Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0030193 (pain)
 261,466 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The delivery of high-dose epirubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer usually entails serious myelotoxicity and frequent treatment delays. Concurrent administration of G-CSF probably allows the administration of epirubicin on schedule with minimal morbidity. From August 1990 to February 1992, 42 women with advanced breast cancer were treated with six cycles of epirubicin 110 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg per day for 14 days was administered subcutaneously starting 24 hours after chemotherapy. All patients had multiple metastatic sites, and 39 had visceral metastases. All cases were evaluable for response, toxicity, and survival. Treatment was delayed in only two cases. The actually administered average dose per unit time per patient amounted to 99.6% of the dose prescribed by the protocol. Two (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [C.I.] 0-16%) patients demonstrated a complete response and 14 (33%; 95% C.I. 19-49%) a partial response. Median time to progression was 31 weeks and median survival was 60 weeks. Severe granulocytopenia was seen in six patients; stomatitis and diarrhea in one patient each. Myoskeletal pain was noticed in 23 (55%) patients, while cardiac problems were reported in 3 cases. The present study shows that the prophylactic use of r-met-hu G-CSF allows the administration of high-dose epirubicin every 4 weeks with minimal morbidity and an improved quality of life.
 ...
PMID:High-dose epirubicin and r-met-hu G-CSF (filgrastim) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer: A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study. 752 43

Radiotherapy patients are at risk of developing leukopenia, which risk depends on the irradiated volume, the rate of irradiated bone marrow and the radiation dose. Radiogenic leukopenia may cause radiotherapy drop-out, with consequent effects, on local tumor control and clinical outcome. The introduction of granulocyte growth factors, such as filgrastim, has permitted to accelerate normal neutrophil count recovery in irradiation-related neutropenia both in vitro and animal models; clinical experience in humans is still lacking, relative to both indications and scheduling. In the Oncologic Radiotherapy Department of Treviso Hospital, 31 patients irradiated for Hodgkin disease, rectal cancer and other malignancies, who presented leukopenia requiring treatment discontinuation, were given filgrastim to assess its actual effect in avoiding further drop-outs and to compare two administration schedules (2 or 3 vials, 30 MIU, weekly). Filgrastim treatment was continued throughout the radiotherapy cycles, for 1 to 5 weeks. Eighteen patients had received previous chemotherapy and 11 were undergoing concurrent 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy-irradiation. A mean 203% increase in leukocyte count was observed (136% in the patients treated with 2 vials/week and 274% in those receiving 3 vials/week); this increase was more apparent in women that in men (256% versus 91%) and slightly higher in patients 50 years old and with target volumes < 5000 ml. Filgrastin treatment was well tolerated by all patients, with no discontinuations due to adverse effects; 9 patients (29%) reported skeletal pain, which was marked in 2 of them only. Eighty percent of patients completed all the radiotherapy cycles with no discontinuation, while 6 patients dropped out because leukopenia persisted. Biweekly filgrastim administration was effective to prevent unscheduled radiotherapy discontinuation in 75% of patients and triweekly administration was effective in 86% of patients. In our experience, filgrastim administration was well tolerated and effective in decreasing the irradiation drop-outs caused by treatment-related leukopenia. Since this drug is rather expensive, we decided to use routinely the lower dosage of biweekly administration (with one vial given on Friday and Saturday, to permit neutrophil recovery during the day off) and to reserve the higher dosage (3 vials a week) to the patients with large body areas, big target volumes and persistent leukopenia during previous chemotherapy.
 ...
PMID:[Use of filgrastim, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), in radiotherapy to reduce drop-outs because of radiogenic leukopenia]. 963 71

