Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0030305 (
pancreatitis
)
16,014
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Back pain affects millions of people. It affects 80% of the population and up to 52% at any given time. Back pain is not limited to sedentary individuals; it has significant effects on athletes as well. Depending upon the sport, incidence rates of back pain occur in athletes from 1.1% to as high as 30%. Athletes differ from the non-athletic population in that their incentives to return to activity are considerably different than non-athletes. The reasons may vary from the will to win through to significant financial considerations. Although reasons for recovery are different, the physiology and mechanics of repair of injured soft tissue in the athlete is the same as for the non-athlete. Proper management of the athlete requires ruling out emergent causes of back pain such as tumour, infection, acute fracture, progressive neurological deficit, visceral sources (e.g.
pancreatitis
, abdominal aortic aneurysm), and rheumatoid variants. Once a good history and physical is performed, a simple classification system can be utilised to manage the athlete presenting with back pain. This system can be expressed as: (a) regional back pain; (b) radicular
leg pain
; (c) radicular
leg pain
with progressive neurological deficit; and (d) cauda equina syndrome. Each of these categories needs to be managed in a specific manner and can provide the healthcare professional with simple, straightforward guidelines for handling the athlete with lower back pain. The key is to return the athlete to the field of play in a safe and timely manner.
...
PMID:Management of back pain in athletes. 872 48
Lentinan is a beta 1-->3 glucan isolated from Lentinus edodes (Shiitake mushroom) which has immune modulating properties. We have conducted two phase I/II placebo-controlled trials on a total of 98 patients. In one study at the San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH), ten patients each were administered 2, 5, or 10 mg of lentinan or placebo i.v. once a week for eight weeks. In the second study at the Community Research Initiative in New York (CRI), two groups of 20 patients each were administered 1 or 5 mg of lentinan i.v. twice a week for 12 weeks, and ten patients were administered placebo (vehicle containing mannitol plus dextran 40) i.v. twice a week. Entry criteria were an HIV positive test, CD4 levels of 200-500 cells, age 18-60 years, and without current opportunistic infections. This study confirms, in Caucasian subjects also, the good tolerability of lentinan observed in Japanese cancer patients. Side effects were mainly mild, especially when infusion was carried out over a 30-minute period. In the SFGH study, where administration was over a ten minute period, there were nine side effects severe enough to be reported to the FDA (one case each of anaphylactoid reaction, back pain,
leg pain
, depression, rigor, fever, chills, granulocytopenia and elevated liver enzymes) and there were four patients who discontinued therapy because of side effects. In the CRI study, where infusion was over a 30-minute period, there were no side effects reportable to the FDA and there were four dropouts due to side effects or personal preference. Most side effects resolved promptly after the discontinuation of medication, and all of them were relieved within 24 hours. Patients in the study have shown a trend toward increases in CD4 cells and in some patients neutrophil activity. Because of the small numbers, these values do not have statistical significance. Inasmuch as no side effects such as anemia, leukopenia,
pancreatitis
or neuropathy were seen, and in view of the positive effects of lentinan on certain surrogate markers (recognizing that these were small studies), we recommended a long-term clinical trial of lentinan in combination with didanosine (ddI) or zidovudine in HIV positive patients. Most patients in these trials did not have measurable p24 levels. In the CRI trials of ten patients with elevated p24 levels, eight on lentinan and two on placebo had decreased p24 levels. Of these decreases, those with lentinan and one with placebo were marked. These results were provocative and needed confirmation. Subsequent to this study, a trial of lentinan in combination with didanosine (ddI) showed a mean increase of 142 CD4 cells/mm3 over a twelve month period, in contrast to a decrease in CD4 cells in patients on ddI alone (Gordon et al. 1995).
...
PMID:A placebo-controlled trial of the immune modulator, lentinan, in HIV-positive patients: a phase I/II trial. 1050 66