Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
 261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Quality of life (QOL) measurement may aid decision making in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer but must be clinically valid to be useful. This study considered if the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL questionnaire, the QLQ-C30, showed differing results in two clinically distinct groups of patients with oesophageal cancer and also investigated the correlation between dysphagia grade and various scales of QOL. Patients treated by oesophagectomy reported significantly better physical, emotional, cognitive, and global health scores than those in the palliative treatment group. Patients who received palliative treatment had significantly worse pain, fatigue, appetite loss, constipation, and dysphagia. The correlations between dysphagia grade and each of the QOL scales and items in both groups of patients were poor. This questionnaire differentiates clearly between the two clinically distinct groups of patients, but to be an entirely appropriate indicator of QOL in patients with oesophageal cancer, an additional specific oesophageal module including a dysphagia scale is required.
 ...
PMID:Quality of life measurement in patients with oesophageal cancer. 748 36

The QLQ-C30, a health-related quality of life questionnaire developed for use in patients with cancer, has been previously validated in patients with lung cancer and head and neck cancer. In this study, further validation was carried out for 535 patients, including patients with breast cancer (n = 143) and ovarian cancer (n = 111) for whom there is no previously published validation, as well as patients with lung cancer (n = 160) and a heterogeneous group of other cancers (n = 121). All patients were entered in one of two trials of anti-emetics to prevent chemotherapy-induced emesis. The QLQ-C30 was completed before chemotherapy and on day 8 after chemotherapy. The factor structure in patients with breast and ovarian cancer was similar to that previously described. Interdomain correlations, in the entire group, were strongest for the physical and role function domains and the fatigue, pain and global quality of life domains before and after chemotherapy. In addition, after chemotherapy, social function was also strongly correlated with fatigue and global quality of life. These correlations were not always of equal strength in the breast, ovarian and lung groups, suggesting that there may be differences between these groups. The responsiveness of the QLQ-C30 in the presence of widely metastatic, as compared with locoregional, disease showed changes in the expected directions (i.e., diminished function in physical and social role functions and in global quality of life, with greater fatigue and pain in patients with metastatic disease). Eight days after chemotherapy, decreases were seen in physical, role and social functioning and in global quality of life, and there was greater fatigue, nausea and vomiting compared with before chemotherapy. Patients with breast cancer had better physical, role and social functioning and less fatigue and pain than patients with ovarian cancer. This result is expected, since many of the patients with breast cancer had early stage disease, whereas those with ovarian cancer had advanced stage disease. Mean scores for patients with lung cancer were between the other two groups, in keeping with the mixture of early and advanced stage disease in these patients. There was a strong correlation between ECOG performance status scores and several domains of the QLQ-C30; these were all in the expected directions. The results of this study confirm those in earlier studies on patients with lung cancer, and provide new information on patients with breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, the QLQ-C30 is responsive to the effects of chemotherapy and of metastatic disease.
 ...
PMID:Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer. 784 68

A cross-validation of the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and quality of life (QOL) as measured by item 30 of the quality of life questionnaire developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group (EORTC QLQ-C30) was conducted using ordered logit analysis and prospective data from a continuous sample of 139 lung cancer patients. The QOL is found to be a much broader concept than the KPS, since it likely captures not only physical functioning but also functioning in the non-physical dimensions of social, emotional, and possibly cognitive well-being as well as the level of distress in the physical dimensions of pain, breathing and fatigue. These results suggest that the palliative treatment of advanced cancer and the terminally ill should be guided by a broad concept of well-being that goes beyond one based only on physical functioning.
 ...
PMID:The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale re-examined: a cross-validation with the EORTC-C30. 786 59

Long-term survivors of head and neck cancer may suffer from psychological distress and reduced quality of life because of late side-effects of the treatment. In a follow-up study of patients randomised to two different radiation fractionating regimens, 204 patients filled in a mailed questionnaire 7-11 years after treatment. The questionnaire consisted of the General Health Questionnaire, 20-item version (GHQ-20), and the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). There were no differences in psychological distress between patients receiving conventional radiotherapy and those receiving a slightly hypofractionated regimen. A high prevalence of psychological distress was found in both treatment groups (30% of 'cases' according to the GHQ-20), especially in patients with impaired cognitive or social function, or with pain. Clinicians need to be aware of this morbidity, and their ability to detect patients with psychological problems needs to be improved. The GHQ-20 can facilitate the communication process in a clinical setting. With an increased awareness of these problems and by using valid instruments for identification of patients at risk, the clinicians may intervene and help the patients to reduce their psychological distress.
 ...
PMID:Psychological distress in head and neck cancer patients 7-11 years after curative treatment. 788 Jul 43

The EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life has developed a modular system for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials composed of two basic elements: (1) a core quality of life questionnaire, the EORTC QLQ-C30, covering general aspects of health-related quality of life, and (2) additional disease- or treatment-specific questionnaire modules. Two international field studies were carried out to evaluate the practicality, reliability and validity of the core questionnaire, supplemented by a 13-item lung cancer-specific questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-LC13. In this paper, the results of an evaluation of the QLQ-LC13 are reported. The lung cancer questionnaire module comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (i.e. coughing, haemoptysis, dyspnoea and pain) and side-effects from conventional chemo- and radiotherapy (i.e. hair loss, neuropathy, sore mouth and dysphagia). It was administered to patients with non-resectable lung cancer recruited from 17 countries. In total, 883 and 735 patients, respectively, completed the questionnaire prior to and once during treatment. The symptom measures discriminated clearly between patients differing in performance status. All item scores changed significantly in the expected direction (i.e. lung cancer symptoms decreased and treatment toxicities increased) during treatment. With one exception (problems with a sore mouth), the change of toxicity measures over time was related specifically to either chemo- or radiotherapy. However, the single item on neuropathy did not measure adequately the full range of symptoms. The hypothesised scale structure of the questionnaire was partially supported by the data. The multi-item dyspnoea scale met the minimal standards for reliability (Cronbach alpha coefficient > 0.70), while the pain items did not form a scale with reliability estimates acceptable for group comparisons. In conclusion, the results form international field testing lend support to the EORTC QLQ-LC13 as a clinically valid and useful tool for assessing disease- and treatment-specific symptoms in lung cancer patients participating in clinical trials, when combined with the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire. In a few areas, however, the questionnaire module could benefit from further refinements. In addition, its performance over a longer period of time still needs to be investigated.
 ...
PMID:The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) for use in lung cancer clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. 808 Jun 79

A cohort study was conducted to investigate the construct validity of the domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire). Ninety-six patients undergoing chemotherapy at the Kingston Regional Cancer Centre, Kingston, Canada were given the EORTC QLQ-C30 and two out of four comparison scales; the Sickness Impact Profile, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, the General Health Questionnaire and the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System, to complete during their clinic visits. Using the multitrait-multimethod matrix to examine relationships, the Spearman ranked correlation coefficients of similar and dissimilar domains between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the comparison scales were compared. The EORTC QLQ-C30 domains of pain and physical and role functioning performed well in that they converged and diverged appropriately with the other instruments. The domain of psychological functioning had strong associations with domains thought to be dissimilar (social interaction and fatigue). Social interaction and financial impact diverged across dissimilar domains. This lack of specificity may relate to question wording. The symptom domain had strong associations with other domains across the comparison scales. This study shows that the domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 have substantial construct validity in the multidimensional assessment of the quality of life of cancer patients and identifies where further work is required.
 ...
PMID:A validation study of the domains of the core EORTC quality of life questionnaire. 813 96

Choosing a measure instrument for a study raises the question of whether instruments designed for the same purpose produce the same results. We investigated this question for two instruments designed to measure subjective quality of life (QOL) in cancer clinical trials: the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) and the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core module (QLQ-C30). These were administered concurrently to 98 cancer patients. Four patient groups were defined: (1) well, no chemotherapy (n = 23); (2) adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 24); (3) stable disease, active chemotherapy (n = 24); (4) progressive disease (n = 27). Both instruments have global, role, social, emotional, pain, and nausea scales; QLQ-C30 also assesses physical function, cognitive function, and fatigue, while FLIC assesses hardship. Correlation analysis indicated convergent validity for the global, role, emotional, pain and nausea dimensions, but not the social dimension. Both instruments indicated that groups 1 and 2 had better QOL than group 4 in at least one dimension. However, different dimension-specific results meant that qualitatively different conclusions would have been drawn if either instrument had been used singly: FLIC indicated that group 1 had better role function that group 4 and suffered less hardship and that group 1 suffered less nausea than group 3, while the QLQ-C30 data indicated that group 2 had better physical function than group 4. The only consistent result was for pain: both instruments indicated group 4 had more pain than either groups 1 or 2. Thus the choice of QOL instrument for use in a particular trial will affect both the results and conclusions. It is important, therefore, to consider carefully which instrument is most likely to detect important differences relevant to the patients' lives in that setting.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of two quality-of-life questionnaires for cancer clinical trials: the functional living index--cancer (FLIC) and the quality of life questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30). 859 7

