Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Clinical and experimental studies have markedly expanded our understanding of the causes of renal disease. Although they have not resulted in comparable therapeutic advances, new lines of treatment have emerged which cannot be underestimated. The prognosis of lipoid nephrosis has been substantially modified. The treatment of membranous glomerulonephropathy with steroids and immunosuppressive drugs may modify the course of the disease, at least in a subset of patients with decreased and deteriorating renal function. Encouraging results have been reported after the use of inhibitors of platelet aggregation in mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis. We have demonstrated that a receptor antagonist of thromboxane can significantly influence the renal functional parameters in patients with lupus nephritis. ACE-inhibitors, cyclosporine and NSAID's have proved useful in reducing nephrotic proteinuria. Lipid lowering agents are able to ameliorate the glomerular lesions in experimental models of renal injuries. Since systemic hypertension may initiate the development of renal disease or accelerate loss of function in the kidney in which parenchymal disease is already established, controlling hypertension by any effective means helps to slow the progression of renal failure. Preliminary reports have suggested that there may be advantages to using ACE-inhibitors and/or calcium entry blockers.
 ...
PMID:[The pharmacological therapy of glomerulonephritis]. 835 18

We have investigated whether the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the ACE inhibitor benazepril hydrochloride are altered with proteinuria by studying 8 patients with major proteinuria of different causes who were given a single dose of 10 mg p.o. The maximum plasma concentration of benazepril was found between 0.5 and 2 h after dosing (median 1 h). Its elimination was almost complete within 6 h. Peak plasma levels of benazeprilat, the active metabolite of benazepril, were observed between 1 and 6 h (median 2.5 h). The elimination of benazeprilat from plasma was biphasic, with mean initial and terminal half-lives of 3.0 and 17.3 h, respectively. On average, the pharmacokinetic parameters of benazepril and benazeprilat in the patients did not differ from those in a historical control group of healthy volunteers, but intersubject variability in the AUC and half-lives of benazeprilat was greater in the patients. Plasma ACE was completely inhibited from 1.5 to 6 h after dosing, and at 48 h the mean inhibition was still 42%. Plasma renin showed substantial intersubject variation. Mean supine blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) was reduced from baseline by a maximum of 18/13 mm Hg at 6 h. Proteinuria was diminished after benazepril in 7 patients. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that proteinuria in the nephrotic range does not require a change in benazepril dosage.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of benazepril hydrochloride in patients with major proteinuria. 835 84

The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of lisinopril (L), a novel ACE inhibitor, were compared to those of captopril (C), the familiar drug of the same class, in a multicentre controlled trial. The study included 91 mild-to-moderate, middle-aged hypertensives of both genders, 46 of which were randomized to C and 45 to L. After a two-week placebo period the examinees were receiving either L o.d. in increasing dosage of 10, 20, or 40 mg per day (amount necessary to achieve normotension), or C b.i.d. in a corresponding daily dose of 25, 50, or 100 mg. During the eight-week formal part of the trial, L decreased the systolic blood pressure from the initial values by an average of 14.9%, and the diastolic pressure by some 15.2%. The same parameters were lowered on C by 11.2%, and 11.7%, respectively. The mean arterial pressure from an initial average of 125.5 mmHg was lowered to 110.9 mmHg on C (11.6% reduction, p < 0.01), and from 125.3 mmHg to 108.2 mmHg on L (13.6% reduction, p < 0.01). Although the L effects were more pronounced, the observed between-group differences did not reach the level of statistical significance, except for the achievement of normotension, which disclosed the superiority of L (p < 0.05). The tolerability of both drugs was good and only one examinee had to be excluded because of side-effects (proteinuria). It is concluded that both ACEIs under study showed comparable efficacy and safety, L being marginally more potent and longer acting.
 ...
PMID:Controlled multicentre comparison of captopril versus lisinopril in the treatment of mild-to-moderate arterial hypertension. 838 38

We tested the effect of renal insufficiency, with and without angiotensin (Ang) converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, on blood and brain atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) in rats. Two ACEs, one which penetrates into the CNS and one which does not, were used to distinguish between peripheral and central ACE effects. Rats underwent 5/6 nephrectomy (5/6-NPX) by ligation of renal arterial branches. After seven days, 28 5/6-NPX rats received lisinopril 20 mg/kg/day and 28 5/6-NPX rats received quinapril 30 mg/kg/day orally for five days, while 28 5/6-NPX control rats and 28 sham rats did not. Body weight, blood pressure, drinking and urine volume were monitored. At sacrifice, urine, plasma, and brain tissue was collected. ANF in 16 brain areas was measured by radioimmunoassay. 5/6-NPX resulted in increased blood pressure, increased urine volume, proteinuria, and increased drinking. Both ACEs lowered blood pressure to sham values and decreased proteinuria. Both ACEs increased plasma renin activity and decreased plasma ANF. However, only lisinopril decreased drinking and urine volume. 5/6-NPX increased ANF values in six brain areas, namely the periventricular preoptic nucleus, the arcuate nucleus, the perifornical nucleus, the periventricular hypothalamic nucleus, the paraventricular nucleus, and the dorsal raphe nucleus compared to sham rats. These same increases in brain ANF were also observed in 5/6-NPX rats given quinapril, compared to shams. However, lisinopril lowered ANF to sham levels in the periventricular preoptic nucleus, the arcuate nucleus, and the perifornical nucleus. In the three additional brain areas, namely the periventricular hypothalamic nucleus, the paraventricular nucleus, and the dorsal raphe nucleus, lisinopril did not effect the elevated ANF concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Effect of ACE inhibitors on atrial natriuretic factor in the brains of rats with reduced renal mass. 839 52

