Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0032285 (pneumonia)
 54,520 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Netilmicin, a new aminoglycoside antibiotic, was used to treat 19 patients with urinary tract infection and 5 with systemic infection. The causal organisms were Escherichia coli (in 2), Klebsiella pneumoniae (in 4), Serratia marcescens (in 12) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (in 7); 1 patient was infected with two of these organisms. All the isolates of causal organisms except one of Serratia were initially sensitive to netilmicin but many were resistant to other aminoglycosides. Sixteen of the urinary tract infections responded to netilmicin therapy, although relapse occurred in three patients. Two of the three patients with musculoskeletal infection responded to combined therapy with surgery and netilmicin; the other patient responded to the same regimen but with carbenicillin added. Netilmicin cured pneumonia in one patient but failed in the other patient with pneumonia, who had leukemia. Superinfection occurred in five patients with urinary tract infection. Adverse reactions to netilmicin were minor. Netilmicin may prove to be a useful agent, particularly for infections due to multiresistant Klebsiella or Serratia, or when prolonged aminoglycoside therapy is required.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic experience with netilmicin. 10 97

During a 12-month period, 43 consecutive episodes of new fever in neutropenic cancer patients were evaluated. A two-drug combination of cephalothin, gentamicin or carbenicillin was used empirically for each episode. Overall mortality for this series was 28%. Microbiologic documentation of infection occurred in only nine of 43 episodes but a probable site of infection was observed in 14 others. The lungs were the most common site of infection and pneumonia was associated with a 100% fatal outcome. Despite the large number of febrile episodes with no infectious isolates, response to empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics was common (n = 23) and was associated with 4% mortality compared to 55% mortality in episodes with no response. Superinfection occurred only in patients treated with antibiotics longer than 7 days (4 of 30). Bone marrow recovery was associated with lower mortality but was not essential for survival. The routine use of empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics for all unexplained febrile episodes in neutropenic cancer patients has led to an increased frequency of culture-negative episodes. Care must be taken to avoid over-use of these empiric drugs.
 ...
PMID:Fever, neutropenia and malignancy: a clinical syndrome in evolution. 91 64

Cefixime (CFIX) was evaluated clinically in pediatric respiratory tract infections, particularly those caused by Haemophilus influenzae: 1. The total number of children in this study treated with CFIX was 232, out of which 215 cases were evaluated for clinical efficacy and 224 cases were investigated for safety. A daily dosage of 3-6 mg/kg/day was given divided into 2 to 3 times daily for 3-15 days. 2. Causative organisms were identified in 146 cases, out of which 128 cases were found to be single microbial infections and 18 cases were mixed infections. In single microbial infections, clinical efficacy was 100% for those caused by H. influenzae/Haemophilus parainfluenzae, and was 95% for Streptococcus pyogenes with an overall efficacy of 96.9%. In mixed infections, the clinical efficacy was 100% for those caused by a combination of H. influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae, and the overall rate was 94.4%. An involvement of H. influenzae was observed in 108 cases with a clinical efficacy rate of 99.1%, and definite involvement of beta-lactamase secreting strains of H. influenzae was found in 32 cases with a clinical efficacy of 96.9%. 3. Bacteriological effect was studied for 164 strains identified in 146 cases, and eradication rates were 89.5% for H. influenzae, 100% for H. parainfluenzae and S. pyogenes, and 71.4% for S. pneumoniae. The overall eradication rate was 91.4%. Superinfection was observed in 21 cases. MICs against 78 strains of H. influenzae were in a range of less than or equal to 0.10 microgram/ml regardless of beta-lactamase production, and far superior to cefaclor and amoxicillin. MICs against S. pyogenes and S. pneumoniae were in ranges of less than or equal to 0.10 microgram/ml and 0.39 micrograms/ml, respectively. 4. Clinical efficacy was 93.0% in 215 cases (excellent: 136, good: 64, fairly good: 10, poor: 5). CFIX attained a high efficacy in the range of 89.4-95.7% in acute pharyngitis, acute tonsillitis, acute bronchitis and acute pneumonia. 5. Safety was monitored in 224 cases and there were only one case of loose stool and another of diarrhea as side effects. There were no abnormal findings in 31 cases of the laboratory test. In conclusion, it was confirmed that CFIX is excellent and safe in the treatment of the respiratory tract infections.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation of cefixime in pediatric respiratory tract infections]. 204 Nov 46

