Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors exert a beneficial effect on nephritis. We investigated the effects of KD3-671, an angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist (2-propyl-8-oxo-1-[(2'-(H-tetrazole-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]-4,5,6,7-t etrahydro-cycloheptimidazole), on anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody-associated nephritis in rats. Untreated nephritic rats had massive proteinuria, glomerular lesions including crescent formation, a significant augmentation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen-positive cells, alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive cells, and the increase in deposition of proteoglycan, fibronectin and desmin in the glomeruli. Administration of KD3-671 to nephritic rats prevented the development of intense proteinuria, glomerular alterations and the increase in plasma urea nitrogen. KD3-671 suppressed the deposition of matrix protein and the expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin and desmin in the nephritic glomeruli. Captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, suppressed urinary protein excretion and the expression of desmin in the nephritic glomeruli, but not other parameters. These results suggest that KD3-671 may be a useful medicine against glomerulonephritis and glomerulosclerosis.
...
PMID:Angiotensin II type I receptor antagonist suppresses proteinuria and glomerular lesions in experimental nephritis. 1042 45

A lot of evidence points to the important role of the renin-angiotensin system in the physiopathology of hypertension and the progression of chronic renal failure. In this review, the authors report the data concerning the protective effects of antagonists of angiotensin II AT1 receptors (AT1ra). The AT1 ra have been shown to have beneficial effects in most experimental models of nephropathy in which they have been tested (renal ischaemia, essential or induced hypertension, glomerulonephritis, 5/6 nephrectomy, renal transplantation, induced diabetes, toxic and radiotherapy-induced nephropathy). Clinical trials confirm these beneficial effects. In healthy subjects and hypertensive patients, the AT1 ra have identical effects to those of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on renal haemodynamics. In hypertensives, Candesartan and Irbesartan increase renal blood flow and the glomerular filtration rate and decrease the filtration fraction. Two studies have also shown that Candesartan and Irbesartan reduce proteinuria in diabetic patients. Similar results have been reported in essential hypertension with renal failure. These data suggest that AT1 ra have beneficial effects on the progression of experimental kidney disease and on proteinuria in the clinical setting. Of the pharmacological agents available for use in this class, it is essential to propose molecules whose efficacy in antagonising the effects of angiotensin II lasts throughout the 24 hour period. Clinical trials are under way to evaluate the effects of AT1 ra on renal function in man over a long period.
...
PMID:[Are the antagonists of angiotensin II AT1 receptors protectors of the kidney?]. 1044 11

The effects of the selective angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, eprosartan, were evaluated in experimental renal disease. Five-sixth nephrectomy in male Munich-Wistar rats led to the development of hypertension, proteinuria and remnant glomerulosclerosis. Administration of the AT1 receptor antagonist, eprosartan, for 4 weeks resulted in inhibition of angiotensin II activity as confirmed by a reduced blood pressure response to exogenous angiotensin II challenge. Compared to vehicle treatment, eprosartan normalized blood pressure, reduced proteinuria and limited remnant glomerulosclerosis. These data suggest that eprosartan may provide a new tool in the treatment of progressive renal disease.
...
PMID:Effects of eprosartan on glomerular injury in rats with reduced renal mass. 1045 63

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are known to inhibit the progression of established renal failure. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of an ACEI and an AT1 receptor antagonist (AT1R-Ant) in preventing the development of renal disease, at an early stage of hypertensive nephrosclerosis. SHRSP/Izm rats (n = 61) were treated from 10 wk until 22 wk with the ACEI delapril (40 mg/kg/d) or the AT1R-Ant candesartan cilexetil (1 mg/kg/d). Proteinuria, and structural/ultrastructural changes were assessed at 14 and 22 wk. Treatment with either agent resulted in reductions in blood pressure and cardiovascular hypertrophy. Neither proteinuria nor major renal histological changes were evident at 14 wk. At 22 wk, however, proteinuria accompanied by nephrosclerotic changes was seen in the untreated SHRSP/Izm. Treatment with either ACEI or AT1R-Ant resulted in similar reductions in proteinuria (untreated, 32.2 +/- 7.4; delapril-treated, 5.5 +/- 1.2; candesartan-treated, 3.9 +/- 0.3 mg/100 g/d). Prominent sclerosis of small-to-medium sized renal arteries was seen in the untreated SHRSP/Izm at 22 wk, but was similarly attenuated by the ACEI and AT1R-Ant. The glomerular ultrastructure was comparable between the two groups. No significant changes in renal AT1a or AT1b receptor subtype mRNA expression were seen throughout the course of the study. In contrast, a decrease in AT2 receptor mRNA was seen in the drug-treated groups at 14 wk but not at 22 wk. These results suggest that both ACEI and AT1R-Ant have similar efficacy in attenuating the onset of renal injury in early hypertensive nephrosclerosis, and that treatment with either agent is associated with a transient decrease in AT2 receptor mRNA expression.
...
PMID:Effects of angiotensin inhibitors on renal injury and angiotensin receptor expression in early hypertensive nephrosclerosis. 1058 Mar 98

