Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033687 (proteinuria)
 24,015 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

ACE-inhibitors have many positive features, when treating patients with progressive renal failure. These patients have high mortality in cardiac and vascular complications. It is therefore important to treat hypertension in these patients with drugs which do not have negative effects on lipid-, glucose, or electrolyte-metabolism, and ACE inhibition fulfills these requirements. These drugs decrease left ventricular hypertrophy, which is a positive prognostic sign of hypertensive patients, too. Contrary to regular diuretics, ACE-inhibition does not cause the negative effects associated with activation of the renin-angiotensin system. In many patients ACE-inhibitors decrease proteinuria to a higher degree than other antihypertensive drugs, and this may be an important clinical advantage, particularly in nephrotic patients. ACE inhibition might slow progressive renal failure. This effect may be associated with advantageous intraglomerular hemodynamic changes, but may also associate with inhibition of negative effects of angiotensin II on mesangial hypertrophy and matrix proliferation.
 ...
PMID:[ACE inhibitors' effect on kidney function]. 221 87

A 55-year-old man developed renovascular hypertension that was characterized by high plasma renin activity. This was accompanied by nephrotic range proteinuria. Treatment with nifedipine and furosemide lowered the blood pressure to normal values, but proteinuria persisted. However, treatment with an ACE-inhibitor brought resolution of the proteinuria, suggesting a role for angiotensin II in urinary protein loss.
 ...
PMID:Disappearance of renin-induced proteinuria by an ACE-inhibitor: a case report. 222 56

We evaluated the efficacy of an ACE inhibitor captopril (CAP) for the reduction of proteinuria in glomerular diseases, and tried to find the conditions in which urinary protein excretion was significantly decreased by this drug. Renin provocation test by CAP (C-test) was performed, and the result was compared to the effect on proteinuria. In 33 patients with proteinuria, ranging from 1.1 to 14.1 g/day, CAP was administered. Urinary protein excretion was reduced from 3.6 +/- 0.6 to 2.8 +/- 0.4 g/day (mean +/- SEM, p less than 0.01) after 2 weeks. The decrease in urinary protein was significant when renal function was moderately impaired (30 less than or equal to Ccr less than 60 ml/min) or patients were on a salt diet less than 7 g of NaCl daily. Reduction of urinary protein excretion by 2-week treatment of CAP was correlated with the result of C-test (r = 0.874, p less than 0.025). The long-term follow up for more than 6 months also suggested that CAP delayed the deterioration of renal function. Thus, CAP was proved effective in treating proteinuria, and C-test might give us an information of its proteinuria-suppressing effect in an individual case. But its efficacy was observed only in patients with moderately-reduced renal function or on low-salt diet. Therefore, we should select the cases carefully to expect the effect of CAP for the reduction of proteinuria.
 ...
PMID:[The effect of captopril on proteinuria in glomerular diseases]. 226 22

High doses of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, captopril, is known to cause significant increases in urinary protein excretion in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. To find whether other angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors yield similar results, we prospectively examined the effect of enalapril in five consecutive patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy, elevated arterial pressure, and proteinuria and compared them to age-matched controls receiving clonidine. Glomerular filtration rate, 24-hour urinary protein excretion, and arterial pressure were measured. All patients served as their own controls. Those who received enalapril demonstrated an initial increase in proteinuria (-0.3 +/- 0.7 delta gm/day, clonidine vs 3.9 +/- 0.9 delta gm/day, enalapril: P less than .05) despite similar decreases in arterial pressure (-18 +/- 6 delta mm Hg, clonidine vs -22 +/- 6 delta mm Hg, enalapril: NS) and glomerular filtration rate (-1.1 +/- 0.8 delta mL/min, clonidine vs -1.9 +/- 1.2 delta mL/min, enalapril: NS) when compared to the clonidine group. This increase in proteinuria, however, did not occur when these patients were rechallenged with enalapril. To our knowledge, this is the first report to document a significant increase in preexisting nephrotic range proteinuria following administration of nonsulfhydryl ACE inhibitor. This increase, however, appears to be unique to the initial treatment phase of the disease and does not affect long-term management.
 ...
PMID:The effects of enalapril on urinary protein excretion in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. 231 67

