Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030567 (Parkinson's disease)
 63,064 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Flunarizine and cinnarizine have been well documented to cause EPS. Other CCBs, on rare occasions, also have been reported to cause EPS. Theoretical explanations for these events include the inhibition of calcium influx into striatal cells and direct dopaminergic antagonistic properties. In addition, the chemical structures of flunarizine and cinnarizine, which are related to neuroleptics, may explain the relatively greater incidence of EPS with these agents. Suggested risk factors for acquiring EPS with flunarizine or cinnarizine use appear to be age, although experience with using these agents in younger patients is limited, and a family history of tremors and/or Parkinson's disease. The onset and type of presentation is unpredictable and, in most instances, discontinuation of the medication relieves the symptoms within a few days to months. Pharmacologic management of EPS with continued use of the offending agent generally has not been of clinical benefit. In conclusion, patients receiving CCBs, particularly flunarizine and cinnarizine, should be monitored for EPS.
 ...
PMID:Extrapyramidal symptoms associated with calcium-channel blockers. 771 50

Preclinical studies have shown that quetiapine (Seroquel, AstraZeneca) is an atypical antipsychotic with many similarities to clozapine. Both placebo-controlled and comparative studies in patients with schizophrenia have demonstrated that quetiapine has long-term efficacy in both positive and negative domains, as well as beneficial effects on affective and cognitive symptoms. Comparative clinical studies confirm that quetiapine is at least as effective as the standard antipsychotics, chlorpromazine and haloperidol and response rates with quetiapine are similar to those reported with other atypical antipychotics. Quetiapine has also demonstrated superior efficacy to haloperidol in partially responsive patients, who can be particularly difficult to treat. Quetiapine has a wide clinical dosing range (150-750 mg/day), although doses of 400 mg or above should be used in patients who do not fully respond to lower doses of the drug. Quetiapine is generally well tolerated with no requirement for routine ECG or blood monitoring and it has minimal effects on weight. Uniquely among other first-line atypical antipsychotics, quetiapine is associated with a placebo-level incidence of EPS and an indistinguishable effect from placebo on plasma prolactin at all doses. Thus, clinicians can confidently increase the dose of quetiapine, without increasing the risk of EPS or hyperprolactinaemia. A number of studies have also shown that quetiapine is well-tolerated and effective in patients who are particularly susceptible to EPS, including elderly and adolescent patients and those with pre-existing dopaminergic pathology, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. The consistent efficacy in treating all schizophrenic domains and good tolerability, particularly placebo-level EPS, make quetiapine acceptable to patients, as demonstrated in a survey of patient satisfaction. Thus quetiapine is a suitable first-line therapy for the treatment of schizophrenia and psychosis.
 ...
PMID:Review of quetiapine and its clinical applications in schizophrenia. 1124 16

Clozapine was one of the major advances in the treatment of schizophrenia since the introduction of the classic antipsychotic agent chlorpromazine in the 1950s. Over the past 10 years, clozapine has become the reference compound for the development of new antipsychotics, and new drugs have been developed which have also claimed atypical status. The indications of clozapine were recently extended to Psychosis in Parkinson's disease and harmonized in the European Union. This provides the opportunity to update the data on clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia. In this article we review current clinical evidence in schizophrenia to address the following issues: 1) Efficacy in refractory/positive symptoms: a systematic and critical analysis of 14 double-blind clinical trials in comparison with both standard and novel antipsychotics show consistent findings in favour of clozapine, with all but three of the reports demonstrating superiority. The review of studies allow us to say little about the predictors of treatment response, time to clozapine response and about the impact of clozapine on the quality of patients'life and longer-term outcome. Treatment options for clozapine non-responders are reviewed. 2) Risk of EPS: clozapine is considered to have a minimal risk of EPS and in all studies where a valid methodology was used, a clear superiority over the other neuroleptics is demonstrated. It is pointed out that, if the prevalence and incidence of EPS with clozapine is low, it is not zero. All the studies assessing clozapine treatment for TD have major methodological limitations, so no final conclusion can be drawn. 3) Efficacy for primary and secondary negative symptoms and neurocognitive effects: the data of clinical studies where negative symptoms scales were used favour clozapine in terms of improvement. However most of the studies were carried out in populations with predominantly positive symptoms. With regard to the need to distinguish primary and secondary symptoms, data are conflicting regarding the benefit of clozapine. Due to the lack of studies with a valid methodology, no definitive conclusion can be drawn about the efficacy on clozapine on the deficit syndrome and on neurocognitive disorders. 4) Impact on suicide risk: 4 out of 6 retrospective studies provide evidence for the ability of clozapine therapy to reduce suicidal behaviour. The results of a recent randomized, parallel-group study designed to compare clozapine versus olanzapine in preventing suicide attempts seems to confirm this hypothesis. We also address the tolerability and safety data, especially haematologic, comitial, cardiovascular and metabolic side-effects. The effectiveness of blood monitoring for the management of neutropenia and agranulocytosis demands that the recommendations are strictly followed. The use of clozapine at doses higher than 600 mg daily should follow published recommendations, in order to minimize the risk of seizures; these include anticonvulsant regimens based on blood levels. With regard to the cardiovascular mortality, if clozapine therapy has negligible effects on QT interval, its association with potential fatal myocarditis cannot be excluded in young patients who should be investigated if they develop cardiac symptoms in the first weeks of treatment. Available data support the notion that the frequency of bodyweight gain is high with several new antipsychotics, including clozapine. Potential long term effects of bodyweight gain on mortality and morbidity have to be taken into consideration. The pharmacological mechanisms underlying the "unique clozapine profile" is discussed. Clozapine remains the only antipsychotic with efficacy at relatively low D2 receptor occupancy. The pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic aspects are also reviewed. Finally, the place of clozapine in the current treatment of schizophrenia is highlighted to inform the development of guidelines for clinical management.
 ...
PMID:[Leponex, 10 years after -- a clinical review]. 1562 52

The Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) was developed to assess four types of drug-induced movement disorders (DIMD): Parkinsonism, akathisia, dystonia, and tardive dyskinesia (TD). Comprehensive ESRS definitions and basic instructions are given. Factor analysis provided six ESRS factors: 1) hypokinetic Parkinsonism; 2) orofacial dyskinesia; 3) trunk/limb dyskinesia; 4) akathisia; 5) tremor; and 6) tardive dystonia. Two pivotal studies found high inter-rater reliability correlations in both antipsychotic-induced movement disorders and idiopathic Parkinson disease. For inter-rater reliability and certification of raters, >or=80% of item ratings of the complete scale should be +/-1 point of expert ratings and >or=70% of ratings on individual items of each ESRS subscale should be +/-1 point of expert ratings. During a cross-scale comparison, AIMS and ESRS were found to have a 96% (359/374) agreement between TD-defined cases by DSM-IV TD criteria. Two recent international studies using the ESRS included over 3000 patients worldwide and showed an incidence of TD ranging from 10.2% (2000) to 12% (1998). ESRS specificity was investigated through two different approaches, path analyses and ANCOVA PANSS factors changes, which found that ESRS measurement of drug-induced EPS is valid and discriminative from psychiatric symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Manual for the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS). 1594 57