Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030201 (Postoperative pain)
 1,085 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Postoperative pain management in the critically ill patient is a challenge for nurses. Knowing the basis of pain transmission and mechanisms of action of interventions can assist the critical care nurse in making clinical decisions regarding pain control for individual patients. There are a number of modalities available to treat postoperative pain including both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. Techniques such as PCA not only can provide good analgesia, but allow the critically ill patient at least one aspect of control in the otherwise highly controlled environment of the critical care unit. Epidural or intrathecal analgesia, using either opioids or LAAs alone or in combination, provides excellent analgesic effect (with minimal side effects) and may improve patient outcomes. Nonpharmacologic techniques, unfortunately, are commonly overlooked as adjuncts to traditional analgesia routines because of the nature of the illness in the critically ill patient. Nonpharmacologic techniques of pain management have a place in the care of the critically ill when applied based on the assessment of an individual patient's needs and abilities to participate in his or her care. Ensuring optimal patient comfort can benefit critically ill patients and improve clinical outcomes.
 ...
PMID:Pain management. 209 59

Postoperative pain relief can be achieved by several methods, including the use of systemic opioids and regional anaesthesia with intrathecal or epidural opioids or local anaesthetics. On-demand analgesia using a PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) system is regarded as the ideal option for systemic opioid analgesia. While PCA devices are not yet commonly used in all recovery units, the use of repetitive boluses on demand is still the most frequent form of administration in postoperative pain therapy. The objective of the present study was to show if continuous infusion of the opioid tramadol could produce better analgesia than repetitive administration of boluses. METHOD. In a study under double-blind conditions 135 ASA I and II patients were assigned at random to group I (infusion group) or group B (bolus group) when they first requested pain treatment after abdominal surgery. The patients in group I received an initial intravenous loading dose of 100 mg tramadol, followed by an infusion of 12 mg/h tramadol for 24 h; if necessary, repeated boluses of 50 mg tramadol were given. In group B the patients received a placebo infusion instead of the tramadol infusion; otherwise, the procedure was the same. Pain relief was monitored by means of a VAS (visual analogue scale) up to 6 h after surgery. We investigated the retrograde assessment of analgesia by the patients after 6 h, how often repetitive boluses were required, and the amount of analgesics administered in 6 and 24 h. RESULTS. The pain relief was assessed as excellent or good by 76.5% of group I and 65.6% of group B; 19.1% of group I and 26.9% of group B assessed the analgesic effect as satisfactory; 4.4% of group I and 7.5% of group B complained of insufficient analgesia. In group I 69.2% requested only one or no repetitive bolus, compared with 40.3% in group B, while two or more boluses were demanded by 30.8% in group I und 59.7% in group B. The average analgesic consumption after 6 h was 223.5 +/- 53.7 mg tramadol in group I and 176.6 +/- 63.1 mg tramadol in group B, respectively. After 24 h it was 449.5 +/- 66.0 mg tramadol in group I and 201.6 +/- 83.9 mg tramadol in group B. While the consumption during the first 6 h was comparable, from then on the consumption in group I increased significantly. Side effects were reported by 25% in both groups. They were clinically irrelevant and did not necessitate termination of the clinical trial in any case. During the study period pulse and blood pressure remained within the normal range and did not show any significant changes. CONCLUSION. The fact that the patients in group I requested far fewer repetitive boluses than those in group B and the assessment by the patients led to the conclusion that treatment in the infusion group is better than that in the bolus group. Concerns that a significantly higher consumption of analgesics would cause unwanted side-effects have proven unfounded. Six hours after surgery, when analgesia was evaluated by the patients, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Not until the maintenance infusion had been administered for a further 18 h, was the tramadol consumption within the infusion group significantly higher. Thus, we should consider continuing unreduced administration of the maintenance infusion 6 h after operation.
 ...
PMID:[Postoperative analgesia with tramadol. Continuous infusion versus repetitive bolus administration]. 804 60

