Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In a serological survey among Dutch patients suspected of leptospirosis, using a recently developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, a patient was traced with a high antibody titre to Hantaan virus. No anti-leptospira antibodies were detected in this 27-year-old man. Shortly before he had been admitted to the hospital with progressive dyspnoea and coughing, accompanied with high fever. An interstitial pneumonia was diagnosed. He subsequently developed a progressive renal failure with proteinuria and polyuria. Later a liver failure accompanied with thrombocytopenia, anaemia and coagulation disturbances occurred. Before an aetiological diagnosis was made, the patient was treated with erythromycin. The patient eventually recovered completely. Based on the clinical symptoms and the positive serology, it was concluded that the disease diagnosed had probably been caused by a Hantaan virus infection. The diagnostic value of Hantaan virus serology in patients with similar symptoms is stressed.
 ...
PMID:[Another case of Hantaan virus infection in The Netherlands]. 257 78

In view of the pharmacological and chemical reasons for using ACE-inhibitors to treat diabetic hypertension, a group of 40 outpatients were treated with Enalapril. The sample consisted of 20 outpatients, 6 males, 14 females aged 48-76 (mean age 63.75), 18 of whom had type II and 2 type I diabetes and 11 under treatment by diet and hypoglycaemic drugs or insulin. All these patients presented slight or moderate essential arterial hypertension (diastolic pressure less than 115 mmHg). For about one year 17 of the patients were given 20 mg/die Enalapril and the remaining three 10 mg/die in a single morning dose. In 16 cases no other treatment was given. In 4 a non-potassium conserving diuretic was also given. Check-ups before six months into and at the end of treatment showed: a statistically significant reduction in systolic (p less than 0.05) and diastolic (p less than 0.01) pressure. In contrast no significant change was noted in heart beat, glycaemia before or after meals, body weight, glycosylated haemoglobin or any other blood chemical parameter considered. In one case only there was a slight increase in proteinuria that was however present at the start of treatment. As far as side effects are concerned there was one case of cardiac palmus during treatment and one case of coughing that regressed totally when treatment was suspended but nothing else of significance. It should be noted that the antidiabetic treatment remained unchanged throughout the period considered in most cases and at most was subjected to minimal qualitative and quantitative adjustments.
 ...
PMID:[Prolonged treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients with enalapril. 1-year follow-up]. 282 79

Lisinopril is a new, nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor approved for the treatment of hypertension. After oral administration, 25-29 percent of the dose is absorbed intact; biotransformation is not required for pharmacological activity. Onset of action occurs one to two hours after administration, with effects still present 24 hours later. The major route of elimination is through renal excretion and an elimination half-life of 12.6 hours has been reported in normotensive individuals. In patients with impaired renal function (creatinine clearance less than or equal to 30 ml/min) a longer half-life and accumulation have been observed. Lisinopril 20-80 mg/d has been shown to be as effective as hydrochlorothiazide, nifedipine, and beta-blocking agents in the treatment of essential hypertension. Its efficacy in renovascular hypertension has also been demonstrated. In congestive heart failure (CHF) doses of 2.5-20 mg/d appear to provide hemodynamic effects comparable to those of captopril. Dizziness and cough have been the most frequently reported side effects; rash and proteinuria have also been reported in a small number of patients. Interactions with diuretics, potassium supplements, and possibly with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents may occur. Lisinopril appears to be similar in efficacy to other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of essential hypertension and to captopril in the treatment of CHF. Whether lisinopril is safer or more effective than captopril or enalapril in the treatment of hypertension or CHF requires further investigation. Prolonged duration of action of lisinopril allows once daily dosing, unlike captopril for which dosing is required every 8-12 hours or enalapril which may necessitate twice daily dosing.
 ...
PMID:Lisinopril: a new angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. 283 26

