Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030305 (pancreatitis)
 16,014 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We report our experience with eight patients with severe persistent pancreatitis associated with peripancreatic fluid collections requiring placement of drainage catheters who subsequently developed pancreatic fistula. The fistulas were diagnosed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, contrast tube study, or Hypaque enema at a mean of 13 weeks after diagnosis of pancreatitis and drain placement. These fistulas involved the duodenum in five patients and colon in three patients. Six patients had fistula resolution with medical therapy (after removal of percutaneous drainage catheters in three and with drain removal in conjunction with transpapillary stenting of a disrupted pancreatic duct in another three). We conclude that in patients with ongoing pancreatitis, pancreaticoenteric fistulas are probably caused by erosion of percutaneous drainage catheters. Such fistulas resolved with conservative treatment in six of eight patients.
 ...
PMID:Pancreaticoenteric fistula: no longer a surgical disease? 155 24

Pancreatitis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality secondary to endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). One factor that may cause post-ERP pancreatitis is the type of contrast media utilized during the procedure. The purpose of this prospective, double-blind, randomized study was to evaluate the effects of three contrast agents of differing osmolality and ionicity on changes between pre- and post-ERP chemical changes in serum amylase and lipase and development of clinical symptoms of acute pancreatitis. Our study of 53 patients showed that those who received Omnipaque a non-ionic, relatively iso-osmolar contrast agent, had a significantly lower serum amylase (p = 0.0038) and serum lipase (p = 0.0002) in post-ERP serological markers, compared with patients who received the ionic agents, Hypaque meglumine 60% or Hexabrix. In addition, the development of clinical symptoms of pancreatitis was less in patients who received Omnipaque than in those who received Hexabrix or Hypaque (1 vs. 3 vs. 4). No significant difference was found between patients who received ionic agents. No patient who received Omnipaque needed hospitalization, whereas one (6%) patient who received Hexabrix was hospitalized compared to three (20%) hospitalized patients who received Hypaque. When the initial cost and cost of hospitalization were compared, the non-ionic contrast medium was also found to be more cost-effective for the patient. In summary, the risk of post-ERP acute pancreatitis was significantly lower for patients who received the non-ionic contrast agent than for those who received the ionic agents.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of contrast agents for endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. 159 71

Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCPs are complicated by pancreatitis in 1% to 10% of patients, and evidence suggests that the contrast agent used for ERCP may be important in the pathogenesis of such pancreatitis. This prospective, double-blind study was undertaken to determine whether the use of a low-osmolality, nonionic contrast agent (Omnipaque 300; iohexol, 672 mOsm/kg H2O) would reduce the frequency and severity of postprocedure pancreatitis as compared to a high-osmolality, ionic contrast agent (Hypaque 50%; diatrizoate sodium, 1515 mOsm/kg H20). Six hundred ninety patients undergoing diagnostic ERCP (pancreatogram, cholangiogram, or both) either with or without sphincter of Oddi manometry and therapy were randomized to iohexol or diatrizoate sodium. Postprocedure pancreatitis was diagnosed when the serum amylase or lipase level was elevated to at least four times the upper limits of normal at 18 hours and was associated with increased abdominal pain persisting for at least 24 hours after the procedure that required administration of narcotic analgesics. The pancreatitis was graded as mild, moderate, or severe depending on the length of hospital stay and the need for intervention. The overall frequency (7.2% versus 7.5%) and severity (4.3% mild, 2% moderate, 0.9% severe for the diatrizoate sodium group versus 4.3% mild, 2.6% moderate, and 0.6% severe for the iohexol group) of postprocedure pancreatitis and the frequency and severity within each procedure category were similar for the two contrast agent groups (p > .05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized, prospective study comparing a low- and high-osmolality contrast agent. 792 31