Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030201 (Postoperative pain)
 1,085 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Whether laparoscopic appendectomy is superior to open appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children is still debatable. To answer this question, surgical experience of three experienced pediatric surgeons in a single institution was studied during one year in all cases of laparoscopic appendectomy. From January 2003 to January 2004, all laparoscopic appendectomies were reviewed for operative technique, advantages, disadvantages, operative time and length of stay. There were 44 laparoscopic appendectomies in children aged 4 to 19 years. Operating time dropped from 52 minutes at the beginning to less than 25 minutes at the end of year. Operating time in perforated appendicitis was slightly longer, from 58-65 minutes. Length of stay was 1-2 days for simple cases, and maximum 5 days for perforated ones. There were no postoperative complications such as abscess, bowel obstruction, bleeding, wound infection or mortality. Laparoscopic appendectomy is at least as safe and effective, if not superior to, as open appendectomy for both, simple and perforated appendicitis. Postoperative pain is less, and recovery is faster. Laparoscopic appendectomy is our procedure of choice in pediatric surgery.
 ...
PMID:[Laparoscopic appendectomy in children--a new fashion or a privilege]. 1561 75

The acceptance of the laparoscopic technique for appendectomy can't be compared with the success in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The discussion is still controversial. A lower rate of wound infection in comparison to open appendectomy has been proven statistically in many studies. There is no evidence of a higher rate of complications. Postoperative pain may be reduced and return to work is often earlier. Cosmesis shows better results. Operation time and hospital stay are comparable to open appendectomy. The total of direct and indirect costs is not higher with laparoscopic than with open appendectomy. Excellent indications for laparoscopic appendectomy are atypical pain in the right lower abdomen, uncertain diagnosis in fertile and elderly women, obesity and complicated appendicitis. Controlled double-blinded randomized studies are necessary in the future to define the advantages and further indications.
 ...
PMID:[Is open appendectomy still up-to-date?]. 1575 21

Whether or not there is a benefit to laparoscopy versus open surgery in the management of acute appendicitis remains a subject of controversy despite the publication of numerous randomized studies. Operative time is longer for the laparoscopic approach. The incidence of abdominal wall abscess is decreased for laparoscopy but the incidence of deep intra-abdominal abscess may be increased, especially in the case of complicated appendicitis. Post-operative pain is diminished and resumption of normal activity is quicker with the laparoscopic approach. Hospitalization is shorter but the cost of hospital care is higher; nevertheless, the global cost may be less - particularly for patients whose return to work is hastened by a laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopy diminishes the number of normal appendectomies, particularly in women of reproductive age where the diagnosis may be unclear. Laparoscopic appendectomy is practicable and has advantages over open appendectomy under certain circumstances. These advantages are most evident in the young female, the working patient, and the obese patient. Overall, the advantages of laparoscopy are, at best, modest and clinical benefit is not always demonstrable. The risk of deep abscess, particularly in patients with perforated or gangrenous appendicitis, remains an unknown and should be evaluated by further studies.
 ...
PMID:[Appendicitis: yes or no to laparoscopic approach?]. 1688

This prospective comparative study was conducted in the department of Pediatric Surgery, Dhaka Shishu (children) Hospital during the period of June 2007 to September 2008 with the children of <12 years, diagnosed as acute Appendicitis. Patient selection was done by simple random technique by means of lottery. For open Appendectomy (OA) conventional method & for Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LA) 3 trocher technique was applied. Data was analyzed with the help of SPSS version 10. In this study 60 cases with acute Appendicitis including both gender were studied by two groups, group-A include 30 cases for laparoscopic and group-B include 30 cases for open appendectomy. Postoperative pain was assessed in both groups by using FLACC scale and compared at 1st 6-hours, 24 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours & at day 7. At 1st 6-hours, most of the children 24(80%) of group A had moderate pain whereas 17(56.7%) children of group B had severe pain (p<0.001). At 24 hours most of the patient 17(56.7%) of group A had mild pain compared to 27 (90%) patients of group B had moderate pain (p<0.0001). At 48 hours in group A most of the children 23(76.7%) had mild pain compared to moderate pain in 18(60%) children of group B (p<0.0001). Subsequently at 72 hours and at 96 hours most of the patients of LA group were free of pain compared to OA group. At final follow-up on day 7, 29(96.7%) children of group A had no pain compared to 26(86.7%) of group B. Regarding analgesics requirement both qualitative & quantitative requirements of analgesics were less in LA group than OA group. About post operative wound infection in group A only 1(3.3%) case had developed post operative wound infection whereas in group B 7(23.3 %) cases had. The mean (+/-SD) of post operative length of hospital stay was 52.00+/-11.62 (range 48-96) hours for group A and 76.00+/-12.74 (range 48-96) hours for group B children (p<0.001). Laparoscopic Appendectomy is more effective, preferable & superior procedure than that of open Appendectomy to reduce the post operative morbidity in children undergone appendectomy for acute appendicitis.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of post operative morbidity between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. 2063 25

For children with surgical problems, pain location conveys important clinical information. We developed a Location and Level of Intensity of Postoperative Pain (Lolipops) tool consisting of a body outline with a seven-sector abdominal grid, the International Association for the Study of Pain Revised Faces Pain Scale, and a recording chart. The aim of the study was to assess the validity and reliability of Lolipops. Children aged 5-14 years who had undergone laparoscopic appendectomy took both nurse- and investigator-administered Lolipops, and an investigator administered Varni Thompson Pediatric Pain Questionnaires, within 24 hours of surgery. The average age of the 42 participants was 10.7 years; 64% were boys; 24 (57.1%) had acute appendicitis, 13 (31%) had perforated appendicitis, and 5 (11.9%) were uninflamed. Pain scores were higher at the laparoscopic port incision sites than in upper abdominal sites distant from incisions or expected inflammation, mean (SD) 3.3 (2.3) and 1.1 (1.8), respectively (p < .0001). In children with acute appendicitis, pain scores were higher in the right iliac fossa than in upper abdominal sites, mean (SD) 3.3 (2.5) and 0.4 (0.7), respectively (p = .001). In children with perforated appendicitis, Lolipops demonstrated a more widespread pain pattern. Correlations between nurse and investigator were fair to moderate with an overall intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.597. This study presents a new tool to measure the location of pain in pediatric surgical patients and shows it to be valid and reliable.
...
PMID:Validity and reliability of a pain location tool for pediatric abdominal surgery. 2602 97