A collective, multicentre (Ljubljana, Split, Zagreb) comparison of the antihypertensive effects between two angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) captopril and enalapril was made in 69 hypertensives of both sexes, having a diastolic blood pressure (DBP), following two weeks on a placebo, of between 110 and 130 mm Hg (14.7 and 17.3 kPa). There were 35 patients on enalapril (20-40 mg), and 34 on captopril (50-100 mg). Both drugs under study decreased significantly the mean DBP already after the first week of ACEI treatment (p less than 0.001). By the end of the trial (9th week) captopril had decreased the DBP in the supine position from the initial 180.3 +/- 15.3/117.7 +/- 6.4 mm Hg to 151.6 +/- 11.1/96.8 +/- 7.2 mm Hg. Enalapril had lowered the DBP more efficiently: from 182.7 +/- 16.7/118.7 +/- 7.7 to 145.6 +/- 12.8/92.2 +/- 6.4 mm Hg (p less than 0.05). The average reduction in mean DBP was 16.9% on captopril, and 20.9% on enalapril. Low dose ACEI monotherapy (i.e. 50 mg and 20 mg) achieved DBP normalization in 11.8% on captopril and in 26.4% on enalapril (p less than 0.01). There were no significant heart rate changes. The laboratory results did not change appreciably and there were no relevant side-effects, although particular attention was paid to the expected adverse reactions, such as cough, ageusia or proteinuria. It is concluded that the ACEIs under study showed comparable effectiveness within the used dose range, enalapril being more potent, longer acting, and possibly safer.
 ...
PMID:Enalapril versus captopril: a double-blind multicentre comparison in essential hypertension. 284 Dec 51

Adverse effects of converting enzyme inhibitors are either substance-specific (neutropenia, proteinuria, skin rashes, taste disturbances) or due to the converting enzyme inhibition (hypotension, functional renal insufficiency, hyperkalemia, cough, angioedema). They are rare nowadays because of better knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and -dynamics of the converting enzyme inhibitors, resulting in lower dosage, and because of identifying patients at high risk. The dosage must be adjusted according to renal function, in order to prevent accumulation and toxicity. In addition to patients with renal insufficiency, patients at high risk are those with a stimulated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, i.e. patients with renovascular hypertension or heart failure. Patients with collagen vascular disease, for example, systemic lupus erythematosus or scleroderma, should not be considered for long-term therapy with converting enzyme inhibitors because of the increased risk of neutropenia. Life-threatening angioedema may develop, mainly during the first few hours after drug administration.
 ...
PMID:[Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: side effects and risks]. 285 Jun 87

Since their introduction in clinical practice in 1980, ACE inhibitors have been found useful in the treatment of hypertension and CHF. In hypertension, they are effective as monotherapy in 40% to 50% of the patients, and in combination with diuretics or calcium antagonists, they are effective in up to 85% of the patients. They are well tolerated, are not associated with depression, impotence, bronchospasm or metabolic derangements such as hypokalemia, hyperuricemia or hyperglycemia, and do not have adverse effects on the quality of life. As a result, they are preferred in hypertensive patients with CHF, left ventricular dysfunction, mental depression, older age, coronary artery disease, metabolic disorders, chronic destructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral vascular disease. In CHF they cause long-lasting hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement, improve exercise tolerance, and may lower mortality in certain patient subsets. Evolving new indications for ACE inhibitors include the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension, the prediction of surgical success, the treatment of scleroderma renal crisis, the reduction of proteinuria, renal protection, cardioprotection, the improvement of arterial compliance, in Bartter's syndrome and idiopathic edema, etc. ACE inhibitors are usually well tolerated but in some instances they may cause class-specific side effects such as hypotension; usually reversible azotemia or renal failure, especially in patients with renal artery stenosis or with CHF with low blood pressure; cough; angioedema; and hyperkalemia. Differences among ACE inhibitors are emerging and include chemical class (e.g., zinc ligand), biotransformation, potency, pharmacokinetics, prodrugs, tissue effects, additional pharmacologic properties, and drug interactions.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. II. Clinical use. 305 46

This review will discuss the safety profiles of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors captopril, enalapril and lisinopril in patients with hypertension. In general, the safety profiles of ACE inhibitors compare favourably with those of other agents used for the treatment of hypertension. Adverse effects are not common when ACE inhibitors are used at the currently recommended doses. The adverse experiences that do occur with ACE inhibitors can be divided into 3 categories. Hypotension, hyperkalaemia and renal impairment are related directly to the blockade of the angiotensin-converting enzyme. Attention to the clinical condition, including concomitant therapy, reduces the risk of these adverse effects of ACE inhibition. Other adverse effects such as cough and angioedema also occur with all ACE inhibitors. The mechanisms are poorly understood, making it difficult to predict in which patients they will occur. Adverse effects such as rash, dysgeusia, neutropenia and proteinuria, which were reported relatively frequently in the early experience with captopril, are reported less frequently with lower doses of captopril and do not appear to be a problem with other ACE inhibitors such as enalapril and lisinopril.
 ...
PMID:Safety profiles of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. 306 90