The combination aztreonam + cefotaxime (AZ + CE) was compared to amikacin + cefotaxime (AM + CE) in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia acquired at the intensive-care unit. This study included a total of 33 patients fulfilling criteria for nosocomial pneumonia. 16 of them were randomly allocated to the AZ + CE group and 17 to the AM + CE group. The empirical treatment was effective for 78% of AZ + CE cases and 92% of AM + CE cases (p = NS). Clinical care was observed in 77% of cases (10 out of 13 evaluable) in the AZ group and in 75% of the group treated with AM (12 cases out of 16 evaluable; p = NS). In the evaluable cases, treatment failure was associated with injections due to the following organisms: Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (1) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1) in the AZ group and A. calcoaceticus (1) in the AM group. Superinfections were observed only in the AM group P. aeruginosa. A. calcoaceticus, Streptococcus viridans, Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus and Serratia marcescens. Both the peak and through serum concentrations of AZ and AM were maintained within normal ranges. Finally, an impairment of renal tubular function was observed in the group of patients treated with AM, as measured by urinary levels of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase and leucine aminopeptidase sequentially during the treatment. These changes in renal functions alterations mentioned were not observed in the AZ group. It is concluded that the AZ + CE combination is an effective empirical and active antibiotic treatment against severe nosocomial pneumonia. Aztreonam has no renal toxicity, which is an advantage to take into account in patients with altered renal function.
 ...
PMID:Therapeutic efficacy of the combination of aztreonam with cefotaxime in the treatment of severe nosocomial pneumonia. Comparative study against amikacin combined with cefotaxime. 265 89

In a prospective, comparative trial, 47 hospitalized patients with serious infections that required parenteral antibiotic therapy were randomly assigned to receive either ciprofloxacin (200 mg every 12 hours intravenously followed by 500 mg every 12 hours orally at a time dependent on the patients' clinical and bacteriologic responses) or ceftazidime (2 g every eight to 12 hours intravenously). All evaluable subjects (39 patients) had documented infections, 23 percent of which were associated with bacteremia. The mean/median duration of intravenous antibiotic use for ciprofloxacin was 7.37/five days and for ceftazidime 9.95/seven days; 63 percent of the ciprofloxacin patients received an additional 17 days of oral therapy with ciprofloxacin, whereas intravenous therapy with ceftazidime was followed by an average of 12 days of an oral regimen in 55 percent of patients. Overall response rates for patients receiving ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime were 76 percent (16 of 21) and 82 percent (18 of 22), respectively. Four out of five bacteremias in each group were successfully treated. Overall, 69 percent of the pathogens were gram-negative aerobes, and 47 percent of the infections involved the urinary tract. Failure of therapy was most often associated with pneumonia (two of five failures with ciprofloxacin and three of four failures with ceftazidime). Adverse effects occurred in approximately 20 percent of patients in each group and were mild and reversible. Superinfections occurred in five of 19 (26 percent) ciprofloxacin recipients and seven of 20 (35 percent) ceftazidime recipients. All fungal superinfections involved the genitourinary tract and occurred most often in association with chronic indwelling catheters. Enterococcal superinfections occurred in both groups (a bacteremic urinary tract infection in a ceftazidime patient and osteomyelitis in a ciprofloxacin patient). Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea was documented in a ceftazidime recipient. The mean duration of hospitalization following the onset of antibiotic treatment was 10.45 days in the ciprofloxacin group and 12.95 days in the ceftazidime group. Sequential intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin was as safe and effective as intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of infections due to susceptible gram-positive and gram-negative organisms.
 ...
PMID:Prospective, randomized comparison of sequential intravenous followed by oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of serious infections. 268 21