Renal effects of enalapril maleate in ten hypertensive patients with glomerulonephritis were evaluated after 1 and 16 weeks of therapy. Systemic blood pressure decreased, glomerular filtration rate was not significantly changed, and sodium fractional excretion and renal plasma flow increased, whereas renal vascular resistances and filtration fraction decreased acutely at the end of the study. Proteinuria diminished, but no variations in qualitative pattern were observed. ACE inhibitors, promoting efferent rather than afferent arteriolar vasodilatation and reduction of glomerular permeability coefficient, may reduce glomerular capillary hypertension and the development of proteinuria.
 ...
PMID:Renal effects of enalapril in hypertensive patients with glomerulonephritis. 254 56

We studied the efficacy of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril in treating overt proteinuria in comparison with the NSAID indomethacin, and evaluated some of the conditions that could influence this antiproteinuric effect. In 12 patients with a proteinuria varying from 3.2 to 10.5 g/24 hr, a diastolic BP ranging from 64 to 105 mm Hg, and a GFR varying from 34 to 127 ml/min, the effect of different lisinopril doses and of changing dietary sodium intake was evaluated. Proteinuria fell by 27 +/- 20% from 6.1 +/- 2.1 to 4.5 +/- 1.9 g/24 hr on a low dose (median 5 mg/day) lisinopril and by 50 +/- 17% to 3.1 +/- 1.4 g/24 hr on a higher dose (median 10 mg/day), irrespective of initial proteinuria, BP, or GFR. This antiproteinuric effect was abolished by increasing salt intake from 50 to 200 mmol/day, and was recovered again by re-instituting the sodium restricted diet. The antiproteinuric effect of 10 mg/day lisinopril was comparable to the reduction in proteinuria (by 57 +/- 21% to 2.8 +/- 2.0 g/24 hr) on 150 mg/day indomethacin, while adverse effects were less and renal hemodynamic effects were more favorable during lisinopril. In some patients it took several weeks before the effect of the ACE inhibitor on proteinuria was stabilized. Thus, the antiproteinuric effect of the ACE inhibitor lisinopril appears to be dose and time related, and is strongly dependent on dietary sodium restriction, whereas it does not depend on initial proteinuria, BP, or GFR. The effect is comparable to that of indomethacin, while adverse effects are less.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and variability of the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition by lisinopril. 255 Jun 96

In view of the pharmacological and chemical reasons for using ACE-inhibitors to treat diabetic hypertension, a group of 40 outpatients were treated with Enalapril. The sample consisted of 20 outpatients, 6 males, 14 females aged 48-76 (mean age 63.75), 18 of whom had type II and 2 type I diabetes and 11 under treatment by diet and hypoglycaemic drugs or insulin. All these patients presented slight or moderate essential arterial hypertension (diastolic pressure less than 115 mmHg). For about one year 17 of the patients were given 20 mg/die Enalapril and the remaining three 10 mg/die in a single morning dose. In 16 cases no other treatment was given. In 4 a non-potassium conserving diuretic was also given. Check-ups before six months into and at the end of treatment showed: a statistically significant reduction in systolic (p less than 0.05) and diastolic (p less than 0.01) pressure. In contrast no significant change was noted in heart beat, glycaemia before or after meals, body weight, glycosylated haemoglobin or any other blood chemical parameter considered. In one case only there was a slight increase in proteinuria that was however present at the start of treatment. As far as side effects are concerned there was one case of cardiac palmus during treatment and one case of coughing that regressed totally when treatment was suspended but nothing else of significance. It should be noted that the antidiabetic treatment remained unchanged throughout the period considered in most cases and at most was subjected to minimal qualitative and quantitative adjustments.
 ...
PMID:[Prolonged treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients with enalapril. 1-year follow-up]. 282 79