Captopril is an orally active inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and has been widely studied in the treatment of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, severe hypertension not responsive to conventional diuretic/beta-adrenoceptor blocker/vasodilator regimens, and patients with chronic congestive heart failure refractory to treatment with a diuretic and digitalis. In patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension, titrated low doses of captopril used alone or in conjunction with a diuretic are similar in efficacy to usual doses of hydrochlorothiazide, chlorthalidone, or beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, as well as to the other ACE inhibitors. In addition, captopril improved well-being to a greater extent than methyldopa or propranolol in a study designed specifically to determine the effect of treatment on the quality of life of patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension. The earlier demonstrated efficacy of captopril, used with a diuretic and often also with a beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug, in the treatment of severe hypertension refractory to conventional 'triple therapy' has been confirmed in more recent trials which illustrate the generally marked antihypertensive effect of captopril-containing regimens in such patients. Results of initial trials in patients with scleroderma are promising, with control of hypertension and stabilization of renal function in these patients when treated at an early stage of the disease. Several comparative and long term trials of captopril in patients with chronic congestive heart failure refractory to treatment with a diuretic/digitalis regimen clearly demonstrate that initial haemodynamic improvement is maintained and correlates with clinical benefit. A tendency for overall clinical response to captopril to be better than the response to prazosin, hydralazine, nisoldipine or enalapril has been reported. Results of a multicentre comparison with digoxin and placebo indicate that captopril is a suitable alternative to digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure who are receiving maintenance diuretic therapy. The tolerability of captopril has now been studied in many thousands of patients involved in formalized trials and the early impression of poor tolerability can no longer be justified. The use of generally lower dosages of captopril in patients with normal or slightly impaired renal function has resulted in a generally low incidence of rash (0.5 to 4%), dysgeusia (0.1 to 3%), proteinuria (0.5%), neutropenia (0.3% during first 3 months) and symptomatic hypotension (0.1 to 3%). Cough is an infrequent but troublesome effect resulting from ACE inhibition.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Captopril. An update of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension and congestive heart failure. 306 99

When captopril was first introduced, it was used in high doses for severe hypertension, often in the presence of renal insufficiency, and side effects such as proteinuria, rash, neutropenia, and altered taste sensation were noted. Upon analysis, these effects were most commonly seen in patients with renal disease, autoimmune disease, or collagen vascular disease. These complications usually reversed rapidly upon discontinuation of treatment. In contrast, the growing use of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, captopril and enalapril, for treating mild to moderate hypertension and the trend toward the use of lower doses has shown these agents to be well tolerated with a low frequency of troublesome adverse effects. In fact, the original spectrum of adverse effects has virtually disappeared with the use of lower doses in patients with uncomplicated hypertension. In low doses, the converting enzyme inhibitors produce remarkably few incidences of symptomatic discomfort; the most common is skin rash, which often responds to dosage reduction. Cough and rare occurrences of angioedema have also been reported. Moreover, evidence is evolving that indicates that the converting enzyme inhibitors may sometimes decrease proteinuria and improve renal function; these effects may be especially important in diabetic hypertensive patients. Of note, these drugs can also attenuate the unwanted metabolic side effects of concurrent diuretic treatment.
 ...
PMID:Safety issues during antihypertensive treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. 306 5

An examination of the principal physiological actions of angiotensin II should make it clear why in vivo attempts to inhibit the rate of angiotensin II generation have been an attractive avenue in pursuing control of high blood pressure. The major physiological effect of angiotensin II relates to its direct pressor effect, but there are supplementary blood pressure regulating actions. Therefore, if we limit the rate of angiotensin II generation by inhibiting the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) we should expect to control high blood pressure in a number of clinical syndromes. This paper reviews the future of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of conditions such as hypertension associated with unilateral renal artery stenosis, essential hypertension and severe and previously unresponsive hypertension, with respect not only to efficacy but also to the side-effect profile and ancillary properties. Side effects seen with this class of drug are cough, rashes (both morbilliform and urticarial) and, rarely, angio-oedema. Proteinuria, nephrotic syndrome, leukopenia and taste disturbance were previously reported with captopril but only taste disturbance, and that less frequently, is apparent at the lower doses now employed. Several studies have examined the 'quality-of-life' aspects of ACE therapy and have usually but not always reported favourably. There are features of the ACE inhibitors which make them attractive drugs, and while we should be cautious because of limited experience, we should critically and creatively examine their properties over the next years.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in hypertension. 331 25


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>