Oral ciprofloxacin has been shown to be effective in the treatment of infections due to gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods. The efficacy and safety of intravenous ciprofloxacin was compared with that of intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of 59 patients with well-documented serious infections in a prospective, controlled, randomized study with a third-party blinding. Thirty-three patients were treated with intravenous ciprofloxacin (200 mg every 12 hours, plus a daily extra placebo dose); 26 patients were treated with ceftazidime (1 g every eight hours). The severity of the infections, underlying diseases, and demographic features were comparable in both groups, although there were more men in the ciprofloxacin group. For ciprofloxacin/ceftazidime treatments, respectively, the evaluated infections were: pyelonephritis (16 patients/nine patients), pneumonia (three/five), soft-tissue infections (four/zero), spontaneous peritonitis (five/two), primary bacteremia (three/eight), and other (two/two). Isolated pathogens included: Escherichia coli (22/12), Klebsiella sp. (five/four), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (two/three), Haemophilus influenzae (one/one), Proteus mirabilis (two/zero), Proteus vulgaris (one/zero), Salmonella sp. (zero/two), Plesiomonas shigelloides (one/zero), and others (one/four). The clinical responses were cure or improvement in 31 ciprofloxacin cases/21 ceftazidime cases; failure, zero/four; and indeterminate, two/one. The bacteriologic responses were eradication in 28 ciprofloxacin cases/22 ceftazidime cases; persistence, one/three; and indeterminate, four/one. Mild intolerance occurred in three ciprofloxacin cases and two ceftazidime cases. A mild increase in serum hepatic enzymes was observed in two patients in each group. Superinfections occurred in five patients: enterococcal septicemia (zero/two) and urinary tract infections (one/two). The results presented suggest that intravenous ciprofloxacin is an effective and safe antimicrobial agent for the treatment of serious infections, with an efficacy comparable with that of ceftazidime, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin. An additional advantage seems to be a lower rate of superinfections.
 ...
PMID:Intravenous ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime in serious infections. A prospective, controlled clinical trial with third-party blinding. 268 25

The incidence of respiratory tract infections was determined in 59 multiple trauma patients requiring prolonged intensive care (greater than 5 days) and receiving no antibiotic prophylaxis. Early pneumonia (less than 48 hr) with S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and/or H. influenzae was found in 44% of patients. Secondary colonization of the oropharynx and respiratory tract with ICU-associated Gram-negative bacilli followed by pneumonia occurred in 12 patients (20%). The overall incidence of respiratory tract infections was 59%. In a prospective open trial three prophylactic antibiotic regimens were compared: 17 patients were treated with intestinal decontamination using nonabsorbable antibiotics (polymyxin E 400 mg, tobramycin 320 mg, amphotericin B 2,000 mg/day). No difference in infection rate was found. Twenty-five patients were treated with intestinal and oropharyngeal decontamination using an ointment containing 2% of the same antibiotics. Secondary colonization and infection of the respiratory tract with Gram-negative bacilli was significantly reduced (p less than 0.001). The incidence of early (Gram-positive) infections, however, was unchanged. Another group of 63 patients was treated with systemic antibiotic prophylaxis during the first days in combination with oropharyngeal and intestinal decontamination. The incidence of early pneumonia was significantly reduced (p less than 0.001). Five patients (8%) developed an infection. Superinfections were not observed.
 ...
PMID:The effect of oropharyngeal decontamination using topical nonabsorbable antibiotics on the incidence of nosocomial respiratory tract infections in multiple trauma patients. 303 59

