Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030201 (Postoperative pain)
 1,085 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The intraoperative use of opioid analgesics decreases the volatile anesthetic requirement and provides for pain relief in the early postoperative period. In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 95 ASA physical status 1 or 2 children (ages 5-15 yr) undergoing general anesthesia for elective operations, we compared postoperative analgesia following the intraoperative intravenous (iv) administration of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug or morphine, an opioid analgesic. After induction of general anesthesia and before the start of the surgical procedure, children received equal volumes of saline, morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1, iv) or ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1, iv). Postoperative pain was evaluated by the child using a 10-cm linear visual analog scale (VAS) and by a blinded observer using both a VAS and an objective pain scale (OPS) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). There were no statistically significant differences in the VAS and OPS scores in the PACU or in the postoperative analgesic requirements in children receiving morphine or ketorolac. The placebo group had a significantly higher VAS and OPS score and required earlier and more frequent analgesic therapy in the PACU compared to the two analgesic groups. Patients receiving ketorolac had less postoperative emesis than those receiving morphine. We conclude that ketorolac (0.9 mg.kg-1) is an effective alternative to morphine (0.1 mg.kg-1) as an iv adjuvant during general anesthesia, and in the dose used in this study, is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting in children.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of ketorolac and morphine as adjuvants during pediatric surgery. 151 1

An analgesic is often administered upon the occurrence of pain following surgery. Buprenorphine hydrochloride suppository (0.2 mg) was given immediately postoperatively to patients who had undergone surgery under general anesthesia. Post-operative pain has been observed after 782 +/- 41 minutes (n = 148, mean +/- SE) in the patients with suppository and 127 +/- 18 minutes (n = 57) in the control group (P less than 0.01). Analgesics were given to 68% of the control group within 2 hours, while it was given to 14% of the study group. Further 57% of the latter did not complain of any pain after 20 hours. The pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine was studied in 7 patients. Intrarectal administration of 0.2 mg buprenorphine suppository just after surgery had a sufficient analgesic action and did not induce any adverse reactions of any clinical importance.
 ...
PMID:[Evaluation of buprenorphine hydrochloride suppositories for postoperative pain relief]. 154 87

Postoperative pain management is still a grossly neglected field. In most cases, antipyretic analgesics alone are insufficient during the early postoperative period. Powerful narcotics are often avoided or underdosed because they are associated with the risk of respiratory depression. Some authors recommend combined infusion of tramadol and metamizole, which is assumed to provide sufficient pain relief without the risk of respiratory depression. However, this regimen has not yet been investigated in a study that meets currently accepted scientific standards. METHODS. Sixty patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy were included in a randomised, prospective double-blind study. Thirty women received two placebo suppositories immediately after induction of anaesthesia and a postoperative infusion of tramadol and metamizole (400 mg tramadol plus 5 g [= 10 ml] metamizole in 500 ml electrolyte solution). The 30 women of the control group received two ibuprofen suppositories (585.2 mg) preoperatively and a post-operative tramadol infusion (400 mg tramadol plus 10 ml placebo [NaCl 0.9%] in 500 mg electrolyte solution). The patients of both groups received 125 ml of the appropriate infusion solution as a loading dose over 10 min (corresponding to 1.25 mg metamizole and 100 mg tramadol in the metamizole/tramadol group or 100 mg tramadol in the ibuprofen/tramadol group) 10 min after awakening. The remaining solution was administered at an infusion rate of 12.5-25 ml/h (corresponding to 125-250 mg metamizole and 10-20 mg tramadol/h or 10-20 mg tramadol/h). On request or when complaining of stronger pain, the patients received an additional bolus infusion of 125 ml over 10 min. In case of insufficient pain reduction despite repeated infusion of 125-ml boli or consumption of the entire infusion solution, the patients discontinued the study and received demand-adapted intravenous titration of piritramide. Postoperative pain was evaluated on the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the 101-point numerical rating scale immediately before the start of the infusion. Pain evaluation was repeated 20, 30, 40, 60, 100, 120, and 240 min after awakening accompanied by registration of heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and side effects. RESULTS. About 60% of the entire infusion solution was administered within 60 min in both groups. Significant postoperative pain reduction in both groups and on both the 101-point scale and the VAS was observed only at 100, 120, and 240 min after awakening. In the tramadol/metamizole group, nausea occurred in 7 cases and vomiting in 1. Nine patients in this group additionally required intravenous piritramide because of insufficient pain relief. In the tramadol/ibuprofen group, 8 patients complained about nausea and 4 patients vomited. Six patients additionally received intravenous piritramide because of insufficient pain reduction. CONCLUSIONS. Satisfactory pain reduction occurred rather late despite high doses of both the tramadol/metamizole and the tramadol/ibuprofen. Both analgesic combination must be regarded as insufficient after inhalational anaesthesia because of the very slow onset of action and the high failure rate.
 ...
PMID:[A comparison of a tramadol/metamizole infusion with the combination tramadol infusion plus ibuprofen suppositories for postoperative pain management following hysterectomy]. 163 21

