UMLS:C0030193 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Ropivacaine is an amide local anesthetic structurally related to, but appearing less cardiotoxic, than bupivacaine. The authors' investigation was designed in a randomized, double-blind fashion to compare the clinical effectiveness of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery. Forty-five patients were randomized to receive 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine or bupivacaine. Intermittent sensory (pinprick) and motor (Bromage score) measurements were made while the block was in effect, and changes in heart rate, blood pressure and amounts of additional analgesics, sedatives and other medications were also recorded. Presence of tourniquet pain and the quality of anesthesia were also assessed. One patient was excluded from analysis; thus, 22 patients each received ropivacaine or bupivacaine. No differences were found in patient or perioperative characteristics between the groups. The quality and extent of sensory and motor blockade between groups were comparable, although bupivacaine was slightly longer acting. Cardiovascular changes, incidence of tourniquet pain, and the amounts of supplemental medications necessary were also similar between groups. The authors found 0.5% ropivacaine and bupivacaine to be clinically similar in both sensory- and motor-blocking characteristics, with the exception that bupivacaine produced a blockade of slightly longer duration. Because ropivacaine is reported to be less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine in animal studies, the similarity of clinical epidural anesthesia may make ropivacaine the preferred agent.
...
PMID:Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery. 232 80

Ropivacaine exhibits less cardiotoxicity and causes less motor block than bupivacaine when used in equianalgesic doses. This makes ropivacaine potentially well suited for epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study was to determine which of three concentrations of epidurally administered ropivacaine infused for postoperative analgesia would attenuate intravenous opioid analgesia requirements while also minimizing motor block. Forty ASA I-III patients, having major lower abdominal surgery, completed the study. They were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: Group S, control, epidural saline (n = 10); Group 1, epidural 0.1% ropivacaine (n = 10); Group 2, epidural 0.2% ropivacaine (n = 10); and Group 3, epidural 0.3% ropivacaine (n = 10). The study was double-blind. Initial epidural analgesia was established with 0.5% ropivacaine, and then general anesthesia induced for surgery. Once in the recovery room, epidural infusions were commenced at 10 mL/h and maintained at that rate for 21 h. Intravenous patient controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine was used as required by the patients for supplemental analgesia. Total PCA morphine use was more over the 21-h period in Group S than all the ropivacaine groups, being significantly so for Group 2 (median values: Group S, 43.3 mg; Group 1, 18.7 mg; Group 2, 7.5 mg; Group 3, 19 mg; for Group 2, P = 0.03). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores on coughing were significantly lower (i.e., less pain) than control for all ropivacaine groups after 4 h of infusion and also for Groups 2 and 3 after 8 h of infusion. (Median VAS (mm) on coughing at 8 h: Group S = 70, Group 1 = 56, Group 2 = 32, Group 3 = 0; for Groups 2 and 3, P < 0.05 compared to Group S). There was a dose-related increase in the amount of motor block, with Group 3 having significantly more motor block than all other groups at 4 and 8 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:Epidural ropivacaine infusion for postoperative analgesia after major lower abdominal surgery--a dose finding study. 748 88

We compared the effects of continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.25% with bupivacaine 0.25% on pain relief and motor block during labor, and on the neonate. Seventy-six full-term parturients in active labor requiring epidural analgesia were randomly allocated to receive either bupivacaine 0.25% or ropivacaine 0.25%. Fifteen minutes after a loading dose of 10 mL of the study drug, an epidural infusion with the same drug was started at 6-12 mL/h to maintain an adequate block. Top-up doses of 6-10 mL were given as required. At full cervical dilation, the epidural infusion was discontinued. The onset of pain relief (verbal scale), contraction pain (visual analog scale), intensity of motor block (modified Bromage scale), and duration of motor block were not statistically different between the groups. Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min after delivery were comparable. There was a higher proportion of the neonates in the ropivacaine group (26/31 = 84%) who had a neurologic and adaptive capacity score (NACS) > or = 35 2 h after delivery than in the bupivacaine group (18/29 = 62%). We conclude that ropivacaine 0.25% and bupivacaine 0.25% are equally effective for epidural pain relief during labor. Ropivacaine may have an advantage over bupivacaine regarding neonatal neurobehavioral performance during the first few hours after delivery, although further studies will be required to substantiate this.
...
PMID:Ropivacaine 0.25% versus bupivacaine 0.25% for continuous epidural analgesia in labor: a double-blind comparison. 781 14

