Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
 261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Meloxicam is a new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), with a favourable ratio of inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)/cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), giving the drug the potential to produce few gastric adverse effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of meloxicam in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Five hundred and thirteen patients were treated in a double-blind trial comparing once-daily meloxicam 7.5 mg, 15mg, 30mg, or placebo (140, 134, 102 and 137 patients, respectively). Outcome measures included scores on Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) for pain on movement (primary endpoint) and pain at rest in the target joint as well as global efficacy. Lesquesne's index of severity and paracetamol consumption were also measured. Global tolerability and the occurrence of adverse events were monitored. Both meloxicam 7.5 mg and 15 mg were significantly more effective than placebo with respect to pain on movement (p < 0.01 and p < 0.03, respectively). Both doses of meloxicam compared favourably with placebo with respect to pain of the target joint at rest, although only the 15 mg dose achieved statistical significance (p < 0.02). Global efficacy showed a significant difference for both doses of meloxicam (p < 0.05 and p < 0.002 for 7.5 mg and 15 mg doses, respectively). Once daily meloxicam 7.5 and 15 mg is effective and well tolerated in the short term symptomatic treatment of OA of the knee.
 ...
PMID:A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and tolerance of meloxicam treatment in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. 950 75

In this controlled, randomised, parallel-group, multicentre study, the efficacy and tolerability of an intramuscular (i.m.) dose of meloxicam (15 mg) on Day 1 followed by seven days of oral meloxicam (15 mg/day) were compared with those of an i.m. dose of piroxicam (20 mg) on Day 1 followed by seven days of oral piroxicam (20 mg/day) therapy in a total of 169 outpatients with acute lumbago. Time to onset of analgesic action after i.m. injection was determined, and overall efficacy, pain on movement, limitation of daily activities, local tolerability at the injection site and overall tolerability were assessed by investigators and patients on verbal rating scales (VRSs). Adverse events and laboratory assessments were documented. Meloxicam and piroxicam showed a rapid onset of action after i.m. injection (40 and 45 minutes median time, respectively), overall efficacy of both therapies was highly rated, and limitations to daily life were greatly reduced in the majority of patients in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between meloxicam and piroxicam. Local and overall tolerabilities were equally good for the two drugs, but there were fewer gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events among meloxicam patients (1.2% of patients) than piroxicam patients (7.0% of patients). The improved tolerability profile of meloxicam may be explained by its selectivity towards cyclooxygenase-2.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerability of intramuscular and oral meloxicam in patients with acute lumbago: a comparison with intramuscular and oral piroxicam. 952 91

In this study lysine clonixinate, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agent with selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 and 5-lipooxygenase in in vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamic studies, was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical study versus paracetamol/codeine, in 151 patients with pain following inguinal hernioplasty. Patients were treated with one 125 mg tablet of lysine clonixinate or paracetamol/codeine (500 mg + 30 mg) administered at fixed doses every 4 h during 2 days. Controls were carried out 1, 2 and 4 h after the first intake of day 1 and day 2. Each control included assessment of pain at rest, when coughing, sitting and upon moderate pressure. Both treatment groups (lysine clonixinate, 77 patients and paracetamol/codeine, 74 patients) were comparable in terms of demographic and baseline pain intensities. Spontaneous pain was reduced significantly in both treatment groups from the 1st-h control. The following values were recorded in the lysine clonixinate group during day 1: baseline: 6.86 +/- 1.24; 1st h: 4.49 +/- 1.77; 2nd h: 2.96 +/- 1.74; 4th h: 2.23 +/- 1.51. The following values for the same group during day 2 were: predose: 1.70 +/- 1.64; 1st h: 1.16 +/- 1.17; 2nd h: 0.78 +/- 1.06; 4th h: 0.63 +/- 1.05. The paracetamol/codeine group revealed the following values: day 1: baseline: 6.72 +/- 1.22; 1st h: 4.57 +/- 1.72; 2nd h: 2.97 +/- 1.68; 4th h: 2.47 +/- 1.68 and day 2: predose: 2.02 +/- 1.57; 1st h: 1.32 +/- 1.23; 2nd h: 0.82 +/- 0.99; 4th h: 0.66 +/- 0.89. Reduction of pain induced by coughing, sitting and pressure showed similar behavior patterns. No significant differences between both treatment groups were encountered in terms of analgesic efficacy. Incidence of adverse effects was significantly higher in the paracetamol/codeine group (X2: p < 0.05): 11 out of 74 patients; three patients had to discontinue treatment. In the lysine clonixinate group four out of 77 patients showed side effects but these did not require treatment discontinuation.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy and tolerance of lysine clonixinate versus paracetamol/codeine following inguinal hernioplasty. 963 4