Since their introduction in clinical practice in 1980, ACE inhibitors have been found useful in the treatment of hypertension and CHF. In hypertension, they are effective as monotherapy in 40% to 50% of the patients, and in combination with diuretics or calcium antagonists, they are effective in up to 85% of the patients. They are well tolerated, are not associated with depression, impotence, bronchospasm or metabolic derangements such as hypokalemia, hyperuricemia or hyperglycemia, and do not have adverse effects on the quality of life. As a result, they are preferred in hypertensive patients with CHF, left ventricular dysfunction, mental depression, older age, coronary artery disease, metabolic disorders, chronic destructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral vascular disease. In CHF they cause long-lasting hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement, improve exercise tolerance, and may lower mortality in certain patient subsets. Evolving new indications for ACE inhibitors include the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension, the prediction of surgical success, the treatment of scleroderma renal crisis, the reduction of proteinuria, renal protection, cardioprotection, the improvement of arterial compliance, in Bartter's syndrome and idiopathic edema, etc. ACE inhibitors are usually well tolerated but in some instances they may cause class-specific side effects such as hypotension; usually reversible azotemia or renal failure, especially in patients with renal artery stenosis or with CHF with low blood pressure; cough; angioedema; and hyperkalemia. Differences among ACE inhibitors are emerging and include chemical class (e.g., zinc ligand), biotransformation, potency, pharmacokinetics, prodrugs, tissue effects, additional pharmacologic properties, and drug interactions.
 ...
PMID:Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. II. Clinical use. 305 46

Numerous trials have shown the efficacy of ACE-inhibitors in moderate and severe essential hypertension. Their use must be regarded as very promising. They lower peripheral vascular resistance without influencing cardiac index and heart rate. Additionally, they maintain serum potassium and do not effect plasma lipids or provoke diabetes mellitus or gout. In 20-30% of hypertensive patients ACE-inhibitors have to be combined with diuretics and/or calcium antagonists. The addition of beta-blockers is useful in patients with resting tachycardia. In mild hypertension the use of ACE-inhibitors as first-line drugs is indicated in patients with adverse reactions to beta-blockers or diuretics. In bilateral renovascular hypertension, ACE-inhibitors may induce a strong blood pressure fall; in bilateral stenosis they contribute to a deterioration of renal function with reversible renal insufficiency. In renoparenchymal hypertension, ACE-inhibitors may attenuate the progression of renal insufficiency; in addition, proteinuria is lowered. In systolic hypertension in the elderly, one must be aware of a marked first-dose hypotensive effect. ACE-inhibitors decrease exaggerated exercise-induced elevation of blood pressure and heart rate and therefore lower myocardial oxygen consumption. In patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, antihypertensive treatment should be initiated for blood pressure levels above 140/90 mmHg, to attenuate the progression of vascular damage in the kidney. In patients with severe left ventricular hypertrophy, ACE-inhibitors reduce left ventricular mass within three months by about 30%. In hypertension and coronary heart disease, recent studies report benefits of ACE-inhibitors on coronary circulation. Presently available ACE-inhibitors and those in preparation do not differ in pharmacodynamic, but in pharmacokinetic properties, concerning the beginning and duration of blood pressure lowering. A hypotensive first-dose effect can be observed in diuretic pretreated patients, in severe (malignant) and renovascular hypertension. ACE-inhibitors should not be used during pregnancy or in patients with autoimmune diseases or those undergoing treatment with immunosuppressive drugs, due to the side effects of neutropenia and proteinuria, which are more often seen under these conditions. Results from long-term studies on the influence of ACE-inhibitor treatment on cardiovascular risk in mild hypertension have not been available until now. In the decision to treat mild hypertension with ACE-inhibitors as first-line drug therapy, the costs of therapy in comparison to cheaper antihypertensives must be taken into account.
 ...
PMID:[The value of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension]. 306 60

The use of ACE-inhibitors has increased greatly during the last years. They were first used in treating hypertension, but nowadays cardiac diseases, mainly cardiac failure, are common indications. This means that the drugs are used in the treatment of more elderly patients who often have generalised atherosclerosis. This means that the patients must be controlled more often after initiation of treatment, especially concerning kidney function, since treatment with ACE-inhibitors can cause pronounced changes in renal haemodynamics and kidney function. This review focuses on the effects of ACE-inhibitors on renal haemodynamics and kidney function, which may be positive, with preservation of kidney function in diabetic and other chronic nephropathy, or negative, for example in cases with atherosclerotic stenosis of large or small renal arteries. It is concluded, that in cases of diabetic nephropathy an ACE-inhibitor is the "drug of choice" for treatment of hypertension. Furthermore the ACE-inhibitors seem to reduce the rate of deterioration of renal function and proteinuria in other kidney diseases. It is emphasized, that during treatment with ACE-inhibitors kidney function must be controlled before and following one to two weeks of treatment, if the dose is changed and in all cases following two to three months of treatment. Special attention should be given to patients with atherosclerotic manifestations e.g. angina.
 ...
PMID:[Renal function during treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors]. 748 49


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>