Ropivacaine is a new local anaesthetic with advantages that suggest an important role in the provision of postoperative analgesia. The main aim of this study was to investigate the dose-response relationship of extradural infusion of ropivacaine. We studied 36 ASA I-III patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery during general anaesthesia and extradural block (catheter insertion at T6-9) using 0.5% ropivacaine in a randomized, double-blind study. After surgery nine patients each received an extradural infusion of either ropivacaine 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3% or saline at a rate of 10 ml h-1 for 21 h. All patients had access to i.v. morphine via a PCA device. The ropivacaine groups consumed significantly less morphine over the 21-h infusion period than the saline group (medians: saline 75 mg; 0.1% ropivacaine 32 mg; 0.2% ropivacaine 39 mg; 0.3% ropivacaine 13 mg) (P < 0.05). Pain (VAS scores) at rest was significantly lower in all ropivacaine groups than in the saline group after 4 h of infusion (medians: saline 45 mm; 0.1% ropivacaine 15 mm; 0.2% ropivacaine 12 mm; 0.3% ropivacaine 0 mm). Pain on coughing was significantly less in all ropivacaine groups than in the saline group after 4 h infusion (medians: saline 67 mm; 0.1% ropivacaine 44 mm; 0.2% ropivacaine 33 mm; 0.3% ropivacaine 0 mm) and for 0.2% and 0.3% ropivacaine at later times. Motor block was negligible throughout the infusion. Patient satisfaction was higher in the 0.2% and 0.3% ropivacaine groups than in the two other groups.
...
PMID:Postoperative analgesia by continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine after upper abdominal surgery. 865 17

Ropivacaine is a new aminoamide local anaesthetic. Compared with bupivacaine, ropivacaine possesses a higher threshold for systemic toxicity and a high selectivity for sensory fibres. We have compared prospectively these two agents in a concentration of 0.25% for extradural analgesia in labour. A total of 104 parturients requesting extradural analgesia were randomized to receive either ropivacaine or bupivacaine. The women in the bupivacaine group required more top-up doses to maintain analgesia (median 3.0 vs 2.0) (P < 0.05). The onset of sensory block, quality of analgesia, ultimate level of maximum sensory block and maternal satisfaction were similar in both groups. The incidence, intensity and duration of motor block were slightly but not significantly less in the ropivacaine group. The ropivacaine group had a higher incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery (70.59% vs 52.00%). There was no significant difference in neonatal outcome as assessed by Apgar scores, umbilical acid-base status and neurological and adaptive capacity score at 2 and 24 h after delivery. We conclude that ropivacaine and bupivacaine in a concentration of 0.25% produced comparable analgesia for pain relief of labour with no detectable adverse effect on the neonate.
...
PMID:A double-blind comparison of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for extradural analgesia in labour. 867 83

