Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033036 (APC)
10,214 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Aberrant DNA methylation patterns may be the earliest somatic genome changes in prostate cancer. Using real-time methylation-specific PCR, we assessed the extent of hypermethylation at 16 CpG islands in DNA from seven prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP, PC-3, DU-145, LAPC-4, CWR22Rv1, VCaP, and C42B), normal prostate epithelial cells, normal prostate stromal cells, 73 primary prostate cancers, 91 metastatic prostate cancers, and 25 noncancerous prostate tissues. We found that CpG islands at GSTP1, APC, RASSF1a, PTGS2, and MDR1 were hypermethylated in >85% of prostate cancers and cancer cell lines but not in normal prostate cells and tissues; CpG islands at EDNRB, ESR1, CDKN2a, and hMLH1 exhibited low to moderate rates of hypermethylation in prostate cancer tissues and cancer cell lines but were entirely unmethylated in normal tissues; and CpG islands at DAPK1, TIMP3, MGMT, CDKN2b, p14/ARF, and CDH1 were not abnormally hypermethylated in prostate cancers. Receiver operator characteristic curve analyses suggested that CpG island hypermethylation changes at GSTP1, APC, RASSF1a, PTGS2, and MDR1 in various combinations can distinguish primary prostate cancer from benign prostate tissues with sensitivities of 97.3-100% and specificities of 92-100%. Hypermethylation of the CpG island at EDNRB was correlated with the grade and stage of the primary prostate cancers. PTGS2 CpG island hypermethylation portended an increased risk of recurrence. Furthermore, CpG island hypermethylation patterns in prostate cancer metastases were very similar to the primary prostate cancers and tended to show greater differences between cases than between anatomical sites of metastasis.
...
PMID:Hypermethylation of CpG islands in primary and metastatic human prostate cancer. 1502 33

CpG island hypermethylation is a potential means of inactivating tumor suppressor genes, and many genes have been demonstrated to be hypermethylated and silenced in colorectal cancer. However, limited data is available upon the concurrent methylation of multiple genes in colorectal cancer and in its precursor lesion. To address changes in the methylation profiles of multiple genes during colorectal carcinogenesis, we investigated the methylation of 12 genes (APC, COX-2, DAP-kinase, E-cadherin, GSTP1, hMLH1, MGMT, p14, p16, RASSF1A, THBS1, and TIMP3) in normal colon (n=24), colon adenoma (n=95), and colorectal cancer (n=149), using methylation-specific PCR. The average number of these genes methylated per sample was 0.12, 1.8, and 3.0 in normal colon mucosa, adenoma, and carcinoma, respectively, showing a stepwise increase (P<0.001). All the genes were methylated in colorectal cancer at frequencies varying from 51 to 9.4% and colon adenoma displayed methylation for the 11 genes, except for GSTP1, at frequencies varying from 40 to 1.1%. In contrast, normal colon mucosa demonstrated methylation for APC only, at a frequency of 12.5%. The total number of methylated genes per tumor showed a continuous, nonbimodal distribution in colon adenoma or cancer. CpG island hypermethylation exhibited a proclivity toward proximal colon cancer or adenoma, and the average number of genes methylated was higher in proximal colon cancer or adenoma than in distal colon cancer or adenoma, respectively (3.5 vs 2.6, P=0.018 for cancer, and 2.5 vs 1.4, P=0.003 for adenoma). In conclusion, concurrent CpG island methylation is an early and frequent event during colorectal carcinogenesis. It appears that CpG island methylation plays a more important role in proximal colon cancer development than in distal colon cancer development.
...
PMID:Aberrant CpG island hypermethylation of multiple genes in colorectal neoplasia. 1512 5