On the whole, diabetic microangiopathy can be understood as the clinical renal-retinal syndrome. About 10% of all diabetics die of end-stage renal failure, more frequent in IDDM. With an incidence of 14% diabetic retinopathy is one of the major causes of blindness in adulthood. In the non-proliferative state, the pathological changes are limited to the retina, whereas the alterations affect both retina and vitreous in the proliferative state. Photocoagulation is the treatment of choice. If photocoagulatory treatment is not possible because of cataract, vitreous surgery (pars-plana vitrectomy) could improve visual prognosis. The clinical features hypertension, proteinuria and finally renal failure define the term "diabetic nephropathy". The increased intraglomerular pressure is the main pathological alteration of incipient nephropathy. Microalbuminuria essentially determines the prognosis: in IDDM it concerns the incidence of a manifest nephropathy, in NIDDM the excessively increased incidence of cardiovascular mortality. Sonographically, the kidneys are large with bright and wide parenchyma. Along with the development of end-stage renal disease the kidney size diminishes. According to Mogensen, nephropathy is divided into five stages: Stage 1, the early stage, is defined by hypertrophy and hyperfiltration. Stage 2 shows incipient structural changes without any clinical findings. Stage 3 is characterised by persistent microalbuminuria. Stage 4 leads to increasing renal failure and stage 5 to end-stage renal disease and the necessity of dialysis treatment. Incipient nephropathy demands a strict treatment of both hypertension and diabetes. In the meantime, ACE inhibitors are the treatment of choice. In case of dialysis treatment continuous ambulant peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is usually preferred.
 ...
PMID:[Diabetic microangiopathy]. 847 38

ACE inhibitors, which till recently were used almost exclusively for treatment of cardiovascular diseases, are becoming a perspective group of drugs also in the treatment of nephropathies. It was found that they are effective in particular in the treatment of proteinuria of varying origin and have also a marked renoprotective effect and are therefore recommended to retard progression of renal failure. They reduce intraglomerular hypertension, increase glomerular filtration and the renal blood flow, and it is assumed that they can retard progression of chronic glomerulonephritis and diabetic nephropathy. We may expect already in the near future that their therapeutic application will be substantially extended also in clinical nephrology.
 ...
PMID:[ACE inhibitors--a potential new group of drugs for treatment of kidney diseases]. 847 65

Apart from near normal metabolic control, early treatment of an increase in blood pressure in diabetic patients with nephropathy, is one of the most important therapeutic methods to prevent further progression of this complication. Long-term studies, recently published, suggest that ACE inhibitors have a beneficial effect on albuminuria and progression of nephropathy, irrespective of their hemodynamic effects. However, the mechanism by which ACE inhibitors exert these positive effects on glomerular pathology is still unclear. Several non-hemodynamic factors have been identified as being involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy: (a) changes in the composition of glomerular basement membrane due to a changed metabolism of the proteins which make up this structure; consequences are an impairment of the filtration properties, onset of proteinuria as well as thickening of basement membrane; (b) Mesangial expansion due to an overproduction of mesangial matrix and deposition of proteins as well as (c) impairment of mesangial clearance function; consequences are development of glomerulosclerosis and reduction of filtration surface. It is known that the renin-angiotensin-system is stimulated in diabetic patients with nephropathy and that angiotensin II influences the synthesis of glomerular and mesangial proteins as well as the function of mesangial cells. Hypothetically, these points could explain the beneficial effects of ACE-inhibitors on the progression of diabetic nephropathy.
 ...
PMID:ACE inhibitors and diabetic nephropathy: clinical and experimental findings. 851 36