This review compares the key features and psychometric properties of three site-specific quality of life measures that are currently being used in clinical trials for new therapeutic agents for lung cancer. These measures include the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and its lung cancer module (EORTC-QLQ-LC13), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--Lung Cancer Quality of Life Instrument (FACT-L), and the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS). Differences are found among the three instruments. However, these differences allow choice of detail concerning specific aspects of quality of life, depending on the purpose of the assessment. All three instruments have acceptable feasibility. The FACT-L and LCSS are also reliable measures for lung cancer patients, but the EORTC lung cancer module needs refinement of its pain subscale and further testing of reliability. Additionally, all three instruments have support for validity, with the LCSS and EORTC lung cancer modules having had more extensive testing, and having been tested with larger samples than the FACT-L. The EORTC and FACT are still under development; thus, each will need further testing. The LCSS has fewer questionable psychometric properties than the other two measures, and the development of items is complete. For repeated measures with patients with the progressive disease of lung cancer, the LCSS provides less patient and staff burden with its nine-item patient and six-item observer scales. Both the EORTC lung cancer module and FACT-L are measures that expect the core measure to be administered, requiring 40+ items each. Alternatively, the EORTC and the FACT, including their site-specific modules, provide a more comprehensive assessment than the LCSS, if that is the intent of the quality of life assessment.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of instruments for measuring quality of life in patients with lung cancer. 861 Feb 35

Ovarian cancer is the most malignant cancer in women, where it is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death. The disease and its treatment have considerable effects on the quality of life of patients with this cancer. This study reviews existing literature on quality of life in patients with ovarian cancer to demonstrate the importance of the topic, to comment on improvements achieved and to consider their implications for the implementation of optimal treatment. A literature search was carried out through MEDLINE and of published papers on quality of life in patients with ovarian cancer from 1976 to 1994. Twenty papers have been reviewed, of which, 10 were treatment-related assessments of quality of life and the remaining 10 dealt with different topics including psychometric issues in measuring health-related quality of life. Twenty-four instruments were employed to measure quality of life. Of these, the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) and The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) were found to be the most appropriate. Although meta-analysis of results is impossible, it appears that debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy could improve both quality of life and survival. In addition to effective and efficient treatment, psychological counselling, palliative and home care, nutritional support and pain relief are the most important areas for improving quality of life of patients with ovarian cancer. Knowledge and insight into the quality of life of patients with ovarian cancer are still limited, and a large carefully planned international study is required. Use of existing standard measures is preferable and agreement should be reached on a selected single instrument.
 ...
PMID:Quality of life in patients with ovarian cancer: current state of research. 873 48

To examine the prevalence of depressive symptoms and its relationship with quality-of-life domains in home-care cancer patients at an advanced stage of illness, 86 patients were given psychological tests for depression (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale) (HAD) and quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) 1 week after admission to the home-care program. Using a proper cut-off score on the HAD-Depression subscale, depressive symptoms were reported by 45% of the patients. The quality of life of depressed patients was more affected than non-depressed patients in the social, emotional, cognitive, and physical domains. Significant correlations were found between depression scores and impairment in most quality-of-life areas. These findings support the importance of depression and quality-of-life evaluation in patients with advanced cancer who are followed in a home-care setting. This evaluation is needed to provide patients, their families, and caregivers with appropriate psychosocial interventions.
J Pain Symptom Manage 1996 Nov
PMID:Depressive symptoms and quality of life in home-care-assisted cancer patients. 894 25


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>