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition reduces proteinuria in established adriamycin nephrosis. To investigate whether the reduction in proteinuria is due to decreased generation of angiotensin II (AngII) or to decreased degradation of bradykinin, four series of experiments in established adriamycin nephrosis were performed. In the first series, 2 mg/kg lisinopril reduced BP from 117 +/- 4 to 67 +/- 2 mmHg and proteinuria from 335 +/- 66 to 57 +/- 10 mg/24 h after 2 wk of treatment. Subsequent continuous intraperitoneal infusion of AngII (250 ng/kg per min) for 2 wk partially restored proteinuria to 180 +/- 42 mg/24 h, whereas BP increased to 97 +/- 3 mmHg. Subsequent withdrawal of AngII restored the antiproteinuric effects of lisinopril, whereas subsequent withdrawal of lisinopril restored proteinuria to pretreatment values. In the second series, AT1 receptor blockade induced a fall in BP and proteinuria similar to that by lisinopril. In the third series, lisinopril reduced BP from 121 +/- 5 to 68 +/- 2 mmHg and proteinuria from 355 +/- 90 to 101 +/- 10 mg/24 h. Subsequent intraperitoneal infusion of bradykinin antagonist (HOE 140; 1 mg/kg per 24 h) for 2 wk did not affect BP (72 +/- 2 mmHg) or proteinuria (92 +/- 15 mg/24 h). In the fourth series, bradykinin (3 mg/kg per 24 h) was infused for 2 wk to mimic decreased bradykinin breakdown. This did not affect proteinuria, but induced a fall in BP from 114 +/- 3 to 93 +/- 4 mmHg. The BP-lowering effect of exogenous bradykinin was completely reversed by 1 wk infusion of HOE 140 (93 +/- 4 to 113 +/- 4 mmHg), while proteinuria remained unchanged. In conclusion, the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition appears to be independent of bradykinin in this model, supporting a main role for reduction of AngII in the antiproteinuric action of ACE inhibition.
...
PMID:Chronic angiotensin II infusion but not bradykinin blockade abolishes the antiproteinuric response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in established adriamycin nephrosis. 1070 72

Reduction of proteinuria is a prerequisite for successful long-term renoprotection. To investigate whether individual patient factors are determinants of antiproteinuric efficacy, we analyzed individual responses to different modes of antiproteinuric intervention in nondiabetic and diabetic patients, obtained in prior studies comparing the efficacy of various pharmacological regimens. The individual antiproteinuric response to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition positively correlated to the response to angiotensin type I (AT1) receptor blockade in diabetic (r = 0.67, P < 0.01, N = 16) as well as nondiabetic patients (r = 0.75, P < 0.01, N = 12). This corresponded to the correlations for antihypertensive efficacy between ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade in diabetic (r = 0.73, P < 0.001) as well as nondiabetic patients (r = 0.55, P < 0.05). Remarkably, the antiproteinuric response to ACE inhibition also correlated positively to the antiproteinuric response to indomethacin (r = 0.63, P < 0.05, N = 9). Thus, patients responding favorably to one class of antiproteinuric drugs also respond favorably to other classes of available drugs, supporting a main role for individual patient factors in responsiveness or resistance to antiproteinuric intervention. In the search for strategies to improve response in these high risk patients, combination-treatment (combining different drugs, and combining drugs with dietary measures like sodium and protein restriction), and the use of higher doses may provide more fruitful strategies to optimize renoprotection than shifting to other classes of the available drugs.
...
PMID:Role of patient factors in therapy resistance to antiproteinuric intervention in nondiabetic and diabetic nephropathy. 1082 59

A considerable amount of data have implicated angiotensin receptors (AT receptors) in the development and maintenance of essential hypertension and renovascular hypertension as well as in progressive renal pathologies. Inhibition of angiotensin II (Ang II) action by blocking Ang II formation through angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or by blocking AT1 receptors directly using subtype-selective nonpeptide antagonists, has been found to attenuate the proteinuria, microalbuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, and nephrosclerosis in a variety of experimental models and in clinical trials. This review will first broadly discuss AT receptor subtypes in terms of their structure, function, tissue distribution and signaling. Secondly, the mechanistic differences between ACE inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade will be examined because these pharmaceutical agents are widely used tools to investigate the role of AT receptors in renal disease. Lastly, experimental models of essential hypertension, renovascular hypertension and progressive renal disease will be presented, which include the Fawn-hooded rat, the stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive rat, renal mass ablation and the 2K1C and 1K1C animal models. The overall goal of this review is to critically evaluate the data regarding the role of AT receptors in the pathophysiology of renal disease.
...
PMID:Kidney angiotensin receptors and their role in renal pathophysiology. 1102 92