Current morphology-based cervical cancer screening is associated with significant false-positive and false-negative results. Tumor suppressor gene hypermethylation is frequently present in cervical cancer. It is unknown whether a cervical scraping reflects the methylation status of the underlying epithelium, and it is therefore unclear whether quantitative hypermethylation specific PCR (QMSP) on cervical scrapings could be used as a future screening method augmenting the current approach. Cervical scrapings and paired fresh frozen cervical tissue samples were obtained from 53 cervical cancer patients and 45 controls. All scrapings were morphologically scored and analyzed with QMSP for the genes APC, DAPK, MGMT, and GSTP1. To adjust for DNA input, hypermethylation ratios were calculated against DNA levels of a reference gene. Hypermethylation ratios of paired fresh frozen tissue samples and scrapings of cervical cancer patients and controls were strongly related (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.80 for APC, 0.98 for DAPK, and 0.83 for MGMT; P < 0.001). More cervical cancer patients than controls were DAPK positive (P < 0.001). When cutoff levels for ratios were defined to be above the highest ratio observed in controls, QMSP in cervical scrapings identified 32 (67%) of 48 cervical cancer patients. This feasibility study demonstrates that QMSP on cervical scrapings holds promise as a new diagnostic tool for cervical cancer. The addition of more genes specifically methylated in cervical cancer will further improve the assay.
...
PMID:Detecting cervical cancer by quantitative promoter hypermethylation assay on cervical scrapings: a feasibility study. 1519 22

Methylation profile was analyzed in nine cases of relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for p14, p15, p16, Rb, MGMT, APC, hMLH1, RARbeta, RIZ, DAPK, and FHIT genes by using methylation specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) analysis. Frequency of methylation in each gene was: MGMT, 56%; RARbeta, 44%; and p16, 22%, respectively. None of the p14, p15, Rb, APC, hMLH1, RIZ, DAPK, and FHIT genes were hypermethylated. Five (56%) of 9 cases showed methylation of at least one gene. All of the samples with hypermethylation in p16 and MGMT gene at relapse, had already acquired the change at the time of initial diagnosis. Interestingly, three of 4 cases with RARbeta gene methylation at relapse did not have methylation of this gene at the time of initial presentation. These results suggest that hypermethylation might be involved in the relapse of childhood ALL.
...
PMID:Aberrant methylation in promoter-associated CpG islands of multiple genes in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 1520 66

Aberrant promoter hypermethylation of several known or putative tumor suppressor genes occurs frequently during the pathogenesis of human cancers and is a promising marker for cancer detection. We investigated the feasibility of detecting aberrant DNA methylation in the urine and serum samples of renal cancer patients. We examined the tumor and the matched urine and serum DNA for aberrant methylation of nine gene promoters (CDH1, APC, MGMT, RASSF1A, GSTP1, p16, RAR-beta2, and ARF) from 17 patients with primary kidney cancer by quantitative fluorogenic real-time PCR. An additional 9 urine samples (total, 26) and 1 serum sample (total, 18) also were tested from renal cancer patients. Urine from 91 patients without genitourinary cancer and serum from 30 age-matched noncancer individuals were used as controls. Promoter hypermethylation of at least two of the genes studied was detected in 16 (94%) of 17 primary tumors. Aberrant methylation in urine and serum DNA generally was accompanied by methylation in the matched tumor samples. Urine samples from 91 control subjects without evidence of genitourinary cancer revealed no methylation of the MGMT, GSTP1, p16, and ARF genes, whereas methylation of RAR-beta2, RASSF1A, CDH1, APC, and TIMP3 was detected at low levels in a few control subjects. Overall, 23 (88%) of 26 urine samples and 12 (67%) of 18 serum samples from cancer patients were methylation positive for at least one of the genes tested. By combination of urine or serum analysis of renal cancer patients, hypermethylation was detected in 16 of 17 patients (94% sensitivity) with high specificity. Our findings suggest that promoter hypermethylation in urine or serum can be detected in the majority of renal cancer patients. This noninvasive high-throughput approach needs to be evaluated in large studies to assess its value in the early detection and surveillance of renal cancer.
...
PMID:Quantitative detection of promoter hypermethylation of multiple genes in the tumor, urine, and serum DNA of patients with renal cancer. 1575 19