Surgery on the shoulder often causes severe pain and, therefore, requires high doses of opiates. As postoperative pain is frequently treated inadequately, it is desirable to seek alternatives for providing effective analgesia. In a prospective study we examined the efficacy of balanced anesthesia consisting of general anesthesia combined with interscalene brachial plexus blockade for intra- and postoperative analgesia for operations on the shoulder. METHODS. Using the technique described by Winnie, interscalene block (ISB) was performed in 100 awake patients. After location of the brachial plexus by means of a peripheral nerve stimulator, we injected 40 ml bupivacaine 0.375%, after which general anesthesia (GA) was induced. At three predetermined points in time (recovery room, 8 h, and 24 h after the end of surgery), pain was evaluated by a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10 and the extent of sensory blockade was tested by the pinprick method. The results of the pain scores and individual demands for analgesics were compared with a group of 22 patients who received only GA. Both groups were comparable in age, sex, and type of surgical procedure. RESULTS. We noted technical failure of the ISB in 8% of our patients. Side effects such as Horner's syndrome (18%), phrenic nerve paralysis (10%), and recurrent laryngeal nerve block (1%) were only temporarily observed during the action of the local anesthetics. During the surgical procedure, the group with ISB received a mean dose of 0.13 +/- 0.07 mg fentanyl versus 0.29 +/- 0.08 mg in the GA group (P less than 0.01) with equipotent doses of volatile anesthetics (1.0 to 1.5 MAC enflurane). Postoperative pain occurred for the first time in 39% of the patients given ISB later than 12 h after the end of surgery (average 8.7 +/- 5.9 h). In contrast, 95% of the patients with GA complained of pain in the recovery room. Pain measurement by the analogue scale clearly demonstrated the advantages of balanced anesthesia directly and 8 h after the operation (P less than 0.01). Even 24 h after the end of the surgical procedure the patients had better pain relief (P less than 0.05) in spite of the decreasing effect of the ISB. These significant differences led to the following results for postoperative treatment: 35% of the patients with ISB did not require additional analgesics during the first 24-h period after surgery, whereas 95% of those with GA requested analgesia. Only 32% of the ISB patients required opioids versus 86% with GA. The average duration of stay in the recovery room was reduced by 25% in the group with ISB (86 vs 134 min). In a final assessment, 84% of the patients were satisfied with the balanced anesthesia and only 5% were disappointed with the method. CONCLUSION. The combination of ISB and GA allows a reduction in intraoperative doses of opiates and facilitates postoperative pain management. Because of the low incidence of side effects, the lack of complications, and the high degree of patient acceptance, we recommend this type of balanced anesthesia for patients undergoing shoulder surgery.
 ...
PMID:[The combination of general anesthesia and interscalene block in shoulder surgery]. 174 12

Presented in an illustrative case report and a review of the anesthetic management of obstructive sleep apnea patients. Preoperative evaluation should include a thorough airway evaluation and a comprehensive cardiovascular and pulmonary evaluation. With polysomnography, identification of the severity of sleep apnea can be idenified. Although sleep centers vary in their definitions, severe obstructive sleep apnea is diagnosed if the patient demonstrates an apnea index greater than 70 and an oxygen (O2) desaturation less than 80% with cardiovascular sequelae. Severe sleep apnea patients are at extreme risk for general anesthesia. These risks should be discussed preoperatively with the patient. Unsupervised preoperative sedation should be avoided because of the extreme sensitivity of these patients to sedatives and airway obstruction. Intraoperative management of the obstructive sleep apnea patient varies depending on the severity of the sleep apnea. Invasive monitoring may be necessary if the patient demonstrates evidence of cardiopulmonary dysfunction. With the assistance of the otolaryngologist, the anesthesiologist can formulate an approach to establishing an airway. Intraoperative opioids and sedatives should be limited. The recovery of the sleep apnea patient is extremely important and is the time when most airway emergencies occur. Extubation of the patient should occur when appropriate surgical personnel and equipment are available in case of an airway emergency. Steroids may be used to decrease the amount of airway swelling. Supplemental O2 should be used in patients who demonstrate desaturation. Opioids and sedatives should be avoided, as should other drugs that have central and sedating effects. Postoperative pain is effectively controlled with acetaminophen and topical anesthetic sprays. Postoperative monitoring for apnea, desaturation, and dysrhythmias is a necessity in sleep apnea patients.
 ...
PMID:Anesthetic management of obstructive sleep apnea patients. 176 Jan 69

One hundred and sixty-four patients scheduled for elective termination of pregnancy under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive one of three different supplements to propofol and oxygen in nitrous oxide anaesthesia: 0.1 mg fentanyl, 0.5 mg alfentanil or placebo. Postoperative pain and nausea, as well as complications during anaesthesia were studied. There were no differences in complications or complaints by surgeons during anaesthesia, and no patient in any group reacted unsatisfactorily to surgery. The patients in the placebo group consumed significantly more propofol during the procedure (P less than 0.001). No differences were seen in time until hospital discharge between the three groups. Complaints about postoperative pain were significantly less frequent among patients receiving fentanyl (P less than 0.01). The number of patients requesting postoperative analgetics, however, did not differ. There was no difference in the frequency of nausea or vomiting, but postoperative pain was found significantly to increase complaints of nausea (P less than 0.01) and also time until hospital discharge (P less than 0.01). In conclusion, opioid supplementation lowered the amount of propofol needed for anaesthesia. Alfentanil 0.5 mg did not improve the postoperative course. Fentanyl 0.1 mg decreased the frequency of postoperative pain without increasing the time to hospital discharge.
 ...
PMID:Opioid supplementation to propofol anaesthesia for outpatient abortion: a comparison between alfentanil, fentanyl and placebo. 176 99