The enantiomerically pure (S-enantiomer) amide local anaesthetic drug ropivacaine blocked nerve fibres responsible for transmission of pain (A delta and C fibres) more completely than those that control motor function (A beta fibres) in in vitro studies. The drug shares the biphasic vascular effects common to the amide local anaesthetic drug class. In vitro studies indicate that ropivacaine is less cardiotoxic than equimolar concentrations of bupivacaine. Apart from one trial in women undergoing hysterectomy, clinical studies that compared the efficacy of different doses of epidurally administered ropivacaine in patients undergoing various surgical procedures did not reveal any consistent dose-related differences with respect to sensory blockade. However, motor blockade did become more intense as the dose of ropivacaine increased. Overall, direct comparisons show that epidural ropivacaine is less potent than epidural bupivacaine when the 2 drugs are administered at the same concentration. However, this difference is less marked in terms of sensory blockade than motor blockade. The greater degree of separation between motor and sensory blockade seen with ropivacaine relative to bupivacaine is more apparent at the lower end of the dosage scale. Nevertheless, higher doses of ropivacaine than bupivacaine are generally required to elicit equivalent anaesthetic effects. Ropivacaine has been shown to induce successful brachial plexus anaesthesia when given at a concentration of 5 mg/ml, but not 2.5 mg/ml, and was as effective as bupivacaine in comparative studies in this indication. Limited data indicate that continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine postoperatively reduces postsurgical pain in a dose-related manner. Morphine consumption was also reduced. Higher doses of ropivacaine were significantly more effective than placebo. Similarly, ropivacaine controlled postsurgical pain when infiltrated directly into surgical wound sites (i.e. would infiltration) and was as effective as bupivacaine, and more effective than placebo, in this regard. Adverse events associated with epidurally administered ropivacaine include hypotension, nausea, bradycardia, transient paraesthesia, back pain, urinary retention and fever. The drug appears to have an adverse event profile similar to that of bupivacaine. In animal studies, overdoses of ropivacaine were better tolerated than overdoses of bupivacaine but not lidocaine (lignocaine). Human volunteers tolerated a higher intravenous dosage of ropivacaine than bupivacaine before developing initial signs of toxicity. Thus, ropivacaine, according to animal data, is less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine. Based on available clinical data, ropivacaine appears to be as effective and well tolerated as bupivacaine when equianalgesic doses are compared. The greater degree of separation between motor and sensory blockade seen withropivacaine relative to bupivacaine at lower concentrations (approximately 5 mg/ml) will be advantageous in certain applications.
...
PMID:Ropivacaine. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in regional anaesthesia. 887 32

Ropivacaine is a new, long-acting local anaesthetic, prepared as a single enantiomer (the S form). Ropivacaine has a pKa of 8.07, a protein binding of approximately 94%, but a lower lipid solubility than bupivacaine. Extensive animal toxicological studies have shown a lower propensity for cardiotoxicity with ropivacaine than with bupivacaine. Studies in sheep have shown that the systemic toxicity of ropivacaine is not enhanced by gestation. Studies in human male volunteers have shown that ropivacaine is associated with at least 25% less CNS and cardiovascular adverse effects than bupivacaine following use of intravenous infusions of either drug at a rate of 10 mg/min, to a maximum dose of 150 to 250 mg. With its lower toxicity, especially cardiovascular toxicity, and less intense motor blockade, ropivacaine may have advantages over bupivacaine in epidural pain relief during labour. In general, comparative studies have shown ropivacaine and bupivacaine to have similar efficacy, but ropivacaine has a greater degree of separation between motor and sensory blockade than bupivacaine when it given epidurally for epidural pain relief during labour (as intermittent doses or continuous infusion) or for caesarean section. A significantly lower rate of instrumental deliveries and significantly higher neurological and adaptive capacity scores in neonates at 24 hours were noted for following epidural relief during labour with ropivacaine in a meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing this agent with bupivacaine. Ropivacaine is also of great interest when used as an epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia. There are a few studies evaluating epidural infusions of ropivacaine 0.1%, 0.2% or 0.3% (10 ml/h for 21 hours) after upper or lower abdominal or orthopaedic surgery, and epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% (6 to 14 ml/h) after orthopaedic surgery. The studies show that ropivacaine provides postoperative pain relief in a dose-related manner with minimal or a low degree of dose-related motor blockade. Recommended doses of ropivacaine given epidurally to control postsurgical pain or labour pain are 20 to 40 mg as a bolus with 20 to 30 mg as a top-up with an interval > or = 30 minutes. Alternatively, ropivacaine 2 mg/ml (0.2%) can be given as a continuous epidural infusion at a rate of 6 to 14 ml/h (lumbar) or 4 to 8 ml/h (thoracic). Epidural ropivacaine 0.2% provides a good level of analgesia with minimal motor block, but the effects of a combination of ropivacaine and an opioid administered epidurally could have potential and need to be investigated. Preoperative or postoperative subcutaneous wound infiltration, during cholecystectomy or hernia repair, with ropivacaine 100 to 175 mg has been shown to be more effective than placebo and as effective as bupivacaine in reducing wound pain. The adverse effects associated with epidural administration of ropivacaine include hypotension, nausea, bradycardia, transient paraesthesia, back pain, urinary retention and fever. In comparative studies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine, the 2 drugs appear to be associated with a similar incidence of similar types of adverse effects excluding cardiovascular and CNS toxicities which are lower with ropivacaine. In conclusion, ropivacaine is effective for pain relief during labour and in the postoperative period. Ropivacaine is associated with less cardiovascular and CNS toxicity than bupivacaine and provides a greater degree of dissociation between sensory and motor effects producing less intense motor blockade and more rapid recovery to full patient mobilisation.
...
PMID:Preliminary risk-benefit analysis of ropivacaine in labour and following surgery. 924 93

