Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033377 (prolapse)
11,717 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

GK 13 (N-[1-(2-benzo (b) thiophenyl)-cyclohexyl] piperidine), GBR 12783 (1-[2-(diphenylmethoxy)-ethyl] 4-(3-phenyl propenyl)-piperazine and dexamphetamine are three indirect catecholaminergic agonists, acting via different neurochemical mechanisms. We have compared their effects in rodents, in several behavioral tests. All three drugs increased locomotion. The stimulant locomotor effect of dexamphetamine was more easily antagonized by haloperidol than that of GBR 12783 and GK 13. Only dexamphetamine reversed reserpine-induced akinesia. This reversal was prevented by pretreatment with either GK 13 or GBR 12783. The three drugs reduced pentobarbital sleeping time in mice. They induced rotation ipsilateral to a unilateral 6-OHDA lesion of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway. The stereotypies induced by GK 13 and GBR 12783 were essentially limited to sniffing. Haloperidol-induced catalepsy was apparently more easily antagonized by dexamphetamine than by GK 13 or GBR 12783. GK 13 and GBR 12783 had no significant effects on body temperature. The three drugs displayed an anti-immobility effect in the "despair test". Dexamphetamine and GK 13 reversed the hypothermia induced by apomorphine (16 mg/kg), as well as reserpine-induced hypothermia and reserpine-induced ptosis. Dexamphetamine induced a dose-dependent anorectic effect, whereas GK 13 and GBR 12783 induced only a brief and partial anorexia. Similar observations were made on water intake. Pretreatment with either GBR 12783 or GK 13 did not affect the dexamphetamine-induced anorexia. Effects of the three drugs are discussed by reference to their known neurochemical properties on catecholaminergic transmission.
...
PMID:Comparison of the effects of three indirect dopamine agonists, GK 13, GBR 12783 and dexamphetamine on behavioural tests involving central catecholaminergic transmissions. 197 95

Haloperidol in low doses antagonized the apomorphine-induced cage-climbing behaviour of mice, whereas ceruletide (CER) and its analogue, Nle8-CER-(4-10) had very weak anticlimbing efficacy; Nle8-CER and diazepam were inactive. The ptosis caused by CER and cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) was antagonized by apomorphine in doses 27 times smaller than those effective against the haloperidol-induced ptosis. No such differences occurred when either methylphenidate or picrotoxin replaced apomorphine. Low-dose haloperidol was an antagonist to the antiptotic effect of apomorphine versus both CER and CCK-8. The rearing inhibiting effect of CER and haloperidol, in contrast to that of clonazepam, was very resistant to apomorphine. Methylphenidate was weakly effective against clonazepam and haloperidol but inactive versus CER. Picrotoxin was no antagonist to either rearing inhibiting agent. The results taken together suggest presynaptic sites of the dopaminergic system as important for the production of ptosis by CCK-like peptides.
...
PMID:Neuroleptic-like effects of ceruletide and cholecystokinin octapeptide: interactions with apomorphine, methylphenidate and picrotoxin. 614 Jan 74