The postoperative analgesia afforded after colonic surgery by IV opioid, clonidine and lignocaine given intra- and postoperatively was evaluated. In a double-blind randomised trial, 80 male patients scheduled for colonic resection under general anaesthesia received fentanyl 5 micrograms.kg-1 at induction and another 4 micrograms.kg-1 before skin incision (group A) or fentanyl (same dose) plus clonidine 4 micrograms.kg-1 in 20 min + 2 micrograms.kg-1.h-1 (group B, C) or fentanyl plus clonidine (same dosage) plus lignocaine 2 mg.kg-1 before skin incision, repeated before peritoneal incision and retractor placement (group D). In the four groups, intraoperative boluses of fentanyl 2 micrograms.kg-1 were given in response to the painful stimulation of the procedure. Postoperative pain was managed with PCA delivering 2 mg morphine per request in group A, 1.5 mg morphine in group B, 1.5 mg morphine + 15 micrograms clonidine in group C and 1.2 mg morphine + 15 micrograms clonidine + 23 mg lignocaine in group D. Postoperative analgesia was assessed by recording the analgesic demands (met and unmet) and the dose of morphine delivered at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 hours. Side-effects, pain and sedation analogue scores were also recorded. Analgesic demands and delivered morphine dose were reduced, at any time interval considered, in groups B, C, D, compared with A (P < 0.001). No differences were noted between the group B, C, D. Pain analogue scores were better in groups B, C, D compared with group A (P < 0.001). Sedation and side-effects were not increased in groups B, C, D.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Intraoperative and postoperative analgesia using intravenous opioid, clonidine and lignocaine. 816 Sep 43

Efficacy and safety of a PCA protocol, without loading dose or background infusion, was investigated in 40 consenting patients after osteotomy of the foot. All patients had intrathecal lidocaine 5% 1.8 ml preoperatively. Postoperative pain relief was provided with morphine from a Baxter Travenol infusor with PC module. The morphine concentration was 2 mg/ml or 3 mg/ml. In order to reach the analgesic blood concentration as quickly as possible, the patients were instructed to start PCA from the very first moment pain occurred. The patients breathed room air. The nursing staff evaluated respiratory and cardiovascular parameters, pain and side effects. Although mean VAS scores were higher than 3 in the early postoperative phase, no supplementary analgesics were required. One patient had urine retention. One patient had a drop in blood pressure at the start of morphine, which was quickly restored with the administration of colloids. Oxygen saturations were lower (SpO2 < 95%) the first hours postoperatively, especially at the first assessment where no morphine was administered. Pain or relative hypovolaemia could be an explanation. Dry mouth and sleepiness were the most frequently reported side-effects, followed by dizziness, vomiting and nausea. Sweating and itching were less frequently reported. The occurrence of the side effects was the highest during the first postoperative day. We conclude that even when morphine is used in PCA without loading dose or background infusion after opiate-free locoregional analgesia, close monitoring is necessary for at least 5 hours.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of morphine for patient controlled analgesia with the Infusor system after opiate-free locoregional anesthesia for osteotomy of the foot. 866 16

Our study describes an original technique of continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block (CPSB) (Group A, 60 patients) and compares its analgesic efficacy after foot surgery with intramuscular (IM) opioids (Group B, 15 patients) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with morphine (Group C, 45 patients). CPSB was performed using Singelyn's landmarks. The sciatic nerve was localized with a short-beveled needle connected to a peripheral nerve stimulator. A 20-gauge catheter was placed at the same depth as the needle with a Seldinger technique. Thirty milliliters of 1% mepivacaine with epinephrine 1/200,000 was injected and followed by a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine with sufentanil 0.1 microgram/mL and clonidine 1 microgram/mL at 7 mL/h for 48 h. Postoperative analgesia (intravenous [IV] propacetamol [PRO] and/or IM piritramide [DIPI]) was standardized. Postoperative pain score (PPS), supplemental analgesia, and side effects were noted. CPSB was easy to perform in 55 patients (92%). In Group A, highest and mean PPS were significantly lower, and the mean dose of PRO was reduced by 62% and 36% when compared with Group B and C, respectively. Only 8% of patients required postoperative opioid in Group A compared with 91% and 100% in Groups B and C, respectively. No immediate or delayed complications other than postoperative technical problems (kinked or broken catheter 25%) were noted in Group A. In conclusion, CPSB is easy to perform, safe, and a more efficient technique than parenteral opioid for providing postoperative analgesia after foot surgery.
 ...
PMID:Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block: an original technique to provide postoperative analgesia after foot surgery. 902 34