Hypermethylation of cytosine residues in the CpG islands of tumor suppressor genes is a key mechanism of colorectal carcinogenesis. Detection and quantification of CpG island methylation in human DNA isolated from stools might provide a novel strategy for the detection and investigation of colorectal neoplasia. To explore the feasibility of this approach, colorectal biopsies and fecal samples were obtained from 32 patients attending for colonoscopy or surgery, who were found to have adenomatous polyps, colorectal cancer, or no evidence of neoplasia. A further 18 fecal samples were obtained from healthy volunteers, with no bowel symptoms. Isolated DNA was modified with sodium bisulfite and analyzed by methylation-specific PCR and combined bisulfite restriction analysis for CpG island methylation of ESR1, MGMT, HPP1, p16(INK4a), APC, and MLH1. CpG island methylation was readily detectable in both mucosal and fecal DNA with methylation-specific PCR. Using combined bisulfite restriction analysis, it was established that, in volunteers from whom biopsies were available, the levels of methylation at two CpG sites within ESR1 assayed using fecal DNA were significantly correlated with methylation in DNA from colorectal mucosa. Thus, noninvasive techniques can be used to obtain quantitative information about the level of CpG island methylation in human colorectal mucosa. The methods described here could be applied to a much expanded range of genes and may be valuable both for screening purposes and to provide greater insight into the functional consequences of epigenetic changes in the colorectal mucosa of free-living individuals.
...
PMID:Use of DNA from human stools to detect aberrant CpG island methylation of genes implicated in colorectal cancer. 1534 51

Gene promoter hypermethylation is increasingly recognized to play an important role in cancer development through silencing of gene transcription. This study determined the methylation profiles of primary colorectal cancers and adenomas to elucidate the role of epigenetic changes in different stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. We examined the methylation profiles of 47 sporadic colorectal cancers, 36 colonic adenomas from patients without cancer and 34 colonic biopsies from patients without colonic lesions. Paired adjacent dysplasia tissues obtained from 17 cancer patients were also examined. Promoter hypermethylation in 10 tumor-related genes (APC, ATM, GSTP1, HLTF, MGMT, hMLH1, p14, p15, SOCS-1 and TIMP-3) were studied by methylation-specific PCR. Promoter hypermethylation was frequently detected in more than 40% of colonic cancers and adenomas in APC, ATM, HLTF, MGMT and hMLH1 genes (p < 0.0001 vs. normal). While low level of methylation was detected in p14, p15 and TIMP-3, there was no methylation detected in GSTP1 and SOCS-1. The frequencies of methylation were comparable between tumors and adenomas, and advanced and nonadvanced adenoma. In contrast, K-ras mutation was only detected in advanced adenomas and cancers. Concurrent methylation in >/= 3 genes was found in 66.7% adenomas and 68.1% cancers but not in normal colonic tissues. Methylation was associated with reduced protein expressions in colorectal adenomas and cancers. Moreover, methylation in ATM was more common in older cancer patients (p = 0.002), but there was no significant association between promoter hypermethylation and other clinicopathologic characteristics of cancer. Our study demonstrated the early and specific involvement of promoter hypermethylation in the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence.
...
PMID:Promoter hypermethylation of tumor-related genes in the progression of colorectal neoplasia. 1538 72

Serrated adenoma is a recently described entity characterized by having combined architectural features of hyperplastic polyps and classical adenoma. To understand the role of gene regulation in the progression of the serrated neoplasia pathway, we examined the methylation profiles of the promoter regions of 19 genes, DNA ploidy, and mutator phenotype status. In all, 40 sporadic, classical serrated adenomas were pathologically reviewed and divided into four pathologic groups according to their histologic grades. Methylation-specific PCR was performed using primers for p16, hMLH1, RASSF1A, APC, HIC-1, DAPK, MGMT, SLC5A8, RB1, H-Cadherin, E-Cadherin, TIMP3, PTEN, THBS1, LKB1, p14, p15, FHIT, and VHL. Dual flow-cytometric analyses using cytokeratin and DAPI and MSI studies using BAT26 were also performed. Methylation was observed in 2.5-82.5% (mean 33.9%) of the CpG islands in the promoter regions of 16 genes. The tumors with higher histologic grades, including carcinomas, showed more extensive methylation compared to those with lower grades, and serrated adenomas in the right colon showed more frequent methylation than those in the left (P<0.05). Tumor-specific promoter methylation of SLC5A8 was observed in 33 (82.5%) of the serrated adenomas. Aneuploidization with near-diploid DNA indices was detected in four out of 28 cases examined (14.3%); two were low-grade serrated adenomas and two were carcinomas in the left colon. The high mutator phenotype was not observed in any of the cases examined. Our results indicate that: (1) aberrant, widespread methylation of CpG islands increases with the histological progression of serrated adenomas; (2) methylation of SLC5A8 is an early event; and (3) additional methylation of the p16, p14, MGMT, TIMP3, and FHIT genes are important tumorigenic steps in the serrated neoplasia pathway.
...
PMID:Progressive methylation during the serrated neoplasia pathway of the colorectum. 1538 52