This study was undertaken to determine whether angiotensin receptor blockers are as renoprotective as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in an experimental model of chronic interstitial renal disease. Groups of rats received one of the following treatments for 1 week: (1) enalapril, (2) diltiazem, (3) a cocktail of hydralazine, reserpine, and hydrochlorothiazide, or (4) irbesartan (an AT1 antagonist). The animals were injected with bromoethylamine (200 mg/kg), and antihypertensive treatment continued for 1 month. All drugs were effective in lowering the mean arterial pressure. The bromoethylamine-treated rats developed albuminuria and sustained a 40-50% decrease in creatinine clearance. Enalapril and irbesartan reduced albuminuria, but only enalapril partially prevented the decline in creatinine clearance and lowered the number of ED-1-positive cells. Diltiazem and cocktail had no effect on proteinuria, creatinine clearance, or ED-1 cells. In this experimental model, the effects of enalapril and irbesartan were not identical. Both drugs reduced proteinuria, but enalapril was more effective in protecting the renal function. The fact that the AT1 antagonist protected against albuminuria but did not affect the clearance of creatinine implies that the results seen with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition may be in part due to an effect on angiotensin II via AT2 receptor blockade or through an effect on bradykinin.
...
PMID:Differential effects of enalapril and irbesartan in experimental papillary necrosis. 1117 5

Angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion in rats augments vascular injury in balloon-injured carotid arteries and induces marked vascular and tubulointerstitial injury in kidneys. We examined how the AT1 receptor is modulated and whether blockade of the receptor with losartan could prevent the phenotypic and cellular changes. We also examined the role of the local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by examining the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and the effect of treatment with the ACE inhibitor, ramipril. Ang II infusion resulted in systemic hypertension and accelerated intimal and medial thickening in balloon-injured carotid arteries. Renal injury was manifested by proteinuria, glomerular phenotypic changes (mesangial expression of alpha-actin and podocyte expression of desmin), and tubulointerstitial injury with the tubular upregulation of the macrophage-adhesive protein, osteopontin, the interstitial accumulation of macrophages and myofibroblasts, and the deposition of collagen types III and IV. Ang II infusion decreased AT1 receptor number in the renal interstitium but not in glomeruli. Losartan completely blocked the Ang II-mediated hypertension, proteinuria, and injury to both carotid and kidney. Ang II infusion was also associated with an increase in ACE protein in both the proximal tubular brush border as well as at interstitial sites of injury, but despite evidence for activation of the local RAS, treatment with ramipril was without effect. These studies demonstrate that the renal and vascular injury induced by Ang II infusion is mediated by the AT1 receptor despite downregulation of the receptor in the interstitium. In addition, although there is evidence for local RAS activation, the injury appears to be mediated solely by the exogenous Ang II.
...
PMID:Renal and vascular injury induced by exogenous angiotensin II is AT1 receptor-dependent. 1117 28

In recent years in conjunction with medicamentous treatment of renoparenchymatous hypertension in particular two problems were discussed: target blood pressure values and renoprotective effects of antihypertensive drugs. Prospective studies revealed that a blood pressure reading of < 130/80 mm Hg significantly retards the progression of nephropathy whereby patients with proteinuria > 1 g/d benefit from even lower BP readings. In diabetic nephropathy the drugs of choice are inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACEI), already in the incipient stage and also in normotensive patients. The importance of ACEI in the treatment of non-diabetic nephropathies was confirmed recently by controlled prospective studies AIPRI and REIN. A maximal renoprotective effect of ACEI probably calls for larger doses than those needed for normalization of BP. Long-term investigations of the renoprotective effect of antagonists of angiotensin AT1 receptors and comparative studies with ACEI resp. are not available. Dihydropyridine blockers of calcium channels with a short-term action (nifedipine) may have a negative influence on the progression of diabetic nephropathy, the effect of dihydropyridines of the second generation is tested in prospective studies. Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers have a renoprotective action in diabetic nephropathy. In cca two thirds of the patients combined treatment with ACEI and diuretics or with calcium channel blockers is necessary. As to other antihypertensive drugs, vasodilatating beta-blockers and perspectively antagonists of endothelin receptors are useful.
...
PMID:[Treatment of renal hypertension]. 1122 86


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>