The 'discovery' of losartan represents three separate discoveries: (1) losartan as the unique biphenyltetrazole molecule and the first of a new chemical class; (2) losartan as a tool to identify AT1-subtype receptors; and (3) losartan as a specific probe for exploring the multiple roles of angiotensin II (Ang II) in normal physiology and pathologic states. Losartan is the first nonpeptide orally active Ang II receptor antagonist to reach clinical trials. Losartan was selected for its affinity for Ang II receptors, functional antagonism of Ang II, lack of agonist properties, and oral anti-hypertensive effects. Losartan has been widely used to define the distribution and function of AT receptor subtypes. Although possible roles of the AT2 subtype have been reported, virtually all of the known effects of Ang II are blocked by losartan. Specific AT1 receptor blockade has been broadly compared with ACE inhibition. Possible differences on the basis of AT1 selectivity, bradykinin potentiating effects and Ang II formed by non-ACE pathways are discussed. Losartan blocks the vascular constrictor effect of Ang II, the Ang II-induced aldosterone synthesis and/or release, and the Ang II-induced cardiovascular 'growth' in vitro and in vivo. In various models of experimental hypertension, losartan prevents or reverses the elevated blood pressure and the associated cardiovascular hypertrophy similar to ACE inhibitors. Likewise, in models of renal failure (for example reduced renal mass, puromycin, ochratoxin), losartan, like ACE inhibition, markedly reduced the elevation in blood pressure, proteinuria or sclerosis. In aortocaval shunt, coronary ligation and ventricular pacing models of heart failure, losartan demonstrated a pathological role for Ang II by reversing the associated haemodynamic findings. In SHR-stroke prone, losartan dramatically increased survival while having a limited effect on blood pressure, suggesting a non-pressure dependent effect of Ang II. These collective data show that Ang II exerts complex pathological effects in experimental models of vascular, cardiac, renal and cerebral disease. The effectiveness of losartan in experimental models of heart failure supports its evaluation in clinical trials with patients with heart failure.
 ...
PMID:Discovery of losartan, the first angiotensin II receptor antagonist. 858 79

Whether ACE inhibitors (ACEi) differ from other antihypertensives in their efficacy to lower proteinuria is controversial. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of articles on this subject. The secondary objective in our meta-analysis was to study whether there is any difference between diabetic and non-diabetic patients in antiproteinuric response to blood pressure reduction. To identify all articles we performed a computer search using the bibliographic databases. To minimize publication bias, only trials in which a direct comparison was made between an ACEi and another antihypertensive were included. Studies performed both in diabetic and in non-diabetic patients were eligible. Included were 41 studies, comprising 1124 patients, of which 558 had non-diabetic renal disease. The mean antiproteinuric effect of ACEi was significantly greater than that of their comparator drugs: -39.9% (95% confidence interval: -42.8 to 36.8%) versus -17.0% (-19.0 to -15.1%) respectively (difference 24% (19.5 to 28.6%)). The blood-pressure-lowering effect was equal: -12.0% (-12.8 to -11.2%) versus -11.4% (-11.7 to -11.1%) respectively (difference -0.8% (-1.8 to 0.2%)). Thus it may be concluded that ACEIs confer an antiproteinuric effect beyond that attributable to their blood-pressure-lowering effect. A wide interstudy variation in antiproteinuric response to non-ACEI antihypertensives was observed. Multiple variable regression analysis was performed to assess which factors may explain this heterogeneity. From the comparator drugs, the class was of no importance: calcium-channel antagonists (CCA), beta-blockers, and a rest group of other drug types showed a similar response. Patient characteristics such as initial GFR and blood pressure partly explained the variation in response, but most of it appeared dependent on the blood pressure reduction achieved. Furthermore the type of CCA is of importance, with nifedipine having the least effect. A significantly greater antiproteinuric effect of 'non-ACEI' antihypertensives was found in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetics. However, this coincided with a greater blood pressure reduction in diabetics. Adjusted for differences in blood pressure control, diabetics showed even a slightly lesser antiproteinuric response to non-ACEI antihypertensive compared to non-diabetics.
 ...
PMID:Antiproteinuric effect of blood-pressure-lowering agents: a meta-analysis of comparative trials. 864 49

Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of uremia in Italy and other industrialized countries: once diabetic nephropathy commences, it advances slowly but inexorably to uremia. Prevention begins with strict control of blood sugar to inhibit or normalize glomerular hyperfiltration, and control of blood pressure to prevent glomerular hypertension and decrease microalbuminuria. Pharmacological measures include ACE-inhibitors and calcium channel blockers, alone or in combination, to reduce proteinuria and preserve renal function. It is believed that some classes of anti-hypertensive drugs have a direct pharmacological depressive effect on cell growth factors that lead to mesangial sclerosis: ACE-inhibitors would thus depress angiotensin II, and the calcium channel blockers would inhibit the increase in intracellular calcium of the mesangial cells which increases gene expression of early growth. Dietary sodium restriction seems to correct the expansion of the sodium pool and related volemic expansion hypertension. A protein-poor diet limits the precapillary glomerular vasodilatation resulting from protein-induced hyperaminoacidemia. The earlier dietetic and pharmacological measures are taken, the more effective they become: while they cannot arrest diabetic nephropathy once it has commenced, they are able to delay evolution of the disease to uremia.
 ...
PMID:[The feasibility and current limits in the prevention of diabetic nephropathy]. 864 29


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>