Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030201 (Postoperative pain)
 1,085 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Postoperative pain management is still a grossly neglected field. In most cases, antipyretic analgesics alone are insufficient during the early postoperative period. Powerful narcotics are often avoided or underdosed because they are associated with the risk of respiratory depression. Some authors recommend combined infusion of tramadol and metamizole, which is assumed to provide sufficient pain relief without the risk of respiratory depression. However, this regimen has not yet been investigated in a study that meets currently accepted scientific standards. METHODS. Sixty patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy were included in a randomised, prospective double-blind study. Thirty women received two placebo suppositories immediately after induction of anaesthesia and a postoperative infusion of tramadol and metamizole (400 mg tramadol plus 5 g [= 10 ml] metamizole in 500 ml electrolyte solution). The 30 women of the control group received two ibuprofen suppositories (585.2 mg) preoperatively and a post-operative tramadol infusion (400 mg tramadol plus 10 ml placebo [NaCl 0.9%] in 500 mg electrolyte solution). The patients of both groups received 125 ml of the appropriate infusion solution as a loading dose over 10 min (corresponding to 1.25 mg metamizole and 100 mg tramadol in the metamizole/tramadol group or 100 mg tramadol in the ibuprofen/tramadol group) 10 min after awakening. The remaining solution was administered at an infusion rate of 12.5-25 ml/h (corresponding to 125-250 mg metamizole and 10-20 mg tramadol/h or 10-20 mg tramadol/h). On request or when complaining of stronger pain, the patients received an additional bolus infusion of 125 ml over 10 min. In case of insufficient pain reduction despite repeated infusion of 125-ml boli or consumption of the entire infusion solution, the patients discontinued the study and received demand-adapted intravenous titration of piritramide. Postoperative pain was evaluated on the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the 101-point numerical rating scale immediately before the start of the infusion. Pain evaluation was repeated 20, 30, 40, 60, 100, 120, and 240 min after awakening accompanied by registration of heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and side effects. RESULTS. About 60% of the entire infusion solution was administered within 60 min in both groups. Significant postoperative pain reduction in both groups and on both the 101-point scale and the VAS was observed only at 100, 120, and 240 min after awakening. In the tramadol/metamizole group, nausea occurred in 7 cases and vomiting in 1. Nine patients in this group additionally required intravenous piritramide because of insufficient pain relief. In the tramadol/ibuprofen group, 8 patients complained about nausea and 4 patients vomited. Six patients additionally received intravenous piritramide because of insufficient pain reduction. CONCLUSIONS. Satisfactory pain reduction occurred rather late despite high doses of both the tramadol/metamizole and the tramadol/ibuprofen. Both analgesic combination must be regarded as insufficient after inhalational anaesthesia because of the very slow onset of action and the high failure rate.
 ...
PMID:[A comparison of a tramadol/metamizole infusion with the combination tramadol infusion plus ibuprofen suppositories for postoperative pain management following hysterectomy]. 163 21

Postoperative pain relief immediately after major surgery cannot be achieved with opioids alone in all patients without respiratory depression or other significant side effects. This investigation was conducted to determine whether the need for opioids and the incidence of side effects can be reduced while maintaining the quality of pain relief using a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug as an adjuvant to an opioid. The analgesic efficacy and safety of patient-controlled analgesia using fentanyl with and without intravenous diclofenac were compared after total hip replacement. Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either diclofenac 75 mg as an initial intravenous loading dose followed by an infusion of 5 mg per hour or saline in a double-blind fashion. The amount of fentanyl administered was recorded. The patients assessed their pain intensity verbally and on a visual analogue scale at intervals of 4 h. The diclofenac group showed a significant reduction in the amount of fentanyl administered during the first 16 h postoperatively as compared to the placebo group (0.65 mg +/- 0.2 vs. 1.08 mg +/- 0.4 respectively, P less than 0.01), and also reported less pain at 16 h (median score on visual analogue scale 0.75 vs. 2.4 respectively, P less than 0.05)). There were no differences in side effects, postoperative blood loss, plasma activated partial thromboplastin time, or Ivy bleeding time between the groups. In conclusion, the addition of diclofenac led to a reduction in fentanyl requirement but did not have any other significant advantages in the treatment of pain following major orthopedic surgery.
 ...
PMID:Intravenous diclofenac coupled with PCA fentanyl for pain relief after total hip replacement. 173 95