Bioanalytical methods for determining the total concentration of the new local anaesthetic drug ropivacaine in blood plasma, urine and tissues are presented. Ropivacaine is a drug mainly used in connection with surgery and for post-operative pain relief. The biological samples were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction and analysed using capillary gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection or mass spectrometry. The methods are highly selective and reliable with a between-day precision, given as the relative standard deviation, generally below 6%. More than 20000 samples have been analysed using the methods described.
...
PMID:Determination of ropivacaine and [2H3]ropivacaine in biological samples by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection or mass spectrometry. 965 26

Axillary brachial plexus block using 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine was compared in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of two groups of 15 patients. The times to onset of sensory and motor block and to resolution of motor block, as well as the time to onset and degree of post-operative pain were recorded by an observer blinded to the identity of drug. Times to onset of sensory block were similar in the two groups (ropivacaine 10 min, mepivacaine 8 min). Resolution of motor block in the operated hand and the time to first requirement of post-operative analgesia occurred later with ropivacaine (9 h 50 min and 10 h) than with mepivacaine (3 h 50 min and 6 h), P < 0.01 for both measurements. Nine patients who received ropivacaine and two patients who received mepivacaine did not require further post-operative analgesia (P < 0.05). Ropivacaine is less toxic than other long-acting local anaesthetics, and 0.75% ropivacaine may be better for brachial plexus block when fast onset is required and prolonged pain relief is useful.
...
PMID:A double-blind study of axillary brachial plexus block by 0.75% ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine. 978 69

A 39-year-old patient developed phantom pain after amputation of both upper arms following a burn injury. The pain did not respond to naproxen, morphine, carbamazepine, amitriptyline, calcitonin or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). At the 39th post-operative day an axillary catheter was placed on the right side, as well as an interscalene catheter on the left. Ropivacaine 0.2% was infused, starting with a rate of 4 ml/h, that was increased to 6 ml/h during the subsequent 6 days. Within 20 min of catheter placement complete pain relief was achieved. The patient did not need any other analgesics and remained painfree for 7 months. Neither motor block, nor any other side effects occurred during the infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%. Thus, the patient not only received analgesia, but also got an effective treatment of established phantom pain. A similar approach with bupivacaine may not have been feasible, because of the possibility of toxic side effects. Ropivacaine is a long-acting local anaesthetic which is less toxic than bupivacaine and has the additional advantage of producing less motor-blockade in the concentration used, so the patient was able to move actively without experiencing any pain.
Pain 1998 Nov
PMID:Continuous blockade of both brachial plexus with ropivacaine in phantom pain: a case report. 983 24

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>