Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0033036 (APC)
10,214 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

In the zebrafish, Danio rerio, and other teleosts, the class I and class II loci of the major histocompatibility complex ( Mhc) reside on different chromosomes. To shed light on the events that might have generated this difference from tetrapods, in which these two types of loci are clustered in a single chromosomal region, the organization of the class II loci in linkage group 8 of the zebrafish was determined by the characterization of contigs of PAC clones. Three contigs were defined: DAB, DCB, and DBB. The 350-kb-long DAB contig contained only four genes: DDB, DAB, SLC7A4, and DAA. The 150-kb-long DCB contig contained the DCB, DCA, and fz10 genes at an undetermined distance from the DAB contig. And the 120-kb-long DBB contig comprised the DBB gene presumably in another linkage group. The low gene density of the linkage group 8 contigs, contrasting with the high gene density of the zebrafish class I region, and the close association with genes [ SLC7A4 coding for an amino acid transporter, and fz10 (frizzled 10) coding for a receptor of the WNT glycoprotein] that are not linked with the tetrapod Mhc, is interpreted to mean that the separation of the class II from class I loci in teleosts occurred by translocation rather than by genomic or chromosomal duplication.
...
PMID:Evidence that the separation of Mhc class II from class I loci in the zebrafish, Danio rerio, occurred by translocation. 1224 92

Strategies for correlation analysis in protein contact prediction often encounter two challenges, namely, the indirect coupling among residues, and the background correlations mainly caused by phylogenetic biases. While various studies have been conducted on how to disentangle indirect coupling, the removal of background correlations still remains unresolved. Here, we present an approach for removing background correlations via low-rank and sparse decomposition (LRS) of a residue correlation matrix. The correlation matrix can be constructed using either local inference strategies (e.g., mutual information, or MI) or global inference strategies (e.g., direct coupling analysis, or DCA). In our approach, a correlation matrix was decomposed into two components, i.e., a low-rank component representing background correlations, and a sparse component representing true correlations. Finally the residue contacts were inferred from the sparse component of correlation matrix. We trained our LRS-based method on the PSICOV dataset, and tested it on both GREMLIN and CASP11 datasets. Our experimental results suggested that LRS significantly improves the contact prediction precision. For example, when equipped with the LRS technique, the prediction precision of MI and mfDCA increased from 0.25 to 0.67 and from 0.58 to 0.70, respectively (Top L/10 predicted contacts, sequence separation: 5 AA, dataset: GREMLIN). In addition, our LRS technique also consistently outperforms the popular denoising technique APC (average product correction), on both local (MI_LRS: 0.67 vs MI_APC: 0.34) and global measures (mfDCA_LRS: 0.70 vs mfDCA_APC: 0.67). Interestingly, we found out that when equipped with our LRS technique, local inference strategies performed in a comparable manner to that of global inference strategies, implying that the application of LRS technique narrowed down the performance gap between local and global inference strategies. Overall, our LRS technique greatly facilitates protein contact prediction by removing background correlations. An implementation of the approach called COLORS (improving COntact prediction using LOw-Rank and Sparse matrix decomposition) is available from http://protein.ict.ac.cn/COLORS/.
...
PMID:Improving residue-residue contact prediction via low-rank and sparse decomposition of residue correlation matrix. 2692 58