Anesthesia in patients for surgery of the head and neck should begin with evaluation of the animal's medical history, laboratory data, and physical examination. This information plus knowledge of the physiologic changes induced by abnormalities and surgery of the head and neck provide the basis for selection of anesthetic regimens and techniques. The regimen should include drugs that produce minimal impact on organ systems, especially those systems lacking physiologic reserve because of disease. Establishment of a patent airway, protection of the airway, and control of ventilation should receive primary attention. Monitoring and support of cardiopulmonary function and maintenance of fluid volume and renal function are essential. The patient should be observed until protective reflexes return and recovery is complete. Postoperative pain should be managed with analgesics.
 ...
PMID:Anesthesia for head and neck surgery. 180 43

The management of primary varicose veins is evolving. Recovery time, cost, recurrence rate, and cosmesis are critical determinants. Classic "high ligation" and ankle-to-groin stripping is expensive, results in a long convalescence, and may produce unacceptable scarring and possible permanent nerve injury. This report describes the technique of stab evulsion phlebectomy performed in an outpatient setting. Under loco-regional anesthesia, and after high ligation, existing tributary and trunk varicosities are evulsed with specially designed hooks. The multiple stab incisions, 1.5- to 3-mm long, are closed with adhesive strips. Fifty-six patients, with 69 involved limbs, have been operated on during the past 9 months. Postoperative pain and complications were minimal. Convalescence was eliminated and all patients immediately resumed normal daily activities. Cosmesis was excellent. This technique is based on hemodynamically accurate principles. It effectively removes all varicosities, eliminates the proximal source of reflux, and disconnects potentially outflowing perforators, yet leaves in situ undamaged trunk veins, which may be used as potential vein grafts.
 ...
PMID:Ambulatory stab evulsion phlebectomy for truncal varicose veins. 186 40

Postoperative pain relief and sedation with epidural midazolam were studied. Twenty-one patients for elective upper abdominal surgery were divided into 3 groups. Epidural catheter was inserted into thoracic epidural space before induction of general anesthesia. In each group, either 10 ml saline only, midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1 + 10 ml saline, or midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 + 10 ml saline was injected into epidural catheter for complaint of pain in recovery room. For 120 minutes after epidural injection, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, serum concentration of midazolam, and sedation score were monitored. In midazolam injected groups, only slight changes were seen in blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. Sedation score was graded from 1 to 6:1 means complete sleep, and not responded to verbal command, 6 means agitated and many complaints. Midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 + 10 ml saline group had the lowest score, and saline 10 ml group had the highest score. Prolonged sedation and pain relief were obtained in midazolam injected group, especially 0.1 mg.kg-1 + 10 ml saline group. Serum midazolam concentrations were lower than 200 ng.ml-1. These values were considered as the lower limit for sedation by intravenous administration. In conclusion, epidural midazolam was useful for postoperative pain relief. The mechanism is considered to involve spinally mediated CNS action or direct spinal action.
 ...
PMID:[Epidural midazolam for treatment of postoperative pain]. 194 8

Epidural butorphanol 1, 2 and 4 mg were compared with morphine, 5 mg, for postoperative analgesia in 92 consenting, healthy, term parturients who had undergone Caesarean section under epidural lidocaine anaesthesia in a randomized double-blind study. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale and recorded with heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate. The demographic characteristics, and the incidences of primary and repeat Caesarean sections, were not different among the four treatment groups. At 15, 30, 45 and 60 min after treatment the median pain scores following butorphanol were similar and lower than those following morphine (P less than 0.05). Calculated median percentage pain relief values for butorphanol were higher than morphine at each of these times (P less than 0.05). At 90 min and 2 hr the pain scores and pain relief values were similar. Beyond 45 min the number of patients requesting supplemental medication and dropping out of the study increased progressively in both the butorphanol and morphine treated patients. The attrition profiles for butorphanol were different from morphine (P less than 0.01). The median time in the study was greater than 24 hr for morphine, and 3, 2.5 and 4 hr for butorphanol, 1, 2 or 4 mg, respectively. No patient developed a clinically important change in heart rate or blood pressure, and none experienced a decrease in respiratory rate below 12 breaths.min-1. One of 69 patients (1.4 per cent) who received butorphanol developed pruritus compared with ten (43 per cent) of 23 patients who received morphine. The global assessments of the adequacy of analgesia were indistinguishable between morphine and butorphanol. Epidural butorphanol provides safe, effective postoperative analgesia, has a prompt onset, and a limited duration.
 ...
PMID:Post-caesarean section analgesia: a comparison of epidural butorphanol and morphine. 198 36


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>