The assessment of postoperative pain and analgesic efficacy is essential as pain levels and morphine requirements are not predictable. Self-assessment with unidimensional methods (such as the visual analogue pain scale, the numerical rating scale and the verbal rating scale) is the rule for adults and children more than 5 years of age. The former is a validated method and the most accurate and reproducible scale. Assessment of pain is difficult in children less than 5 years old. Only the scales for hetero-assessment with behavioural assessment (CHEOPS and OPS) are used. Finally, morphine consumption with PCA is also an indirect pain assessment method. Postoperative pain should be assessed several times a day in every patient, starting in the recovery room and prolonged during hospital stay. Pain should be measured at rest and in dynamic conditions by the medical and paramedical team.
 ...
PMID:[How is postoperative pain evaluated?]. 975 Jul 87

Trial methodology was evaluated in paediatric analgesic studies. Databases were searched for randomised, placebo controlled studies of systemic paracetamol, NSAIDs and opioids administered for acute postoperative pain in children. Eighty-three studies met the inclusion criteria and 40 were included for the analysis. Analgesics were administered for established postoperative pain in two studies only. In all other studies they were administered in a prophylactic manner. As study design and sensitivity are particularly demanding in studies using pre-emptive dosing of analgesics, the placebo groups were analysed for issues of study sensitivity. Postoperative pain outcomes included pain scores in 34, rescue analgesia in 36, time to first rescue analgesia in 15, pain on activity in eight, number of patients with pain in six, pain relief in three, global efficacy rating in two and analgesic consumption via PCA in four studies. Twenty of 36 studies reported criteria for rescue analgesia that varied from 20 to 77% of the maximum pain intensity. Need of rescue analgesia showed more often differences between study groups than time to first rescue analgesia or pain intensity. Rescue analgesia was administered to 21-100% of the patients in the placebo groups where no other analgesics were given perioperatively. Most patients in the placebo groups had pain that was greater than 30% of the maximum. In conclusion, analysis of the methodology showed several aspects of trial design that can be improved in future studies. Placebo control groups can be used in paediatric analgesic studies to demonstrate internal sensitivity.
 ...
PMID:A systematic review of trial methodology, using the placebo groups of randomized controlled trials in paediatric postoperative pain. 1593 88