Recent studies indicate that tumor suppressor genes can be epigenetically silenced through promoter hypermethylation. To further understand epigenetic alterations in cholangiocarcinoma, we have studied the methylation profiles of 12 candidate tumor suppressor genes (APC, E-cadherin/CDH1, MGMT, RASSF1A, GSTP, RAR-beta, p14ARF, p15INK4b, p16INK4a, p73, hMLH1 and DAPK) in 72 cases of cholangiocarcinoma, including equal number cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A total of 10 cases of benign biliary epithelia were included as controls. The methylation status of tumor suppressor genes was analyzed using methylation-specific PCR. We found that 85% of all cholangiocarcinomas had methylation of at least one tumor suppressor gene. The frequency of tumor suppressor gene methylation in cholangiocarcinoma was: RASSF1A (65%), p15INK4b (50%), p16INK4a (50%), APC (46%), E-cadherin/CDH1 (43%), p14(ARF) (38%), p73 (36%), MGMT (33%), hMHL1 (25%), GSTP (14%), RAR-beta (14%) and DAPK (3%). Although single tumor suppressor gene methylation can be seen in benign biliary epithelium, methylation of multiple tumor suppressor genes is only seen in cholangiocarcinoma. About 70% (50/72) of the cholangiocarcinomas had three or more tumor suppressor genes methylated and 52% (38/72) of cases had four or more tumor suppressor genes methylated. Concerted methylation of multiple tumor suppressor genes was closely associated with methylation of RASSF1A, p16 and/or hMHL1. Methylation of RASSF1A was more common in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma than intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (83 vs 47%, P=0.003) while GSTP was more frequently seen in intrahepatic compared to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (31 vs 6%, P=0.012). Our study indicates that methylation of promoter CpG islands of tumor suppressor genes is a common epigenetic event in cholangiocarcinoma. Based on distinct methylation profiles, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are two closely related but biologically unique neoplastic processes. Taking advantage of the unique concurrent methylation profile of multiple genes in cholangiocarcinoma may facilitate the distinction of cholangiocarcinoma from benign biliary epithelium in clinical settings.
...
PMID:Promoter methylation profiles of tumor suppressor genes in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. 1546 12

A subset of sporadic colon cancers has been shown to have microsatellite instability caused by an epigenetic inactivation of the MLH1 gene by hypermethylation of the the CpG island in its promoter region. We report here that in colorectal cancer, inactivation of the MLH1 gene is frequently accompanied by hypermethylation of the CpG island in the promoter of the mitotic gene checkpoint with forkhead and ring finger domains (CHFR). This was first observed in the colon cancer cell lines HCT-116, DLD-1, RKO and HT29. Among the 61 primary colon cancer samples studied, hypermethylation of the MLH1 and the CHFR promoter was found in 31% of the tumors. In 68% of all primary cancers (13/19) with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation, hypermethylation of the CHFR promoter was observed as well (P-value < 0.0001, Fisher's two-sided exact). Hypermethylation of the HLTF, MGMT, RASSF1, APC, p14 and p16 promoter regions were also frequent events, being observed in 48% (28/58), 40% (26/64), 21% (14/64), 50% (31/62), 43% (26/60) and 56% (35/63), respectively. However, methylation of these genes was not associated with methylation of either MLH1 or CHFR. The observed methylation profile was unrelated to Duke's stage. The coordinated loss of both mismatch repair caused by methylation of MLH1 and loss of checkpoint control associated with methylation of CHFR suggests the potential to overcome cell cycle checkpoints, which may lead to an accumulation of mutations.
...
PMID:CHFR promoter hypermethylation in colon cancer correlates with the microsatellite instability phenotype. 1576 Sep 19


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>