The discovery of a second isoform of cyclooxygenase (cyclooxygenase-2) that is expressed in inflammatory cells and the central nervous system, but not in the gastric mucosa, offers the possibility of developing anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents that lack the gastrointestinal side effects of currently available nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Lead compounds from several different structural classes have been identified and shown to be slow, tight-binding inhibitors that express their selectivity for cyclooxygenase-2 in the time-dependent step. The determination of structures of enzyme-inhibitor co-crystals along with site-directed mutagenesis experiments reveal the molecular basis for selectivity of some, but not all, inhibitors. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are highly promising new agents for the treatment of pain and inflammation, and for the prevention of cancer.
 ...
PMID:Design of selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 as nonulcerogenic anti-inflammatory agents. 973 21

The enzymes cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-1 and COX-2) catalyze the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin (PG) H2, the precursor of PGs and thromboxane. These lipid mediators play important roles in inflammation and pain and in normal physiological functions. While there are abundant data indicating that the inducible isoform, COX-2, is important in inflammation and pain, the constitutively expressed isoform, COX-1, has also been suggested to play a role in inflammatory processes. To address the latter question pharmacologically, we used a highly selective COX-1 inhibitor, SC-560 (COX-1 IC50 = 0.009 microM; COX-2 IC50 = 6.3 microM). SC-560 inhibited COX-1-derived platelet thromboxane B2, gastric PGE2, and dermal PGE2 production, indicating that it was orally active, but did not inhibit COX-2-derived PGs in the lipopolysaccharide-induced rat air pouch. Therapeutic or prophylactic administration of SC-560 in the rat carrageenan footpad model did not affect acute inflammation or hyperalgesia at doses that markedly inhibited in vivo COX-1 activity. By contrast, celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, was anti-inflammatory and analgesic in this model. Paradoxically, both SC-560 and celecoxib reduced paw PGs to equivalent levels. Increased levels of PGs were found in the cerebrospinal fluid after carrageenan injection and were markedly reduced by celecoxib, but were not affected by SC-560. These results suggest that, in addition to the role of peripherally produced PGs, there is a critical, centrally mediated neurological component to inflammatory pain that is mediated at least in part by COX-2.
 ...
PMID:Pharmacological analysis of cyclooxygenase-1 in inflammation. 978 85

The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) meloxicam is a preferential cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) antagonist. The UV protective potential of this drug was studied to compare it with the reported beneficial effects of such preferentially COX-1 specific NSAIDs as indomethacin and acetylsalicylic acid in the literature. In a pilot study (open-label, non-randomized, non-controlled, unblinded), 10 patients received UV irradiation with the minimal erythema dose (MED), first with meloxicam (7.5 mg/die) to reduce post-operative pain and second without ingestion of meloxicam. The factor of UV protection was evaluated. In six of ten patients meloxicam showed no benefit, whereas four of ten patients had a 1.3- up to 3-fold UV protection. In this study, the benefit in UV protection of meloxicam as a preferential COX-2 antagonist was not above the reported benefit of the "old" COX-1 inhibiting NSAIDS.
 ...
PMID:Meloxicam in acute UV dermatitis--a pilot study. 982 88