Surgery on the shoulder often causes severe pain and, therefore, requires high doses of opiates. As postoperative pain is frequently treated inadequately, it is desirable to seek alternatives for providing effective analgesia. In a prospective study we examined the efficacy of balanced anesthesia consisting of general anesthesia combined with interscalene brachial plexus blockade for intra- and postoperative analgesia for operations on the shoulder. METHODS. Using the technique described by Winnie, interscalene block (ISB) was performed in 100 awake patients. After location of the brachial plexus by means of a peripheral nerve stimulator, we injected 40 ml bupivacaine 0.375%, after which general anesthesia (GA) was induced. At three predetermined points in time (recovery room, 8 h, and 24 h after the end of surgery), pain was evaluated by a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10 and the extent of sensory blockade was tested by the pinprick method. The results of the pain scores and individual demands for analgesics were compared with a group of 22 patients who received only GA. Both groups were comparable in age, sex, and type of surgical procedure. RESULTS. We noted technical failure of the ISB in 8% of our patients. Side effects such as Horner's syndrome (18%), phrenic nerve paralysis (10%), and recurrent laryngeal nerve block (1%) were only temporarily observed during the action of the local anesthetics. During the surgical procedure, the group with ISB received a mean dose of 0.13 +/- 0.07 mg fentanyl versus 0.29 +/- 0.08 mg in the GA group (P less than 0.01) with equipotent doses of volatile anesthetics (1.0 to 1.5 MAC enflurane). Postoperative pain occurred for the first time in 39% of the patients given ISB later than 12 h after the end of surgery (average 8.7 +/- 5.9 h). In contrast, 95% of the patients with GA complained of pain in the recovery room. Pain measurement by the analogue scale clearly demonstrated the advantages of balanced anesthesia directly and 8 h after the operation (P less than 0.01). Even 24 h after the end of the surgical procedure the patients had better pain relief (P less than 0.05) in spite of the decreasing effect of the ISB. These significant differences led to the following results for postoperative treatment: 35% of the patients with ISB did not require additional analgesics during the first 24-h period after surgery, whereas 95% of those with GA requested analgesia. Only 32% of the ISB patients required opioids versus 86% with GA. The average duration of stay in the recovery room was reduced by 25% in the group with ISB (86 vs 134 min). In a final assessment, 84% of the patients were satisfied with the balanced anesthesia and only 5% were disappointed with the method. CONCLUSION. The combination of ISB and GA allows a reduction in intraoperative doses of opiates and facilitates postoperative pain management. Because of the low incidence of side effects, the lack of complications, and the high degree of patient acceptance, we recommend this type of balanced anesthesia for patients undergoing shoulder surgery.
 ...
PMID:[The combination of general anesthesia and interscalene block in shoulder surgery]. 174 12

One hundred and sixty-four patients scheduled for elective termination of pregnancy under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive one of three different supplements to propofol and oxygen in nitrous oxide anaesthesia: 0.1 mg fentanyl, 0.5 mg alfentanil or placebo. Postoperative pain and nausea, as well as complications during anaesthesia were studied. There were no differences in complications or complaints by surgeons during anaesthesia, and no patient in any group reacted unsatisfactorily to surgery. The patients in the placebo group consumed significantly more propofol during the procedure (P less than 0.001). No differences were seen in time until hospital discharge between the three groups. Complaints about postoperative pain were significantly less frequent among patients receiving fentanyl (P less than 0.01). The number of patients requesting postoperative analgetics, however, did not differ. There was no difference in the frequency of nausea or vomiting, but postoperative pain was found significantly to increase complaints of nausea (P less than 0.01) and also time until hospital discharge (P less than 0.01). In conclusion, opioid supplementation lowered the amount of propofol needed for anaesthesia. Alfentanil 0.5 mg did not improve the postoperative course. Fentanyl 0.1 mg decreased the frequency of postoperative pain without increasing the time to hospital discharge.
 ...
PMID:Opioid supplementation to propofol anaesthesia for outpatient abortion: a comparison between alfentanil, fentanyl and placebo. 176 99

Postoperative pain relief and sedation with epidural midazolam-saline or midazolam-bupivacaine were studied in 46 patients after elective upper abdominal surgery. They were divided into 6 groups. In each group, 10 ml saline, 10 ml saline+midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1, 10 ml saline+midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 (saline group), 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml, 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml + midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1 or 0.25% bupivacaine 6 ml + midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 (bupivacaine group) was administered via epidural catheter for complaint of pain. For 120 minutes after epidural injection, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), sedation score, and serum concentration of midazolam (conc midazolam) were evaluated. The time interval until next complaint of pain (pain relief time) was measured. In midazolam injected group, BP, HR, RR were not changed from preinjection value, but sufficient sedation was obtained and pain relief time was significantly prolonged compared with saline or bupivacaine injected group. Midazolam level was lower than that of sedation level. There were no significant differences between saline group and bupivacaine group, but the pain relief effect was slightly stronger in bupivacaine group. It is concluded that epidural saline - midazolam or 0.25% bupivacaine - midazolam is useful for postoperative pain relief after upper abdominal surgery.
 ...
PMID:[Epidural administration of midazolam with saline or bupivacaine for postoperative pain]. 176 1