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation leads to an earlier engraftment compared to BMT. The feasibility, acceptance and long-term side-effects of G-CSF mobilisation of PBSC in unrelated healthy donors needs to be evaluated. Forty unrelated healthy donors received G-CSF in a dose of 10 microg/kg bodyweight for 5 days and two aphereses were performed. The donors were monitored prospectively. The data were compared to bone marrow harvests from unrelated donors. Almost all stem cell donors reported some side-effects due to Filgrastim application. Bone pain (32), headache (20), chest pain (two) and night sweats (one) were complained of. By taking analgesics, the pain was relieved in most cases. No donor discontinued the filgrastim application. Bone pain and headache resolved within 2-4 days after termination of Filgrastim application. There was, as expected, a seven-fold increase in the number of total WBCs. There were no significant changes of platelet counts during G-CSF application. After 4 weeks haemoglobin concentration and platelet counts showed no significant differences compared to baseline values. The aphereses were mostly tolerated very well. Eighteen donors reported paraesthesia, one donor developed dizziness, two complained of nausea and vomiting. There was a significant decrease in platelet count (242 before, 98 x 10(9)/l after aphereses). Autologous platelets were transfused after the second aphereses in four donors. These data were compared to data from 245 unrelated bone marrow donors, who had on average, 14 days bone pain and tiredness after donation. The G-CSF mobilisation and apheresis of peripheral blood stem cells is an alternative to traditional bone marrow harvesting in unrelated healthy donors. It is well tolerated and the duration of side-effects on average is shorter than after the surgical procedure. So far no long-term effects have been observed in the follow-up.
 ...
PMID:Acceptance and feasibility of peripheral stem cell mobilisation compared to bone marrow collection from healthy unrelated donors. 971 88

Oral mucositis is a dose-limiting toxicity of intensive chemotherapy. It is caused directly by the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapeutic agents and indirectly by sustained neutropenia. Severe oral mucositis is an important predisposing factor for life-threatening septic complications during aplasia. It also reduces quality of life. At present, no effective causal prophylaxis or treatment against oral mucositis is established. We performed a prospective randomised placebo-controlled trial using topical oral r-metHuG-CSF (filgrastim) in high-grade lymphoma patients treated according to the B-NHL protocol, which contains high-dose methotrexate and causes severe oral mucositis (WHO grades I-IV) in >50% of patients. Between August 1996 and July 1997, a total of 32 chemotherapy cycles were documented in eight patients (four male, four female). Mucosal erythema and ulceration were recorded. All patients assessed their oral pain and impact on swallowing daily, using a subjective scale from no to maximal discomfort (1-10). In addition, oral mucositis was assessed according to the WHO score. Filgrastim was administered in 16 cycles as a viscous mouthrinse (carboxymethylcellulose 2%, oleum citrii) 4 x 120 microg/day from days 10 to 16. Sixteen cycles were given to control patients, of these 14 with placebo, and another two cycles with no treatment. Severe mucositis (WHO grade III/IV) was documented in 21 of 32 cycles (65.5%). A difference of borderline significance was observed for the reduction of maximum severity of oral mucositis between G-CSF vs placebo (P = 0.058), with a reduction of WHO grade IV of 50% (four G-CSF vs eight control). The number of days in hospital was reduced significantly in the G-CSF group (P = 0.02). In conclusion, topical oral G-CSF mouthrinses may be beneficial to reduce oral mucositis.
 ...
PMID:Effect of topical oral G-CSF on oral mucositis: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. 982 76

Neo-adjuvant, dose-dense docetaxel, 100 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks x 4 cycles, was administered to 12 patients with locally advance breast cancer (LABC) (10 stage IIIa and three stage IIIb). Eligibility requirements included a PS 0-2, normal hepatic and renal function, and radiologic absence of metastatic disease. Filgrastim [granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)] was started 1 day after chemotherapy and was given for 6 days. Complete blood counts were determined weekly. Surgery was planned upon recovery from the last dose of docetaxel and followed by 4 cycles of adjuvant doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) and radiotherapy. Patients with ER status received tamoxifen. The median age was 45 (range 34-73) and pre-treatment pathology revealed poorly differentiated infiltrating duct carcinoma in 11 and infiltrating lobular cancer in one, with positive ER/PR status in five. Twelve patients were treated, and all are evaluable for response and toxicity. Nine patients had a major clinical tumor response with five PR and four pathologic complete responses (pCR rate of 33%). Three patients (of whom two with stage IIIb) had progressive disease and went on to receive neo-adjuvant therapy with AC. There was one instance of grade 3 hematologic toxicity (neutropenic fever in one G-CSF non-compliant patient). There were two instances of grade 3 extra-hematologic toxicity: one patient had severe pain and one had treatment-related fatigue. After a median follow-up of 20 months (range 7-49 months) all patients are alive and eight of nine responders remain progression-free. Despite the small size of our study, we believe that dose-dense neo-adjuvant docetaxel is well tolerated and its activity warrants confirmation in a larger number of patients.
 ...
PMID:Neo-adjuvant therapy with dose-dense docetaxel plus short-term filgrastim rescue for locally advanced breast cancer. 1239 62

