g/d) was significantly reduced with 55.6% (95% confidence interval, 16.0 to 73.2%; P < 0.02) on the maximal additional tolerated dose of lisinopril. The maximal dose of lisinopril was 10 mg in two of eight, 20 mg in two of eight, 30 mg in one of eight, and 40 mg in three of eight patients. At this dose, target
proteinuria
of < 1 g/d was reached in two of eight patients. The number of patients with adverse events during dose titration was five of eight patients: two had
cough
; two had hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mmol/L), one of whom had > 50% increase of serum creatinine; and one had dizziness. In conclusion, individual titration for maximal RAS blockade, entailing dose titration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on top of high-dose angiotensin II antagonists with diuretic, induces further reduction of residual
proteinuria
. However, this occurs at the expense of adverse events. To further improve renoprotective treatment strategies, it is important to explore other modes of antiproteinuric intervention in patients with residual
proteinuria
during RAS blockade.
...
PMID:Individual titration for maximal blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in proteinuric patients: a feasible strategy? 1593 35
We retrospectively reviewed 34 consecutive patients with serologically confirmed leptospirosis admitted during years 1992-2002. Nine patients (26.5%) had respiratory symptoms on admission including
cough
(n = 4), shortness of breath (n = 4), cyanosis (n = 2), and hemoptysis (n = 1). Six patients had pulmonary radiographic findings including (1) diffuse, ill-defined, ground-glass density (n = 3); (2) diffuse alveolar opacities (n = 2); and (3) small nodular density (n = 1). Male/female ratio was 8/1 and mean age was 47 years. Seven patients reported their exposure source including hunting (n = 2), fishing (n = 2), fresh water swimming (n = 2), and canoeing (n = 1). All patients had fever (mean = 40.1 degrees C). Other common symptoms were headache (n = 4), vomiting (n = 3), and myalgia (n = 3). Biological abnormalities included elevated liver enzymes (n = 8),
proteinuria
(n = 7), lymphopenia (n = 6), hematuria (n = 5), renal failure (n = 4), anemia (n = 4), and elevated neutrophil count (n = 4). PaO(2 )was measured for 3 patients while they were breathing room air (32, 55, and 66 mmHg). Suspected diagnosis on admission included leptospirosis (n = 2), bacterial pneumonia (n = 2), intoxication, influenza, viral hepatitis, biliary tract lithiasis, and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (one patient each). The first serologic testing for leptospirosis was positive for 5 patients (55%). Serovar was presumptively identified for 7 patients: Australis (n = 3), Grippotyphosa (n = 2), and Icterohaemorrhagiae (n = 2). Seven patients were treated with penicillin; two patients received no antibiotics. All patients were cured. In conclusion, patients with leptospirosis may present predominantly with nonspecific pulmonary symptoms. In these patients, leptospirosis must be suspected when there is a potential exposure to rats, especially in case of high-grade fever, myalgia, hepatitis, and renal abnormalities.
...
PMID:Respiratory manifestations of leptospirosis: a retrospective study. 1621 64
This randomized, prospective, two-arm clinical study evaluated the antiproteinuric and nephroprotective effects and the safety of treatment with an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (irbesartan) in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN) as compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIls). A total of 50 patients with CGN diagnosed by renal biopsy and protein levels in 24-hour urine higher than 1 g were enrolled. All patients received treatment for at least 24 months, 27 in group 1 (irbesartan) and 23 in group 2 (ACEs). A significant decrease in
proteinuria
(p < 0.001) was seen in both groups (49.2% in group, 1, and 44.8% in group 2) since the third month, and confirmed at 12 and 24 months of follow-up (58.1% and 62.7% in group 1, and 56.8% and 55.4% in group 2, respectively), with no significant differences being seen between the two groups. No differences were found in blood pressure control. No significant decrease was found in any of the groups in the glomerular filtration rate, but this showed higher values in the group treated with ACEIs (2.98 +/- 7.77 vs 1.64 +/- 6.84 ml/min/year), though the difference with irbersartan was not statistically significant. No side effects occurred among patients treated with irbesartan, whereas three patients initially treated with ACEIs showed intolerance (
cough
). In conclusion, irbesartan showed in our study an antiproteinuric and nephroprotective effect similar to ACEIs in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis, and its administration was also shown to be safe.
...
PMID:[Effect of irbesartan in proteinuric non-diabetic renal disease]. 1639
Drugs that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA) are gaining increasing popularity as initial medications for the management of hypertensive patients. In the year 2002, ACE-I were the most commonly prescribed drugs for the treatment of hypertension in USA. Although their antihypertensive efficacy as monotherapy is similar to other antihypertensive agents, they have the advantage of better tolerability, limited side effects and a favorable metabolic profile. When compared to other antihypertensive agents (diuretics, beta-adrenergic blockers and calcium antagonists) in large clinical trials, ACE-I and ARA provided no additional advantages regarding improvement in cardiovascular and total mortality. With the exception of the superiority of ARA in prevention of stroke, RAS inhibitors have no advantage over other agents in prevention of other cardiovascular morbid events, namely, heart failure (though ACE-I are superior to calcium antagonists), coronary heart disease and total cardiovascular events. However, there is the possibility that these agents have other benefits beyond blood pressure lowering. At equal degrees of blood pressure reduction, RAS inhibitors prevent or delay the development of diabetes mellitus and provide better end-organ protection, kidneys, blood vessels and the heart when compared with other antihypertensive agents. The combined use of ACE-I and ARA is particularly useful in organ protection. RAS inhibitors are specifically indicated in the treatment of hypertension in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function, diabetes,
proteinuria
, impaired kidney function, myocardial infarction, multiple cardiovascular risk factors and possibly elderly patients. The main limitation of the ACE-I is
cough
and rarely angioedema. Elderly patients or those who are volume depleted or receiving large doses of diuretics or in heart failure are liable to develop hypotensive reaction and/or deterioration in kidney function.
...
PMID:RAS inhibition in hypertension. 1639 19
The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system plays a key role in the regulation of fluid and electrolyte balance. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) inhibit angiotensin II type 1 receptors and large clinical trials have shown that they are effective in many cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, heart failure, myocardial infarction and diabetic nephropathy. They lower blood pressure effectively, are very well tolerated and can be used as monotherapy or in combination with other drug classes for the treatment of hypertension. ARBs are particularly suitable for hypertensive patients with co-morbidities such as diabetes, microalbuminuria,
proteinuria
, left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure. Unlike angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ARBs do not cause persistent dry
cough
. For patients in whom angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are indicated but not tolerated, an ARB should be considered. Periodic monitoring of renal function and electrolytes is required in patients treated with an ARB.
...
PMID:Therapeutic potential of angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension. 1673 15
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Next >>