Ceftazidime and cefamandole were compared in a randomized multicentre trial in hospitalized patients with pneumonia. Of 290 patients enrolled, 92 patients in the ceftazidime group and 71 patients in the cefamandole group were evaluable. Geometric mean MICs of organisms isolated and tested to ceftazidime were within achievable therapeutic serum concentrations of ceftazidime. Satisfactory clinical responses were observed in 91% (84/92) of ceftazidime-treated patients and 83% (59/71) of cefamandole-treated patients (P greater than 0.05). Superinfection occurred in one (1%) ceftazidime-treated patient and in five (7%) cefamandole-treated patients. Side effects were infrequent with either treatment. Ceftazidime is as safe and effective as cefamandole for the treatment of pneumonia due to a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.
 ...
PMID:Comparative multicentre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of ceftazidime versus cefamandole for pneumonia. 353 91

Thirty-five patients underwent 38 treatment courses with cefotaxime. Documented infections included 11 bacteremias, 7 cases of nosocomial pneumonia, 6 surgical wound infections, 3 bone infections, 1 biliary infection, and 1 urinary tract infection. Granulocytopenic patients with fever received 15 courses of empiric cefotaxime therapy alone; in 8 courses, no definite site of infection or pathogen was isolated. Broad-spectrum antibiotics had been administered to 23 patients before cefotaxime. Thirty-seven bacterial pathogens were isolated from 25 patients. Three such pathogens were resistant to cefotaxime and required alternative therapies. Pathogenic isolates included 13 Serratia marcescens, 12 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 4 Escherichia coli, 2 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 2 Providencia stuartii, 1 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Haemophilus influenzae, 1 Enterococcus, and 1 Staphylococcus aureus. Of the treatment courses, 25 of 38 resulted in a favorable response to cefotaxime, including 9 of 15 in granulocytopenic patients. Superinfection was seen in one patient. The emergence of resistance was documented in another patient. Of 15 patients with multiply resistant pathogens, 12 improved with cefotaxime. Of 12 patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 6 favorably responded. Possible complications of cefotaxime were observed in 14 of 42 treatment courses. Cefotaxime is most useful in treatment of infections due to multiply resistant, gram-negative pathogens other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
 ...
PMID:Clinical efficacy of cefotaxime in serious infections. 628 2

Twenty-eight patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were clinically studied for the effectiveness of the time-difference combination use of netilmicin (NTL) and minocycline (MINO). The patients were treated with NTL 100 mg and two hours later, with MINO 100 mg intravenously, twice daily, in the morning and evening for 14 days. Of 26 patients, MRSA was eradicated in 16 (61.5%), decreased in one, and unchanged in nine. Superinfections occurred with Serratia marcescens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in two patients. The clinical efficacies were assessed in two patients with septicemia, 16 with pneumonia, and eight with chronic bronchitis. The obtained results were excellent in four patients, good in 15, fair in six, and poor in one patient. The rate of effectiveness was 73.1% (19/26). The overall clinical effectiveness judged by the committee was good in 19, fair in five, and poor in two patients. The efficacy rate was also 73.1% (19/26). Coagulase type II of MRSA was found in 23 patients, and coagulase type III in three patients, with overall clinical efficacy rates of 73.9% (17/23) and 66.7% (2/3), respectively. A side effect of eruption was observed in one patient, and its incidence was 3.6% (1/28). Abnormal laboratory test results were observed in 16 patients (57.1%), including abnormal liver function in 14 patients, abnormal kidney function in three, and increased eosinophils in three. Laboratory abnormalities occurred twelve of 16 bedridden patients, and this rate was higher than that in non bedridden patients. However, these abnormalities were all mild, transient, and immediately recovered after the treatment. In conclusion, the time-difference combination therapy using NTL and MINO was effective in the treatment of MRSA infections.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical studies on the time-difference combination therapy with netilmicin and minocycline in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections]. 780 92


1 2 Next >>