Both granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone (DXM) are used for neutrophil (PMN) mobilization and collection. This prospective study was aimed to evaluate and compare the rate, severity and clinical significance of adverse reactions of these drugs alone and in combination in healthy donors. PMN mobilization was carried out using dexamethasone alone (8 mg orally; n=25) or glycosylated G-CSF alone (Lenograstim, 5 microg/kg subcutaneously, n=24) or in combination (n=23) prior to a standard granulocyte apheresis on the Spectra cell separator. The number of PMNs counted in the mobilized peripheral blood of the donors was 7.0 (3.6-20.4) x10(9)/L (DXM), 25.2 (15.5-49.7) x10(9)/L (G-CSF), and 31.6 (20.0-43.0) x10(9)/L (G-CSF+DXM), corresponding to PMN apheresis yields of 13 (8-43) x10(9)/U, 56 (34-118) x10(9)/U, and 83 (33-117) x10(9)/U, respectively. The three groups had comparable percentages of donors with at least one adverse effect (ranging from 75 to 80%), but the G-CSF-containing regimens were generally more toxic, as was reflected by higher percentages of donors with moderate to severe adverse reactions and higher overall severity scores of 2.28 (G-CSF) and 2.08 (G-CSF+DXM) compared with 1.33 in the DXM group ( p<or=0.001). With G-CSF alone, pain symptom complexes were more frequent, more severe, and more often triggered requests for analgesics (9/47 donors; 19%) and unwillingness to give further neutrophil donations (2/47 donors; 4%). The addition of DXM to G-CSF diminished some symptoms, particularly bone pain, headache and the frequency of requests for analgesics. The predominant symptoms in the DXM alone group were mild gastrointestinal complaints. We conclude that G-CSF stimulation improved neutrophil mobilization and apheresis yields at the expense of donor tolerability. Compared with G-CSF alone, the combination G-CSF and DXM did not increase the quantity or the severity of donor symptoms.
 ...
PMID:A comparative study of adverse reactions occurring after administration of glycosylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor and/or dexamethasone for mobilization of neutrophils in healthy donors. 1506 Jul 47

To evaluate the equivalence of the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety properties of two recombinant G-CSF formulations in healthy male volunteers, a standard 2-way randomized crossover double-blind study, with a 3 week washout period, was conducted. A single 300 microg G-CSF dose was administered subcutaneously. Hebervital (Heber Biotec, Havana, formulation A) and Neupogen (Hoffmann-La Roche S.A, formulation B) were compared. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers were included. The serum G-CSF level was measured by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) during the first 36 h after administration. Absolute neutrophils (ANC), white blood cells (WBC) and CD34+ cells counts were the pharmacodynamic variables measured up to 120 h. Other clinical and laboratory determinations were used as safety criteria. The pharmacokinetic parameters for formulation A and B were very close to each other (i.e. AUC, 235.9 vs 270.0 ng.h/ml; C(max), 29.2 vs 33.4 ng/ml; T(max), 4.2 vs 4.7 h; half-life, 3.2 vs 2.8 h; CL, 260.9 vs 277.2 ml/h; V(d), 1.2 vs 1.1 l; and MRT, 7.58 vs 7.38 h). The confidence intervals for the means ratio of all these parameters were within or very close to the 0.8-1.25 acceptance range. The pharmacodynamics showed high similarity since ANC and WBC had the same profiles for both products and no differences were detected for the estimated parameters. The CD34+ cells count increments were evident for both formulations in a similar way as well. The treatments were well tolerated. Registered adverse events were similar; back/spine pain was the most frequent. According to the overall results these formulations could be considered as clinically comparable.
 ...
PMID:Bioequivalence of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formulations in healthy male volunteers. 1579 6