The pharmacological profile of a novel and newly discovered non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and analgesic compound, 3-(difluoromethyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-[4-(methylsulfinyl)phenyl]pyraz ole (FR140423), was investigated. In recombinant human cyclooxygenase enzyme assays, the inhibition of prostaglandin E2 formation by FR140423 was 150 times more selective for cyclooxygenase-2 than cyclooxygenase-1. Oral administration of FR140423 dose dependently reduced carrageenin-induced paw edema and adjuvant arthritis. These effects were two- to three-fold more potent than those of indomethacin. Unlike indomethacin, FR140423 did not induce mucosal lesions in the stomach. FR140423 showed dose-dependent anti-hyperalgesic effects in the yeast-induced hyperalgesic model. This effect was five-fold more potent than that of indomethacin. Furthermore, FR140423 increased the pain threshold in non-inflamed paws and, unlike indomethacin, it produced an analgesic effect in the tail-flick test. These analgesic effects were blocked by the mu-opioid antagonist naloxone. These results suggest that FR140423, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, is a potent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) without gastrointestinal side effects and is a unique compound having morphine-like analgesic effects.
 ...
PMID:Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of a novel pyrazole derivative, FR140423. 998 10

Pain is the most common complaint of patients who see rheumatologists. In this article, the current treatment options for pain are reviewed; these include acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, new specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, opioid analgesics, centrally acting muscle relaxants, antidepressants, and topical analgesics and counterirritants. The doses of medication and known adverse effects of these medications are highlighted.
 ...
PMID:The use of analgesics in the management of pain in rheumatic diseases. 1008 63

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in the treatment of arthritis and pain. These drugs tend to cause significant side effects, however, including gastric and intestinal toxicity. The mechanism of action of NSAIDs is through their inhibition of the key enzyme of prostaglandin biosynthesis, the cyclooxygenase. Recently, two forms of cyclooxygenase have been found to exist: COX-1 and COX-2, the constitutive and inducible forms, respectively. COX-1 exists in the stomach, intestine, kidneys and platelets, while COX-2, the inducible form, is expressed during inflammation. The therapeutic effects of NSAIDs are largely the result of inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), whereas the toxic effects (e.g., gastrointestinal, renal and platelet effects) are primarily due to the inhibition of COX-1. Individual NSAIDs show different potencies against COX-1 compared with COX-2 and this explains the variations in the side effects of NSAIDs at their anti-inflammatory doses. Drugs with high potency against COX-2 and a better COX-2-/COX-1 activity ratio will have anti-inflammatory activity with fewer gastrointestinal side effects. In contrast piroxicam and indomethacin, which drugs have a much higher potency against COX-1 than against COX-2, are amongst those with the highest gastrointestinal toxicity. Based on these findings, COX-2 seems to be an ideal target for the development of new anti-inflammatory drugs. Several compounds with preferential or specific COX-2 inhibiting properties have been synthesized and evaluated in pre-clinical and clinical studies i.e. Meloxicam, Celecoxib, MK-966, Flusolid and L-745, 337. The COX-2 selectivity of these novel NSAIDs relate well to their favorable gastrointestinal tolerability profile. Clinical trials have shown meloxicam and celecoxib to be as effective as currently available NSAIDs, but with an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile. Further clinical trials and large-scale postmarketing surveillance programs are needed, however, to confirm the potential therapeutic benefits of these novel preferential or specific COX-2 inhibitors.
 ...
PMID:[Preferential COX-2 inhibition: its clinical relevance for gastrointestinal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory rheumatic drug toxicity]. 1009 Dec 84

Celecoxib offers the unique therapeutic prospect of alleviating pain and inflammation without the untoward gastrointestinal, renal, and platelet effects associated with conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This is possible because celecoxib is a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-specific inhibiting agent that inhibits the conversion of arachidonic acid to the prostaglandins that mediate pain and inflammation while having no effect on the formation of the prostaglandins that mediate normal homeostasis in the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, and platelets and that are formed under the control of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1). Double-blind clinical trials have demonstrated that celecoxib is as effective in ameliorating the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis as naproxen and as effective as aspirin in reducing pain following dental extraction. Controlled trials have also shown that the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and the combined incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers and erosions are significantly lower with celecoxib therapy than with naproxen therapy and are similar to those associated with placebo administration. In a study of platelet function, it was found that a single 650-mg dose of aspirin profoundly diminished platelet function, while therapeutic doses of celecoxib exhibited no such effect. Celecoxib has been shown to be well tolerated, with incidences of adverse events similar to placebo in most instances. In summary, evidence to date indicates that celecoxib is a safe and effective therapeutic modality for the management of arthritis and pain.
 ...
PMID:Celecoxib, a COX-2--specific inhibitor: the clinical data. 1019 98


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>