The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, rofecoxib, was a popular analgesic adjuvant for improving perioperative pain management. We designed this placebo-controlled study to test the hypothesis that gabapentin could produce similar reductions in postoperative pain and opioid analgesic usage, thereby improving the recovery process. One hundred patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy procedures were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: 1) control group received placebo capsules and pills before and for 2 days after surgery, 2) rofecoxib group received 50 mg/d PO and placebo capsules before and after surgery and, 3) gabapentin group received 1.2 g/d PO and placebo pills before and after surgery, and 4) combination group received rofecoxib 50 mg/d and gabapentin 1.2 g/d PO before and after surgery. The anesthetic technique was standardized and the postoperative assessments included verbal rating scales for pain and sedation, IV morphine usage, quality of recovery assessment, recovery of bowel function, resumption of normal activities, and patient satisfaction with their pain management. Postoperative pain scores were significantly reduced in all three analgesic treatment groups (versus control group). Compared with the control group, patient-controlled analgesia morphine usage was also significantly reduced in the 3 analgesic treatment groups at 1, 8, 24, and 30 h after surgery. Total PCA morphine usage was decreased by 43%, 24%, and 50% in groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively, compared with group 1. Oral analgesic consumption was also smaller in groups 2 and 4 when compared with the control group. The opioid-sparing effects of rofecoxib and gabapentin lead to a faster recovery of bowel function. Discharge eligibility scores in groups 2 and 4 were improved at 24 h when compared with group 1, and patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management was significantly higher at 24 h in all 3 analgesic treatment groups. At the 72 h follow-up, all of the patients in group 4 were completely satisfied with their pain management compared with only 32%, 64%, and 72% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Gabapentin (1.2 g/d PO) appears to be an acceptable alternative to rofecoxib (50 mg/d PO) for short-term use as an adjuvant to opioid analgesics in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery.
 ...
PMID:Gabapentin: an alternative to the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors for perioperative pain management. 1636 26

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 86 patients (44 verum, 42 placebo), scheduled for knee-joint arthrotomies or minor orthopaedic operations received either naproxen, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic, or placebo orally in three doses: the first immediately before the operation and the others 6 h and 12 h after the first. The verum group received 1250 mg naproxen in total. Postoperative pain intensity was measured by the category splitting procedure. All patients were allowed to self-administer piritramide from a PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) pump (Prominjekt, Pharmacia, Sweden) in 2-mg boluses every 5 min during a 6-h period and subsequently every 15 min for another 18 h after surgery. The patients receiving verum had significantly (P<0.05) less pain immediately after surgery and used a significantly lower cumulated dose of piritramide during the first 24 h after operation (24 mg vs 44 mg;P<0.05) than placebo-treated subjects. There were no significant differences in the incidence of side-effects between the two groups. The intensity of typical side effects of opioids and antipyretic anti-inflammatory analgesics (nausea, vomiting, stomachache, headache, vertigo) was low and they were easily controlled in all cases. Lowering of respiratory frequency was not observed. Perioperative administration of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic naproxen results in better pain relief and significantly lower opioid requirements (by about 46%) after minor orthopaedic surgery.
 ...
PMID:[Reduced postoperative opioid requirement with perioperative administration of naproxen. A randomized study in 86 patients with intravenous on-demand analgesia after orthopaedic surgery.]. 1841 2

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 112 patients scheduled for knee-joint arthrotomies or minor orthopaedic operations received 75 mg diclofenac, 600 mg apazone, the combination of 75 mg diclofenac and 600 mg apazone, or placebo (50 ml NaCl 0.9%) as a single i.v. dose immediately after operation. Postoperative pain intensity was measured by a numeric rating scale. All patients were allowed to self-administer piritramide from a PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) pump (Prominjekt, Pharmacia, Sweden) in 2-mg boluses every 5 min during the first 6 h and subsequently every 15 minfor another 18 h after surgery. The patients receiving diclofenac, apazone, or the combination of diclofenac and apazone required a significantly lower cumulated dose of piritramide during the first 24 h after operation than did placebo-treated subjects (38 mg vs 39 mg vs 27 mg vs 67 mg;P<0.05), but there were no significant differences among the former three groups of patients. The incidence of typical side effects of opioids and antipyretic anti-inflammatory analgesics (nausea, vomiting, stomach ache, headache, vertigo) was low, and they were easily controlled in all cases. Postoperative combined application of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics diclofenac and apazone results in a significantly lower opioid requirement (about 60%) after minor orthopaedic surgery. The opioid-sparing effect appears to be superior to that of diclofenac (44%) or apazone (42%) alone, but this was not statistically significant.
 ...
PMID:[Combined intravenous administration of diclofenac and apazone for postoperative analgesia A randomized study of 112 patients with access to i. v. on-demand analgesia after minor orthopaedic operations.]. 1841 63


1 2 Next >>