Interest in the management and study of pain in children has increased in recent years. A range of techniques appropriate to children with different developmental levels is now available for the assessment of various aspects of childhood pain. A management plan can be developed depending on the cause of pain and choosing from a range of therapeutic techniques. It should take into account both the physical and psychological aspects of pain. Drugs from the mainstay of treatment of pain with a clear physiological cause. Suitable drugs are now available but inexperience and myths may still result in reluctance to use appropriate strong analgesics in children. Postoperative pain control and the analgesic needs of neonates have been particularly neglected areas. Management can be dramatically improved by increasing staff sensitivity and the use of an integrated programme of drugs, physical techniques and psychological approaches.
 ...
PMID:Pain management in children. 179 79

Postoperative pain management in children is a topic that has been neglected in the past but is currently an active field of interest and effort. Clearly, the child's cognitive understanding of and emotional response to pain are different than an adult's, and these differences make pain assessment and control more difficult. Ongoing work to develop more accurate techniques of estimating pain intensity in children may have helpful results. The effects of untreated pain in children are similar to those in adults but may have more long-term consequences in children. In the past, postoperative pain treatment in children was often inadequate, but newer techniques, such as continuous infusion of opioids, patient-controlled analgesia, epidural administration of opioids, and regional analgesia, hold promise for improved care in the future.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative pain management in children. 187 63

Postoperative pain relief and sedation with epidural midazolam were studied. Twenty-one patients for elective upper abdominal surgery were divided into 3 groups. Epidural catheter was inserted into thoracic epidural space before induction of general anesthesia. In each group, either 10 ml saline only, midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1 + 10 ml saline, or midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 + 10 ml saline was injected into epidural catheter for complaint of pain in recovery room. For 120 minutes after epidural injection, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, serum concentration of midazolam, and sedation score were monitored. In midazolam injected groups, only slight changes were seen in blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. Sedation score was graded from 1 to 6:1 means complete sleep, and not responded to verbal command, 6 means agitated and many complaints. Midazolam 0.1 mg.kg-1 + 10 ml saline group had the lowest score, and saline 10 ml group had the highest score. Prolonged sedation and pain relief were obtained in midazolam injected group, especially 0.1 mg.kg-1 + 10 ml saline group. Serum midazolam concentrations were lower than 200 ng.ml-1. These values were considered as the lower limit for sedation by intravenous administration. In conclusion, epidural midazolam was useful for postoperative pain relief. The mechanism is considered to involve spinally mediated CNS action or direct spinal action.
 ...
PMID:[Epidural midazolam for treatment of postoperative pain]. 194 8

This article is a report of our experience with an interdisciplinary pain service in a large tertiary care pediatric hospital. During the first 2 years of operation, we received 869 consultations and referrals from more than 19 hospital divisions. Postoperative pain was the most frequent reason for consultation (56% of patients). Patients with pain related to cancer and sickle cell disease comprised 25% of the consultations. The remaining patients had a wide variety of primary diagnoses and causes of pain. We calculated the time spent by pain service physicians in direct patient care. The majority (63%) of physician time was spent with a small number of patients (17%). Most of these patients had pain that was unrelated to surgery, cancer, or sickle cell disease, and many posed dilemmas in diagnosis and treatment. Physician time was correlated directly to the use of psychologic and physical therapies for the pain, involving multiple team members. This experience supports the demand for an interdisciplinary pain service in a tertiary care children's hospital. A significant amount of physician time is necessary to provide patient care and to maintain a team approach, however, and pediatricians and other health care professionals who aim to implement such services should be cognizant of the time required.
 ...
PMID:Experience of an interdisciplinary pediatric pain service. 195 41

Postoperative pain continues to occur, despite both advances in analgesic techniques and recognition of the damaging effect of pain upon recovery. This study set out to describe the pain experiences of successive cholecystectomy patients in a large teaching hospital, using three different pain measures and self-reports of anxiety and pain-related attitudes and experiences. Nurses and doctors in surgical wards provided parallel information about their pain-related attitudes and practices. A substantial proportion of patients suffered significant postoperative pain, apparently related to their fear of addiction and reluctance to ask for extra analgesic help. Nurses were more convinced than patients that patients should have more control of their own pain relief. Barriers to effective pain relief are seen to include cognitive, attitudinal and systemic factors; some suggestions are offered for reform of relevant hospital practices.
 ...
PMID:Postoperative pain experiences: relevant patient and staff attitudes. 197 5


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>